Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
SEAorPWM wrote:https://www.cnbc.com/2022/06/16/environmental-groups-sue-biden-to-block-oil-and-gas-drilling-permits.html
While I agree with the premise, wouldn't this mainly be replacing the fossil fuels sold by Russia and OPEC autocracies?
william wrote:SEAorPWM wrote:https://www.cnbc.com/2022/06/16/environmental-groups-sue-biden-to-block-oil-and-gas-drilling-permits.html
While I agree with the premise, wouldn't this mainly be replacing the fossil fuels sold by Russia and OPEC autocracies?
Environmentalist are problem wondering what is the problem? They state higher gas prices are good, makes clean energy competitive. Problem is, it is political suicide.
MohawkWeekend wrote:You could see incremental refinery modifications to get say a a couple of thousand more barrels of output but most of the easy stuff has been done. Alot of the refinery cap-ex spending in recent years has been to simply make the cleaner fuels required - Ultra Low Sulfur diesel for OTR trucks and low sulfur fuel oil for ships.
No one is going to build a new refinery in the North America or Europe. Soon gasoline demand will begin to fall with the adoption of EV's. Who wants to be stuck with a multi billion dollar investment that only has a limited life span?
I've been preaching for quite sometime that what we are seeing now was going to happen but the banning of Russian oil (and gasoline/diesel) exports moved this date up.
The aviation industry is going to get hurt the worse. They are somehow hoping that some benevolent oil company will build multi billion dollar sustainable fuel refineries (and in a hurry) with prices similar to what they are paying now. Because as gasoline demand falls in the next few years, more refineries will close. And the remaining ones will charge even more for their products. And yet airlines are all talking about growth. They better start looking at buying oil refineries (like Delta did) to ensure someone is around to refine the fossil jet fuel they'll need for the next 28 years.
Sri Lanka only has enough fuel for about five more days, minister says
Sri Lanka's fuel stocks will last for about five more days, its power and energy minister said on Thursday, as the island nation awaits official confirmation from the Indian government for a new $500 million credit line for fuel.
The country of 22 million people is caught in its worst financial crisis in seven decades after its foreign exchange reserves dwindled to record lows, with dollars running out to pay for essential imports including food, medicine and fuel.
Nigerian Fuel Crisis Could See Airlines Shut Down
According to the Airline Operators of Nigeria (AON), the cost of aviation fuel has risen to about N714 ($1.72) per liter, making it almost impossible for Nigerian airlines to sustain flight operations. ...
Unfortunately, the AON has noted that a committee set up to regulate aviation fuel prices can do little to nothing as the rising fuel costs result from foreign exchange rates and worldwide oil prices.
Egypt’s Prime Minister Urges Egyptians to Rationalize Food Consumption
Madbouly noted that the government is exerting tremendous effort to mitigate the crisis, and urged the Egyptian public to “rationalize” their food consumption in order to lessen the constraints and pressures that are imposed on the government, according to Ahram Online.
On the same day, Minister of Supply and Internal Trade Ali Moselhi noted that Egypt has strategic reserves of basic commodities, and that cooking oil, wheat, and sugar will be sufficient for the upcoming six months.
GalaxyFlyer wrote:There’s 400 million petroleum powered vehicles in the US, using petroleum isn’t going away any time soon, certainly not in the lifetime of more refineries—not before 2060. Realistically, petroleum is here to stay for a very long time.
seb146 wrote:"Breaking Bad" actor Dean Norris summed things up pretty well:
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/b ... capitalism
This is the free market doing what the free market does. Capitalism being capitalism. Those blaming Biden and Democrats and demanding a return to covid ways obviously hate capitalism.
ACDC8 wrote:Read an article today where gas station in BC who typically take in 10 cents per litre in profits are now taking in 20 cents per litre in profits - but yeah, its all Trudeau's fault
WildcatYXU wrote:Well, in Ontario he and his party are definitely responsible for 12.43c/liter.
ACDC8 wrote:WildcatYXU wrote:Well, in Ontario he and his party are definitely responsible for 12.43c/liter.
Here in Metro Vancouver, we pay the most fuel taxes of anywhere in North America, but they're not the reason why fuel prices have gone up almost a dollar per litre in a period of a couple of months.
While the taxes our Governments have put on fuel is a part of what we're paying at the pumps, pointing the finger at them in blame as the reason why fuel is so expensive now is just simply beyond silly.
Look at Germany, Government cut taxes by 30 cents, price of oil went down, price of gas went up even more and the oil companies and gas stations profits sky rocketed.
MohawkWeekend wrote:Gas prices could reach ‘apocalyptic’ levels during hurricane season, oil expert warns
https://nypost.com/2022/06/24/gas-price ... il-expert/
Tropical Development Possible By Early Next Week Near Windward Islands; 'Bonnie' Could Then Become Caribbean Concernhttps://weather.com/storms/hurri ... r-antilles
GalaxyFlyer wrote:MohawkWeekend wrote:You could see incremental refinery modifications to get say a a couple of thousand more barrels of output but most of the easy stuff has been done. Alot of the refinery cap-ex spending in recent years has been to simply make the cleaner fuels required - Ultra Low Sulfur diesel for OTR trucks and low sulfur fuel oil for ships.
No one is going to build a new refinery in the North America or Europe. Soon gasoline demand will begin to fall with the adoption of EV's. Who wants to be stuck with a multi billion dollar investment that only has a limited life span?
I've been preaching for quite sometime that what we are seeing now was going to happen but the banning of Russian oil (and gasoline/diesel) exports moved this date up.
The aviation industry is going to get hurt the worse. They are somehow hoping that some benevolent oil company will build multi billion dollar sustainable fuel refineries (and in a hurry) with prices similar to what they are paying now. Because as gasoline demand falls in the next few years, more refineries will close. And the remaining ones will charge even more for their products. And yet airlines are all talking about growth. They better start looking at buying oil refineries (like Delta did) to ensure someone is around to refine the fossil jet fuel they'll need for the next 28 years.
There’s 400 million petroleum powered vehicles in the US, using petroleum isn’t going away any time soon, certainly not in the lifetime of more refineries—not before 2060. Realistically, petroleum is here to stay for a very long time.
MohawkWeekend wrote:Trump's pressure on the Saudi's was the RIGHT move. They could have crushed US shale production due to their lower cost of production compared to drilling in the States. We saved many oil field jobs and expertise that would have taken years to reconstitute. Remember there was so much oil that companies were being paid to take it off oil companies hands in the United States.
Much as I don't care for Trump - this was the smart thing to do. Think how much more we would be beholden to OPEC and the Russians if Trump hadn't done that.
MohawkWeekend wrote:Which proved Trump right - low prices below the cost of production in the United States would have permanetly devastated the American shale oil industry. So even though shale production fell when prices were low, they quickly went back up when the market realized that OPEC wasn't going to be able to destroy the US's oil producers.
Oil is one of the most strategic assets a country can have. It won WWII for us and is right now keeping Putin's damage in reasonable check. And the Iranians and the Venezuelans too.
Trump's move was spot on. In fact, IMO President Biden should put a large tariff on all oil imported to the US except that from Canada. It would speed up the transition to low carbon future and protect us from a pretty dangerous world.
il has a new problem. They are probably already producing too much oil to meet demand.
Citi’s analysts see oil falling to $65, and could fall further to $45 a barrel by the end of 2023 if oil-exporting countries don’t intervene to reduce supply.
Aesma wrote:Also the rate hikes have made the Euro plunge to parity against the Dollar, from 1,2 to 1 one year ago, so the Euro countries aren't seeing that much of a plunge in imported oil yet, and everything else that is imported is more expensive...
Aesma wrote:Since getting oil shouldn't be a problem (at least if you can pay the price) I wonder if it's time for electricity providers to check/make investments so that their gas fired power plants can use oil. It should be possible for some of them.
German legislators saw it differently. Last week, the country’s parliament, with the backing of members of the Green Party in the coalition government, passed emergency legislation to reopen coal-powered plants, as well as further measures to boost the production of renewable energy. There would be no effort to restart closed nuclear power plants, or even reconsider the timeline for closing the last active reactors.
“The gas storage tanks must be full by winter,” Robert Habeck, Germany’s economy minister and a member of the Green Party, said in June. “That is our top priority.”
Partially as a result of that prioritization, Germany — which has already seen carbon emissions rise over the past two years, missing its ambitious emissions targets — will emit even more carbon in 2022.
Aesma wrote:Since getting oil shouldn't be a problem (at least if you can pay the price) I wonder if it's time for electricity providers to check/make investments so that their gas fired power plants can use oil. It should be possible for some of them.
casinterest wrote:Oil has plummeted back close to 90 bucks
https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/crude-oil
For those keeping score the price has dropped almost 25% from the 120 dollar high.
Another Rate Hike may be coming from the Fed.
SRQLOT wrote:casinterest wrote:Oil has plummeted back close to 90 bucks
https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/crude-oil
For those keeping score the price has dropped almost 25% from the 120 dollar high.
Another Rate Hike may be coming from the Fed.
Yet in Utah gas is still over $5.00. Been at $5.15 for almost a week now. Still better then the $5.29 I paid last 2 weeks.
GalaxyFlyer wrote:Why should people be subsidized in their choice of vehicle? Why is governments deciding who gets “free” transportation and others don’t. Small government means government doesn’t take from some citizens to give to others.
mxaxai wrote:The 'small government' party in action again. This time trying to force towns and businesses to demolish EV chargers and add bureaucracy to their operation. Heck, they'd even be willing to spend additional state funds just to get rid of infrastructure. Throwing a temper tantrum just because other people get offered nice things as a form of advertisement. Things the bill proponents don't want to use anyway, mind you. But if I can't have it, then you shall have it neither.
https://www.thedrive.com/news/a-north-c ... ee-gas-too
GalaxyFlyer wrote:Why should people be subsidized in their choice of vehicle? Why is governments deciding who gets “free” transportation and others don’t. Small government means government doesn’t take from some citizens to give to others.
mxaxai wrote:The 'small government' party in action again. This time trying to force towns and businesses to demolish EV chargers and add bureaucracy to their operation. Heck, they'd even be willing to spend additional state funds just to get rid of infrastructure. Throwing a temper tantrum just because other people get offered nice things as a form of advertisement. Things the bill proponents don't want to use anyway, mind you. But if I can't have it, then you shall have it neither.
https://www.thedrive.com/news/a-north-c ... ee-gas-too