Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
frigatebird wrote:Would be nice if this became RAM's standard livery....
Northwest1988 wrote:Saw this bad boy doing touch and gos at GSP earlier today!
https://flightaware.com/photos/view/708 ... ate/page/1
Love the long look!
qf789 wrote:
shuck wrote:qf789 wrote:
Please can anyone provide me with the Juneyao Airlines flight number for the delivery flight from PAE-PVG on October 19th 2018. Thanks
Dan23 wrote:shuck wrote:qf789 wrote:
Please can anyone provide me with the Juneyao Airlines flight number for the delivery flight from PAE-PVG on October 19th 2018. Thanks
It was DKH787.
RobK wrote:Melb94 wrote:RobK wrote:The Uzbekistan Government 787 is now in a stall at PAE. Painted all white.
Going by the 787 production list, I presume its LN764 UK-78704? I thought it was for Uzbekistan Airways
All I'll say is that data differs from my own. Feel free to disregard.
qf789 wrote:First 789 for WestJet has rolled out of final assembly
https://twitter.com/propandkerosene/sta ... 5072234497
qf789 wrote:First 789 for WestJet has rolled out of final assembly
https://twitter.com/propandkerosene/sta ... 5072234497
cumulushumilis wrote:qf789 wrote:First 789 for WestJet has rolled out of final assembly
https://twitter.com/propandkerosene/sta ... 5072234497
Where are the powerplants?
ikolkyo wrote:Nice to see the 787-10s starting coming through.
817Dreamliiner wrote:First Turkish Airlines Boeing 787-9 will be LN865.
airnorth wrote:In the two pictures that CassidysVacay posted in post# 1071, the front landing gear doors are different in the two planes, and the rear landing gear are tipped back on Etihad, and forward on United, are they just in a different part of the landing phase? It almost seems like the United plane is not yet fully extended, yet they both appear to be landing, and obviously close to the ground.
Great pics by the way, really like the Etihad livery on all of their aircraft.
airnorth wrote:In the two pictures that CassidysVacay posted in post# 1071, the front landing gear doors are different in the two planes, and the rear landing gear are tipped back on Etihad, and forward on United, are they just in a different part of the landing phase? It almost seems like the United plane is not yet fully extended, yet they both appear to be landing, and obviously close to the ground.
Great pics by the way, really like the Etihad livery on all of their aircraft.
audidudi wrote:airnorth wrote:In the two pictures that CassidysVacay posted in post# 1071, the front landing gear doors are different in the two planes, and the rear landing gear are tipped back on Etihad, and forward on United, are they just in a different part of the landing phase? It almost seems like the United plane is not yet fully extended, yet they both appear to be landing, and obviously close to the ground.
Great pics by the way, really like the Etihad livery on all of their aircraft.
I would assume that the UA bird is doing a go-around and has started to retract its undercarriage.
audidudi wrote:airnorth wrote:In the two pictures that CassidysVacay posted in post# 1071, the front landing gear doors are different in the two planes, and the rear landing gear are tipped back on Etihad, and forward on United, are they just in a different part of the landing phase? It almost seems like the United plane is not yet fully extended, yet they both appear to be landing, and obviously close to the ground.
Great pics by the way, really like the Etihad livery on all of their aircraft.
I would assume that the UA bird is doing a go-around and has started to retract its undercarriage.
7BOEING7 wrote:audidudi wrote:airnorth wrote:In the two pictures that CassidysVacay posted in post# 1071, the front landing gear doors are different in the two planes, and the rear landing gear are tipped back on Etihad, and forward on United, are they just in a different part of the landing phase? It almost seems like the United plane is not yet fully extended, yet they both appear to be landing, and obviously close to the ground.
Great pics by the way, really like the Etihad livery on all of their aircraft.
I would assume that the UA bird is doing a go-around and has started to retract its undercarriage.
If you look closely the TE flaps on the Etihad are fully extended for landing, so it will be doing a full stop (probably) whereas the United has only partial TE flaps indicating their gear configuration is due to an alternate gear extension so they can check the "TOO LOW GEAR" (and also the "TOO LOW FLAPS") caution followed by a go-around. If it had started a go-around the nose would have been pitched up -- want a positive rate before the gear comes up.
7BOEING7 wrote:audidudi wrote:airnorth wrote:In the two pictures that CassidysVacay posted in post# 1071, the front landing gear doors are different in the two planes, and the rear landing gear are tipped back on Etihad, and forward on United, are they just in a different part of the landing phase? It almost seems like the United plane is not yet fully extended, yet they both appear to be landing, and obviously close to the ground.
Great pics by the way, really like the Etihad livery on all of their aircraft.
I would assume that the UA bird is doing a go-around and has started to retract its undercarriage.
If you look closely the TE flaps on the Etihad are fully extended for landing, so it will be doing a full stop (probably) whereas the United has only partial TE flaps indicating their gear configuration is due to an alternate gear extension so they can check the "TOO LOW GEAR" (and also the "TOO LOW FLAPS") caution followed by a go-around. If it had started a go-around the nose would have been pitched up -- want a positive rate before the gear comes up.
817Dreamliiner wrote:787 spreadsheet has been updated to LN900.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... edit#gid=2
First KLM Boeing 787-10 will be LN862
First Turkish Airlines Boeing 787-9 will be LN865
First Vietnam Airlines Boeing 787-10 will be LN880 via ALC
First Saudia Boeing 787-10 will be LN886 via Saudi Ministry of Finance.
Momo1435 wrote:The update also show some direct orders from Suparna Airlines that have never been announced.
WoodysAeroimag wrote:The 1st 787 for Westjet in final assembly at Everett
Source: https://twitter.com/yyc_charles/status/1060359148531924992
JayinKitsap wrote:WoodysAeroimag wrote:The 1st 787 for Westjet in final assembly at Everett
Source: https://twitter.com/yyc_charles/status/1060359148531924992
In the 2nd picture, does anyone know if the saddles have any fasteners to the frame, is is suction say like the large building glazing lift cups, or just cushioned?
OA940 wrote:How many -10s is Saudia due to take? When did they sign this deal? Is it a UFO?
MoonC wrote:Is this one still going to the ROK?
Stitch wrote:That looks to still be the plan. It was delivered to Boeing Business Jets in 2015 and then transferred to the Bank of Utah. It was undergoing conversion by Korean Airlines into a VIP frame at Moses Lake before moving in earlyNovember to San Bernardino for painting (likely in the ROK color scheme). Then it will be back to Moses Lake.
MileHFL400 wrote:ikolkyo wrote:Nice to see the 787-10s starting coming through.
Not so nice to see it’s not picking up orders the way it’s smaller brother is though.
seabosdca wrote:That picture is from today, post-painting. It sure doesn't look like any previous ROK color scheme - it's very "generic BBJ," with gray and black swoops.
seabosdca wrote:Stitch wrote:That looks to still be the plan. It was delivered to Boeing Business Jets in 2015 and then transferred to the Bank of Utah. It was undergoing conversion by Korean Airlines into a VIP frame at Moses Lake before moving in earlyNovember to San Bernardino for painting (likely in the ROK color scheme). Then it will be back to Moses Lake.
That picture is from today, post-painting. It sure doesn't look like any previous ROK color scheme - it's very "generic BBJ," with gray and black swoops.
SteelChair wrote:Does anyone have a current breakdown of how cumulative engine selection stands? XX% GE. XX% RR?