Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
wedgetail737 wrote:Does anyone know how well or unwell SY did on their current service?
bohica wrote:wedgetail737 wrote:Does anyone know how well or unwell SY did on their current service?
It doesn't really matter how they did going to STS. They flew to STS to position a plane to do college football charters for colleges in the Pacific region. The planes had to be repositioned to/from MSP anyway so it only made sense to sell seats on those flights. The biggest question is how well they did on the football charters. If they were profitable, you may see them back in STS next year. That may also depend on SY's revamped business plan and post-fire STS as other posters have mentioned.
lavalampluva wrote:bohica wrote:wedgetail737 wrote:Does anyone know how well or unwell SY did on their current service?
It doesn't really matter how they did going to STS. They flew to STS to position a plane to do college football charters for colleges in the Pacific region. The planes had to be repositioned to/from MSP anyway so it only made sense to sell seats on those flights. The biggest question is how well they did on the football charters. If they were profitable, you may see them back in STS next year. That may also depend on SY's revamped business plan and post-fire STS as other posters have mentioned.
If they don't return to STS they could do the same with other airports in the region. SBA would be a good option.
loisencroach wrote:lavalampluva wrote:bohica wrote:
It doesn't really matter how they did going to STS. They flew to STS to position a plane to do college football charters for colleges in the Pacific region. The planes had to be repositioned to/from MSP anyway so it only made sense to sell seats on those flights. The biggest question is how well they did on the football charters. If they were profitable, you may see them back in STS next year. That may also depend on SY's revamped business plan and post-fire STS as other posters have mentioned.
If they don't return to STS they could do the same with other airports in the region. SBA would be a good option.
I was thinking the same thing.....or Reno/Tahoe. The fires mostly had an impact on residential areas and a few wineries. The big name vintners were unaffected and tourism shouldn't take much of a percentage hit.
wedgetail737 wrote:SY picked STS in 2017 for some reason. It didn't just happen as an idea out of someone's butt. They could have done the same thing out of SFO, SJC, LAX, SAN or any major city.