Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR

 
art
Posts: 5719
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:46 am

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Thu Mar 09, 2023 9:28 am

Russian troops will have “open road” to capture key cities in eastern Ukraine if they seize control of Bakhmut, President Volodymyr Zelensky warned in an interview with CNN, as he defended his decision to keep Ukrainian forces in the besieged city.

“This is tactical for us,” Zelensky said, insisting that Kyiv’s military brass is united in prolonging its defense of the city after weeks of Russian attacks left it on the cusp of falling to Moscow’s troops.


https://edition.cnn.com/2023/03/07/euro ... index.html

I thought that the declared purpose of defending the pile of rubble that was previously Bakhmut was to inflict high Russian troop losses in Bakhmut, not to defend it due to its importance.

Ukraine's military says Russia fired 81 missiles at its cities overnight, in what was the biggest strike in weeks.

In a post on Telegram, it adds that 34 cruise missiles were successfully shot down, as well as the four of the eight Iranian-made Shahed drones that were sent.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-64899277

Why was such a small proportion of the missiles shot down in this attack? In recent attacks it was much higher.
 
Oykie
Posts: 2181
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 9:21 am

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Thu Mar 09, 2023 11:13 am

According to Bloomberg Russia used a new tactic using different kinds of weapons, missiles and drones.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... ium-europe
 
GDB
Posts: 17061
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Thu Mar 09, 2023 4:38 pm

When you don't need a huge barrage to hit your target;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xniod2kwET0

Summary, these recent drone and missile strikes appear to have used a few of the system carried by the Mig-31, these will be very hard to shoot down though they won't have many of them, their limited use in over a year indicates this.
And of course, Putin's real nuclear threat.
If that nuclear plant, due to Russia's actions, does create a radioactive leak, it will respect no borders, including Russia's, if any of it affects NATO territory, which seems inevitable, that's Article 5, as unlike Chernobyl, this is deliberate military action.

Worth noting that these infrastructure and civilian targets in general attacks, have followed Russian military failure.
So that's your answer about Bakhmut, after 10 months, even if they 'win' there, they've lost due to to sheer number of losses of troops and assets, as well as sparking unrest internally with the whole Wagner/Russian MoD stand off;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xniod2kwET0

Not many of the Iranian drones it seems, a useful, low cost counter to them as well as other suitable targets;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCX-xHR ... jOvmMuy88N

https://en.defence-ua.com/news/czech_ex ... -4856.html
 
hh65man
Posts: 501
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 7:52 am

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Thu Mar 09, 2023 5:38 pm

Historian Anne Applebaums view, and talks about how she thinks the war will end. I think she’s right about the west dropping the ball concerning Putins ambitions.

https://youtu.be/Xs3Kk4oF5H8
 
wingman
Posts: 4415
Joined: Thu May 27, 1999 4:25 am

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Thu Mar 09, 2023 6:33 pm

marcelh wrote:
wingman wrote:
Whoever it was I'm glad they did it. If the person keeping the neighborhood afloat gets addicted to crack and the neighborhood starts going to hell, the best first step is cutting them off. Addiction clouds your judgement and dealers are scum. Just like Putin they work to bring everyone down to their scummy little world of hopelessness and depravity. If they were Ukranians give all six medals of freedom.


Time will tell. The “addicted” isn’t clean but has now other suppliers which have leverage for their own purposes.


The key for Germany and Europe in general is to set up a receiving and distribution network that caters to the global gas supply chain vs. a single supplier. Especially when tha single supplier is insane like Russia is. The purpose they were leveraging (in your words) was two-fold: make money and have Germany by the proverbial nut sack so that they could invade European countries and coerce them into total submission. Most people saw that naked strategy for what it was but it took this war for the lights to finally go off in Berlin.

I don't see how tethering yourself to a global energy supply chain leads to any leverage other than the honest exchange of money according to established rules of commerce. Commerce, economic security and prosperity, general social and political values..we still share these objectives after 80 years. Russia didn't share any of them, land grabbing in order to enrich a small handful was their goal all along. You seemingly equate that to the US if I'm interpreting your comment correctly.
 
iamlucky13
Posts: 1761
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:35 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Thu Mar 09, 2023 7:04 pm

art wrote:
Ukraine's military says Russia fired 81 missiles at its cities overnight, in what was the biggest strike in weeks.

In a post on Telegram, it adds that 34 cruise missiles were successfully shot down, as well as the four of the eight Iranian-made Shahed drones that were sent.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-64899277

Why was such a small proportion of the missiles shot down in this attack? In recent attacks it was much higher.


I've been uncertain in general of the accuracy of Ukraine's reported interception rates. Accuracy of the counting may vary over time. Accuracy of reporting also varies. Here is a more detailed summary of the ministry of defense report that indicates the 34 missiles shot down were of the 48 cruise missiles. That's 71%, which I believe is is on par with recent effectiveness against Russian cruise missiles.

https://twitter.com/NOELreports/status/ ... e1lawtAAAA

Most of the rest are difficult to intercept for various reasons, including high speeds. Of these, two are perhaps worth a bit of extra discussion:

The KH-31P's are anti-radar missiles. Ukraine claims these did not reach their targets. That may be true, or they may mean they did not hit a civilian target. If they successfully hit an air defense target, that would have helped other missiles gets through.

6 were the new KH-47, which is an air launched version of the Iskander tactical ballistic missile. It is Russia's newest and perhaps most capable tactical missile, but extremely limited in numbers. Ukraine has stated they have no effective defense against ballistic missiles, which are part of why the Patriot battery we promised Ukraine but have not yet delivered is important for them. With that said, even Patriot still has not had a chance for a real-world test against them, so how effective it can be is uncertain.

I would also consider two more points that should be expected to result in variation in air defense effectiveness:

1) Russia may be adjusting their tactics to reduce interception rates, such as spending more time before each strike locating Ukranian air defenses and plotting safer trajectories, and improving the coordination so more targets are passing through a given area at once, saturating air defenses. The high tempo of launches in past waves likely made this level of detail very difficult for both their mission planners, and for the crews conducting the attacks.

2) It is not possible to maintain maximum readiness all the time. Equipment needs maintenance, crews get exhausted, defenses need to be relocated to avoid being easy to identify and counter, including by attempting to destroy them. When Russia was conducting strikes every night, the air defenses presumably had a routine that worked around these constraints, at least for a time. With a pause of several weeks, they might not have been able to stay as effectively on their toes.
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 28730
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Thu Mar 09, 2023 8:07 pm

art wrote:
Russian troops will have “open road” to capture key cities in eastern Ukraine if they seize control of Bakhmut, President Volodymyr Zelensky warned in an interview with CNN, as he defended his decision to keep Ukrainian forces in the besieged city.

“This is tactical for us,” Zelensky said, insisting that Kyiv’s military brass is united in prolonging its defense of the city after weeks of Russian attacks left it on the cusp of falling to Moscow’s troops.

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/03/07/euro ... index.html

I thought that the declared purpose of defending the pile of rubble that was previously Bakhmut was to inflict high Russian troop losses in Bakhmut, not to defend it due to its importance.

I think Zelenskyy feels defending Bakhmut is a visible goal that keeps the West focused on Ukraine's needs. It'll be harder to keep this focus if/when the military situation requires a withdrawal to the next line of defense further down the road and at the same time it'd give the enemy time to reorganize its forces. Better to keep the enemy engaged as long as losses don't become excessive. Keep in mind Ukraine defended the steel plant long after most other people were saying they should withdraw.
 
marcelh
Posts: 2400
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:43 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Thu Mar 09, 2023 8:37 pm

wingman wrote:
marcelh wrote:
wingman wrote:
Whoever it was I'm glad they did it. If the person keeping the neighborhood afloat gets addicted to crack and the neighborhood starts going to hell, the best first step is cutting them off. Addiction clouds your judgement and dealers are scum. Just like Putin they work to bring everyone down to their scummy little world of hopelessness and depravity. If they were Ukranians give all six medals of freedom.


Time will tell. The “addicted” isn’t clean but has now other suppliers which have leverage for their own purposes.


The key for Germany and Europe in general is to set up a receiving and distribution network that caters to the global gas supply chain vs. a single supplier. Especially when tha single supplier is insane like Russia is. The purpose they were leveraging (in your words) was two-fold: make money and have Germany by the proverbial nut sack so that they could invade European countries and coerce them into total submission. Most people saw that naked strategy for what it was but it took this war for the lights to finally go off in Berlin.

I don't see how tethering yourself to a global energy supply chain leads to any leverage other than the honest exchange of money according to established rules of commerce. Commerce, economic security and prosperity, general social and political values..we still share these objectives after 80 years. Russia didn't share any of them, land grabbing in order to enrich a small handful was their goal all along. You seemingly equate that to the US if I'm interpreting your comment correctly.


Although I agree about Russia, I’m less convinced about the “general social and political values”’you are talking about. As Europe, we have shifted our dependance of natural gas to the same region which threatened those values in the 1973 oil crisis. Also to the USA, which has a lot of internal issues which can be a threat to those values as well. Sometimes we (USA and Europe) have mutual interests, but that isn’t always the case (and might be less in the future, also depending on which direction the USA wantsen going internally and on the geo-political playing field. To be clear - I’m not equating Russia by any means with the USA (although some members over here do think so because I have expressed my doubts about US foreign policy) but if tensions between USA and Europe rise for one reason or another, our dependence to LNG from the USA may be very discomforting for us.
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 28730
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Thu Mar 09, 2023 10:05 pm

marcelh wrote:
Although I agree about Russia, I’m less convinced about the “general social and political values”’you are talking about. As Europe, we have shifted our dependance of natural gas to the same region which threatened those values in the 1973 oil crisis. Also to the USA, which has a lot of internal issues which can be a threat to those values as well. Sometimes we (USA and Europe) have mutual interests, but that isn’t always the case (and might be less in the future, also depending on which direction the USA wantsen going internally and on the geo-political playing field. To be clear - I’m not equating Russia by any means with the USA (although some members over here do think so because I have expressed my doubts about US foreign policy) but if tensions between USA and Europe rise for one reason or another, our dependence to LNG from the USA may be very discomforting for us.

I've always wondered why all consumer nations don't work towards energy independence more. I remember talk of a "national energy policy" after the oil shocks of the 1970s (yes, I'm old enough to remember those, lol). Such talk went nowhere. I think it's a safe assumption that they went nowhere because Big Oil had/has a large part of its net worth tied up in "mineral rights" all around the world, and put its prerogatives ahead of national security. I imagine it's the same in other parts of the world too. I remember driving around DE circa 2005 and seeing lots of solar farms and was impressed, but later I was told the policies that had favored creating such farms had changed.
 
User avatar
par13del
Posts: 11974
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:14 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Thu Mar 09, 2023 10:14 pm

I would not overlook the political influence that the oil company parent companies use to influence activities of the host nations, a lot of what the oil companies do is tied up and in some areas influenced by their host nations political institutions. All the lobbying by big oil and other big business are not just affecting domestic policies.
 
petertenthije
Posts: 4803
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2001 10:00 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Thu Mar 09, 2023 10:28 pm

Latvia has found a new way to support Ukraine.

Cars confiscated from drunk drivers in Latvia are being sent to Ukraine to support the war effort. The first batch of eight vehicles is already en-route to Ukraine. Latvia expect to send over 2 dozen cars per week!

Drivers with more then three times the legal limit can get their car confiscated.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64903201
 
User avatar
scbriml
Posts: 22185
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 10:37 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Thu Mar 09, 2023 11:43 pm

petertenthije wrote:
Latvia has found a new way to support Ukraine.

Cars confiscated from drunk drivers in Latvia are being sent to Ukraine to support the war effort. The first batch of eight vehicles is already en-route to Ukraine. Latvia expect to send over 2 dozen cars per week!

Drivers with more then three times the legal limit can get their car confiscated.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64903201


Dude, where's my car?

Slava Ukraine!
 
iamlucky13
Posts: 1761
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:35 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Thu Mar 09, 2023 11:46 pm

The following article is initially about how Switzerland's neutrality policy extending to arms exports and even re-exports, is affecting their arms industry, but it also summarizes many of the instances it has affected support for Ukraine.

https://breakingdefense.com/2023/03/the ... -conflict/

Personally, I though the most interesting part was implications for NATO:

in a recent meeting with Swiss economics minister Guy Parmelin, a dozen CEOs of defense companies had given recent examples of situations in which they had expected to have been asked for requests for proposals from abroad and didn’t get them.

“Some even got letters asking if their company could guarantee that they could share and deliver weapons in case NATO allies had to invoke Article 5 of its founding treaty … but no Swiss company can give this guarantee because Swiss law not only prohibits giving to other countries but also prohibits delivering to countries involved in an internal or external armed conflict,”


Basically, Switzerland seems to have set precedent for expecting that if you buy a Swiss made weapon system, and end up having to use it, you won't be able to get replacements.
 
GDB
Posts: 17061
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 12:21 am

An offbeat look at a Soviet weapon system, still in use in Ukraine, from an excellent channel dealing with Soviet aviation history, by a Ukrainian, highly recommend the channel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQzAjCZr0BM

A Russian counter battery radar gets boomed;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkMVKL4IArE

On the recent air attacks;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2noA68TfPEo
 
art
Posts: 5719
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:46 am

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 10:19 am

iamlucky13 wrote:
Basically, Switzerland seems to have set precedent for expecting that if you buy a Swiss made weapon system, and end up having to use it, you won't be able to get replacements.


It seems to me pointless buying defence equipment from a supplier when if you use it as intended it becomes subject to embargo by the supplier.
 
art
Posts: 5719
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:46 am

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 1:04 pm

Russian mercenary Wagner group’s chief Yevgeny Prigozhin has accused Vladimir Putin of cutting him off over his call for resupplying arms and ammunition in the grinding battle in eastern Ukraine.

“To get me to stop asking for ammunition, all the hotlines to offices, to departments etc have been cut off from me.


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 97882.html

Sounds like the Prigozhin-Putin relationship is heading south. Running a mercenary army, Prigozhin must have a deal in which Wagner is paid for its services. What about if there start to be 'bureaucratic delays' in payments being made on top of the ammunition supply issues? Would Wagner redeploy its services elsewhere (Africa, for example) or would that result in Putin decapitating the organisation? I could see evidence of fraud or tax evasion - real or not - being used to bring Prigozhin down if he becomes too annoying to Putin.
 
GDB
Posts: 17061
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 2:08 pm

More training on Leopard 2's, highlighting some of it's features;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vHDWrq6nUk

Loitering munition on the a ATGM;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtJHwrJiJSo

This BMP crew, or some of them, were lucky to get out;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ks9ReTr6mR4

At the opposite end of the scale from the first video, the face of war in the trenches, this is intense and while not full of obvious blood and gore detail, frightening almost to see;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2bXDQCyMNc

No fan of the paper that linked the one above, though like the government they slavishly support, they have a good defence reporter, certainly in Ukraine.
 
johns624
Posts: 6763
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:09 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 2:44 pm

art wrote:
iamlucky13 wrote:
Basically, Switzerland seems to have set precedent for expecting that if you buy a Swiss made weapon system, and end up having to use it, you won't be able to get replacements.


It seems to me pointless buying defence equipment from a supplier when if you use it as intended it becomes subject to embargo by the supplier.
I wonder if that's why SIG-Sauer's US operations are separate from the European ones?
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 28730
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 3:08 pm

art wrote:
Russian mercenary Wagner group’s chief Yevgeny Prigozhin has accused Vladimir Putin of cutting him off over his call for resupplying arms and ammunition in the grinding battle in eastern Ukraine.

“To get me to stop asking for ammunition, all the hotlines to offices, to departments etc have been cut off from me.


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 97882.html

Sounds like the Prigozhin-Putin relationship is heading south. Running a mercenary army, Prigozhin must have a deal in which Wagner is paid for its services. What about if there start to be 'bureaucratic delays' in payments being made on top of the ammunition supply issues? Would Wagner redeploy its services elsewhere (Africa, for example) or would that result in Putin decapitating the organisation? I could see evidence of fraud or tax evasion - real or not - being used to bring Prigozhin down if he becomes too annoying to Putin.

It's interesting to see how this leads to all kinds of tension within the ruling clique:

"He's not going to be attacking the government like he's attacking it unless he's got some official approval," Smart said. "You can't just go out and be saying what he's saying."

Smart added that this "leads a lot of people to conclude that Putin is trying to put the blame on Shoigu ... He's using Prigozhin to do that."

So this theory suggests Prigozhin could only be attacking the MoD if and only if Putin wanted it done.

OTOH we have lots of evidence that the role of Wagner is being diminished and the MoD is winning the internal battle.

Who knows?

Ref: https://www.newsweek.com/kremlin-cuts-o ... ss-1786788
 
GDB
Posts: 17061
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 3:11 pm

johns624 wrote:
art wrote:
iamlucky13 wrote:
Basically, Switzerland seems to have set precedent for expecting that if you buy a Swiss made weapon system, and end up having to use it, you won't be able to get replacements.


It seems to me pointless buying defence equipment from a supplier when if you use it as intended it becomes subject to embargo by the supplier.
I wonder if that's why SIG-Sauer's US operations are separate from the European ones?


Just as well given that, if I have it right, they are supplying the next generation of small arms to the US.
The UK as an interim in the 2000's between replacing the Browning HP pistol, brought some SIG pistols before procurement of Glock 17's.
The SIG's were used in combat operations.
The 35mm cannon on the Gephards were used widely, not least in a twin radar directed ground mount, including by Argentina in the Falklands, they were all captured and used later by the RAF Regiment.
But back then, a UK company also produced the ammo, guess what we let happen?

To mangle George Orwell, 'some nations are neutral but some are more neutral than others'.
Certainly in the Cold War, Sweden was clear where the threat would come from so designed it's defences accordingly, they were also supplying Ukraine before formal application for NATO membership.
But then they did not hoard looted Nazi gold and help with the 'ratlines' for escaping war criminals.
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 28730
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 3:20 pm

Interesting twitter thread on the spate of mobik appeal videos we've been seeing lately.

Starts with:

1/ Mobilised Russians from at least 16 regions of Russia have posted videos in the last few weeks complaining about poor training, lack of equipment, brutal commanders, mistreatment, and being used as "meat" for suicidal assaults on Ukrainian positions.

2/ Anyone who has been following @wartranslated (if you don't, you should) will have seen many of these videos. The independent Russian news outlet Verstka has been analysing them and has identified where the people appearing in them came from.

3/ As the map at the top of this thread shows, they are from places across the European and west Asian regions of Russia. Notably, though, they are fairly peripheral regions; the wealthiest parts of western Russia do not seem to be represented. Verstka summarises:


Middle has a bunch of the videos linked.

Ends with:

14/ Verskta notes that this is the second big wave of mobik appeal videos to have appeared. The first was after mobilisation began in late September – early October 2022, when many mobiks were rushed to the front lines with little or no training after Ukraine's offensive.

15/ From November 2022 through to the end of January 2023, there were few such appeal videos. This likely reflects who was taking the brunt of the fighting: principally Wagner soldiers and contract soldiers, who were mostly not incentivised or able to make appeals.

16/ The launch of Russia's new offensive at the start of February 2023 has prompted a new wave of mobik appeal videos. There are a number of common themes and some interesting new developments, which I'll cover tomorrow in a second thread.


Ref: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1633 ... 20067.html

It's interesting to see how Putin still fears mass conscription from the wealthy cities in favor of drafting from the poorer outlying parts of the Russian Federation, or from the prison population, or from the LPRK/DPRK in Ukraine itself.

This fear seems to be an unspoken issue for the RF, just like the issue where they don't seem to be able to use a lot of the tanks that were always thought to be part of their inventory.

In short, it seems Russia just doesn't have the assets people thought it had, or just can't utilize them.

Sooner or later, one would think the rulers of those outlying regions are going to start asking questions about why they have to make the sacrifices while the Russian Federation itself does not make similar sacrifices.
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 28730
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 3:57 pm

ISW reports Wagner 'pause' in eastern Bakhmut:

The #Wagner Group's offensive operation in eastern #Bakhmut appears to have entered a temporary tactical pause and it remains unclear if Wagner fighters will retain their operational preponderance in future #Russian offensives in the city. (1/7) http://isw.pub/UkrWar030923
...
3/ #WagnerGroup fighters have been conducting highly attritional frontal assaults on eastern #Bakhmut for nine months and are likely not prepared to conduct a crossing of the Bakhmutka River to the Bakhmut city center at this time.


4/ The frontal offensive on eastern #Bakhmut likely consumed a significant amount of #Wagner personnel and resources, although it is not yet evident whether this effort has caused Wagner’s offensive within Bakhmut itself to culminate.

Ref: https://twitter.com/TheStudyofWar/statu ... 7808686081

Looks like the ball is now in the MoD's court.

Bakhmut: Wagner's last stand?

A Ukrainian official's recent comments regarding the mercenary group suggest Ukraine sees the brutal fighting in Bakhmut as an opportunity to deplete Wagner's forces once and for all, according to The New York Times. Col. Serhiy Cherevaty, a spokesman for Ukraine's eastern group of forces, told Radio Liberty that Bakhmut marks Wagner Group's "last stand," per the Times.

Ref: https://www.businessinsider.com/ukraine ... sia-2023-3
Last edited by Revelation on Fri Mar 10, 2023 4:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 28730
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 4:13 pm

A sign of desperation: The RUAF welded a naval gun from the 1940s, presumably taken from a naval patrol craft, onto a tank body.

Compare to UAF who is getting modern weaponry from the West with far more accuracy and firepower.

https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineWarVide ... _recorded/
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 28730
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 4:22 pm

Major RU media propagandists admit they can't win, discuss terms of peace deals:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evHnNjHcUnQ

RU state not paying teachers, Brits offer to send squirrels:

https://www.reddit.com/r/UkrainianConfl ... _salaries/
 
GDB
Posts: 17061
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 4:35 pm

As this piece explains, it can be hard to discern the real level of Russian support, not just 'support' borne out of fear. I suspect a majority still do, I also think it's only going to go in one direction, certainly after more than a year, hence the attempt of messaging the 'we are fighting NATO' line. (They should consider themselves very lucky they are not).
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... yalty-fear

No nice way to preface this, it's not explicit, or violent, it is however horrific in it's subject, albeit not without precedent, especially from the Russian Army.
The reporting and recording of sexual war crimes by the Russians;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsSXaDGFWBI

On a somewhat more positive note, war has a way of stripping away old internal divides, worth noting this group also suffered greatly in the Holocaust;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEBmbWRK5jA
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 28730
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 4:43 pm

GDB wrote:
As this piece explains, it can be hard to discern the real level of Russian support, not just 'support' borne out of fear. I suspect a majority still do, I also think it's only going to go in one direction, certainly after more than a year, hence the attempt of messaging the 'we are fighting NATO' line. (They should consider themselves very lucky they are not).

Interesting how they've gone from "we'll take Kiev in three days and install our own government" to "we're fighting all of NATO".

Their military failed to take Kiev.

They're not fighting all of NATO, and they're still losing.

Putin the master strategist strikes again...

The psychology of the "average Ivan" is pretty complex, but I think it all boils down to I'm cool as long as it doesn't impact me (which is the case for the vast majority of them), and if it does, well, there's not much I can do about it.
 
art
Posts: 5719
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:46 am

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 4:58 pm

Revelation wrote:
Interesting how they've gone from "we'll take Kiev in three days and install our own government" to "we're fighting all of NATO".

Their military failed to take Kiev.

They're not fighting all of NATO, and they're still losing.

Putin the master strategist strikes again...


I'm not sure that if one country invades another which loses a fair chunk of its territory, the country gaining all that territory can realistically be termed to be losing.
 
User avatar
bikerthai
Posts: 7031
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:45 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 5:23 pm

art wrote:
I'm not sure that if one country invades another which loses a fair chunk of its territory, the country gaining all that territory can realistically be termed to be losing.


:mrgreen: They will be winning up until the point when the last truck rolls back across the Russian-Ukrainian border. :white:

bt
 
GDB
Posts: 17061
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 5:45 pm

Fire support from tanks and heavy mortars on the Bakhmut front;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84bK6fFv_1w

At the other side of Russia, a claim of sabotage by a partisan group linked to Ukraine but also reportedly with dissident Russians too, (which you would need so far from home);
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFB-NAi-dwc
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 28730
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:20 pm

art wrote:
I'm not sure that if one country invades another which loses a fair chunk of its territory, the country gaining all that territory can realistically be termed to be losing.

A country that plans to invade and capture another country's capital in three days but doesn't, is losing.

A country who lost the flag ship of its fleet to a country without a navy, is losing.

A country who once occupied 25% of the country it invaded but now holds 15%, is losing.

A country who lost the use of a bridge it paid $4B for in a single strike, is losing.

Shall I go on?
 
iamlucky13
Posts: 1761
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:35 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:45 pm

Revelation wrote:
GDB wrote:
As this piece explains, it can be hard to discern the real level of Russian support, not just 'support' borne out of fear. I suspect a majority still do, I also think it's only going to go in one direction, certainly after more than a year, hence the attempt of messaging the 'we are fighting NATO' line. (They should consider themselves very lucky they are not).

Interesting how they've gone from "we'll take Kiev in three days and install our own government" to "we're fighting all of NATO".

Their military failed to take Kiev.

They're not fighting all of NATO, and they're still losing.


I've been told Russian and Ukrainian humor frequently relies on cliches to help prepare the listener to understand the punchline. For example when two Jewish men from Odessa are talking, it's going to be a cynical joke. So with that introduction, here was Zelensky's commentary on your observation in an interview a couple months ago with David Letterman:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilJNfILKtLc

GDB wrote:
As this piece explains, it can be hard to discern the real level of Russian support, not just 'support' borne out of fear.


Russian popular attitudes towards the war are an important topic, and it seems like the Levada Center is one of the better places to turn to in order to try to get a sense of this. They are an independent (not government funded) polling organization in Russia, sort of like Pew here in the US. I guess the most significant sign their information is much better than anything the Kremlin says is the fact the Kremlin has labeled them a "foreign agent." Their latest update is from November, and still shows 74% of the population supporting the war:

https://www.levada.ru/en/tag/ukraine/

The general sense I have of Russia's attitude to the war at large reminds me of the video you posted yesterday about reports of Russian missiles hitting toilets. The takeaway from the video is less a history about the development of Russian optically guided missiles, and more a lengthy demonstration of the meaning of the Russian term "Smekalka" which only very roughly translates as "savvy." I will link it again for convenience:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQzAjCZr0BM

In this context, however, I don't actually refer to "Smekalka" type savvy, but rather the same cynical spin on resolve. Russian society seems resolved to persevere against Ukraine (or NATO as they are told), without deeply questioning why their resolve is needed.
 
iamlucky13
Posts: 1761
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:35 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 7:06 pm

Revelation wrote:
art wrote:
I'm not sure that if one country invades another which loses a fair chunk of its territory, the country gaining all that territory can realistically be termed to be losing.

A country that plans to invade and capture another country's capital in three days but doesn't, is losing.

A country who lost the flag ship of its fleet to a country without a navy, is losing.

A country who once occupied 25% of the country it invaded but now holds 15%, is losing.

A country who lost the use of a bridge it paid $4B for in a single strike, is losing.

Shall I go on?


They're not winning, but none of those individually indicate the long term outcome of the war. The collection of them all together give strong indications, but Russia's willingness to endure massive attrition to make small gains continues to make the situation very dangerous for the side with 1/4 as many people.

I'm not sure a better way to put it than to note that both sides are losing a lot in the war. I definitely have hope that a shift more clearly in Ukraine's favor over will occur over the next couple of months, but with the anticipated change being that the dynamic shifts from Russia assaulting prepared defenses to Ukraine assaulting prepared defenses, I have some level of concern whether Ukraine will be able to make significant counteroffensive gains.

With that said, western armor is finally trickling into the country. I also suspect there is more to the stepped up defense of Bakhmut than meets the eye, which could turn into a significant achievement on Ukraine's part, but I don't expect clear signs of it for several weeks, or perhaps a couple months. In the meantime, it is perhaps prudent not to speculate too much on future plans, so I will wait and watch and comment later if my theory is correct.
 
GDB
Posts: 17061
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 8:22 pm

iamlucky13 wrote:
Revelation wrote:
GDB wrote:
As this piece explains, it can be hard to discern the real level of Russian support, not just 'support' borne out of fear. I suspect a majority still do, I also think it's only going to go in one direction, certainly after more than a year, hence the attempt of messaging the 'we are fighting NATO' line. (They should consider themselves very lucky they are not).

Interesting how they've gone from "we'll take Kiev in three days and install our own government" to "we're fighting all of NATO".

Their military failed to take Kiev.

They're not fighting all of NATO, and they're still losing.


I've been told Russian and Ukrainian humor frequently relies on cliches to help prepare the listener to understand the punchline. For example when two Jewish men from Odessa are talking, it's going to be a cynical joke. So with that introduction, here was Zelensky's commentary on your observation in an interview a couple months ago with David Letterman:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilJNfILKtLc

GDB wrote:
As this piece explains, it can be hard to discern the real level of Russian support, not just 'support' borne out of fear.


Russian popular attitudes towards the war are an important topic, and it seems like the Levada Center is one of the better places to turn to in order to try to get a sense of this. They are an independent (not government funded) polling organization in Russia, sort of like Pew here in the US. I guess the most significant sign their information is much better than anything the Kremlin says is the fact the Kremlin has labeled them a "foreign agent." Their latest update is from November, and still shows 74% of the population supporting the war:

https://www.levada.ru/en/tag/ukraine/

The general sense I have of Russia's attitude to the war at large reminds me of the video you posted yesterday about reports of Russian missiles hitting toilets. The takeaway from the video is less a history about the development of Russian optically guided missiles, and more a lengthy demonstration of the meaning of the Russian term "Smekalka" which only very roughly translates as "savvy." I will link it again for convenience:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQzAjCZr0BM

In this context, however, I don't actually refer to "Smekalka" type savvy, but rather the same cynical spin on resolve. Russian society seems resolved to persevere against Ukraine (or NATO as they are told), without deeply questioning why their resolve is needed.


That Levada Center is very interesting, thanks.
In particular some of the larger words in the Tags, if it is was I think, an indication of how much certain words about certain issues come up, it certainly does show what you mention, I also think though that lack of questioning, though ingrained, is not completely solid and likely subject to erosion.
But it's no match for the resolve of Ukraine, Putin bet big on exploiting divisions last year, like much else, it's had the opposite effect.

Then there is regime survival, not from mass revolt, even given his mangled view of history, Putin will know that failing in a military campaign historically has not gone well for the leader, usually a Czar, which he pretty much is.
He lives in a palace, has built more, as have the modern day court around him, the term 'Palace Coup' comes to mind.

Being from Ukraine, there was concern about the creator of the Paper Skies channel, certainly his content slowed down.
His father being a pilot in the Soviet Air Force and his own childhood late Cold War memories, certainly add a lot including the humour.
Which the clip of the Ukrainian President shows, over here, Channel 4 have on it's streaming service, his series 'Servant Of The People', that most unlikely path to power for him.

Dr Clarke with more analysis, on the last missile strike and ill advised remarks from those who seemingly don't know better, (Defence Secretary Wallis will be raging, still have to keep it in check as he's needed in post, until we can vote that lot out, though he deserves to keep his seat).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HH8356Q5q6I
Last edited by GDB on Fri Mar 10, 2023 8:47 pm, edited 4 times in total.
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 28730
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 8:25 pm

iamlucky13 wrote:
So with that introduction, here was Zelensky's commentary on your observation in an interview a couple months ago with David Letterman:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilJNfILKtLc

Awesome, thanks for the laugh!

iamlucky13 wrote:
They're not winning, but none of those individually indicate the long term outcome of the war. The collection of them all together give strong indications, but Russia's willingness to endure massive attrition to make small gains continues to make the situation very dangerous for the side with 1/4 as many people.

Sure, but we should also recognize there's reasons why Putin hasn't gone for things many anticipated such as mass mobilization and/or nuclear strikes. Being larger/wealthier/stronger is only important if you are willing/able to use that size/wealth/strength. It's pretty clear to me at least that there's places he can't/won't go, due to fear of either internal or external retaliation.

With that said, western armor is finally trickling into the country.

Also, the first US-provided Patriot system just entered into the country, and both Kiev and Odessa have restored their electricity a day after the last missile strike.

I realize people don't want to go crazy, but still, we have to at least admit Ukraine is punching well above its weight, no?

If you don't think so, go back and review what people were saying about Ukraine's chances in Feb 2022.
 
art
Posts: 5719
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:46 am

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 8:38 pm

Revelation wrote:
art wrote:
I'm not sure that if one country invades another which loses a fair chunk of its territory, the country gaining all that territory can realistically be termed to be losing.

A country that plans to invade and capture another country's capital in three days but doesn't, is losing.

A country who lost the flag ship of its fleet to a country without a navy, is losing.

A country who once occupied 25% of the country it invaded but now holds 15%, is losing.

A country who lost the use of a bridge it paid $4B for in a single strike, is losing.

Shall I go on?


Ukraine has lost a lot of its territory to Russia. That is not indicative of Russia losing. It is indicative of Russia winning. If you you ask who is winning/losing the war at the moment, neither side seems to be. The war could be described as stalemate at the moment.

Russia sustained serious damage to part of a $4 billion bridge. Ukraine has had hundreds of billions of dollars worth (I guess) of buildings and infrastructure damaged or destroyed. Who is the loser?
 
MohawkWeekend
Posts: 2498
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 2:06 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 9:37 pm

What did Vietnam look like after 7 years of US airstrikes, artillery and naval gunfire?

Who won that one? The NVA and VC believed in their cause. The US got tired.

I'm amazed by the courage of those who serve defending Ukraine. The Russians will get tired too.
 
oldJoe
Posts: 1180
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 11:04 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 9:55 pm

art wrote :
Who is the loser?

In my opinion, still Russia ! Why ? Quite simply for the following reasons:
The supposedly second strongest army in the world is embarrassed to the bone against a small neighbor when so-called elite units ( Gostomel ) are almost completely wiped out, high-ranking officers are liquidated and others have to fight with 50+ year old tanks and other weapons or mobilize poor East Russians without Training and self-bought equipment are sent to the front to serve as cannon fodder. Russia has to buy weapons or equipment from other states, e.g. Iran, speaks a clear language about how backward they are. My Russian neighbors are joking about their own country here. For example, what do Ukraine and Putin have in common? Both don't care how many Russians die! A country that is on the winning road does not have to muzzle or lie to its own people. Then there are the thousands of young Russians qualified for the future of the country who have fled abroad in order not to be drafted. There are many other reasons, but I would like to conclude by saying: Russia's greatest loss is its belief in and respect for its military power, loser from the beginning !
 
GDB
Posts: 17061
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 10:14 pm

Given Dr Clarke's look at the most recent attacks by missiles and drones, aside from retaliation and spite at the lack of great progress and huge casualties with their offensive, another factor might be using them before these become operational;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCX-xHR ... M40czSu6JU

There has been training on Patriot and likely SAMP-T is being trained on now.

As well as more of these;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCX-xHR ... NtAFo7Vc3B
 
iamlucky13
Posts: 1761
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:35 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 11:03 pm

Revelation wrote:
I realize people don't want to go crazy, but still, we have to at least admit Ukraine is punching well above its weight, no?


Absolutely yes! That was starting to become apparent by the end of the first week of the war as they matched the VDV in Hostemel, stop the advances from the north, and had Russia struggling to cross the Dnipro in Kherson.

I'm just very careful about getting overly optimistic, because the many successes Ukraine has had don't negate the challenge presented by Russia's size and willingness to keep throwing more and more at their goal.
 
iamlucky13
Posts: 1761
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:35 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 11:16 pm

The MiG-17 monument prominently visible along the highway leading to Bakhmut from the west has been destroyed.

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/03/10/7392844/

I can half imagine Russian propagandist's claiming Ukraine is so desperate that now they're even losing 1950's era fighters.
 
PlymSpotter
Posts: 10996
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 7:32 am

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Fri Mar 10, 2023 11:16 pm

art wrote:
Ukraine has lost a lot of its territory to Russia. That is not indicative of Russia losing. It is indicative of Russia winning. If you you ask who is winning/losing the war at the moment, neither side seems to be. The war could be described as stalemate at the moment.

Russia sustained serious damage to part of a $4 billion bridge. Ukraine has had hundreds of billions of dollars worth (I guess) of buildings and infrastructure damaged or destroyed. Who is the loser?


The war was conceived as a lot more than just a land grab and infrastructure can be rebuilt on both sides. Yes, on paper, Russia has currently 'won' a sizable part of Ukraine and established a land bridge, but what else have they actually 'won'?

Their initial key objectives were to

Demilitarize and 'denazify' Ukraine - Russia have actually been one of the largest suppliers of (abandoned) military equipment to Ukraine
Complete the operation in 3 days - currently 377 days behind schedule, and counting
Keep Ukraine neutral - that's going well... Ukraine has embraced the West
Prevent NATO getting a hold in Ukraine - again, that's going splendidly
Divide NATO and Europe - he's achieved the direct opposite and triggered Finland and Sweden into applications

On the other hand, Russia has

Politically become an international pariah ostracized from the West - potentially for decades to come
Cajoled most of Europe to embrace energy and resource independence from Russia, thus losing a huge amount of political influence and revenue, likely forever
Had freedom to travel restricted for Russians and numerous overseas assets frozen
Lost anything up to 200,000 troops (injured / killed)
Seen a substantial percentage of their operational military hardware wiped out
Demonstrated that most Russian military hardware is not fit for purpose in the modern battlefield, almost certainly strangling much of their export market
Set the stage for them to lose control of Crimea (if the land bridge is severed, we all know how the rest will play out)
Quite possibly set the stage for a future fracturing of the Russian Federation

This isn't winning. This is having your ass handed to you in a paper bag.
 
art
Posts: 5719
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:46 am

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sat Mar 11, 2023 12:16 am

@Plymspotter

I don't think that this is a case of one side winning and the other losing. I think that both the invader and the invaded, the aggressor and the defender have suffered monumental loss.

To those who say Russia is losing (I don't speak of politically and economically), I would say that is misleading at the moment. I would say both sides are deadlocked.
 
Vintage
Posts: 1156
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2022 10:48 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sat Mar 11, 2023 12:26 am

art wrote:
@Plymspotter
I don't think that this is a case of one side winning and the other losing. I think that both the invader and the invaded, the aggressor and the defender have suffered monumental loss.
To those who say Russia is losing (I don't speak of politically and economically), I would say that is misleading at the moment. I would say both sides are deadlocked.

I say Russia has already lost.
They just don't know what to do next.
 
User avatar
bikerthai
Posts: 7031
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:45 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sat Mar 11, 2023 12:54 am

art wrote:
Ukraine has lost a lot of its territory to Russia. That is not indicative of Russia losing. It is indicative of Russia winning.


By that argument, you would argue that Japan was still winning after it lost the battle of Midway :roll:

bt
 
johns624
Posts: 6763
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:09 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sat Mar 11, 2023 2:32 am

art wrote:
@Plymspotter

I don't think that this is a case of one side winning and the other losing. I think that both the invader and the invaded, the aggressor and the defender have suffered monumental loss.

To those who say Russia is losing (I don't speak of politically and economically), I would say that is misleading at the moment. I would say both sides are deadlocked.
They've lost because their goal was to conquer Ukraine and it'll never happen.
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 28730
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sat Mar 11, 2023 4:32 am

iamlucky13 wrote:
The MiG-17 monument prominently visible along the highway leading to Bakhmut from the west has been destroyed.

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/03/10/7392844/

I can half imagine Russian propagandist's claiming Ukraine is so desperate that now they're even losing 1950's era fighters.

Kinda weird. Usually Russians are hyper-sensitive about WW2 monuments, now they've gone and blown this one up.

Vintage wrote:
I say Russia has already lost.
They just don't know what to do next.

Another way to frame the question: who would you rather be right now, Putin or Zelinskyy?
Honestly, I'd rather have Zelinskyy's situation that Putin's.
It's clear to me at least that Putin has no solution to his current problems.
IMO there's no way he emerges from his current situation intact.
 
Vintage
Posts: 1156
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2022 10:48 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sat Mar 11, 2023 5:03 am

Revelation wrote:
iamlucky13 wrote:
The MiG-17 monument prominently visible along the highway leading to Bakhmut from the west has been destroyed.

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/03/10/7392844/

I can half imagine Russian propagandist's claiming Ukraine is so desperate that now they're even losing 1950's era fighters.

Kinda weird. Usually Russians are hyper-sensitive about WW2 monuments, now they've gone and blown this one up.

It will be replaced with a Mig-29 monument to commemorate this war (or maybe a HIMARS rocket).
The WW2 stuff will be overwritten here.
 
marcelh
Posts: 2400
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:43 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:32 am

MohawkWeekend wrote:
What did Vietnam look like after 7 years of US airstrikes, artillery and naval gunfire?

Who won that one? The NVA and VC believed in their cause. The US got tired.

I'm amazed by the courage of those who serve defending Ukraine. The Russians will get tired too.


The elephant in the room is when the supporters of Ukraine will get tired.
 
GDB
Posts: 17061
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sat Mar 11, 2023 9:20 am

marcelh wrote:
MohawkWeekend wrote:
What did Vietnam look like after 7 years of US airstrikes, artillery and naval gunfire?

Who won that one? The NVA and VC believed in their cause. The US got tired.

I'm amazed by the courage of those who serve defending Ukraine. The Russians will get tired too.


The elephant in the room is when the supporters of Ukraine will get tired.


Possible but Putin with the nuclear threats, his repeated threats against others makes him a larger threat than any Russian leader since Stalin, also the first without an effective Politburo or anything else to reign him in before he embarks on destructive adventures.

The fact both Finland, in their case now free to do so without Soviet intimidation, plus Sweden, who never went with NATO membership, even with Stalin’s clear intentions for Europe, starting with West Berlin in his attempt to starve it out (who blinked first there?), then the Korean War (it was very widely, if erroneously with hindsight, believed that this was orchestrated as a feint to distract the West before going after Berlin and likely West Germany too). Still, throughout all this and more, such as Soviet bloody suppression of workers in East Germany (Corbyn, Der Linke and other useful idiots take note), then in Hungary, the ‘Prague Spring’, telling the puppets in Poland to crush Solidarity, Sweden instead went for expensive heavily armed neutrality, albeit very Western facing.

Now what has happened, I think that an over media saturated and in many was less informed, often trivial political class and electorate in Europe have had an existential shock, this sort of thing was not supposed to happen any more, by that I don’t just mean large scale conventional warfare in Europe but also, since this is Russia, large scale atrocities, if the territory so far retaken by Ukraine is anything to go by.
As others have stated, the long, post Cold War era is over, it was really over in 2008 when Georgia was attacked, let alone Ukraine in 2014, it just took people a long time and an escalation of actions culminating in February last year to drive the point home.

History, certainly in the last century, is filled with despots who took the freedoms and yes, often trivia filled democracies as weak and unwilling to act, as often they are, until.....
Germany in the 30’s, Japan in the early 1940’s both made that mistake.
Putin’s misreading of just about everything that would happen if he attacked Ukraine, reminds me of Von Ribbentrop’s assurances to Hitler just after Pearl Harbor, as he mulled declaring war on the US. As someone who had been in the US before, the head of the Reich’s Foreign Service told Hitler that the United States was dominated by ‘Jews and Negros’ and such is the decadence of that society it would not be until around 1970 before they could put serious military hardware and combat power across the Atlantic.
Eleven months later was Operation Torch......
 
art
Posts: 5719
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:46 am

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:53 am

UK intelligence update - Wagner likely to sustain further heavy losses in Bakmut as it reaches the barrier presented by the Bakhmukta river.

https://twitter.com/DefenceHQ/status/16 ... 12/photo/1

PS I presume that crossing the river is not feasible so Russian efforts will concentrate on gaining land west of the town from north-west and south-west directions to encircle the town. Is that actually needed if Wagner can shell the road used to supply the UkAF from territory it currently occupies? Eventually the UkAF will run out of supplies or losses in shipping supplies in will become unacceptable.
Last edited by art on Sat Mar 11, 2023 11:10 am, edited 2 times in total.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: mke717spotter, Phosphorus, StarAC17 and 24 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos