Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Revelation wrote:
Revelation wrote:
bmacleod wrote:Interesting the Airbuses are getting the boot....
Could Fedex be getting pressured by Trump's "Buy American" mantra?
The ATR's (European made) seem OK for now...
bmacleod wrote:Revelation wrote:
Interesting the Airbuses are getting the boot....
Could Fedex be getting pressured by Trump's "Buy American" mantra?
The ATR's (European made) seem OK for now...
INFINITI329 wrote:bmacleod wrote:Interesting the Airbuses are getting the boot....could Fedex be getting pressured by Trump's "Buy American" mantra?
No, Fedex made their future fleet decisions long before Trump.
bmacleod wrote:Revelation wrote:
Interesting the Airbuses are getting the boot....
Could Fedex be getting pressured by Trump's "Buy American" mantra?
The ATR's (European made) seem OK for now...
airzona11 wrote:bmacleod wrote:Revelation wrote:
Interesting the Airbuses are getting the boot....
Could Fedex be getting pressured by Trump's "Buy American" mantra?
The ATR's (European made) seem OK for now...
The Airbus fleet is not getting the boot, they are being retired when their useful life runs out. What Airbus do you recommend Fedex buy to replace the A310s and A300s? Airbus doesn't have an option. FedEx hasn't ordered any planes under "Trump". Same with ATRs, what would FedEx buy to operate in place of them?
lightsaber wrote:Just to clarify, the A330 has too much wingspan to move the same quantity of cargo on the same ramp. This is why the 777X has folding wingtips and I'd be surprised if the MoM doesn't. Otherwise, modern wings take up an uneconomical amount of real estate.
Lightsaber
Stitch wrote:INFINITI329 wrote:bmacleod wrote:Interesting the Airbuses are getting the boot....could Fedex be getting pressured by Trump's "Buy American" mantra?
No, Fedex made their future fleet decisions long before Trump.
Indeed, they placed their first 767F order in December 2011.
The 767 offers more volume, more payload weight and more range than the A300 and A310 while still fitting in the existing A3XX infrastructure. It's the logical replacement for the type now that Airbus no longer offers something of equivalent physical footprint.
CX747 wrote:My historical thought process for FEDEX was a company attached at the hip to Douglas Corporations DC-10. My how times have changed. The quick build up of the 757 fleet to 100+ planes is stunning, as is how the 767 and 777 will be operated in massive numbers. I assume over time additional 777s will be ordered to replace the MD-11s.
ikolkyo wrote:Or they're getting old and its time for them to be retired, heck they are operating the A310-300 testbed which is 32 years old!
LAXintl wrote:Arguably the most important plane at FX was the 727. The airline at one time was the worlds largest operator of the type with 170 of the aircraft in its fleet at a single time.
HPRamper wrote:ikolkyo wrote:Or they're getting old and its time for them to be retired, heck they are operating the A310-300 testbed which is 32 years old!
Actually, there is no set timeframe for retiring the last of the A310-300s (FX operates 6, not 8 as Wiki incorrectly states) whereas the A300 fleet has set retirement dates starting this year and accelerating in upcoming years - dependent of course on operational trends as MD retirements have slowed to a trickle because of volume increases. Speaking from the viewpoint of FX operations, nobody will be sad to see Airbus equipment go, they are maintenance hogs and very finicky, and also are fragile and weak in many ways regarding physical loading. The 767 is similar capacity but much higher quality and with greater ease of use.LAXintl wrote:Arguably the most important plane at FX was the 727. The airline at one time was the worlds largest operator of the type with 170 of the aircraft in its fleet at a single time.
The way I see it is the 727 was the most important plane in the fleet until the Flying Tigers acquisition, at which point with the introduction of a global network the MD (-10 and -11) took over. At this point, even with the 777s and 767s I still believe the MD-11 is the real keystone of the fleet.
ikolkyo wrote:Considering that the A310s are much older and there are so few in the fleet I expect them to be gone sometime soon.
Stitch wrote:ikolkyo wrote:Considering that the A310s are much older and there are so few in the fleet I expect them to be gone sometime soon.
The A310-300F will fly as far as an MD-10F will (albeit with a fair bit less payload volume and a lot less payload weight) whereas an A300 has only about 2/3rd's the range so perhaps the A310-300s are favorable from a utilization standpoint as a stand-in for MD-10F missions that for whatever reasons are going out with much lower loads at that time?
airzona11 wrote:Same with ATRs, what would FedEx buy to operate in place of them?
VSMUT wrote:airzona11 wrote:Same with ATRs, what would FedEx buy to operate in place of them?
FedEx is replacing a large proportion (if not all) of their contractor operated ATR fleet in Europe with freshly converted contractor operated 737-400s. If my sources are correct, they will be joined by some of the first 737-800 conversions shortly:
HPRamper wrote:ikolkyo wrote:Or they're getting old and its time for them to be retired, heck they are operating the A310-300 testbed which is 32 years old!
Actually, there is no set timeframe for retiring the last of the A310-300s (FX operates 6, not 8 as Wiki incorrectly states) whereas the A300 fleet has set retirement dates starting this year and accelerating in upcoming years - dependent of course on operational trends as MD retirements have slowed to a trickle because of volume increases. Speaking from the viewpoint of FX operations, nobody will be sad to see Airbus equipment go, they are maintenance hogs and very finicky, and also are fragile and weak in many ways regarding physical loading. The 767 is similar capacity but much higher quality and with greater ease of use.LAXintl wrote:Arguably the most important plane at FX was the 727. The airline at one time was the worlds largest operator of the type with 170 of the aircraft in its fleet at a single time.
The way I see it is the 727 was the most important plane in the fleet until the Flying Tigers acquisition, at which point with the introduction of a global network the MD (-10 and -11) took over. At this point, even with the 777s and 767s I still believe the MD-11 is the real keystone of the fleet.
jbs2886 wrote:VSMUT wrote:airzona11 wrote:Same with ATRs, what would FedEx buy to operate in place of them?
FedEx is replacing a large proportion (if not all) of their contractor operated ATR fleet in Europe with freshly converted contractor operated 737-400s. If my sources are correct, they will be joined by some of the first 737-800 conversions shortly:
Will we see some more 738 conversions for FedEx in Europe? Any for the US?
wrenchon727 wrote:The 737 are repainted TNT aircraft operated out of LGG. May even see A320 & A321 PtoF in the future as an ASL replacement. I don't see an all Boeing fleet any time soon.
ikolkyo wrote:Considering that the A310s are much older and there are so few in the fleet I expect them to be gone sometime soon.
VSMUT wrote:wrenchon727 wrote:The 737 are repainted TNT aircraft operated out of LGG. May even see A320 & A321 PtoF in the future as an ASL replacement. I don't see an all Boeing fleet any time soon.
Nope, they are converting "new" 737-400s and 737-800s for the FedEx contract. The A320/321 conversion is completely out of the picture.
wrenchon727 wrote:VSMUT wrote:wrenchon727 wrote:The 737 are repainted TNT aircraft operated out of LGG. May even see A320 & A321 PtoF in the future as an ASL replacement. I don't see an all Boeing fleet any time soon.
Nope, they are converting "new" 737-400s and 737-800s for the FedEx contract. The A320/321 conversion is completely out of the picture.
The five FedEx painted ASL aircraft were previous TNT aircraft, what new aircraft & flights have ASL added since FDX took over TNT. We started flying STN and EMA with our 757 and their are more planned as we pull three stored 757 out of VCV. FDX A320/321 is not out of the picture.
Spacepope wrote:wrenchon727 wrote:VSMUT wrote:The A320/321 conversion is completely out of the picture.
FDX A320/321 is not out of the picture.
So FX is launching an airbus NB conversion program? What's the timeline on that new program and where are they planning on getting feedstock?
MO11 wrote:Spacepope wrote:wrenchon727 wrote:FDX A320/321 is not out of the picture.
So FX is launching an airbus NB conversion program? What's the timeline on that new program and where are they planning on getting feedstock?
I'm not sure how you see that. Nothing was said about FX launching an Airbus conversion program. The "not going to happen" statement was negated.
wrenchon727 wrote:http://www.airbus.com/newsroom/press-releases/en/2015/06/efw-st-aerospace-and-airbus-to-launch-a320-a321p2f-freighter-conversion-programme.html
wrenchon727 wrote:http://www.airbus.com/newsroom/press-releases/en/2015/06/efw-st-aerospace-and-airbus-to-launch-a320-a321p2f-freighter-conversion-programme.html
b747400erf wrote:wrenchon727 wrote:http://www.airbus.com/newsroom/press-releases/en/2015/06/efw-st-aerospace-and-airbus-to-launch-a320-a321p2f-freighter-conversion-programme.html
"to launch" not have launched
and from 2 years ago
b747400erf wrote:FX could be angry at 5X for prolonging the 748 line, making better deals on 77Fs less likely.
wrenchon727 wrote:http://www.airbus.com/newsroom/press-releases/en/2015/06/efw-st-aerospace-and-airbus-to-launch-a320-a321p2f-freighter-conversion-programme.html