Limiting access points to purchasing high performance firearms and magazines is the key - still don’t get it? Making it harder to obtain can only have good results - NOBODY is arguing mass casualty shootings will be completely prevented....just like nobody argues gun control is the end all be all to gang violence. Wise up.
What you don't get is that the proposal makes no sense. Limiting access points has proven to be a virtual non-factor in mass shootings as they either obtain their guns legally or ignore laws anyway. The proposal is guaranteed to negatively affect millions of law-abiding citizens (if it holds in court), and it will not guarantee a statistically significant negative effect on law-breakers. That's the definition of a bad law. The only possible hope under a universal background check law is that an evil person will stop their plan to kill people because they can't legally acquire a weapon before they go on a murder spree. How absurd. Some hope that is. You're better off praying.
Good results for whom? For those that want to pass down firearms to the next generation? Those that want to lend a gun to their hunting buddy? Those that want to exercise their Constitutional right to bear arms? No, there is no good results under the proposal.
You are not caught up to this conversation and have no clue about the ideas I've presented above. Please re-read this entire thread before jumping in with little to no information because I'm tired of explaining it over and over again.
Do you have a problem when I butt in to point out illogical, Constitutionally-challengeable ideas?
To borrow your words earlier, I don't care.