Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR

 
User avatar
bikerthai
Posts: 7769
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:45 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sat Jun 03, 2023 8:31 pm

Aesma wrote:
We're all waiting for the offensive, I'm guessing pushing it back can make sense if Ukraine's forces are getting stronger faster than Russian ones.


Not sure of its a matter of pushing back. More logical if the attack would be based on certain conditions like having a predetermined list of targets that needs to be hit before they begin.

So if they are finding that their drone and stormshadows attacks are taking longer to check off the list, then they wold hold off.

I still say they ware waiting for June 6 :bouncy:

bt
 
GDB
Posts: 18172
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sun Jun 04, 2023 12:25 am

A Ukrainian drone team on a mission, finding and directing attacks on targets including an armoured vehicle;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEqoKSi2UbI&t=783s
Working subtitles.

A brief one, artillery on a T-90;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikn3jgD46-s

More Ukrainian civilian casualties;
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-65800870
 
User avatar
Braybuddy
Posts: 7710
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 8:14 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sun Jun 04, 2023 8:22 am

Olga Davis of Russian Media Monitor posts this interesting clip from Russian state TV. The usual talking heads, this time with uncertain glances and frank admissions (for Russia1), with Olga Skabeeva upping the rhetoric:

https://twitter.com/JuliaDavisNews/stat ... 5977875456
 
User avatar
bikerthai
Posts: 7769
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:45 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sun Jun 04, 2023 9:42 am

https://youtu.be/LZphzKJS-Ic

Because it's the only way the Russian knows how to fight, they are now flattening their own cities with artillery :flamed:

bt
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 29623
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sun Jun 04, 2023 12:20 pm

The video linked below is street interviews with 'average citizens' in RU about RU taking Bakhmut. If we're willing to assume it is a fair sampling of public opinion it's pretty interesting because the older people (the ones most likely to be glued to their TVs) are the ones that are pleased about RU taking Bakhmut, and the younger the person the more apathetic they are. The ones that appear to be in their teens and early twenties seem to be totally detached from it, as if there is no war at all, which seems to me to be their way of coping. I think some are going to have a rude awakening when the military 'recruiters' show up at their door.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvnKToKgjp4
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 29623
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sun Jun 04, 2023 12:21 pm

Aesma wrote:
Did you see the cracks on the Kerch bridge ?

Is there any way to know if they are surface vs deep? I guess we won't really know till the bridge falls over.
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 29623
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sun Jun 04, 2023 12:22 pm

bikerthai wrote:
Because it's the only way the Russian knows how to fight, they are now flattening their own cities with artillery :flamed:

If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
 
User avatar
bikerthai
Posts: 7769
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:45 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sun Jun 04, 2023 12:51 pm

Revelation wrote:
it's pretty interesting because the older people (the ones most likely to be glued to their TVs) are the ones that are pleased about RU taking Bakhmut


Or since they lived thru the Soviet times they know enough to say what the authority wants to hear. :listen:

And they probably remember seeing the same propraganda thru the Chechnia war.

bt
 
kelval
Posts: 183
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 2:09 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sun Jun 04, 2023 1:29 pm

Revelation wrote:
The video linked below is street interviews with 'average citizens' in RU about RU taking Bakhmut. If we're willing to assume it is a fair sampling of public opinion it's pretty interesting because the older people (the ones most likely to be glued to their TVs) are the ones that are pleased about RU taking Bakhmut, and the younger the person the more apathetic they are. The ones that appear to be in their teens and early twenties seem to be totally detached from it, as if there is no war at all, which seems to me to be their way of coping. I think some are going to have a rude awakening when the military 'recruiters' show up at their door.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvnKToKgjp4


Younger ones have perfectly understood that the last wave of arrested war protester were immediatly sent to the frontline along with Wagner's murderers...
 
PlymSpotter
Posts: 11063
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 7:32 am

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sun Jun 04, 2023 1:47 pm

Aesma wrote:
We're all waiting for the offensive, I'm guessing pushing it back can make sense if Ukraine's forces are getting stronger faster than Russian ones. Like getting M1 tanks, training more troops, having more rested troops, etc. In the meantime if Russia still has broken logistics, no real training capacity, etc., then the only thing it can do is dig trenches, not that useful.

Did you see the cracks on the Kerch bridge ?

Image

https://news.yahoo.com/crimean-bridge-f ... 00186.html dont read the article there is no info there.


Christ, that does not look good for such a young structure. To me, those look look like corrosion cracks - caused by poor construction technique and potentially substandard concrete. Unlikely to cause immediate major weakness, but the longer they go untreated the faster issues will accelerate.
 
GDB
Posts: 18172
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sun Jun 04, 2023 5:58 pm

This week's Perun presentation is about Escalation Strategy and aid to Ukraine, an admittedly dry sounding subject but with the usual pace, good use of context, historical and current, it does highlight the rationale behind many discussions on this thread, the type and speed of aid to Ukraine, the sometimes inexplicable seeming discussions and delays. There is reason behind it;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWKGYnO0Jf4&t=882s

Also the Russian response, the threats, responses when that does not work etc.
(The pic of that bridge, taking PlymSpotter's comments, reminds of previous Perun videos on Russian corruption).
 
Klaus
Posts: 22184
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sun Jun 04, 2023 6:06 pm

Braybuddy wrote:
Olga Davis of Russian Media Monitor posts this interesting clip from Russian state TV. The usual talking heads, this time with uncertain glances and frank admissions (for Russia1), with Olga Skabeeva upping the rhetoric:

https://twitter.com/JuliaDavisNews/stat ... 5977875456

Comment below the UT video expressing what I was about to comment:
MZX wrote:
That was Khodaryonok? - a former colonel of the Gen.Staff of the RF, who also correctly predicted back in February 2022 the course of events - Western military assistance to Ukraine and russian inevitable defeat due to having insufficient industrial means to support a large-scale, prolonged conflict. He was back then arrogantly dismissed by the same host who hosted this episode...

I had back then posted a link to that article of his; It is intriguing that they keep inviting him even though he has always contributed clear-eyed, no-nonsense analysis certainly from a russian point of view but without propaganda delusions.

It seems that ranting and raving alone is not enough after all even for russian state TV, even if Skabeeva gives it a gruesome but still strangely lackluster go again at the end...
 
User avatar
Aesma
Posts: 16888
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:14 am

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sun Jun 04, 2023 7:27 pm

He states uneasy facts but doesn't give a conclusion so for inattentive TV viewers no real damage is done.

One conclusion could be what another said about ending the SMO and going for a "great patriotic war" but even that suggestion doesn't seem to get approval.

Aside from the genocidal woman they all seem apathetic. And even she is just repeating her nonsense, she doesn't appear convinced.
 
MohawkWeekend
Posts: 2782
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 2:06 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sun Jun 04, 2023 7:33 pm

I don't know - the fact that they are broadcasting such doubtful conjecture is newsworthy. Her denying that she ever wanted to use nuclear weapons is also interesting.

I sense they realize that a civil war is possible. And outlasting the allies is less likely too.
 
Klaus
Posts: 22184
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Sun Jun 04, 2023 8:04 pm

Their propaganda strategy is crumbling before their eyes not so much because it had been delusional all along but because it also relied on ignoring lots of uncomfortable truths which keep poking up in all kinds of places with increasing insistence, undermining that absurd edifice from below.
 
User avatar
flyingturtle
Posts: 6590
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 1:39 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Mon Jun 05, 2023 9:44 am

These videos of the Ukrainian armed forces flattening and stopping various things are my morning jam. Maybe I watch this to see: Yes, there is some justice in the world.

PlymSpotter wrote:

Christ, that does not look good for such a young structure. To me, those look look like corrosion cracks - caused by poor construction technique and potentially substandard concrete. Unlikely to cause immediate major weakness, but the longer they go untreated the faster issues will accelerate.


On Reddit, somebody who apparently is a structural engineer gave these two columns four months.
 
Klaus
Posts: 22184
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Mon Jun 05, 2023 2:12 pm

Some thorough (destructive) testing is the only way to be sure!

Otherwise they'd never know whether that bridge could withstand one of those smoking accidents which somehow keep happening in Russia...! :mischievous:
 
GDB
Posts: 18172
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Mon Jun 05, 2023 4:27 pm

WTF? WTAF? The saying 'fighting like rats in a sack' barely covers it;
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/ ... -commander

Speaking of discord, seems even Russian military bloggers doubt the Kremlin's narrative;
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/ ... weaknesses

David Axe at Forbes has been busy, Australian cargo conversion M113's;
https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2 ... eir-backs/

Likely use of those old vehicles with ancient naval AA mountings;
https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2 ... -defenses/

Finland supplies vehicles for busting through fortified lines;
https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2 ... -brigades/

Related to the above, many will have seen the Challenger 2/dozer blade video;
https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2 ... fications/

Some of the footage from these two short videos seem similar to what's being put out of Russia as proof of repulsing attacks, or is it me?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knT56rQ54S8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xo6IPMUDos8&t=182s

Is Ukraine running agents behind the lines, within Russia itself, to the point of giving them drones? Plus a general round up;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79SMdmj9fME
 
iamlucky13
Posts: 2063
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:35 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Mon Jun 05, 2023 5:09 pm

flyingturtle wrote:
PlymSpotter wrote:

Christ, that does not look good for such a young structure. To me, those look look like corrosion cracks - caused by poor construction technique and potentially substandard concrete. Unlikely to cause immediate major weakness, but the longer they go untreated the faster issues will accelerate.


On Reddit, somebody who apparently is a structural engineer gave these two columns four months.


I don't know how they would determine the rate the issue is progressing from photos. Even with up close inspections, multiple inspections would typically be needed to determine how quickly the issue is becoming critical. What a single up close inspection can help determine is what the current load capacity of the columns is compared to intended. Given the size of the cracks and the fact they run basically the full height of the columns, it does look serious.

Since the photos would have come from a Russian source, they are aware of the issue. Perhaps this was even something previously known, but no one wanted to bring up due to the trap authoritarian societies sometimes fall into of blaming the messenger, where as the bombing of the bridge last year created a context to finally address it. While there is still the hope from Ukraine's perspective that perhaps the fact that it hasn't caused the bridge to fall down yet will result in it continuing to be neglected. However, my default assumption is they are taking action to prevent the issue from worsening, eventually repair it, and ideally (from an engineer's perspective, not Ukraine's), to inspect other piers for signs of similar issues to address.

Still, it is yet one more issue for Russia requiring resources that they are stretched thin on.
 
GDB
Posts: 18172
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Mon Jun 05, 2023 7:52 pm

Latest from the front;
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/ ... -frontline

An assessment of what might be happening;
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/ ... ith-russia

About an official a statement you can expect given the need for operational security;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCX-xHR ... FVA-9ixE1o

Aside from all the usual military training, Ukrainians are being trained to be what the UK forces affectionately refer to as 'Sky Pilots'.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCX-xHR ... jJHMx1NBOH
 
User avatar
Braybuddy
Posts: 7710
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 8:14 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Mon Jun 05, 2023 8:15 pm

GDB wrote:

One Russian milblogger is saying the Ukrainians have pushed the Russians out of Novodonetsk, which is about 6km behind the frontline:

https://twitter.com/GeopoliticalGu1/sta ... 9712761856

https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1665763143795224577

https://twitter.com/hashtag/Novodonetsk ... htag_click
 
User avatar
bikerthai
Posts: 7769
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:45 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Mon Jun 05, 2023 9:27 pm

Braybuddy wrote:
One Russian milblogger is saying the Ukrainians have pushed the Russians out of Novodonetsk, which is about 6km behind the frontline:


If what they are saying is correct in terms of AMX-10 being spotted, then chances are that the unit is a reconnaissance group.

A reconnaissance unit 6km behind your line would be troubling for the Russian to say the least.


bt
 
iamlucky13
Posts: 2063
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:35 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Mon Jun 05, 2023 9:33 pm

It appears Ukraine increased their counteroffensive tempo yesterday.

As usual, a lot of claims are being made by both sides on social media, mostly made up of very limited information, and with some contradictory info, but my initial impression is:

1) Moderate effort counterattacks continue around the flanks of Bakhmut, perhaps with some increase in intensity.

2) Several initial attacks occurred in limited areas around Donetsk city yesterday, as well as west of Vuhledar (specifically Velyka Novosilka). Some gains may have been made.

3) Larger scale attacks occurred today, apparently in some of the areas probed yesterday and making more significant gains than the previous day. Various claims range from that the attacks have been repelled with high losses on Ukraine's side, or that Ukrainian forces advanced several kilometers.

4) Some sources claim observed vehicle counts around Velyka Novosilka consistent with a battalion-scale attack, which would presumably be an operation managed at a brigade level. If accurate, this would count as a significant operation, but a minority of the forces Ukraine is believed to have been holding in reserve for counteroffensives (9-12 brigades).

5) Russian milblogger Rybar reports 9 wheeled vehicles destroyed near Velyka Novosilka. Images appear to show MRAP's. Rybar also claims Leopards are operating in the area, but so far images appear to show AMX-10 RC. The Russian MoD claims 6 motorized infantry and 2 tank battalions were repulsed, which would be the full strength of 2 or more brigades. No evidence has been given that such a large force was involved.

Ukraine is unlikely to provide details on these operations. However, if they handle their information releases the way they did in the Kharkiv counteroffensive, they are likely to share images of limited numbers of troops in identifiable locations within liberated settlements within a day or two of reaching them - after Russia would already know the troops are there, and avoiding showing how many troops and what equipment are in a given location.

This could be a precursor to advance up to Russia's main line of defense for a larger breakthrough effort, or one of several planned parallel attacks, or a diversionary attack ahead of a larger attack elsewhere. It is probably not irrelevant to note that Russia has been reported to be moving troops away from Vuhledar to reinforce Bakhmut against Ukraine's recent offensive efforts there, and to relieve Wagner. The location of the current operation could suggest goals of either Mariupol or Berdyansk.

Here's an end of day article from the Kyiv Independent on the effort:

https://kyivindependent.com/russia-repo ... offensive/
 
tomcat
Posts: 1558
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2000 4:14 am

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Mon Jun 05, 2023 9:47 pm

bikerthai wrote:
Braybuddy wrote:
One Russian milblogger is saying the Ukrainians have pushed the Russians out of Novodonetsk, which is about 6km behind the frontline:


If what they are saying is correct in terms of AMX-10 being spotted, then chances are that the unit is a reconnaissance group.

A reconnaissance unit 6km behind your line would be troubling for the Russian to say the least.
bt


Well, a reconnaissance group equipped with 105mm cannons can do quite a bit of poking here and there while taking a tour behind the Russian lines :-).
 
iamlucky13
Posts: 2063
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:35 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Mon Jun 05, 2023 11:36 pm

A general note for awareness, and some additional thoughts of mine (obviously I'm not privy to Ukrainian plans):

The locations Ukraine currently appears to have advanced through near Velyka Novosilka are not Russia's main line of defense. Attempts to map Russian defensive preparations using commercial satellite imagery appear to show most of the fortifications 15+ kilometers behind the front line. That distance gives them some time to attempt to man those defenses in response to Ukrainian attacks in a specific area, and keeps them out of direct observation from the ground, and out of range of conventional artillery unless it were firing close enough to the front line to be well within the range of counterbattery fire.

What Ukraine is likely encountering yesterday and today is forward defensive outposts, hidden in tree lines and other areas with cover. These positions allow defense against small attacks, and could slow a major attack by forcing them to deploy to clear out these positions, but would not be expected to stop a major attack.

In most locations, there is probably a first defensive line a few kilometers behind these forward outposts, but the main defenses are several kilometers further behind that first line. The main defensive line can include anti-vehicle trenches, mine fields, and dragon's teeth to slow down attackers, followed by a line or multiple lines of trenches for infantry, and prepared positions with good sight lines for tanks, BMP's, anti-tank guns, or ATGM teams.

Russia would likely intend identify a major attack beginning using the forward outposts, blunt it with the first line of defense, and stop it with the main line. Ideally, a successful defense would be followed shortly by a counterattack using reserves to regain that first line and the forward outposts before the attacking force can recover from their offensive work.

Ukraine's goal, therefore, would likely involve keeping more substantial forces in reserve, including their main breaching elements, until they approach those main lines of defense. Of course, if this is not their planned main axis of advance, they may simply advance part way to the main line of defense to force Russia to concentrate more troops there, before striking somewhere else.

A more detailed description of similar defensive lines known to have been built by Russia in Southern Ukraine is in the first link, and a really solid effort at mapping Russia's defenses is in the second link.

https://twitter.com/Inkvisiit/status/16 ... vO6PktAAAA

https://read.bradyafrick.com/p/russian- ... in-ukraine

Braybuddy wrote:
GDB wrote:

One Russian milblogger is saying the Ukrainians have pushed the Russians out of Novodonetsk, which is about 6km behind the frontline:


I spent a little bit of time trying to piece together the various bits of information coming out, and noticed the report that Novodonetsk was 6 km behind the front line is mistaken. From reviewing ISW's maps, including their handy interactive archive map, the furthest Russia had advanced past Novodonetsk was about 2 km.

Around May 11, Ukraine conducted small scale attacks in that area that pushed the line back to the Shaitanka River, which is only 500 meters from Novodonetsk.

https://understandingwar.org/background ... ay-11-2023

With that said, Rybar's map currently shows a pocket west of Novodonetsk that extends further south than the settlement, and it's possible that reflects an advance of 6 km. Since the map will be based on early reports and images, it is possible the actual extent of Ukraine's advance is lesser or greater than shown. I tend to suspect it is greater.

https://twitter.com/hashtag/Novodonetsk?src=hashtag_click


FYI, since Twitter recently decided to block non-members from searching, this specific link only directs to a log-in page for non-members. Members should be able to reach the intended hashtag search.
 
User avatar
bikerthai
Posts: 7769
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:45 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Tue Jun 06, 2023 1:03 am

iamlucky13 wrote:
Russia would likely intend identify a major attack beginning using the forward outposts, blunt it with the first line of defense, and stop it with the main line. Ideally, a successful defense would be followed shortly by a counterattack using reserves to regain that first line and the forward outposts before the attacking force can recover from their offensive work


And this is where I feel the Russian are lacking. Any Reserves they have will have problems moving to the point of attack with Ukrainian partisans roaming the back field.

Forces on the road will be much more vulnerable than forces in dug-in position.

bt
 
Slcpilot
Posts: 624
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 3:32 am

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Tue Jun 06, 2023 4:05 am

Well, it seems the dam has been blown. Interesting, in that at the moment it is not immediately clear who did it, kinda like the Nordstream pipeline.
 
geomap
Posts: 67
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2019 7:58 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Tue Jun 06, 2023 4:06 am

Starting to hear of the Kakhovskaya Dam being blown up tonight.

https://twitter.com/hashtag/Kakhovskaya ... htag_click

Not sure if its real, but lots of traffic about it.
 
geomap
Posts: 67
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2019 7:58 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Tue Jun 06, 2023 4:08 am

The source for the North Crimea Canal is very near the dam. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Crimean_Canal
Crimea got 85% of their water from this canal before the 2014 invasion by Russia. If this is real its kind of a big deal.
 
5427247845
Posts: 2437
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:43 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Tue Jun 06, 2023 4:56 am

What about the cooling of the Zaporizhia Nuclear Power Plant? It’s upstream of the blown dam and I would be surprised the cooling facilities were designed for this kind of event.
 
geomap
Posts: 67
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2019 7:58 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Tue Jun 06, 2023 5:15 am

marcelh wrote:
What about the cooling of the Zaporizhia Nuclear Power Plant? It’s upstream of the blown dam and I would be surprised the cooling facilities were designed for this kind of event.


https://twitter.com/energybants/status/ ... 9442033664

This guy says "Zaporizhzhia NPP, Europe's largest, draws cooling water from a reservoir whose dam is now severely damaged.

All six reactors are off & cold. Almost no cooling water needed.

Unfolding event, but not a serious risk for nuclear accident."


Not sure if correct
Geomap
 
User avatar
par13del
Posts: 12287
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:14 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Tue Jun 06, 2023 11:06 am

So a study of the forces deployed in the region and the lines of demarcation are in order to see who strategically benefits from the flood.
Destruction of dams during war or "special operations" is a given as nature can present formidable defensive obstacles.
 
User avatar
Aesma
Posts: 16888
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:14 am

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Tue Jun 06, 2023 1:03 pm

Since Russia's advances are out of the question, it has to be against Ukraine.

On the other hand it's bad for Russian occupied Crimea to lose its water source again.
 
5427247845
Posts: 2437
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:43 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Tue Jun 06, 2023 1:41 pm

Aesma wrote:
Since Russia's advances are out of the question, it has to be against Ukraine.

On the other hand it's bad for Russian occupied Crimea to lose its water source again.


Possibly the Russians think they will lose Crimea sooner or later. so damaging as much as possible are well known Russian tactics - although “scorching earth” is a bit weird in this circumstance.
 
User avatar
bikerthai
Posts: 7769
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:45 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Tue Jun 06, 2023 1:41 pm

Aesma wrote:
On the other hand it's bad for Russian occupied Crimea to lose its water source again.


It could also be that some local commander got spooked and detonate the explose fearing an Ukrainian attack.

Or the explosive just detonate by themselves due to them being Russian built.

If it was deliberately blown knowing that Crimea will be out of water, then perhaps its a sign thar Russia anticipate they will lose Crimea anyway. (marcelh beat me to it) The situation now is much different than before when the water was shut off. Getting water into Crimea now is exponentially more difficult with Ukraine choking off the supply line.

bt
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 29623
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Tue Jun 06, 2023 2:05 pm

bikerthai wrote:
Aesma wrote:
On the other hand it's bad for Russian occupied Crimea to lose its water source again.


It could also be that some local commander got spooked and detonate the explose fearing an Ukrainian attack.

Or the explosive just detonate by themselves due to them being Russian built.

If it was deliberately blown knowing that Crimea will be out of water, then perhaps its a sign thar Russia anticipate they will lose Crimea anyway. (marcelh beat me to it) The situation now is much different than before when the water was shut off. Getting water into Crimea now is exponentially more difficult with Ukraine choking off the supply line.

bt

Another theory floating around says that the Russians just left the dam gates closed till the dam exceeded 100% and due to its weakened state from various shelling etc it ruptured all by itself. OTOH it was already wired with explosives, this has been known for months. The problem is that locals did not report hearing a major explosion before the dam failed.

The downside of the various disinformation campaigns is there aren't many sources that retain credibility. In short, we don't know who to believe.
 
petertenthije
Posts: 4972
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2001 10:00 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Tue Jun 06, 2023 2:11 pm

marcelh wrote:
well known Russian tactics - although “scorching earth” is a bit weird in this circumstance.

Russians must be afraid of fire, after so many “smoking incidents“. So instead of scorched earth it’s drowned earth.
 
User avatar
bikerthai
Posts: 7769
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:45 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Tue Jun 06, 2023 2:15 pm

Revelation wrote:
The problem is that locals did not report hearing a major explosion before the dam failed.


Charges located inside the dam service tunnel would not cause much of a ruckus outside the dam when detonate.

As an aside. Releasing all that water is not necessarily an environmental disaster (other than the reported oil leak and displaced mines). Near where I live, they breached a century old dam (Elwah river) to allow salmon to migrate up stream. The resulting silt deposit rebuilt the sand bank at the estuary, reclaiming shoreline habitat lost for nearly a century.

bt
 
GDB
Posts: 18172
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Tue Jun 06, 2023 4:05 pm

Details and possible effects, this is breaking a 1977 amendment to the Geneva Convention, not that Russia hasn't been doing plenty of other rule breaking of that from the start;
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/ ... ar-kherson

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/ ... khovka-dam

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/ ... es-to-heal

Given the last report, which states that after last year, this could also seriously affect food supply to some nations, including those which are 'neutral' on Russia, might even allow Putin or his minions in for conferences.
 
iamlucky13
Posts: 2063
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:35 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Tue Jun 06, 2023 5:20 pm

geomap wrote:
The source for the North Crimea Canal is very near the dam. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Crimean_Canal
Crimea got 85% of their water from this canal before the 2014 invasion by Russia. If this is real its kind of a big deal.


Crimea needs water from the canal primarily for agriculture, not to support its utility as a militarily strategic location. Destruction of the dam is a big deal for the civilian population and economy, but is not a big deal related to Russia's primary interests.

marcelh wrote:
What about the cooling of the Zaporizhia Nuclear Power Plant? It’s upstream of the blown dam and I would be surprised the cooling facilities were designed for this kind of event.


My understanding is the water level will very soon be below the intakes for the ZNPP cooling system. Because most of the units are in cold shutdown and have been for a while, they require minimal water circulation to deal with the heat from residual radioactivity. Unit 5 is in hot shutdown - not producing electricity, but producing a small amount of heat for onsite steam uses. This will require more cooling water circulation than cold shutdown, but not nearly as much as normal operations.

They could shut down Unit 5, as well, although I am under the impression that will cause issues for maintenance, especially once winter returns.

The loss of access to cooling water will also affect the nearby Zaporizhzhia Thermal Plant, with 6 coal plants totalling 2.8 GW of power. It also is not currently operating due to lack of coal deliveries.

The destruction of the dam likely means neither will be able to resume operation quickly after the war. I have little doubt the economic harm to Ukraine of destruction of the dam is in the tens of billions of dollars range. Of course, there is also the possibility of deaths due to the downstream flooding.

Revelation wrote:
Another theory floating around says that the Russians just left the dam gates closed till the dam exceeded 100% and due to its weakened state from various shelling etc it ruptured all by itself. OTOH it was already wired with explosives, this has been known for months. The problem is that locals did not report hearing a major explosion before the dam failed.

The downside of the various disinformation campaigns is there aren't many sources that retain credibility. In short, we don't know who to believe.


I have been thinking about this in order to give considerations to alternatives to Russia being intentionally responsible. I lean away from this theory since there appear to be three distinct breaches of the dam:

1) The largest breach runs half the width of the spillway and ends at the west end of the power house
2) One in the middle of the powerhouse
3) One running from the east end of the powerhouse to the locks.

I would expect (although admittedly don't consider it the only possible scenario) a structural failure to begin at a single point and widen progressively. I'm also not certain there are many civilians still close to the dam to hear and report explosions, much less to think of them as distinct in an area where shelling regularly occurs.

Satellite image from today showing the breaches:

https://twitter.com/kromark/status/1666055452138848256

With that said, we do know that the reservoir is overfilled. I do not know whether this is due to Russia intentionally controlling the flood gates, or seasonal flows to a dam with damaged flood gates, but here is a graph of the reservoir levels for the last 7 years, showing a big decrease last fall to apparently record lows, and a big increase this spring to apparently record highs:

https://hydroweb.theia-land.fr/collecti ... a?lang=en&

The water level peaked around May 8, presumably cresting the flood gates that are still intact. A section of roadway that runs along the downstream face of the dam, and is in the area visibly experiencing the highest flows, was also documented by satellite images to have collapsed between June 2 (based on lower resolution Sentinel imagery not linked) and June 5 (higher resolution image in the link):

https://twitter.com/evanhill/status/1665933276647772160
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 29623
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Tue Jun 06, 2023 5:56 pm

bikerthai wrote:
Revelation wrote:
The problem is that locals did not report hearing a major explosion before the dam failed.

Charges located inside the dam service tunnel would not cause much of a ruckus outside the dam when detonate.

True, and it seems clear the timing of the event favors RU. No one is talking about Belgorod today. It could be that RU felt it had to "do something" to change the dynamics of the situation and had kept this one on the shelf for just this kind of situation.

One of the analyses of the Kerch Bridge suggested a good reason to weaken yet not destroy the bridge was so that UA could keep its status as a concern for RU going forward. Once you blow it up it sucks that it's lost but then you move on, and no longer worry about the threat of it being destroyed.

Perhaps of note:

The United States government has intelligence that is leaning toward Russia as the culprit of the attack on the dam in Ukraine, according to two U.S. officials and one Western official.

President Joe Biden’s administration was working to declassify some of the intelligence and share it as early as Tuesday afternoon.

The motive behind the explosion was still being assessed, but the collapse appears likely to make it more difficult for Ukrainian forces to conduct a river crossing and also presents a difficult humanitarian challenge, the Western official said.

Ref: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/live ... #rcrd13603
 
oldJoe
Posts: 1307
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 11:04 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Tue Jun 06, 2023 7:21 pm

Endless fantasies (lies) from Russia. Next Hammer: Shoigu Presents Hitting Tractor As Destruction Of Leopard 2 Tank :o
https://charter97.org/en/news/2023/6/6/550943/
Seems to me like the people in the Kremlin are living in their own dream world to deny reality
 
GDB
Posts: 18172
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Wed Jun 07, 2023 7:34 pm

They even managed to flood some of their own controlled areas;
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/ ... for-russia
(Including their very own 'Comical Alexski').
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jirEg558n08

https://www.theguardian.com/world/video ... apse-video

Way to go on extending your influence Vlad, this survey from before the dam was burst;
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/ ... since-2021

The Little Toxic Manmaid;
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... am-cartoon

https://www.theguardian.com/global/vide ... ding-video

As usual, defiance from those he seeks to subjugate.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/ ... ent-spirit
I try not not do the cliche quotes, too often used and applied to situations that often don't merit it, however;
'What kind of people do they think we are?'
Churchill, 1940.
 
GDB
Posts: 18172
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Thu Jun 08, 2023 1:17 am

Polish TV update, the flooding, Ukrainian strikes, SF kill high ranking Russian Paratroop officer (they've lost a few), intense fighting in the Bakhmut area, including go pro of an intense engagement from a building;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLTIh6_d-bA

Three FPV strikes;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5-2ReOC7Uk
 
alanb976
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2021 9:46 am

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Thu Jun 08, 2023 8:25 am

Articles in the Australian media today about Ukraine potentially getting some of the old classic Australian Hornets. Would have thought the Canadians would have got the best of them.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-08/ ... /102452394
 
User avatar
Braybuddy
Posts: 7710
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 8:14 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Thu Jun 08, 2023 12:37 pm

The counteroffensive has begun, according to the Washington Post, citing four Ukrainian officers and soldiers. Russian milbloggers have reported heavy fighting in the Zaporizhzhia region:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/20 ... offensive/
 
iamlucky13
Posts: 2063
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:35 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Thu Jun 08, 2023 5:33 pm

bikerthai wrote:
Revelation wrote:
The problem is that locals did not report hearing a major explosion before the dam failed.


Charges located inside the dam service tunnel would not cause much of a ruckus outside the dam when detonate.


FYI, the ISW update for June 6 (the day of the collapse) does mention reports of explosions:

Institute for the Study of War wrote:
Russian and Ukrainian sources began reporting loud noises resembling explosions emanating from the KHPP (across the Dnipro River in the Nova Kakhovka area about 55km northeast of Kherson City) between 0200 and 0230 local time on June 6, followed by reports of rushing water and an overall increase in the water level of the Dnipro.


https://understandingwar.org/background ... une-6-2023

To consider all possibilities, it does seem plausible that the reports could be related to either artillery fire, or large scale sudden cracking of concrete. On the other hand, the ISW June 7 update summarizes a New York Times article that includes the opinions of several experts that neither the previous damage the dam took from GMLRS strikes to hit the bridge along the downstream side of the dam, nor alleged Russian cruise missile strikes after the withdrawal from Kherson that damaged some of the flood gates (suspected to be intended to cause challenges for Ukrainian troops operating on the delta islands) were likely to cause the collapse. The article is behind a paywall:

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/06/worl ... ussia.html
 
iamlucky13
Posts: 2063
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:35 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Thu Jun 08, 2023 6:05 pm

Braybuddy wrote:
The counteroffensive has begun, according to the Washington Post, citing four Ukrainian officers and soldiers. Russian milbloggers have reported heavy fighting in the Zaporizhzhia region:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/20 ... offensive/


I'm still watching for signs Ukraine's operations genuinely amount to multiple brigades in strength, although Ukraine is obviously keeping tight operational security, and I think even the Russian milbloggers are either distracted by the dam collapse, or also not receiving as much information from their contacts in the RuAF as usual.

I have seen images of a couple company-size operations (which can be part of larger operations) that are claimed by Russian sources to be Ukrainian advances being stopped by minefields. One of them appears to include a couple Leopard 2A4 tanks, but in the images of burning vehicles, I can't ID what is present.

I would tentatively speculate that Ukraine is trying moderate intensity operations to push the lines in Zaporhizhzhia oblast closer to the Russian main line of defense in multiple location. If so, they would then have multiple options for locations to commit a larger force to attempt a breach of the main line of defense.

There is a very good assessment of the push around Velyka Novosilka here. Admittedly, it is based on images that are now 3 days old, but it is a good example of using multiple sources of information to determine the likely situation:

https://twitter.com/J_JHelin/status/1666513162928005127
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 29623
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Thu Jun 08, 2023 6:17 pm

iamlucky13 wrote:
bikerthai wrote:
Revelation wrote:
The problem is that locals did not report hearing a major explosion before the dam failed.


Charges located inside the dam service tunnel would not cause much of a ruckus outside the dam when detonate.


FYI, the ISW update for June 6 (the day of the collapse) does mention reports of explosions:

Institute for the Study of War wrote:
Russian and Ukrainian sources began reporting loud noises resembling explosions emanating from the KHPP (across the Dnipro River in the Nova Kakhovka area about 55km northeast of Kherson City) between 0200 and 0230 local time on June 6, followed by reports of rushing water and an overall increase in the water level of the Dnipro.


https://understandingwar.org/background ... une-6-2023

To consider all possibilities, it does seem plausible that the reports could be related to either artillery fire, or large scale sudden cracking of concrete. On the other hand, the ISW June 7 update summarizes a New York Times article that includes the opinions of several experts that neither the previous damage the dam took from GMLRS strikes to hit the bridge along the downstream side of the dam, nor alleged Russian cruise missile strikes after the withdrawal from Kherson that damaged some of the flood gates (suspected to be intended to cause challenges for Ukrainian troops operating on the delta islands) were likely to cause the collapse. The article is behind a paywall:

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/06/worl ... ussia.html

Since UA announced the dam was wired to blow months ago, it really would have been nice if they had set up an observation point with optical and IR cameras focused on the dam so they could have actual evidence of the explosion to show the world. It would also allow it to alert its own citizens downstream. I realize there is a war on, but IMO the effort would have paid strong dividends.
 
Oykie
Posts: 2301
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 9:21 am

Re: Russian Invasion of Ukraine - *Discussion* Thread

Thu Jun 08, 2023 6:31 pm

The War Zone is having an update that Ukraine is advancing, but are taking heavy casualties even loosing a Leopard 2 tank. The update say it is to be expected this early in the offense.

From the article it says:

Amidst a highly complex operational picture, heavy fighting continues along multiple sectors of the front. In most areas Ukraine holds the initiative," The U.K. Defense Ministry (MoD) said on its Twitter account.

The objective is to push across the flat open fields south of the Dnipro River toward Crimea in order to cut the peninsula off from the so-called land bridge. A successful operation would go a long way toward meeting Ukraine’s desire of kicking Russia completely out of its land

One US official described the losses – which include US supplied MRAP armored personnel vehicles as 'significant..”

You can read more here : https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/u ... resistance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos