Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
JDAirCEO wrote:AA policy is to no longer give the can unless requested. However, the cups were increased in size at the same time. Overall it speeds up service and reduces waste, but one can assume it also reduces cost since it happened when snacks were reintroduced in Y. For every enhancement you see at an airline you can almost always find a service reduction at the same time that helps cover the enhancement cost.
JDAirCEO wrote:AA policy is to no longer give the can unless requested. However, the cups were increased in size at the same time. Overall it speeds up service and reduces waste, but one can assume it also reduces cost since it happened when snacks were reintroduced in Y. For every enhancement you see at an airline you can almost always find a service reduction at the same time that helps cover the enhancement cost.
Okcflyer wrote:It seems odd to me they would fly excess catering to prevent having to buy supplies at the turn location. That extra weight certainly burns fuel and could be the difference in another pax being kicked off on performance critical routes!
OzarkD9S wrote:Has any airline opted for store-branded sodas and juices? My local store brands are half the retail price as Coke or Pepsi, sometimes even if the major brands are on sale. Now there's a way to cut costs.
OzarkD9S wrote:Has any airline opted for store-branded sodas and juices? My local store brands are half the retail price as Coke or Pepsi, sometimes even if the major brands are on sale. Now there's a way to cut costs.
L1011 wrote:Why don't airlines in the U.S. use 7.5 ounce cans? In Europe, airlines use smaller cans and give you the whole can and a cup. It makes for a much faster beverage service.
Bob Bradley
miaskies wrote:In a perfect world...but this is the American market, MORE MORE MORE MORE.
kalvado wrote:Okcflyer wrote:It seems odd to me they would fly excess catering to prevent having to buy supplies at the turn location. That extra weight certainly burns fuel and could be the difference in another pax being kicked off on performance critical routes!
100 cans of soda (12 oz = 350 ml) would be about 1/3 of a passenger. Extra fuel burn would be in single digit dollars at most.
etops1 wrote:I really think you're misinterpreting this with apple juice ..
kalvado wrote:Okcflyer wrote:It seems odd to me they would fly excess catering to prevent having to buy supplies at the turn location. That extra weight certainly burns fuel and could be the difference in another pax being kicked off on performance critical routes!
100 cans of soda (12 oz = 350 ml) would be about 1/3 of a passenger. Extra fuel burn would be in single digit dollars at most.
Eirules wrote:etops1 wrote:I really think you're misinterpreting this with apple juice ..
Without wishing to sound rude, at 34years old I'm well aware of the difference between a bottle of white wine & a carton of apple juice unless AA now serves apple juice from a glass bottle