Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
stratosphere wrote:Well you know it was supposed to be the most secure election in history NOT.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/brad-raffens ... 00198.html
stratosphere wrote:Well you know it was supposed to be the most secure election in history NOT.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/brad-raffens ... 00198.html
stratosphere wrote:Well you know it was supposed to be the most secure election in history NOT.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/brad-raffens ... 00198.html
LMP737 wrote:stratosphere wrote:Well you know it was supposed to be the most secure election in history NOT.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/brad-raffens ... 00198.html
You should really start reading the articles you post links to.
stratosphere wrote:Well you know it was supposed to be the most secure election in history NOT.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/brad-raffens ... 00198.html
scbriml wrote:stratosphere wrote:Well you know it was supposed to be the most secure election in history NOT.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/brad-raffens ... 00198.html
The article says what you think it says. NOT.
How desperate are you?
casinterest wrote:stratosphere wrote:Well you know it was supposed to be the most secure election in history NOT.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/brad-raffens ... 00198.html
What does security have to do with an honest mistake. Where is your proof of fraud?
Just a hit and run outrage post that the mods have to delete?