Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
UnMAXed wrote:Requiring ID in order to vote is regressive and inconceivable but requiring it in order to eat pancakes is progressive and reasonable!
UnMAXed wrote:Requiring ID in order to vote is regressive and inconceivable but requiring it in order to eat pancakes is progressive and reasonable!
Okie wrote:I am some how seeing a pattern here.
UnMAXed wrote:Requiring ID in order to vote is regressive and inconceivable but requiring it in order to eat pancakes is progressive and reasonable!
UnMAXed wrote:Requiring ID in order to vote is regressive and inconceivable but requiring it in order to eat pancakes is progressive and reasonable!
einsteinboricua wrote:Giving the "gubmint" information it already has?
Okie wrote:einsteinboricua wrote:Giving the "gubmint" information it already has?
WAKE UP Einstein. Damn! There is already offers on the internet for pictures of the logs with your name address email ID which has your birthdate and phone number and they have not even opened up yet.
Okie
tommy1808 wrote:UnMAXed wrote:Requiring ID in order to vote is regressive and inconceivable but requiring it in order to eat pancakes is progressive and reasonable!
There is no alternative to voting if you don't have an ID, but you can have take out pancakes or whip up your own as you please without one. It's a fairly obvious difference between the two.
Okie wrote:einsteinboricua wrote:Giving the "gubmint" information it already has?
WAKE UP Einstein. Damn! There is already offers on the internet for pictures of the logs with your name address email ID which has your birthdate and phone number and they have not even opened up yet.
Okie
Okie wrote:WAKE UP Einstein. Damn! There is already offers on the internet for pictures of the logs with your name address email ID which has your birthdate and phone number and they have not even opened up yet.
einsteinboricua wrote:Do you really think that the local diner and the big chain restaurant are going to collect an entire questionnaire about my life? Are you really under the impression that they'll just collect info on you and leave it unattended?
dtw2hyd wrote:Apparently only Indian Tribes are the only group mastered this.
Aaron747 wrote:UnMAXed wrote:Requiring ID in order to vote is regressive and inconceivable but requiring it in order to eat pancakes is progressive and reasonable!
Partisan shilling absent of scientific public health context masquerading as red herring.
FTMCPIUS wrote:Aaron747 wrote:UnMAXed wrote:Requiring ID in order to vote is regressive and inconceivable but requiring it in order to eat pancakes is progressive and reasonable!
Partisan shilling absent of scientific public health context masquerading as red herring.
You have not demanded that UnMAXed provide a link.
Okie wrote:https://www.cbsnews.com/news/restaurants-reopening-washington-customer-records/
The governor wants your ID, phone number, email and wants to know where you came from and where you are going in order to get food.
I am some how seeing a pattern here.
Okie
UnMAXed wrote:Requiring ID in order to vote is regressive and inconceivable but requiring it in order to eat pancakes is progressive and reasonable!
Okie wrote:einsteinboricua wrote:Do you really think that the local diner and the big chain restaurant are going to collect an entire questionnaire about my life? Are you really under the impression that they'll just collect info on you and leave it unattended?
I can't make you read nor comprehend the article that quotes Inslee.
What kind of tracking is going to be required to travel through the airports? Will the state require a marketable log or will they just rely on the airlines turning over that information?
Okie
ER757 wrote:And if someone is not comfortable with providing that ID info, then they should refrain from dining in for that reason even if they are not hesitant because of health concerns - pretty simple really
Okie wrote:The governor wants your ID, phone number, email and wants to know where you came from and where you are going in order to get food.I am some how seeing a pattern here.
bhill wrote:Very simple, you do not want to participate..VOLUNTARILY....don't.
bhill wrote:Stay home and do not engage in possibly infecting everyone else out there trying to help quell this pandemic.
bhill wrote:Enough of the half truths and "Plandemic" bullshit....Your Constitutional Rights are still secure.
afcjets wrote:tommy1808 wrote:UnMAXed wrote:Requiring ID in order to vote is regressive and inconceivable but requiring it in order to eat pancakes is progressive and reasonable!
There is no alternative to voting if you don't have an ID, but you can have take out pancakes or whip up your own as you please without one. It's a fairly obvious difference between the two.
Getting an ID is always an option.
Okie wrote:einsteinboricua wrote:Giving the "gubmint" information it already has?
WAKE UP Einstein. Damn! There is already offers on the internet for pictures of the logs with your name address email ID which has your birthdate and phone number and they have not even opened up yet.
Okie
airhansa wrote:What I find slightly ridiculous is that nearly all of the East Asian countries have been successful at limiting the coronavirus, but they took far less drastic actions including weaker lockdowns
NIKV69 wrote:Other states joining in. I will not patronize an establishment that asks for my information. Going to hurt business.
UnMAXed wrote:Requiring ID in order to vote is regressive and inconceivable but requiring it in order to eat pancakes is progressive and reasonable!
NIKV69 wrote:Other states joining in. I will not patronize an establishment that asks for my information. Going to hurt business.
NIKV69 wrote:Other states joining in. I will not patronize an establishment that asks for my information. Going to hurt business.
tommy1808 wrote:airhansa wrote:What I find slightly ridiculous is that nearly all of the East Asian countries have been successful at limiting the coronavirus, but they took far less drastic actions including weaker lockdowns
Isn't that what you'd expect? They just had a SARS scare a couple of years back and remember that stuff works. No "I want a hair cut right now, and having to wear a mask violates my human rights, the virus is a hoax anyways!!!!" in Asia. Plus the idea of just sacrificing the old ones isn't really something most asian cultures would seriously consider, while you find plenty of people doing just that in western countries. As evident from the forum as well.
Best regards
Thomas
airhansa wrote:Yes, but the way that so many westerners look down on Asian healthcare philosophy is condemning them to death. It's ridiculous that westerners believe in "evidence based medicine" but prefer to ignore the eastern response to the coronavirus just because they're not following western educational institutions.
dtw2hyd wrote:airhansa wrote:Yes, but the way that so many westerners look down on Asian healthcare philosophy is condemning them to death. It's ridiculous that westerners believe in "evidence based medicine" but prefer to ignore the eastern response to the coronavirus just because they're not following western educational institutions.
That is because XI numbers are fake.
US did 10M tests, 1.4M confirmed cases, 1M active cases, 87K deaths.
How can one conclude 87K confirmed, 78K recovered and 91 active cases is better when the number of tests is ZERO for 1.43 Billion people.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavir ... #countries
tommy1808 wrote:Because we do know zero isn't the right number? They must have at least tested 87k people after all, right?
And they just said days ago the will test 11 million people in Wuhan within 10 days... so they seem to be confident they can process over a million tests per day.
And if you compare their "fake" data with real world data from anywhere else.... gosh damn, the somehow managed to make data that is a) fake, but somehow still b) describes the dynamics of an outbreak perfectly. What an awesome fakery, so real you can't tell it's fake.
Best regards
Thomas
dtw2hyd wrote:XI's ZERO is not better than USA's 14 Million.
ER757 wrote:NIKV69 wrote:Other states joining in. I will not patronize an establishment that asks for my information. Going to hurt business.
And that's what anyone else should also do if they are uncomfortable with this order. See, no problem.
seb146 wrote:Then, those same people (like NikV) will complain there are no small businesses....
seb146 wrote:ER757 wrote:NIKV69 wrote:Other states joining in. I will not patronize an establishment that asks for my information. Going to hurt business.
And that's what anyone else should also do if they are uncomfortable with this order. See, no problem.
We are all supposed to support small businesses but when small businesses do not want to be sued for possibly exposing people to covid-19 and getting their contact information, people will not patronize those small businesses. Then, those same people (like NikV) will complain there are no small businesses....
tommy1808 wrote:Just ask SK
FGITD wrote:Meanwhile the Senate passes a bill allowing the FBI and CIA to access your browsing history without a warrant, and not a peep...
Tugger wrote:FGITD wrote:Meanwhile the Senate passes a bill allowing the FBI and CIA to access your browsing history without a warrant, and not a peep...
That would be this by the way:
https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/5/13/21 ... -mcconnell
Tugg
alfa164 wrote:The governor wants your ID, phone number, email and wants to know where you came from and where you are going in order to get food.I am some how seeing a pattern here.Of course you do; you see a conspiracy theory in everything. Bless your little heart...
FGITD wrote:Meanwhile the Senate passes a bill allowing the FBI and CIA to access your browsing history without a warrant, and not a peep...
Okie wrote:The real question is: "do you really think Trump is going to sign a bill into law that does not address FISA abuse"?