Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
TSS wrote:Ummm... okay? The linked article talks about "unique figures" in the bridge's construction but shows neither photos nor even drawings of same so I guess we'll just have to take their word for it until completion. The towers being painted red is a departure from the white or grey of most suspension bridges, but not terribly different from the iron oxide red color of the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco which at this point the new bridge somewhat resembles. The mid span of more than a mile IS impressive, and it'll be interesting to see how long it takes them to install that many suspended roadway sections. I hope National Geographic (or similar) is already filming construction for a documentary later.
TSS wrote:Hmmm... tough question. On the one hand it is extremely long, possibly the longest center span in the world, so that is definitely noteworthy. On the other hand it appears to be utterly conventional in both appearance and construction except for it's remarkable length. I'll say that IF, and only IF, it holds together and there are no unforeseen "Galloping Gertie" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacoma_Narrows_Bridge_(1940)) problems once it is completed, then yeah, a bridge that long is a "Wonder of the World".
ArchGuy1 wrote:What made the Golden Gate Bridge, Brooklyn Bridge, Sydney Harbor Bridge, and Tower Bridge recognizable landmarks and popular tourist attractions?
petertenthije wrote:ArchGuy1 wrote:What made the Golden Gate Bridge, Brooklyn Bridge, Sydney Harbor Bridge, and Tower Bridge recognizable landmarks and popular tourist attractions?
All those bridges are in areas that a lot of tourists visit.
You can build the same bridges in for instance rural China, and no one would put the bridge on their must-see bucket list.
ArchGuy1 wrote:Local landmark maybe...petertenthije wrote:ArchGuy1 wrote:What made the Golden Gate Bridge, Brooklyn Bridge, Sydney Harbor Bridge, and Tower Bridge recognizable landmarks and popular tourist attractions?
All those bridges are in areas that a lot of tourists visit.
You can build the same bridges in for instance rural China, and no one would put the bridge on their must-see bucket list.
The Canakkale region is a big tourist location as well due being the site of he 1915 Gallipoli campaign during World War 1. So, I see the 1915 Canakkale Bridge becoming an iconic landmark.
ArchGuy1 wrote:...iconic...
ArchGuy1 wrote:...iconic...
ArchGuy1 wrote:...iconic...
ArchGuy1 wrote:petertenthije wrote:ArchGuy1 wrote:What made the Golden Gate Bridge, Brooklyn Bridge, Sydney Harbor Bridge, and Tower Bridge recognizable landmarks and popular tourist attractions?
All those bridges are in areas that a lot of tourists visit.
You can build the same bridges in for instance rural China, and no one would put the bridge on their must-see bucket list.
The Canakkale region is a big tourist location as well due being the site of he 1915 Gallipoli campaign during World War 1. So, I see the 1915 Canakkale Bridge becoming an iconic landmark.
ArchGuy1 wrote:TSS wrote:Hmmm... tough question. On the one hand it is extremely long, possibly the longest center span in the world, so that is definitely noteworthy. On the other hand it appears to be utterly conventional in both appearance and construction except for it's remarkable length. I'll say that IF, and only IF, it holds together and there are no unforeseen "Galloping Gertie" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacoma_Narrows_Bridge_(1940)) problems once it is completed, then yeah, a bridge that long is a "Wonder of the World".
What made the Golden Gate Bridge, Brooklyn Bridge, Sydney Harbor Bridge, and Tower Bridge recognizable landmarks and popular tourist attractions?