YoungMans is on a long road trip and sends regular e-mails.You wouldn't be surprised where he is
Don't tell me he is on some exotic island collecting artifacts from MH370.This is not necessary,tell him to come back to civilization!
Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
YoungMans is on a long road trip and sends regular e-mails.You wouldn't be surprised where he is
777Jet wrote:Spyhunter wrote:Don't believe everything you read in the papers, InsideMan! None of those journalists was professional enough to speak to me and their coverage, inevitably, was one-sided. Substantial fresh evidence has emerged,some of it supplied, by MI5, and the convictions have been referred to the Criminal Cases Review Commission.
As it happens I'm a member of British Mensa - we don't see many lunatics at our gatherings!
Not sure if Buzzard was joking or not, however the Apollo missions were most certainly not faked. At the risk of repeating myself I have met two of the Apollo astronauts, General Tom Stafford USAF and Captain Jim Lovell USN, both men of great courage and integrity. The idea that they lied about going around the Moon is just silly, indeed their spacecraft were tracked there and back.
Your claim that the indecent 'images' were planted might be true (if so I hope you get the justice that you are owed), but you also say the MH370 debris, the AF447 box, etc, were also planted. 'Planted' is a very convenient excuse, for almost any matter. I don't agree, therefore "it was planted". Regarding MH370, the item in the SCS was never confirmed as even coming from a plane! It could be a hatch from a boat or whatever - MH370 is not the only wreck on the planet! How many items washing up around the Indian Ocean will it take for you to possibly change your idea on what happened, or will they all have been planted? If they find the fuselage mostly intact one day at the bottom of the SIO will that have been planted too? Are you going to suggest that MH370 wreckage could be 'planted' after being relocated from MH17? When (what will it take for) does the 'it was planted' line end with MH370 for you?
BTW I've also met Jim Lovell; I lived very close to him in Horseshoe Bay, TX for a long time. Indeed he is a man of courage and integrity - what he did to get Apollo 13 home was amazing.
IIRC the other poster wasn't questioning the Apollo missions going into space and around the moon. He was questioning the landing on the moon itself. Big difference.
Spyhunter wrote:I do indeed mind the human tragedy 9MMPQ and have spoken out in an effort to prevent further tragedy. I am not 'stepping over' evidence, merely requiring an audit trail.
zeke wrote:Looks like another sizeable piece was found washed up in Africa.
SomebodyInTLS wrote:zeke wrote:Looks like another sizeable piece was found washed up in Africa.
Any link?
EIDL wrote:We're now going to be told it was "planted", of course.
Spyhunter wrote:In response to EIDL it would hardly have come from 370 if it was on the coast of East Africa, given that the flight was shot down over the SCS!
Spyhunter wrote:Of course if the plane were found that would change matters altogether. Anyone reading Zeke's posts with respect would think it had been found. As I predicted in March 2014, however, the SIO search has proved fruitless, despite the use of modern sidescan sonar. The missing 777 hasn't been found in the SIO because it isn't in the SIO. It's at the bottom of the SCS. Don't forget that naval assets with high-performance active sonar were involved in the search, most being withdrawn once sonar scans showed no sign of a 777-sized target and word got around the Intelligence Community about the shoot-down, which was caught on satellite. There's your evidence, Zeke, but of course the public is never shown the SATINT.
salttee wrote:Why does this only happen on MH-370 threads?
PlanesNTrains wrote:
"Of course if the plane were found that would change matters altogether". Were they to find it in the SIO, what would you say? Would you accept that you were mistaken or would there be an explanation of how it got there?
spacecadet wrote:Apparently you've never seen a TWA 800 thread!
I do indeed mind the human tragedy 9MMPQ and have spoken out in an effort to prevent further tragedy.
Once governments and intelligence agencies get involved evidence tends to get fabricated, in which case it isn't evidence at all. Take my own case, eg: a memory stick was swapped. The new stick when tested didn't have my fingerprints and DNA on it, and its batch number showed it was probably in Singapore when I am supposed to have acquired it thousands of miles away. 'My' laptop hard drive turned out to be the wrong type for the laptop, with a warranty expiry date 18 months after mine.
Spyhunter wrote:If the plane were to be found in the SIO then of course I would change my position - I recognise facts, but one has to distinguish hard fact from planted evidence.
Spyhunter wrote:My firm understanding is that Boeing ID'd the wreckage found in the SCS as from a 777, which could only have been MH370. It was clearly aircraft wreckage and no other aircraft was lost over the SCS in a time frame which could account for floating wreckage.
Spyhunter wrote:If the plane were in the SIO it would have been found by now.
Spyhunter wrote:No idea who NAV30 is I'm afraid - I'm new to this site.
Spyhunter wrote:From reply 72Nice to see the professionalism of pilots being defended. Airline pilots are NOT generally given to murdering their passengers, or committing suicide. Captain Shah was a good man, and a dedicated pilot. He took care of his passengers, exhibited a high degree of professionalism in his work and was proud of his profession. He had every right to be.
Spyhunter wrote:Is there any particular reason, by the way, why 777Jet's profile photo is of a 747-400, or am I just being picky?
Spyhunter wrote:From reply 85Suicide, say the anti-Shah brigade, but if he wanted to commit suicide he could have done that over the South China Sea, indeed he he could have committed suicide on his way to the airport.
Spyhunter wrote:From reply 204I return to a point I made earlier - what was Captain Shah DOING over this remote part of the ocean? Commercial airline pilots tend to be rational people.
KarelXWB wrote:More debris that is believed to be from MH370 has been found nearby Mozambique.
Sources
https://twitter.com/mozguide/status/769118524472164352/
https://twitter.com/Airlandseaman/statu ... 477138944/
AS512 wrote:
What would the line of screws that are in the red be going to? Is there an access panel in that area of the tail? I wasn't able to find any pictures showing anything that would be in that area.
KarelXWB wrote:More debris that is believed to be from MH370 has been found nearby Mozambique.
Spyhunter wrote:The Smithsonian also claim that the Me 262 was the world's first jet fighter! (The Meter was first, by 3 months, as J W A Taylor revealed in the 60s).
Responding to Buzzard203 (pseudonym inspired by the engine, I take it?), you would be surprised at what governments are able to get covered up. Civil service whistle-blowers are rare. Most are too worried about their promotion prospects or pension. Not 'every' accident investigation body is involved in the MH370 cover-up, just the NTSB, AAIB and the Malaysians, with a bit of help from the Aussies. As I think I have pointed out both NTSB and AAIB have been caught out in deliberate lies, NTSB over TWA800, e.g., and AAIB over Flight 38, where the fuel didn't freeze. Don't know how they get on over ordering pizzas.
I have gone public on the 370 shoot-down, but the mainstream media have ignored my comments. Spyhunter has had a big impact in INTELCOM but so far no newspaper has dared to review it.
No arguments 777Jet over the 747 wing, a fine piece of design. No need to change the photo! NAV would do well to have a closer look at the wreckage. Dumping wreckage is an old trick.
Jury still out on Germanwings. The Calloway incident was admittedly bad, but turns on its own facts. His plea of insanity was rightly rejected, although it is a pity that the death sentence is not available for air piracy, which this was, albeit with attempted insurance fraud thrown in. Yes, there have been incidents of suicidal or criminal behaviour by pilots but they are vanishingly rare.
At the risk of patronising some posters there seems to be a lack of understanding about the capabilities of satellites, which picked up the shoot-down.
Satellite imagery (SATINT) can be hundreds of miles off track. Of course you only have a limited horizon, but the SCS is a sensitive area covered by more than bird. Upper air is cold and infra-red imaging is more effective when the background temperature is low. A detonating warhead at altitude will usually show up very nicely. With computer enhancement you can even get good electro-optical imaging at night. The birds no longer switch off- that goes back to the 60s and chemical film. It follows that you can get good imagery of a low-interest area traversed by birds on an orbit taking them over Afghanistan or China. Most of the downloaded imagery is never viewed, but if you have an incident you can dial it up.
The shoot-down was caught on satellite, and satellites confirmed that no 777-sized target flew to the SIO from the north that night. That's why INTELCOM is confident about what happened to MH370.
Getting a bird moved can be great fun, by the way. The NRO hate it, as the birds have a limited fuel supply. I've only ever had a bird moved twice, thankfully leading to a very useful intel yield each time, otherwise I'd never have heard the end of it! The first time was over the DVD's HQ in Dachau. They got to know soon enough, but not before a huge amount of intelligence had been acquired, leading to a tighter NSA focus on Germany.
PlaneInsomniac wrote:Unfortunately, this speaks volumes about what has become of the a.net forums. An obivoulsy mentally ill 4-week member who never paid a membership fee spamming one of the few remaining threads with out-of-control conspiracy theories about not even the topic at hand, but random historical events, at 30-minute intervals. But according to DM and the crew, a.net is in perfect shape...
PlaneInsomniac wrote:this speaks volumes about what has become of the a.net forums.
7BOEING7 wrote:And now for another theory that's "out in left field".
The latest issue of Smithsonian Air & Space has an article by an author trying to peddle her book that suggests the Captain was in the lavatory when a rapid depressurization took place and remained there until his oxygen ran out while the copilot never put his oxygen mask on and some how in his 30-60 seconds of useful consciousness managed to flail around the cockpit turning off the transponder. She doesn't mention how he found time to reverse course and program the FMC for the flight to the SIO however.
I guess it's time to cancel my subscription when they start printing garbage like that.
salttee wrote:PlaneInsomniac wrote:this speaks volumes about what has become of the a.net forums.
Its been this way for a couple of years. Lately we see the same member here carrying on a dialogue with this troll who fed NAV30 for months on end back in 2014.
This nonsense undermines all the real discussion and information posted in this thread for a casual visitor.
But I guess it pleases those who come to A.net for polite entertaining fluff.
Spyhunter wrote:There is no audit trail linking any of the wreckage found with MH370. Painting a bit of 777 and bashing it about a bit would be straightforward for the Chinese. After their IL-96s were caught on satellite dumping bits of wreckage in the SIO I imagine they've moved to using Chinese-flagged freighters/container ships, or possibly even subs. This latest piece is small and would probably get through a torpedo loading hatch on a Kilo.
Spyhunter wrote:For the record I have worked WITH all three, but FOR none of them. Mossad are the most fun, MI6 the most polite and CIA the most generous when it comes to buying drinks. They also offered me $330,000 for bailing one of their guys out of the hoosegow, but I turned them down, not because I wasn't worth it, but because the whole thing was black as Hades and they were going to pay me out of the Seychelles from an account swollen with finds they'd lifted from the KGB.
777Jet wrote:people might have given your MH370 scenario more thought if you did not claim that AF447 was shot down and the AF447 boxes were planted, etc
Spyhunter wrote:Jury still out on Germanwings
Spyhunter wrote:In response to EIDL it would hardly have come from 370 if it was on the coast of East Africa, given that the flight was shot down over the SCS!
Spyhunter wrote:In response to PlanesNTrains my agenda is simple: I want to avoid further airliner shoot-downs using medium or long range SAMs, a threat to which the aviation community has been blind since TWA800.
Discussions about factual events happening in the airline and general aviation industries.
Spyhunter wrote:No comment on N14AZ's love life!
Spyhunter wrote:Thank you for the kind words, 777Jet. Of course I realised that some in the aviation community might find AF447 being shot down as well a stretch, but as I always told my intelligence students: tell it like it is, and always give your true opinion. You may get flak in return, but it will be less damaging than the flak Ira Eaker and dear old Bomber Harris's boys had to put up with over Berlin. Sticks and stones, etc.
Part of the problem is the excessive deference, with respect, paid to black boxes. They are a vital tool, but because the DVD or its French black agency can arrange to have them duplicated, albeit that it's a process which takes some time (I don't think they can do it in less than 7 days) , their value in the case of shoot-down or sabotage is limited. The audit trail for the black boxes then becomes all important.
I answer questions because I am trying to work the problem with intellectual rigour. If somebody raises a query, as they are fully entitled to do, it needs answering. If it can't be answered then the analysis may be faulty.
Spyhunter wrote:In response to N14AZ, yes it is a fact that MH370 was shot down over the SCS.
zeke wrote:The main feature of this disorder is the presence of delusions, unshakable beliefs in something untrue or not based on reality. People with delusional disorder generally experience non-bizarre delusions, which involve situations that could occur in real life, such as being followed, poisoned, deceived, conspired against, or loved from a distance. These delusions usually involve the misinterpretation of perceptions or experiences. In reality, however, the situations are either not true at all or highly exaggerated. If the delusions could not happen in reality (aliens, television broadcasting your thoughts) then a person might be considered delusional with bizarre-type delusions.
People with delusional disorder often can continue to socialize and function normally, apart from the subject of their delusion, and generally do not behave in an obviously odd or bizarre manner. This is unlike people with other psychotic disorders, who also might have delusions as a symptom of their disorder. In some cases, however, people with delusional disorder might become so preoccupied with their delusions that their lives are disrupted.
From http://www.m.webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/de ... l-disorder
Mental health issues are everywhere, it effects all sorts of people.