Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
M564038 wrote:Nuclear accident?
Is that the new word for Tsunami?
A car that got swept away by waves, was it in a car accident?
It is very interesting to see people's choice of words when it comes to nuclear. Agenda, agenda, alwyas propaganda and agenda
M564038 wrote:Nuclear accident?
Is that the new word for Tsunami?
A car that got swept away by waves, was it in a car accident?
It is very interesting to see people's choice of words when it comes to nuclear. Agenda, agenda, alwyas propaganda and agenda
Okie wrote:M564038 wrote:Nuclear accident?
Is that the new word for Tsunami?
A car that got swept away by waves, was it in a car accident?
It is very interesting to see people's choice of words when it comes to nuclear. Agenda, agenda, alwyas propaganda and agenda
Boiling Water Reactors are an excellent producer of Hydrogen. Hydrogen is the next best evolution in the Green New Deal. Electricity during the day Hydrogen at night.
Malfunctioning Hydrogen Generator
Okie
pune wrote:M564038 wrote:Nuclear accident?
Is that the new word for Tsunami?
A car that got swept away by waves, was it in a car accident?
It is very interesting to see people's choice of words when it comes to nuclear. Agenda, agenda, alwyas propaganda and agenda
This is from wikipedia, take it or leave it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima ... r_disaster
M564038 wrote:Nuclear accident?
Is that the new word for Tsunami?
A car that got swept away by waves, was it in a car accident?
It is very interesting to see people's choice of words when it comes to nuclear. Agenda, agenda, alwyas propaganda and agenda
c933103 wrote:M564038 wrote:Nuclear accident?
Is that the new word for Tsunami?
A car that got swept away by waves, was it in a car accident?
It is very interesting to see people's choice of words when it comes to nuclear. Agenda, agenda, alwyas propaganda and agenda
A train getting stuck by earthquake or a ship getting hit by a storm would both be a train accident and a maritime accident respectively. So would be a plane hit by storm.
Car stuck in these situations aren't called car accident simply because cars are individualistic. If it is a passenger-carrying taxi being swiped into sea by high wind then certainly it will also be called a taxi accident, despite the same vehicle driven by regular person would not be called a car accident.
I think the abnormal part here is how cars are being described instead of how nuclear are being described.
pune wrote:c933103 wrote:M564038 wrote:Nuclear accident?
Is that the new word for Tsunami?
A car that got swept away by waves, was it in a car accident?
It is very interesting to see people's choice of words when it comes to nuclear. Agenda, agenda, alwyas propaganda and agenda
A train getting stuck by earthquake or a ship getting hit by a storm would both be a train accident and a maritime accident respectively. So would be a plane hit by storm.
Car stuck in these situations aren't called car accident simply because cars are individualistic. If it is a passenger-carrying taxi being swiped into sea by high wind then certainly it will also be called a taxi accident, despite the same vehicle driven by regular person would not be called a car accident.
I think the abnormal part here is how cars are being described instead of how nuclear are being described.
Exactly. We know now that Daichi wasn't as careful and had many lapses that went unreported to IAEA, even by the American inspectors. Why did they do that, we would never know. And sadly nobody even took any action against the American inspectors. And we also know even if it was triggered by nature, the ones who called the shots remotely bungled as they had never practiced and most were political figures rather than people who were actually fighting. The Fukushima 50 documents how things actually happened and we know that even those brave heroes are looked down upon in Japanese society. They couldn't find work or even had compensation. Couple of people died from radiation, and some others got cancer later probably due to the high exposure. And of course, now they are going to release thousands of gallons of water in the open sea saying it is treated water because they can't store it. And they have no solutions to date, they are looking for some miracle technologies for the clean-up to happen.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9318772/
c933103 wrote:pune wrote:c933103 wrote:A train getting stuck by earthquake or a ship getting hit by a storm would both be a train accident and a maritime accident respectively. So would be a plane hit by storm.
Car stuck in these situations aren't called car accident simply because cars are individualistic. If it is a passenger-carrying taxi being swiped into sea by high wind then certainly it will also be called a taxi accident, despite the same vehicle driven by regular person would not be called a car accident.
I think the abnormal part here is how cars are being described instead of how nuclear are being described.
Exactly. We know now that Daichi wasn't as careful and had many lapses that went unreported to IAEA, even by the American inspectors. Why did they do that, we would never know. And sadly nobody even took any action against the American inspectors. And we also know even if it was triggered by nature, the ones who called the shots remotely bungled as they had never practiced and most were political figures rather than people who were actually fighting. The Fukushima 50 documents how things actually happened and we know that even those brave heroes are looked down upon in Japanese society. They couldn't find work or even had compensation. Couple of people died from radiation, and some others got cancer later probably due to the high exposure. And of course, now they are going to release thousands of gallons of water in the open sea saying it is treated water because they can't store it. And they have no solutions to date, they are looking for some miracle technologies for the clean-up to happen.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9318772/
Eh that's a fictional movie arranged based on real life event, not a documentary
pune wrote:c933103 wrote:pune wrote:
Exactly. We know now that Daichi wasn't as careful and had many lapses that went unreported to IAEA, even by the American inspectors. Why did they do that, we would never know. And sadly nobody even took any action against the American inspectors. And we also know even if it was triggered by nature, the ones who called the shots remotely bungled as they had never practiced and most were political figures rather than people who were actually fighting. The Fukushima 50 documents how things actually happened and we know that even those brave heroes are looked down upon in Japanese society. They couldn't find work or even had compensation. Couple of people died from radiation, and some others got cancer later probably due to the high exposure. And of course, now they are going to release thousands of gallons of water in the open sea saying it is treated water because they can't store it. And they have no solutions to date, they are looking for some miracle technologies for the clean-up to happen.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9318772/
Eh that's a fictional movie arranged based on real life event, not a documentary
That 'movie' shared a lot of references, similar to Viceroy's house but that is only for those who wanted to look for it (look at the end credits) those who have convinced themselves that nuclear is so safe and nothing can ever go wrong, even though it has been documented that I shared in other threads that American inspectors even though they had een that Daichi nuclear plant wasn't following all the instructions, failed to report. When greed is the motivating factor, that is all you will get.