Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
EK413 wrote:qf789 wrote:VH-OQJ returned to DXB on Wednesday due to a pressurisation issue
http://theqantassource.com/qantas-a380- ... al-return/
With DXB temperatures exceeding 50 degrees on the tarmac the dispatch reliability ex-DXB does not surprise me. The move back to SIN couldn't come any sooner!
EK413
Sydscott wrote:smi0006 wrote:[twoid][/twoid]qf789 wrote:UA to start IAH-SYD from 18 Jan 18, first SYD departure 20 Jan
UA101 IAH2000-630+2SYD 789 D
UA100 SYD1150-1035IAH 789 D
http://newsroom.united.com/2017-09-07-U ... and-Sydney
Stunned by this one! As I posted in the other thread fully expected SFO-MEL first, kudos to UA for holding their own in AU with no star feed, NZ won't be impressed!
I'm not surprised. UA would have a good knowledge of how NZ is doing on IAH-AKL and reasonable knowledge of QF's DFW service. IAH is the only key business market for QF that it doesn't serve and probably never will due to the UA hub so for UA to jump in makes complete sense to me. Moreso given what they've done on LAX & SFO to SIN as it appears UA is determined to push the 787 to its limit.
I hate to say it but people need to give up on a MEL-SFO route. I just can't see it happening.
grjplanes wrote:QF commences codeshare with El Al (LY) from 12 Sept...on flights via BKK, HKG and JNB...isn't going via JNB quite a detour or is it one of the quickest options between SYD and TLV...since the ME3 carriers obviously don't serve TLV.
skyhawkmatthew wrote:grjplanes wrote:QF commences codeshare with El Al (LY) from 12 Sept...on flights via BKK, HKG and JNB...isn't going via JNB quite a detour or is it one of the quickest options between SYD and TLV...since the ME3 carriers obviously don't serve TLV.
Most days the LY flight to TLV leaves HKG before the QF flights arrive; maybe it's a better connection through JNB.
(Or, of course, passengers could just connect with oneworld from the QF flight onto the late night CX departure...)
IndianicWorld wrote:Sydscott wrote:smi0006 wrote:[twoid][/twoid]
Stunned by this one! As I posted in the other thread fully expected SFO-MEL first, kudos to UA for holding their own in AU with no star feed, NZ won't be impressed!
I'm not surprised. UA would have a good knowledge of how NZ is doing on IAH-AKL and reasonable knowledge of QF's DFW service. IAH is the only key business market for QF that it doesn't serve and probably never will due to the UA hub so for UA to jump in makes complete sense to me. Moreso given what they've done on LAX & SFO to SIN as it appears UA is determined to push the 787 to its limit.
I hate to say it but people need to give up on a MEL-SFO route. I just can't see it happening.
I don't agree.
MEL-SFO is a market that will happen at some stage. The size of the tech industry in MEL is significant and has seen some big Silicon Valley companies open Regional HQ's in this city lately. That will drive demand, but will likely take some time to build scale.
The focus on SYD-US is certainly a big disadvantage for MEL and BNE. I can understand how the scale of business and tourism help to bring that level of service to SYD, but at the end of the day those airlines do need other markets to fill those planes. That's why a singular focus seems to be their most efficient use of airline resources, rather than a clear picture of demand into other markets.
a320fan wrote:EK413 wrote:qf789 wrote:VH-OQJ returned to DXB on Wednesday due to a pressurisation issue
http://theqantassource.com/qantas-a380- ... al-return/
With DXB temperatures exceeding 50 degrees on the tarmac the dispatch reliability ex-DXB does not surprise me. The move back to SIN couldn't come any sooner!
EK413
If the temperatures affect dispatch reliability as often as it seems QF is affected in DXB, then why is EKs operation not crippled by aircraft failing in the heat.
smi0006 wrote:IndianicWorld wrote:Sydscott wrote:
I'm not surprised. UA would have a good knowledge of how NZ is doing on IAH-AKL and reasonable knowledge of QF's DFW service. IAH is the only key business market for QF that it doesn't serve and probably never will due to the UA hub so for UA to jump in makes complete sense to me. Moreso given what they've done on LAX & SFO to SIN as it appears UA is determined to push the 787 to its limit.
I hate to say it but people need to give up on a MEL-SFO route. I just can't see it happening.
I don't agree.
MEL-SFO is a market that will happen at some stage. The size of the tech industry in MEL is significant and has seen some big Silicon Valley companies open Regional HQ's in this city lately. That will drive demand, but will likely take some time to build scale.
The focus on SYD-US is certainly a big disadvantage for MEL and BNE. I can understand how the scale of business and tourism help to bring that level of service to SYD, but at the end of the day those airlines do need other markets to fill those planes. That's why a singular focus seems to be their most efficient use of airline resources, rather than a clear picture of demand into other markets.
I agree, I think there is still more room for diversification of AU-US routes, as more airlines receive 787s we've seen routes right sized, and go non-stop, I don't see this trend ending in the next few years as more 789, and A350 are delivered on both sides of the Pacific and Tasman. Equally Australia is doing well as a broader market and still growing. And carriers seem increasingly keen to push the limits on their 789.
Just look at the new continental American routes into AU, most of which are long and thin;
AC - BNE & MEL
UA - MEL-LAX nonstop
UA/AA - AKL (adjusted to seasonally)
UA - IAH
LA- MEL
NZ - EZE/IAH (right sized to 789)
QF haven't received theirs yet, nor have UA,AA, or DL received their 789/350s.
On a seperate note hear rumour QF will announce new lounges for SYD/MEL the coming months with the project team already set up- SYD will take 18months followed by MEL.
eta unknown wrote:JQ TSV-DPS flights not performing up to expectations- no surprise given the current economic conditions in TSV. JQ threatening to cut the route early next year- suspect looking for a local govt. subsidy, but doubt that would past the pub test in present environment.
Jetstar is expected to announce the cancellation of all flights between Townsville and Bali tomorrow.
It comes after a crisis meeting was held today between various stakeholders including Qantas and Jetstar.
The Bulletin understands the airline will make the announcement tomorrow with the flights to end March 21 next year.
Townsville Airport released a statement this afternoon confirming Jetstar would cease direct Townsville-Bali services from March next year.
Townsville Airport chief operating officer Kevin Gill said the airport was disappointed to learn of the decision.
“This was a commercial decision made by Jetstar and we respect that decision,” Mr Gill said.
“We are of course extremely disappointed the service will cease, our team has worked very hard to drive demand on the service since its commencement in September 2015.
eta unknown wrote:JQ TSV-DPS flights not performing up to expectations- no surprise given the current economic conditions in TSV. JQ threatening to cut the route early next year- suspect looking for a local govt. subsidy, but doubt that would past the pub test in present environment.
LionelHutz wrote:eta unknown wrote:JQ TSV-DPS flights not performing up to expectations- no surprise given the current economic conditions in TSV. JQ threatening to cut the route early next year- suspect looking for a local govt. subsidy, but doubt that would past the pub test in present environment.
Interesting that a population centre that size can't support a 3 x week service with an A322.
I didn't realise economic conditions had got that bad.
qf789 wrote:eta unknown wrote:JQ TSV-DPS flights not performing up to expectations- no surprise given the current economic conditions in TSV. JQ threatening to cut the route early next year- suspect looking for a local govt. subsidy, but doubt that would past the pub test in present environment.
An announcement is expected tomorrow with flights to end 21 March 18Jetstar is expected to announce the cancellation of all flights between Townsville and Bali tomorrow.
It comes after a crisis meeting was held today between various stakeholders including Qantas and Jetstar.
The Bulletin understands the airline will make the announcement tomorrow with the flights to end March 21 next year.
TSV airport has already released a statementTownsville Airport released a statement this afternoon confirming Jetstar would cease direct Townsville-Bali services from March next year.
Townsville Airport chief operating officer Kevin Gill said the airport was disappointed to learn of the decision.
“This was a commercial decision made by Jetstar and we respect that decision,” Mr Gill said.
“We are of course extremely disappointed the service will cease, our team has worked very hard to drive demand on the service since its commencement in September 2015.
http://www.townsvillebulletin.com.au/ne ... 3896607e92
JQ TSV-DPS flights not performing up to expectations- no surprise given the current economic conditions in TSV. JQ threatening to cut the route early next year- suspect looking for a local govt. subsidy, but doubt that would past the pub test in present environment.
tullamarine wrote:JQ TSV-DPS flights not performing up to expectations- no surprise given the current economic conditions in TSV. JQ threatening to cut the route early next year- suspect looking for a local govt. subsidy, but doubt that would past the pub test in present environment.
As well as the TSV economy being in the doldrums following the end of mining boom, I'd also question why, with such good weather and great beaches being available within a maximum 3 hour drive from TSV, would anyone want to visit a "hole" like Bali.
qf789 wrote:
qf789 wrote:Effective 25 March 2018 Emirates will add a 4th daily flight to Sydney, A388 equipment
Schedule between 25-30 March 2018
EK416 DXB2040-1720+1SYD 388 D
EK417 SYD1705-25+1DXB 388 D
Schedule from 31 March 2018
EK416 DXB2040-1630+1SYD 388 D
EK417 SYD1615-25+1DXB 388 D
https://www.ausbt.com.au/emirates-adds- ... bai-flight
eamondzhang wrote:qf789 wrote:
To be honest I think it'll be something like 2-3 weekly services max, on routes like SYD/MEL-Broome or Port Hedland or similar. Just can't really see them adding a lot of capacity to a market that isn't exactly big enough, nor would any flights originate from PER.
Cheers
Michael
qantas747 wrote:eamondzhang wrote:qf789 wrote:
To be honest I think it'll be something like 2-3 weekly services max, on routes like SYD/MEL-Broome or Port Hedland or similar. Just can't really see them adding a lot of capacity to a market that isn't exactly big enough, nor would any flights originate from PER.
Cheers
Michael
The article does say within WA twice which would suggest departures ex PER. I would think BME would be key, but somewhere like LEA could work well as its gateway to ningaloo and there could be more scope to get reduced landing fees. Kind of like a PPP of thw north west. Also keeps PHE and KTA mainly corporate traffic.
Would be good to see more affordable options to NW australia
grjplanes wrote:QF commences codeshare with El Al (LY) from 12 Sept...on flights via BKK, HKG and JNB...isn't going via JNB quite a detour or is it one of the quickest options between SYD and TLV...since the ME3 carriers obviously don't serve TLV.
eamondzhang wrote:skyhawkmatthew wrote:grjplanes wrote:QF commences codeshare with El Al (LY) from 12 Sept...on flights via BKK, HKG and JNB...isn't going via JNB quite a detour or is it one of the quickest options between SYD and TLV...since the ME3 carriers obviously don't serve TLV.
Most days the LY flight to TLV leaves HKG before the QF flights arrive; maybe it's a better connection through JNB.
(Or, of course, passengers could just connect with oneworld from the QF flight onto the late night CX departure...)
Both BKK-TLV and JNB-TLV on LY leaves after QF arrives - BKK one leaves at 0010 (QF arrives at 1640) and JNB ones leaves either at 2005 (Day 1,4) or 2135 (Day 6; QF arrives at 1700).
Surprisingly it looks like JNB indeed has the shortest connection time outbound; but for inbound that title belongs to BKK. And the overall travel time when connecting at JNB is 26:35, not too bad I would say, although certainly not good enough.
345tas wrote:Just did some dummy bookings on the QF website. It is indeed a fairly good connection time-wise. But pricey, one way was what I just paid for TLV-MEL return on HU, and TLV-JNB is usually on one of their 763s which I don't think even have PTVs in Y, so pax used to Qantas-level product might be a bit jaded.
No, the ME3 don't serve TLV but one of the most popular TLV-Australia options is actually flying to Cyprus on Arkia and then onto QR.
qantas747 wrote:eamondzhang wrote:qf789 wrote:
To be honest I think it'll be something like 2-3 weekly services max, on routes like SYD/MEL-Broome or Port Hedland or similar. Just can't really see them adding a lot of capacity to a market that isn't exactly big enough, nor would any flights originate from PER.
Cheers
Michael
The article does say within WA twice which would suggest departures ex PER. I would think BME would be key, but somewhere like LEA could work well as its gateway to ningaloo and there could be more scope to get reduced landing fees. Kind of like a PPP of thw north west. Also keeps PHE and KTA mainly corporate traffic.
Would be good to see more affordable options to NW australia
A JETSTAR flight to Bali has had to make an emergency landing in Western Australia to give urgent medical attention to a passenger who became unresponsive.
Flight number JQ127 departed Adelaide for Indonesia just after 8am (ACST) this morning but was forced to land in Port Hedland at 10:50am (AWST) when a passenger fell ill
From today, the Afterpay option is available to Australians booking domestic flights and products online eight weeks in advance.
The service is right now only available for transactions between $200 and $1000, and a service fee of $10 applies.
But Afterpay and Jetstar is looking to extend the service to international flights as well, which will make global travel easier for a lot more Australians.
qf789 wrote:but it's only 4 payments over 8 weeks. So compared to a credit card of 2 monthly cycles. Afterpay picks up fees if late or payment bounces.Jetstar has partnered with payments platform Afterpay to offer passengers the chance to pay off their airfares in small regular paymentsFrom today, the Afterpay option is available to Australians booking domestic flights and products online eight weeks in advance.
The service is right now only available for transactions between $200 and $1000, and a service fee of $10 applies.
But Afterpay and Jetstar is looking to extend the service to international flights as well, which will make global travel easier for a lot more Australians.
http://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-ad ... 6e1995cb80
qf789 wrote:
smi0006 wrote:qf789 wrote:
Wow! That was quick! Is this the missing 330?
Flights from Sydney Airport cancelled due to high winds, passengers may wait for days
Up to 100 flights in and out of Sydney Airport are cancelled and dozens more are delayed as wind gusts hit the runways.
The airport and airlines have not stated how long it will take to clear the backlog, but passengers at the airport told the ABC that airlines had said it might take days for them to get another flight.
Only one of three runways was operating at Australia's busiest airport due to gusts of nearly 60 kilometres per hour.
The winds are only affecting domestic flights. International flights are running as usual.
Air Services Australia warned there will be more flight cancellations later on Thursday due to the strong cross winds.
qf789 wrote:Latest in JQ cancelling TSV-DPS
Passengers who fly the route are claiming flights are always full
http://www.townsvillebulletin.com.au/ne ... b77ad63ce3
qf789 wrote:Latest in JQ cancelling TSV-DPS
Passengers who fly the route are claiming flights are always full
http://www.townsvillebulletin.com.au/ne ... b77ad63ce3
TN486 wrote:A question without notice. Do you see JQ proposed ops in WA being A320? Maybe something smaller - rebadged F100,s perhaps!