Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
QF29 wrote:Regional flights to Asia seem to be unaffected at the moment
ei146 wrote:Most larger airports in Germany have rail access to their fuel depot. So large amounts of fuel can be brought from any refinery in Europe relatively quickly.
If there is no refinery in Australia capable of producing jet fuel or no way to bring it to the airport in large amounts quickly or bean counters cutting down reserve so low that just one failed delivery can cause disruptions, well then you have a whole set of different problems.
QF29 wrote:EK407 will go via PER tonight on its way to DXB. Unkown if QF will do the same although I assume it would unless they've got a different agreement worked out. Regional flights to Asia seem to be unaffected at the moment
greg85 wrote:I believe that many of europes biggest airports are connected by pipelines.
greg85 wrote:I believe that many of europes biggest airports are connected by pipelines.
usflyer msp wrote:I was on QF93 MEL-LAX on 25Nov and we left about 20 minutes late because they had to steal fuel from another QF aircraft. I was not expecting such in "developed" airport like MEL...
a320fan wrote:usflyer msp wrote:I was on QF93 MEL-LAX on 25Nov and we left about 20 minutes late because they had to steal fuel from another QF aircraft. I was not expecting such in "developed" airport like MEL...
20 minutes is nothing for QF93. It has to be one of the most commonly delayed departures from MEL, seems at least 3/4 times a week it goes out with a delay of at least an hour, often more. I haven't looked at the stats though so this is purely from my own observation. Anyone have stats for on time departures of QF93?