Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
phatfarmlines wrote:Very brave of her to do that especially in a state like Texas, but note from the article:
The speech has prompted the Richardson Independent School District to reevaluate its set of protocols for student speeches.
So I imagine any politically-charged speech will likely have to be reviewed going forward. That's the world we're living in.
phatfarmlines wrote:Very brave of her to do that especially in a state like Texas, but note from the article:
The speech has prompted the Richardson Independent School District to reevaluate its set of protocols for student speeches.
So I imagine any politically-charged speech will likely have to be reviewed going forward. That's the world we're living in.
phatfarmlines wrote:Very brave of her to do that especially in a state like Texas, but note from the article:
The speech has prompted the Richardson Independent School District to reevaluate its set of protocols for student speeches.
So I imagine any politically-charged speech will likely have to be reviewed going forward. That's the world we're living in.
casinterest wrote:...with the way 2 judges were put on the court by dishonorable circumstances, it would seem we are set up for some rather dishonorable women's rights rulings going forward.
extender wrote:casinterest wrote:...with the way 2 judges were put on the court by dishonorable circumstances, it would seem we are set up for some rather dishonorable women's rights rulings going forward.
What two dishonorable ways are you referring to? Tone down the vitriol, as there is no basis in fact.
extender wrote:casinterest wrote:...with the way 2 judges were put on the court by dishonorable circumstances, it would seem we are set up for some rather dishonorable women's rights rulings going forward.
What two dishonorable ways are you referring to? Tone down the vitriol, as there is no basis in fact.
casinterest wrote:It is based in the fact that the GOP behaved dishonorably in 2016 and in 2020.
extender wrote:casinterest wrote:It is based in the fact that the GOP behaved dishonorably in 2016 and in 2020.
What dishonorable ways are you referring to?
Aesma wrote:I didn't think you could both be a religious nut and a valedictorian. With all the science and stuff.
lightsaber wrote:Aesma wrote:I didn't think you could both be a religious nut and a valedictorian. With all the science and stuff.
I know several religious people who were valedictorian. Several of the top scientists I know are extreamly religious. This isn't the inquisition era.
CitizenJustin wrote:lightsaber wrote:Aesma wrote:I didn't think you could both be a religious nut and a valedictorian. With all the science and stuff.
I know several religious people who were valedictorian. Several of the top scientists I know are extreamly religious. This isn't the inquisition era.
Religion interferes with objectivity. How can one be a serious scientist while also denying evolution and subscribing to the multiple scientific inaccuracies in the Bible? You’d think if the Bible was inspired by the words of Jesus, the son of the entity that created all, that they’d at least be able to get the science right. However, they don’t. It’s just as primitive and incorrect as all the other nonsense of that time.
phatfarmlines wrote:Talk about hypocrisy.....
State Senator Doug Broxton gave a speech at an in-person high school graduation in Pensacola, Florida.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhPKp4Ij0CQ
Time marker 17:00-17:37 - High school principal introduces State Senator Doug Broxton
Time marker 17:38-22:00 - State Senator Doug Broxton speaks
"How stupid can government be, making you do the things that you had to do. Cancel classes, distance learning, loss of sports, social distancing, contact tracing, quarantining, and worst of all, wearing a mask."
An interesting retort by YouTuber Barron Cousins (Host of Ring of Fire podcast), whose child participated in that same graduation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RB-W08ByeAI
extender wrote:casinterest wrote:...with the way 2 judges were put on the court by dishonorable circumstances, it would seem we are set up for some rather dishonorable women's rights rulings going forward.
What two dishonorable ways are you referring to? Tone down the vitriol, as there is no basis in fact.
phatfarmlines wrote:Very brave of her to do that especially in a state like Texas, but note from the article:
The speech has prompted the Richardson Independent School District to reevaluate its set of protocols for student speeches.
So I imagine any politically-charged speech will likely have to be reviewed going forward. That's the world we're living in.