afcjets wrote:It's telling you say her reason was not because the claims I am making or that Fox wanted to make were untrue.
Do you have a link that shows Fox presented arguments against Dominion after November or December, 2020? (aside from Tucker interviewing Mike Lindell about being cancelled from Twitter over his claims). You say they continued for months but I don't recall any.
It's in the court documents Dominion released in support of their motion for summary judgement. Those have all been posted here and discussed in detail, as well as being posted and the source of numerous news stories online. Have you read them?
All of that information was the result of discovery, and was established as fact by the court. They outline the timeline of what was said on the air, as opposed to what was said in private e-mails and texts, at the same time. Tucker was still referencing the election fraud claims and Dominion, even after Jan 6. In fact he used them as a defense of the rioters.
At the same time, he was disparaging team Trump in private. At the same time, he was complaining about truthful coverage presented on Fox by other reporters. At the same time, he was imploring management to continue making the false claims, in order to maintain viewership and ratings.
Then in his deposition for Dominion, under oath, he said that he never believed the fraud claims, or the Dominion claims. And every person at Fox, testified to the same thing.
You cannot reconcile this by claiming that he questioned Sydney Powell on air, or that he somehow refuted those claims on air. In fact the Dominion discovery shows that he never did, nor has he ever, to this day. Nor has Fox.
Finally the judge affirmed this, and said as a finding of fact of the court, that Fox made no significant effort to redress the claims they had previously made about Dominion. That by definition, includes Tucker.
Thus it's impossible for your claims about Tucker to be correct, unless you believe all these findings and rulings and evidence and Fox's settlement, are somehow incorrect. And you have presented no evidence that they are incorrect, that I can see.