Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
log0008 wrote:Sounds like the stupidest thing ever but IF it somehow eventuated it would have to be via somewhere, maybe Australia, could it go Dubai-Cairns-Somoa?
77H wrote:If I'm reading the OP's post it appears that Samoa is potentially courting EK to use APW as a scissor hub (if you will) to connect Asia and SA.
It is actually an intriguing idea. Small countries allowing liberal air rights as a way to get on the map and get more traffic.
77H wrote:If I'm reading the OP's post it appears that Samoa is potentially courting EK to use APW as a scissor hub (if you will) to connect Asia and SA.
It is actually an intriguing idea. Small countries allowing liberal air rights as a way to get on the map and get more traffic.
smi0006 wrote:In fairness - NZ operate RAR-LAX and RAR-SYD once or twice a week as the route is subsidised by the Cook island government apparently. 767, being upgraded to a 772. Whilst RAR-AKL is a big market, neither are the other two.
No doubt subsidised by the Samoan government, but if it helps with suistainable economic development and supports greater infrastructure to enable more tourism and boost the economy, why not? Doubtful to be non-stop ex DXB, where else in AU Asia is not non-stop and not an A380? BNE?
smi0006 wrote:No doubt subsidised by the Samoan government, but if it helps with suistainable economic development and supports greater infrastructure to enable more tourism and boost the economy, why not? Doubtful to be non-stop ex DXB, where else in AU Asia is not non-stop and not an A380? BNE?
mariner wrote:
The Cook Islands agreed to the higher subsidy, but the route RAR-LAX is unlikely o be profitable in the foreseeable future.
mariner
The Cook Islands agreed to the higher subsidy, but the route RAR-LAX is unlikely o be profitable in the foreseeable future.
Mortyman wrote:Why ?