Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
LAXintl wrote:I find it interesting that a high cost legacy carrier puts so much effort into chasing after longhaul leisure markets using premium heavy product fleet.
vhtje wrote:Who would be AY's target market for these flights?
AirbusOnly wrote:I wonder from where AY get the planes for these routes, as they currently got an IBERIA A 330 EC-LYF in charter for their Miami flights and before that they had an A 340 from HiFly 9H-SUN for weeks on their flights AY5/6 HEL-JFK-HEL on charter.
AirbusOnly wrote:I wonder from where AY get the planes for these routes, as they currently got an IBERIA A 330 EC-LYF in charter for their Miami flights and before that they had an A 340 from HiFly 9H-SUN for weeks on their flights AY5/6 HEL-JFK-HEL on charter.
jfk777 wrote:Finnair A350-900 have 46 J class seats which is hardly "too premium" look at the British Airways 744 86J and the Lufthansa 748 to see what Premium heavy is.
mercure1 wrote:jfk777 wrote:Finnair A350-900 have 46 J class seats which is hardly "too premium" look at the British Airways 744 86J and the Lufthansa 748 to see what Premium heavy is.
When the entire plane seats under 300 people, having 46 business class seats is quite a heavy premium configuration.
vhtje wrote:Interesting move. Who would be AY's target market for these flights? AY seem to have built a good business flying Europeans east to Asia and beyond (and, conversely, flying Asians west to various points in Europe) but I am not sure how their west-bound business model (toe beyond Europe) works. It makes no sense for a Brit to go to HEL to fly to PVR, for example, no matter how good the fare. And wouldn't Asian travellers be better heading to Mexico via the Pacific?
mercure1 wrote:jfk777 wrote:Finnair A350-900 have 46 J class seats which is hardly "too premium" look at the British Airways 744 86J and the Lufthansa 748 to see what Premium heavy is.
When the entire plane seats under 300 people, having 46 business class seats is quite a heavy premium configuration.
Also Finland and HEL is hardly the premium market which London or Frankfurt are.
KarelXWB wrote:Also note that Finnair's A350 feature a "flex compartment": the business seats behind the second door can be swapped for economy seats within 24 hours inside the maintenance hangar.
vrbarreto wrote:There were quite a few Finnish charter flights at goi last time I was there.. Would they have a technical stop or fly there non stop?
Strato2 wrote:KarelXWB wrote:Also note that Finnair's A350 feature a "flex compartment": the business seats behind the second door can be swapped for economy seats within 24 hours inside the maintenance hangar.
For that you would need to have those extra Y seats lying somewhere at that hangar. I don't think Finnair has those. So it sounds a bit like swapping engines on a 787 within 24 hours..
vhtje wrote:Interesting move. Who would be AY's target market for these flights? AY seem to have built a good business flying Europeans east to Asia and beyond (and, conversely, flying Asians west to various points in Europe) but I am not sure how their west-bound business model (toe beyond Europe) works. It makes no sense for a Brit to go to HEL to fly to PVR, for example, no matter how good the fare. And wouldn't Asian travellers be better heading to Mexico via the Pacific?
Do that many Finns want to go to Mexico?
vrbarreto wrote:I find it interesting that a high cost legacy carrier puts so much effort into chasing after longhaul leisure markets using premium heavy product fleet.
LAX772LR wrote:Has AY ever flown to LAX? Granted, I know it's easy for them to just put people on AA's flights from JFK/ORD/MIA... but wonder how conceivably it would be to see them here, since they're in something of an expansion mode?
petteri wrote:Somewhat disappointing that all these new leisure destinations get the A350 while JFK/MIA are still on the 330s. Any word on if this changes in the fall as well?
KarelXWB wrote:Strato2 wrote:KarelXWB wrote:Also note that Finnair's A350 feature a "flex compartment": the business seats behind the second door can be swapped for economy seats within 24 hours inside the maintenance hangar.
For that you would need to have those extra Y seats lying somewhere at that hangar. I don't think Finnair has those. So it sounds a bit like swapping engines on a 787 within 24 hours..
Well Finnair designed their A350 cabin with a flew compartment in mind.
It's not a unique feature though, other carriers too adjust business class demand during the year.
Strato2 wrote:vrbarreto wrote:There were quite a few Finnish charter flights at goi last time I was there.. Would they have a technical stop or fly there non stop?
The A320/321 stop at Dubai on the way.
AA300B wrote:How would the 1x weekly schedule work with the crew? Will they have a week-long layover or do they deadhead back home to Helsinki ?
BigGSFO wrote:Does PVR have other nonstops to Europe?
ryan78 wrote:AA300B wrote:How would the 1x weekly schedule work with the crew? Will they have a week-long layover or do they deadhead back home to Helsinki ?
My guess would be 24-36 hours in PVR then a deadhead to either SAN, ORD, EWR or JFK and 24-36 hours, then operate a live flight from SAN/ORD/JFK-HEL. At least that would seem the most cost effective use of the crew. My guess would be on SAN, Finnair starts flights June 1st 2017 so that would seem the best option. Plus probably more than daily flights from PVR to SAN between Alaska & Virgin America. That's where my bet is...
lucce wrote:Personally my money is on a layover in PVR, then dead heading to Cuba or the Dominican Republic and fly one of those home. They are also operated only 1-2 times a week. Looking at the destinations served from PVR it seems they're pretty light on the Caribbean services but they can probably connect through MEX etc.
ryan78 wrote:lucce wrote:The 2H40M flight to SAN seems to make the most sense but alas we will never know unless someone from Finnair crew scheduling can answer our question...
ryan78 wrote:Ooops, my apologies, I meant SFO not SAN (SAN is San Diego not San Francisco). AA300B asked about the x1 weekly flight and the crew laying over for 1 week in PVR. I said the most likely thing to do is deadhead them from PVR to SFO on either Alaska, United or Virgin America and have them operate the SFO-HEL flight home. I believe AY is starting 3 weekly HEL-SFO starting June 1st. I would edit my previous posts to prevent confusion but it appears I can't...
AA300B wrote:How would the 1x weekly schedule work with the crew? Will they have a week-long layover or do they deadhead back home to Helsinki ?
DeltaB717 wrote:KarelXWB wrote:Strato2 wrote:
For that you would need to have those extra Y seats lying somewhere at that hangar. I don't think Finnair has those. So it sounds a bit like swapping engines on a 787 within 24 hours..
Well Finnair designed their A350 cabin with a flew compartment in mind.
It's not a unique feature though, other carriers too adjust business class demand during the year.
That's not a flexible space, that's a separate part of the business cabin in which you can put your high-tier frequent flyer members who paid for economy but who you're upgrading to business because it's that or fly with a lot of empty seats!
vhtje wrote:Interesting move. Who would be AY's target market for these flights? AY seem to have built a good business flying Europeans east to Asia and beyond (and, conversely, flying Asians west to various points in Europe) but I am not sure how their west-bound business model (toe beyond Europe) works. It makes no sense for a Brit to go to HEL to fly to PVR, for example, no matter how good the fare. And wouldn't Asian travellers be better heading to Mexico via the Pacific?
Do that many Finns want to go to Mexico?
slcdeltarumd11 wrote:To escape the winter, they want to go anywhere warm! I bet they have hotels/travel agent/local incentives something pushed these destinations specifically. They will get help filling them, and like we said for vacationers seeking warmth, once a week even is just fine. Best way to get more use out of the planes, send them somewhere warm in winter. time will tell which work, but low risk.
artof wrote:As for client base to Puerto Vallarta, it is one of the great gay resorts in the world. As the only operator from Europe AY has a great potential clientele.