bpatus297 wrote:casinterest wrote:bpatus297 wrote:
Do you every read someone's post who has a different opinion/view than you for comprehension or is it just to look for points to argue? I said, no less than three times, that I think it is being used politically. Your article doesn't lay out a good case that it is out of line, in fact, I thought it shows how Russia handles most of these cases very similar.
“Foreigners tend to receive stricter sentences because it’s harder to impose a non-custodial sentence,” said Levinson.
The article goes on to talk about how she supported Briona Taylor, which has nothing to do with the Russian sentence.
The article states three years. This conversation started because you jumped in about my assertion that the sentence was too long. Don't talk about points to argue when it was you who jumped in.
The three years read like an opinion to me. I don't see any facts to back that up.
Quoted in the article from someone with experience.
Either way. Folks are working in the state department to get her released and on with her life.