Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR

 
mjoelnir
Posts: 9411
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:06 pm

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Sat Apr 29, 2017 11:45 am

EA CO AS wrote:
mjoelnir wrote:
EA CO AS wrote:

The contract is for carriage, not for a specified seat on a specified flight, so any lease/rent arguments are invalid.


I can well understand that this is your opinion.



It's actually a fact, but hey, don't let that get in the way of a good ol' fashioned "Airlines are eeeeeeeeeevil!" mjoelnir rant...


What is a fact? That airlines can enforce their COC with force against their passengers?
Or is it a fact, that it is possible that airlines can sell a ticket for a certain flight on a certain date, on a certain time, non changeable, non refundable if the passenger does not fly on that time on that date and still declare their are bound by nothing? Is your airline really prepared to defend this in a court of law?

What you do not seem to understand is that contract law regarding consumers is complicated and not every clause is enforceable or defendable in a court of law. It may stand in your COC, but only a court can decide if that clause is good and that is a big reason that corporation rather not defend some clauses in front of a court.
 
dtw2hyd
Posts: 8737
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:11 pm

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:50 pm

EA CO AS wrote:
It's actually a fact, but hey, don't let that get in the way of a good ol' fashioned "Airlines are eeeeeeeeeevil!" mjoelnir rant...


Your condescending comments towards paid passengers are not helping the cause of 1000s of good airline employees.

Oscar shouldn't have tweeted. Let PR or attorneys handle the situation or stay with non-mainline excuse, not my problem.
There was no need to support the troops and city so quickly.
Oscar should have said "He is not wrong" without a pause, but said "He can't be wrong" with a pause. Real vs staged.

A series of costly mistakes of his own making.
All posts are just opinions.
 
StarAC17
Posts: 3937
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 11:54 am

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Sat Apr 29, 2017 3:37 pm

alfa164 wrote:
ahmetdouas wrote:
Let's not forget he'd have to pay 40% tax on whatever he gets ?


United1 wrote:
Could not tell you what the exact dollar amount is but it may not be as high as people think...probably low 7 figures if I were to hazard a guess. A huge percentage of that will go to the attorneys and another large chunk in taxes....


Payments designated for medical expenses and pain and suffering are generally not subject to federal income taxes. A properly-structured settlement will result in little, if any, tax liability.


No income taxes but a lot will be going to his lawyers that handled the settlement.

ikramerica wrote:
I'm sure it was for more than he deserved but not as much as he was hoping. Avoiding a trial and all the discovery of his past behaviors being made public was good for him.


First of all you have to convince a jury that his past indiscretions warranted him getting a concussion and losing two teeth. If this person had a rapsheet of causing disruptions on airlines then you might have an argument.

The main reason that UA did not want this is court is that they would have probably had to fork over more money, the COC would more than likely have been ripped apart by a judge, which would effect more than just UA.

727200 wrote:
I wouldn't have given this clown a dime. Go talk with the City of Chicago PD who did the damage. All this is going to do is encourage others to try the same thing. You should see all the crap airline employee's have to put up with since this happened. Its ridiculous the garbage they now encounter.


Then you would have been summoned in court and forced to by a jury and judge if you lost.

727LOVER wrote:
This reminds me of how quickly Disney settled with the alligator kid family. But why was there not as much hatred against Disney?


Many companies do shady stuff. Probably one of the most beloved companies out there is Apple.

They have had child labour issues, hide $2 trillion in cash overseas, colluded with other tech companies to keep labour costs down. Their former CEO whom is a genius was a certified asshole whom did nothing philanthropic while he was alive. Also there terms and conditions probably make UA's COC look angelic comparatively

People like Apple because they have a sexy phone that people love, Disney makes movies we like and now own the second biggest movie franchise in Star Wars.

People hate airlines and banks because they are for profit necessities and some of them probably act with way more corporate responsibility. The corporations people love make things or have services that people like and they put their blinders on.
Engineers Rule The World!!!!!
 
PlanesNTrains
Posts: 9524
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 4:19 pm

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Sat Apr 29, 2017 6:53 pm

mjoelnir wrote:
EA CO AS wrote:
mjoelnir wrote:

I can well understand that this is your opinion.



It's actually a fact, but hey, don't let that get in the way of a good ol' fashioned "Airlines are eeeeeeeeeevil!" mjoelnir rant...


What is a fact? That airlines can enforce their COC with force against their passengers?


You are twisting what he said.
-Dave


MAX’d out on MAX threads. If you are starting a thread, and it’s about the MAX - stop. There’s already a thread that covers it.
 
NorthTerminal
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2017 2:37 pm

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Sat Apr 29, 2017 9:49 pm

mjoelnir wrote:
EA CO AS wrote:
mjoelnir wrote:

I can well understand that this is your opinion.



It's actually a fact, but hey, don't let that get in the way of a good ol' fashioned "Airlines are eeeeeeeeeevil!" mjoelnir rant...


What is a fact? That airlines can enforce their COC with force against their passengers?
Or is it a fact, that it is possible that airlines can sell a ticket for a certain flight on a certain date, on a certain time, non changeable, non refundable if the passenger does not fly on that time on that date and still declare their are bound by nothing? Is your airline really prepared to defend this in a court of law?

What you do not seem to understand is that contract law regarding consumers is complicated and not every clause is enforceable or defendable in a court of law. It may stand in your COC, but only a court can decide if that clause is good and that is a big reason that corporation rather not defend some clauses in front of a court.


I think the point being is that arguments relating to other types of contract are not really pertinent and don't help arguments for or against. They may be useful as a simile, but don't really hold up to scrutiny beyond that, so are essentialy pointless.

The contract is indeed for carriage and not a specified flight. That is, until the passenger is boarded, then the contract is for a specific flight unless there is a safety or security reason to remove the passenger from the flight.

It is somewhat amusing that this argument is still raging into a second thread, even after all that has been said and transpired over the last couple of weeks.

10/10 for tenacity.
 
User avatar
KarelXWB
Posts: 26968
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 6:13 pm

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Wed Oct 18, 2017 8:06 am

Bump.

In addition to the settlement, two security officers have been fired, and another one resigned:

Three of the Chicago law enforcement officers involved in dragging a Louisville doctor off a United Airlines’ flight in April are no longer on the job, officials revealed Tuesday.

Chicago’s Inspector General Joseph Ferguson said an officer and an Aviation Security sergeant were fired, a third officer resigned and another received a five-day suspension — which was shorted to two days on appeal — for their involvement in the “violent forcible removal” of Dr. David Dao.


https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/airpl ... ht-n811546
What we leave behind is not as important as how we've lived.
 
bennett123
Posts: 10607
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 12:49 am

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Wed Oct 18, 2017 8:37 am

Jeffery Redding had also gone.

Not clear if for this or earlier non disclosure.
 
D L X
Posts: 12717
Joined: Thu May 27, 1999 3:30 am

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Wed Oct 18, 2017 12:44 pm

KarelXWB wrote:
Bump.

In addition to the settlement, two security officers have been fired, and another one resigned:

Three of the Chicago law enforcement officers involved in dragging a Louisville doctor off a United Airlines’ flight in April are no longer on the job, officials revealed Tuesday.

Chicago’s Inspector General Joseph Ferguson said an officer and an Aviation Security sergeant were fired, a third officer resigned and another received a five-day suspension — which was shorted to two days on appeal — for their involvement in the “violent forcible removal” of Dr. David Dao.


https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/airpl ... ht-n811546

Good. This is the appropriate outcome. Cops that misuse their license to use force should be retrained and/or removed.
 
L410Turbolet
Posts: 6287
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 9:12 am

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Wed Oct 18, 2017 1:29 pm

2175301 wrote:
[Knowingly letting people impersonate police; people not following procedures and protocol, etc.


Why does the federal government let the TSA officers knowingly impersonate law enforcement officers, which they are not?
 
User avatar
Super80Fan
Posts: 1622
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 4:14 am

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Thu Oct 19, 2017 12:00 am

Good, the United argument aside, the issue here revolved around these "security officers" and thinking they were above the law.
RIP McDonnell Douglas
RIP US Airways
 
ual777
Posts: 1642
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 6:18 am

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Thu Oct 19, 2017 1:03 am

I’ve heard the number is much lower than anyone thinks (5 figures). From what I’ve heard there is additional video of him in the terminal beating his ownhead against the wall or some other erratic behavior.
It is always darkest before the sun comes up.
 
jumbojet
Posts: 2957
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 3:01 am

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:03 am

ual777 wrote:
I’ve heard the number is much lower than anyone thinks (5 figures). From what I’ve heard there is additional video of him in the terminal beating his ownhead against the wall or some other erratic behavior.


famous last words, 'from what I heard'. So basically in other words, Dao banging his head in the terminal never happened. Now, if you can provide video of it, than I will believe you. And the true amount of any settlement is not known to you or anyone else for that matter. Unless your Dr. Dao, its pure speculation. But, it most likely reached into the 7 figures.

Now, from what I heard, Dao and family get free life time United flights in First/Business but reportedly, they declined the offer.
 
Varsity1
Posts: 2277
Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 4:55 am

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:54 am

If it were a material value it would have to be disclosed on UA's 10K filing.

I still find it amazing that Republic avoided any and all liability, it was their airplane and their crew.
 
jumbojet
Posts: 2957
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 3:01 am

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Thu Oct 19, 2017 5:02 am

Varsity1 wrote:
If it were a material value it would have to be disclosed on UA's 10K filing.

I still find it amazing that Republic avoided any and all liability, it was their airplane and their crew.


what does it say on the boarding pass and the side of the plane? It was for all intents and purposes, it was a United flight.
 
mjoelnir
Posts: 9411
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:06 pm

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Thu Oct 19, 2017 7:48 am

Varsity1 wrote:
If it were a material value it would have to be disclosed on UA's 10K filing.

I still find it amazing that Republic avoided any and all liability, it was their airplane and their crew.


Hidden in between other costs.
 
vfw614
Posts: 3936
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 12:34 am

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Thu Oct 19, 2017 7:57 am

The contract is indeed for carriage and not a specified flight.


It that is the position of US law, I hope that United is aware that this is not the legal situation in other jurisdictions where they do business. Most jurisdictions would find it slightly bizarre that when I enter into a contract of sale about a red car with leather seats, a specified engine and all kinds of gadgets, the car dealer can come up with a blue car with non-leather seats, a different engine and a different set of gadgets, based on the notion that it is a contract of sale about a car and not about a specified car as ordered.
 
CaliguyNYC
Posts: 1264
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 7:27 pm

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Thu Oct 19, 2017 2:01 pm

Varsity1 wrote:
If it were a material value it would have to be disclosed on UA's 10K filing.

I still find it amazing that Republic avoided any and all liability, it was their airplane and their crew.


When your annual profit is in excess of $1B, a $5M settlement is not material. Remember "material" is defined as material in relation to their business not a "big" number to normal people like us.

The comments on this thread are sort of shocking. I hope the heartless comments are not coming from airline employees. I would hate to flying on your airline. Fact remains, no one should be treated like Dr Doa was (unless you are literally threatening people, have a gun etc). This is an airline and airline employees are not God. America spoke very clearly on this. Everyone airline basically responded and changed how they handled overbooking and deplaning. If you can't connect the dots on this (and understand the airline industry knows it is wrong), you aren't seeing clearly what is going on. On a side note, I've avoided flying UA since the Dr Doa incident. Flying them for the first time because no choice. Let's see how it goes.
 
mm320cap
Posts: 320
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2004 12:35 pm

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Thu Oct 19, 2017 2:11 pm

CaliguyNYC wrote:
Varsity1 wrote:
If it were a material value it would have to be disclosed on UA's 10K filing.

I still find it amazing that Republic avoided any and all liability, it was their airplane and their crew.


When your annual profit is in excess of $1B, a $5M settlement is not material. Remember "material" is defined as material in relation to their business not a "big" number to normal people like us.

The comments on this thread are sort of shocking. I hope the heartless comments are not coming from airline employees. I would hate to flying on your airline. Fact remains, no one should be treated like Dr Doa was (unless you are literally threatening people, have a gun etc). This is an airline and airline employees are not God. America spoke very clearly on this. Everyone airline basically responded and changed how they handled overbooking and deplaning. If you can't connect the dots on this (and understand the airline industry knows it is wrong), you aren't seeing clearly what is going on. On a side note, I've avoided flying UA since the Dr Doa incident. Flying them for the first time because no choice. Let's see how it goes.


What AIRLINE employee mis-treated Dr. Dao? It was Chicago Airport Security. And they have been terminated.
 
User avatar
OA412
Moderator
Posts: 4821
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2000 6:22 am

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Thu Oct 19, 2017 2:17 pm

D L X wrote:
KarelXWB wrote:
Bump.

In addition to the settlement, two security officers have been fired, and another one resigned:

Three of the Chicago law enforcement officers involved in dragging a Louisville doctor off a United Airlines’ flight in April are no longer on the job, officials revealed Tuesday.

Chicago’s Inspector General Joseph Ferguson said an officer and an Aviation Security sergeant were fired, a third officer resigned and another received a five-day suspension — which was shorted to two days on appeal — for their involvement in the “violent forcible removal” of Dr. David Dao.


https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/airpl ... ht-n811546

Good. This is the appropriate outcome. Cops that misuse their license to use force should be retrained and/or removed.

Agreed. This was the proper outcome.
Hughes Airwest - Top Banana In The West
 
jumbojet
Posts: 2957
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 3:01 am

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:12 pm

mm320cap wrote:
[
What AIRLINE employee mis-treated Dr. Dao? It was Chicago Airport Security. And they have been terminated.


The airline policy mistreated Dao. It was the asinine policy that UA had back then that set the wheels in motion and that much was even admitted by the Chief Executive Officer of United Air Lines, Mr. Munoz. They are the ones that are ultimately responsible. Not only that, it was Oscar Munoz's two statements that immediately followed the incident that really flushed the toilet full throttle for United Airlines. People need to stop putting the blame squarely on security. This is like a plane crash. You have to identify and go back to the root cause of what ultimately led to the failures of this incident. You can't just say it was the fault of the security officer's that were called by United.
 
dtw2hyd
Posts: 8737
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:11 pm

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:23 pm

mm320cap wrote:
What AIRLINE employee mis-treated Dr. Dao? It was Chicago Airport Security. And they have been terminated.


Airport retail security is different from Airport security. Their responsibility was to enforce retail employee badges and make sure they are not entering unauthorized areas or someone shoplifting. Nothing to do with aviation security or planes in general.
All posts are just opinions.
 
mjoelnir
Posts: 9411
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:06 pm

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:44 pm

mm320cap wrote:
CaliguyNYC wrote:
Varsity1 wrote:
If it were a material value it would have to be disclosed on UA's 10K filing.

I still find it amazing that Republic avoided any and all liability, it was their airplane and their crew.


When your annual profit is in excess of $1B, a $5M settlement is not material. Remember "material" is defined as material in relation to their business not a "big" number to normal people like us.

The comments on this thread are sort of shocking. I hope the heartless comments are not coming from airline employees. I would hate to flying on your airline. Fact remains, no one should be treated like Dr Doa was (unless you are literally threatening people, have a gun etc). This is an airline and airline employees are not God. America spoke very clearly on this. Everyone airline basically responded and changed how they handled overbooking and deplaning. If you can't connect the dots on this (and understand the airline industry knows it is wrong), you aren't seeing clearly what is going on. On a side note, I've avoided flying UA since the Dr Doa incident. Flying them for the first time because no choice. Let's see how it goes.


What AIRLINE employee mis-treated Dr. Dao? It was Chicago Airport Security. And they have been terminated.


Still hiding behind that. I you ask somebody to beat someone else up, you are as guilty as the one doing the beating.
 
GamingPolaris
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2016 12:20 am

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Thu Oct 19, 2017 6:07 pm

mjoelnir wrote:
mm320cap wrote:
CaliguyNYC wrote:

When your annual profit is in excess of $1B, a $5M settlement is not material. Remember "material" is defined as material in relation to their business not a "big" number to normal people like us.

The comments on this thread are sort of shocking. I hope the heartless comments are not coming from airline employees. I would hate to flying on your airline. Fact remains, no one should be treated like Dr Doa was (unless you are literally threatening people, have a gun etc). This is an airline and airline employees are not God. America spoke very clearly on this. Everyone airline basically responded and changed how they handled overbooking and deplaning. If you can't connect the dots on this (and understand the airline industry knows it is wrong), you aren't seeing clearly what is going on. On a side note, I've avoided flying UA since the Dr Doa incident. Flying them for the first time because no choice. Let's see how it goes.


What AIRLINE employee mis-treated Dr. Dao? It was Chicago Airport Security. And they have been terminated.


Still hiding behind that. I you ask somebody to beat someone else up, you are as guilty as the one doing the beating.


No employee ever said, “Beat that man up.” So your speculation is flawed.
 
GamingPolaris
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2016 12:20 am

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Thu Oct 19, 2017 6:11 pm

mjoelnir wrote:
mm320cap wrote:
CaliguyNYC wrote:

When your annual profit is in excess of $1B, a $5M settlement is not material. Remember "material" is defined as material in relation to their business not a "big" number to normal people like us.

The comments on this thread are sort of shocking. I hope the heartless comments are not coming from airline employees. I would hate to flying on your airline. Fact remains, no one should be treated like Dr Doa was (unless you are literally threatening people, have a gun etc). This is an airline and airline employees are not God. America spoke very clearly on this. Everyone airline basically responded and changed how they handled overbooking and deplaning. If you can't connect the dots on this (and understand the airline industry knows it is wrong), you aren't seeing clearly what is going on. On a side note, I've avoided flying UA since the Dr Doa incident. Flying them for the first time because no choice. Let's see how it goes.


What AIRLINE employee mis-treated Dr. Dao? It was Chicago Airport Security. And they have been terminated.


Still hiding behind that. I you ask somebody to beat someone else up, you are as guilty as the one doing the beating.


No employee ever said, “Beat that man up.” If I’m correct, UA only asked for the passenger to be removed. So your speculation is flawed. There are too many ignorant people that fail to understand that UA or an airline has nothing to do with the airport security and their actions.
 
ripcordd
Posts: 1082
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2000 1:12 pm

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Thu Oct 19, 2017 6:19 pm

Well when this happened they were called the DOA Department of Aviation Police Semi-Quasi Police force all went thru CPD training academy. They were glorified security guards well turns out they used Police and they were not so they are now called Security...CPD should have been called and they should have handled it but UA wanted this to go away quick and settled when Dao should have been charged and put on a ban list for life and other airlines should say this guy doesn't listen to crew members orders and put him on their ban list instead this opened a can of worms wanted to get paid for bad behavior. Sure UA could have kept offering more money until they had the number they needed off but they didn't and this guy refused lawful crew orders
 
Varsity1
Posts: 2277
Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 4:55 am

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Fri Oct 20, 2017 3:20 am

jumbojet wrote:
Varsity1 wrote:
If it were a material value it would have to be disclosed on UA's 10K filing.

I still find it amazing that Republic avoided any and all liability, it was their airplane and their crew.


what does it say on the boarding pass and the side of the plane? It was for all intents and purposes, it was a United flight.


If we're being honest it says Republic on the side of the plane and on the boarding pass.
 
mcdu
Posts: 1659
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 5:23 am

Re: United and Dr. Dao reach settlement

Fri Oct 20, 2017 3:28 am

mjoelnir wrote:
mm320cap wrote:
CaliguyNYC wrote:

When your annual profit is in excess of $1B, a $5M settlement is not material. Remember "material" is defined as material in relation to their business not a "big" number to normal people like us.

The comments on this thread are sort of shocking. I hope the heartless comments are not coming from airline employees. I would hate to flying on your airline. Fact remains, no one should be treated like Dr Doa was (unless you are literally threatening people, have a gun etc). This is an airline and airline employees are not God. America spoke very clearly on this. Everyone airline basically responded and changed how they handled overbooking and deplaning. If you can't connect the dots on this (and understand the airline industry knows it is wrong), you aren't seeing clearly what is going on. On a side note, I've avoided flying UA since the Dr Doa incident. Flying them for the first time because no choice. Let's see how it goes.


What AIRLINE employee mis-treated Dr. Dao? It was Chicago Airport Security. And they have been terminated.


Still hiding behind that. I you ask somebody to beat someone else up, you are as guilty as the one doing the beating.


Did southwest demand the cops rough up the lady that would deplane recently ?

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos