
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Duuhrh3U8AAgItl.jpg:large
Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
LAXintl wrote:
calpsafltskeds wrote:I don't know if there was a last minute change, but 25/20Dec LAX_EWR is now sked to operate with N17002
73G:
N15712 sked to exit MIA 2735/20Dec as Domestic unit (was GUM)
From what I see, GUM now has 2 73G units, N21723 and N39726.
iahcsr wrote:calpsafltskeds wrote:I don't know if there was a last minute change, but 25/20Dec LAX_EWR is now sked to operate with N17002
73G:
N15712 sked to exit MIA 2735/20Dec as Domestic unit (was GUM)
From what I see, GUM now has 2 73G units, N21723 and N39726.
They apparently changed their minds again as UA25 is back to Ship 1001.
jetmatt777 wrote:Frustrating experience this morning; I bought a basic economy ticket (which is a good deal since I’m an Explorer card holder I get many of the benefits I need) and purchased an advanced seat assignment on my E145 flight. This morning they changed the seat map and my assigned seat was changed to one of the worst in the aircraft. Are there any plans to straighten out the E145 row numbering? This is very frustrating.
kipfilet wrote:jetmatt777 wrote:Frustrating experience this morning; I bought a basic economy ticket (which is a good deal since I’m an Explorer card holder I get many of the benefits I need) and purchased an advanced seat assignment on my E145 flight. This morning they changed the seat map and my assigned seat was changed to one of the worst in the aircraft. Are there any plans to straighten out the E145 row numbering? This is very frustrating.
This has happened to me a couple times, I think almost always when they change the aircraft that is supposed to fly the route (seat assignments get reset).
jetmatt777 wrote:kipfilet wrote:jetmatt777 wrote:Frustrating experience this morning; I bought a basic economy ticket (which is a good deal since I’m an Explorer card holder I get many of the benefits I need) and purchased an advanced seat assignment on my E145 flight. This morning they changed the seat map and my assigned seat was changed to one of the worst in the aircraft. Are there any plans to straighten out the E145 row numbering? This is very frustrating.
This has happened to me a couple times, I think almost always when they change the aircraft that is supposed to fly the route (seat assignments get reset).
Aircraft swaps of the same seat map will result in a clean exchange of assignments. This one was a totally different map. I am in row 18 which is the very last row on the airplane, on the previous seat map 18 was exit row.
cosyr wrote:jetmatt777 wrote:kipfilet wrote:This has happened to me a couple times, I think almost always when they change the aircraft that is supposed to fly the route (seat assignments get reset).
Aircraft swaps of the same seat map will result in a clean exchange of assignments. This one was a totally different map. I am in row 18 which is the very last row on the airplane, on the previous seat map 18 was exit row.
I recently had a change of flights, and thought I had lost a seat assignment, so I chose another worse seat, and the next day, I checked and UA remembered my original seat and I was back in it. I would wait 24 hours, then call and see what they suggest.
cosyr wrote:jetmatt777 wrote:kipfilet wrote:This has happened to me a couple times, I think almost always when they change the aircraft that is supposed to fly the route (seat assignments get reset).
Aircraft swaps of the same seat map will result in a clean exchange of assignments. This one was a totally different map. I am in row 18 which is the very last row on the airplane, on the previous seat map 18 was exit row.
I recently had a change of flights, and thought I had lost a seat assignment, so I chose another worse seat, and the next day, I checked and UA remembered my original seat and I was back in it. I would wait 24 hours, then call and see what they suggest.
LAXintl wrote:
xxcr wrote:LAXintl wrote:
Amazing shot!!!
Forgot how stubby the 788 looks compared to the 789 and 78J lol!
Only airline to get this shot.
Anyone know any others airline that will have all 3 models of the 787 in their fleet?
ikolkyo wrote:xxcr wrote:LAXintl wrote:
Amazing shot!!!
Forgot how stubby the 788 looks compared to the 789 and 78J lol!
Only airline to get this shot.
Anyone know any others airline that will have all 3 models of the 787 in their fleet?
ANA and maybe JAL and AA if they order the -10, which I think they eventually will.
george77300 wrote:ikolkyo wrote:xxcr wrote:
Amazing shot!!!
Forgot how stubby the 788 looks compared to the 789 and 78J lol!
Only airline to get this shot.
Anyone know any others airline that will have all 3 models of the 787 in their fleet?
ANA and maybe JAL and AA if they order the -10, which I think they eventually will.
British Airways will. They get their first -10 very end 2019 or Jan 2020. I think they are 2nd to have all three.
ikolkyo wrote:george77300 wrote:ikolkyo wrote:
ANA and maybe JAL and AA if they order the -10, which I think they eventually will.
British Airways will. They get their first -10 very end 2019 or Jan 2020. I think they are 2nd to have all three.
Knew I was forgetting someone, Scoot is also a solid candidate
iahcsr wrote:78J
N14001 UA25 LAXEWR / UA275 EWRLAX 20Dec. 78J is swap for 788. First revenue flights for -10.
gsg013 wrote:iahcsr wrote:78J
N14001 UA25 LAXEWR / UA275 EWRLAX 20Dec. 78J is swap for 788. First revenue flights for -10.
I saw the N14001 787-10 land at EWR from FRA Friday Dec 14th. Was that just a test hop or was that a revenue flight?
xxcr wrote:gsg013 wrote:iahcsr wrote:78J
N14001 UA25 LAXEWR / UA275 EWRLAX 20Dec. 78J is swap for 788. First revenue flights for -10.
I saw the N14001 787-10 land at EWR from FRA Friday Dec 14th. Was that just a test hop or was that a revenue flight?
EWR-FRA was a test hop.
calpsafltskeds wrote:Pushing for page 52:
78X:
N17002 just took off from IAD 1950/21Dec, first revenue flight. FYI: Pretty close to full, 54 standbys shown as boarded
VC10er wrote:It is an awesome photo, and I’m sure it will used often and for a long time. Firsts like this (operating all 3 787 types) is a real feather in their caps. Especially for all us aviation geeks- I hope United can connect the benefits for the average flier, it’s a far less obvious good/new thing than Polaris or Premium Economy or fixed up gate areas etc for the United brand- but it is a very clear sign this is NOT the United of just a handful of years ago. Although it’s taken time, and may take a couple years to get there completely, but even today United is virtually a new airline. (Especially when you read about their growth.
Bravo to United & Boeing
calpsafltskeds wrote:Pushing for page 52:
78X:
N17002 just took off from IAD 1950/21Dec, first revenue flight. FYI: Pretty close to full, 54 standbys shown as boarded
FlyHossD wrote:VC10er wrote:It is an awesome photo, and I’m sure it will used often and for a long time. Firsts like this (operating all 3 787 types) is a real feather in their caps. Especially for all us aviation geeks- I hope United can connect the benefits for the average flier, it’s a far less obvious good/new thing than Polaris or Premium Economy or fixed up gate areas etc for the United brand- but it is a very clear sign this is NOT the United of just a handful of years ago. Although it’s taken time, and may take a couple years to get there completely, but even today United is virtually a new airline. (Especially when you read about their growth.
Bravo to United & Boeing
There are signs - good signs like your message - about United's turnaround. It's certainly not the same airline that suffered under Tilton's morass and Smisek's stench. No doubt, there is still much to be repaired, but the current captains (Munoz and Kirby) seem to have the ship at least headed in the right direction.
And the photo of the three 787 sub-types was indeed sweet.
FlyHossD wrote:calpsafltskeds wrote:Pushing for page 52:
78X:
N17002 just took off from IAD 1950/21Dec, first revenue flight. FYI: Pretty close to full, 54 standbys shown as boarded
How did the 787-10 become known as the 78X? I understand that X is the Roman numeral for ten, but I thought the prior references for the 787-10 were 78J - J being the 10th letter of the alphabet.
Amwest2United wrote:FlyHossD wrote:calpsafltskeds wrote:Pushing for page 52:
78X:
N17002 just took off from IAD 1950/21Dec, first revenue flight. FYI: Pretty close to full, 54 standbys shown as boarded
How did the 787-10 become known as the 78X? I understand that X is the Roman numeral for ten, but I thought the prior references for the 787-10 were 78J - J being the 10th letter of the alphabet.
The official ICAO code is 78X, not sure where the 78J came from.
https://www.icao.int/publications/DOC86 ... earch.aspx
VC10er wrote:FlyHossD wrote:VC10er wrote:It is an awesome photo, and I’m sure it will used often and for a long time. Firsts like this (operating all 3 787 types) is a real feather in their caps. Especially for all us aviation geeks- I hope United can connect the benefits for the average flier, it’s a far less obvious good/new thing than Polaris or Premium Economy or fixed up gate areas etc for the United brand- but it is a very clear sign this is NOT the United of just a handful of years ago. Although it’s taken time, and may take a couple years to get there completely, but even today United is virtually a new airline. (Especially when you read about their growth.
Bravo to United & Boeing
There are signs - good signs like your message - about United's turnaround. It's certainly not the same airline that suffered under Tilton's morass and Smisek's stench. No doubt, there is still much to be repaired, but the current captains (Munoz and Kirby) seem to have the ship at least headed in the right direction.
And the photo of the three 787 sub-types was indeed sweet.
I think you are correct and we probably agree. Yes, there is obviously still a lot to be done and big changes at an airline (especially the size of United) are both expensive and slow. But for the top folks at United, who seem very optimistic and motivated to create a great turn around it is FUN. I had the chance to turn a big office around when I was much younger, it was hard, worked lots of OT (gladly) it took us time...it was exciting and certainly gratifying when we succeeded- but then comes the time when you need to maintain the great thing you and your team did...and that is when backsliding can happen. Then comes the cost cutting because you’re a public company beholden to investors.
IMHO, Oscar’s charm and leadership style really comes through even on the seat back TVs or his letters in Hemispheres, etc.
I just hope the next person, after Oscar, doesn’t come in with a chainsaw!
Although the industry always seems to be changing, and the competing never stops.
77H wrote:VC10er wrote:I was on N788UA yesterday NRT-ORD which had Polaris and PE. Did a full walk around front to back. Plane has new sidewalls, new lighting and new seats. I was a little apprehensive about the purple PE seats but it helps to break up the monotonous blue. All in all it looked like a brand new airplane. Thought you’d like to know as we’ve talked about the sidewalls and lighting before.
audidudi wrote:77H wrote:VC10er wrote:I was on N788UA yesterday NRT-ORD which had Polaris and PE. Did a full walk around front to back. Plane has new sidewalls, new lighting and new seats. I was a little apprehensive about the purple PE seats but it helps to break up the monotonous blue. All in all it looked like a brand new airplane. Thought you’d like to know as we’ve talked about the sidewalls and lighting before.
Did you noticed whether the overhead bins and lavatories were changed also?
77H wrote:VC10er wrote:FlyHossD wrote:
There are signs - good signs like your message - about United's turnaround. It's certainly not the same airline that suffered under Tilton's morass and Smisek's stench. No doubt, there is still much to be repaired, but the current captains (Munoz and Kirby) seem to have the ship at least headed in the right direction.
And the photo of the three 787 sub-types was indeed sweet.
I think you are correct and we probably agree. Yes, there is obviously still a lot to be done and big changes at an airline (especially the size of United) are both expensive and slow. But for the top folks at United, who seem very optimistic and motivated to create a great turn around it is FUN. I had the chance to turn a big office around when I was much younger, it was hard, worked lots of OT (gladly) it took us time...it was exciting and certainly gratifying when we succeeded- but then comes the time when you need to maintain the great thing you and your team did...and that is when backsliding can happen. Then comes the cost cutting because you’re a public company beholden to investors.
IMHO, Oscar’s charm and leadership style really comes through even on the seat back TVs or his letters in Hemispheres, etc.
I just hope the next person, after Oscar, doesn’t come in with a chainsaw!
Although the industry always seems to be changing, and the competing never stops.
VC10ER,
I was on N788UA yesterday NRT-ORD which had Polaris and PE. Did a full walk around front to back. Plane has new sidewalls, new lighting and new seats. I was a little apprehensive about the purple PE seats but it helps to break up the monotonous blue. All in all it looked like a brand new airplane. Thought you’d like to know as we’ve talked about the sidewalls and lighting before.
77H
VC10er wrote:77H wrote:VC10er wrote:
I think you are correct and we probably agree. Yes, there is obviously still a lot to be done and big changes at an airline (especially the size of United) are both expensive and slow. But for the top folks at United, who seem very optimistic and motivated to create a great turn around it is FUN. I had the chance to turn a big office around when I was much younger, it was hard, worked lots of OT (gladly) it took us time...it was exciting and certainly gratifying when we succeeded- but then comes the time when you need to maintain the great thing you and your team did...and that is when backsliding can happen. Then comes the cost cutting because you’re a public company beholden to investors.
IMHO, Oscar’s charm and leadership style really comes through even on the seat back TVs or his letters in Hemispheres, etc.
I just hope the next person, after Oscar, doesn’t come in with a chainsaw!
Although the industry always seems to be changing, and the competing never stops.
VC10ER,
I was on N788UA yesterday NRT-ORD which had Polaris and PE. Did a full walk around front to back. Plane has new sidewalls, new lighting and new seats. I was a little apprehensive about the purple PE seats but it helps to break up the monotonous blue. All in all it looked like a brand new airplane. Thought you’d like to know as we’ve talked about the sidewalls and lighting before.
77H
I’m so sorry, but I have not yet learned how to ID an aircraft type just by ship number. Was it a 772?
If so, that does thrill me to bits. I was actually horrified when I saw the first pre merger UA 763 with everything new up to the curtain at the back of business- and then economy looked like my father’s 1962 Comet (after the accident!)
I’ve actually only been on 2 refitted aircraft, a 763, and one of the used CZ A319’s- I thought both looked and smelled factory new. And I was really proud of them for seriously changing EVERYTHING!
What were the sidewalls like? Did the lav have the new “pin-stripe” walls, where the pinstripes consist of extremely tiny United triangles? Very detaily!
I still miss United white napkin sculptures (like origami) the FA’s would make for the lavs before boarding started!
Thanks for remembering! Have an awesome New Year!
United1 wrote:audidudi wrote:77H wrote:I was on N788UA yesterday NRT-ORD which had Polaris and PE. Did a full walk around front to back. Plane has new sidewalls, new lighting and new seats. I was a little apprehensive about the purple PE seats but it helps to break up the monotonous blue. All in all it looked like a brand new airplane. Thought you’d like to know as we’ve talked about the sidewalls and lighting before.
Did you noticed whether the overhead bins and lavatories were changed also?
I'm on N793UA tonight between SFO and ORD if I remember I will take a look. I'm getting a chance to try out the new premium plus seats on the flight.
FlightLevel360 wrote:United1 wrote:audidudi wrote:Did you noticed whether the overhead bins and lavatories were changed also?
I'm on N793UA tonight between SFO and ORD if I remember I will take a look. I'm getting a chance to try out the new premium plus seats on the flight.
They're running the internationally configured birds on domestic runs now?!
FlightLevel360 wrote:United1 wrote:audidudi wrote:Did you noticed whether the overhead bins and lavatories were changed also?
I'm on N793UA tonight between SFO and ORD if I remember I will take a look. I'm getting a chance to try out the new premium plus seats on the flight.
They're running the internationally configured birds on domestic runs now?!
United1 wrote:audidudi wrote:77H wrote:I was on N788UA yesterday NRT-ORD which had Polaris and PE. Did a full walk around front to back. Plane has new sidewalls, new lighting and new seats. I was a little apprehensive about the purple PE seats but it helps to break up the monotonous blue. All in all it looked like a brand new airplane. Thought you’d like to know as we’ve talked about the sidewalls and lighting before.
Did you noticed whether the overhead bins and lavatories were changed also?
I'm on N793UA tonight between SFO and ORD if I remember I will take a look. I'm getting a chance to try out the new premium plus seats on the flight.
tpaewr wrote:VC10er wrote:77H wrote:
VC10ER,
I was on N788UA yesterday NRT-ORD which had Polaris and PE. Did a full walk around front to back. Plane has new sidewalls, new lighting and new seats. I was a little apprehensive about the purple PE seats but it helps to break up the monotonous blue. All in all it looked like a brand new airplane. Thought you’d like to know as we’ve talked about the sidewalls and lighting before.
77H
I’m so sorry, but I have not yet learned how to ID an aircraft type just by ship number. Was it a 772?
If so, that does thrill me to bits. I was actually horrified when I saw the first pre merger UA 763 with everything new up to the curtain at the back of business- and then economy looked like my father’s 1962 Comet (after the accident!)
I’ve actually only been on 2 refitted aircraft, a 763, and one of the used CZ A319’s- I thought both looked and smelled factory new. And I was really proud of them for seriously changing EVERYTHING!
What were the sidewalls like? Did the lav have the new “pin-stripe” walls, where the pinstripes consist of extremely tiny United triangles? Very detaily!
I still miss United white napkin sculptures (like origami) the FA’s would make for the lavs before boarding started!
Thanks for remembering! Have an awesome New Year!
I recently flew a Polaris 763 and it was beautiful. Like you noted really a great job on the details. The Polaris service itself has been gutted down to PMUA levels, but the plane was def something to be proud of! Sadly coming back the sCO 752 clearly hadn’t seen a bit of care since the merger. Not just wear and tear but aged yellow plastics. I am so frustrated with why UA is always so inconsistent with appearance of the fleet. The glory of the new product is lost if the rest of your fleet haven’t seen much care in years.
calpsafltskeds wrote:772:
N768UA entered HKG maint 2785/21Dec
N77012 sked to exit HKG maint 2786/24Dec
77W:
N2639U seat map still shows no PE, hopefully just not updated yet.
SFOtoORD wrote:calpsafltskeds wrote:772:
N768UA entered HKG maint 2785/21Dec
N77012 sked to exit HKG maint 2786/24Dec
77W:
N2639U seat map still shows no PE, hopefully just not updated yet.
I’ve noticed that the seat maps for PE on the 77W don’t change until 24 hours out.
VC10er wrote:77H wrote:VC10er wrote:
I think you are correct and we probably agree. Yes, there is obviously still a lot to be done and big changes at an airline (especially the size of United) are both expensive and slow. But for the top folks at United, who seem very optimistic and motivated to create a great turn around it is FUN. I had the chance to turn a big office around when I was much younger, it was hard, worked lots of OT (gladly) it took us time...it was exciting and certainly gratifying when we succeeded- but then comes the time when you need to maintain the great thing you and your team did...and that is when backsliding can happen. Then comes the cost cutting because you’re a public company beholden to investors.
IMHO, Oscar’s charm and leadership style really comes through even on the seat back TVs or his letters in Hemispheres, etc.
I just hope the next person, after Oscar, doesn’t come in with a chainsaw!
Although the industry always seems to be changing, and the competing never stops.
VC10ER,
I was on N788UA yesterday NRT-ORD which had Polaris and PE. Did a full walk around front to back. Plane has new sidewalls, new lighting and new seats. I was a little apprehensive about the purple PE seats but it helps to break up the monotonous blue. All in all it looked like a brand new airplane. Thought you’d like to know as we’ve talked about the sidewalls and lighting before.
77H
I’m so sorry, but I have not yet learned how to ID an aircraft type just by ship number. Was it a 772?
If so, that does thrill me to bits. I was actually horrified when I saw the first pre merger UA 763 with everything new up to the curtain at the back of business- and then economy looked like my father’s 1962 Comet (after the accident!)
I’ve actually only been on 2 refitted aircraft, a 763, and one of the used CZ A319’s- I thought both looked and smelled factory new. And I was really proud of them for seriously changing EVERYTHING!
What were the sidewalls like? Did the lav have the new “pin-stripe” walls, where the pinstripes consist of extremely tiny United triangles? Very detaily!
I still miss United white napkin sculptures (like origami) the FA’s would make for the lavs before boarding started!
Thanks for remembering! Have an awesome New Year!