lesfalls wrote:TK1 seems to be going for JFK.
Just landed at EWR, what happens now? The pax can leave?
Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
lesfalls wrote:TK1 seems to be going for JFK.
airzim wrote:The strategy is argumentative, but UA firmly believes that rather than displacing folks/crews/aircraft in random diversion airports, proactively cancel and tries to rebuild tomorrow.
Skywatcher wrote:Just checked FlightAware. AZ610 and BA33K diverted to YUL at 20:00. I guess YYZ/DTW/IAD etc. are getting overloaded. Most airports are maxed out at the best of times-these diversions must really stress everybody out.
IADFCO wrote:AZ608 FCO-JFK just landed at BOS. All remaining flights tonight from BOS to the D.C. area are cancelled. I wonder why since BWI, DCA, and IAD all seem to be ok.
ty97 wrote:TWA902fly wrote:AA105 LHR-JFK headed to RDU
RDU instead of CLT? Strange.
shaneam12 wrote:DY7015, SE40, and SU102 are all on their way to IAD now. EK207 going to PIT.
TK787 wrote:lesfalls wrote:TK1 seems to be going for JFK.
Just landed at EWR, what happens now? The pax can leave?
Flaps wrote:There is no one capable of handling an A380 at PIT. The airport itself can handle it but no operators on the field can. That ought to be REALLY interesting.
Flaps wrote:Skywatcher wrote:Just checked FlightAware. AZ610 and BA33K diverted to YUL at 20:00. I guess YYZ/DTW/IAD etc. are getting overloaded. Most airports are maxed out at the best of times-these diversions must really stress everybody out.
Every suitable diversion point is or is close to being maxed out. Stressed out is an understatement. Its chaos. In many cases even if a flight can get in somewhere and get a place to park there is no one available to handle/process the flights once they are in.
chicawgo wrote:Flaps wrote:There is no one capable of handling an A380 at PIT. The airport itself can handle it but no operators on the field can. That ought to be REALLY interesting.
Their runways and taxiways can handle it?
Runway28L wrote:chicawgo wrote:Flaps wrote:There is no one capable of handling an A380 at PIT. The airport itself can handle it but no operators on the field can. That ought to be REALLY interesting.
Their runways and taxiways can handle it?
And oddly enough, FR24 says it's continuing to DFW
Irehdna wrote:Would this be the first A380 to land at PIT? I can't seem to find news of another such diversion anytime
chicawgo wrote:Runway28L wrote:chicawgo wrote:
Their runways and taxiways can handle it?
And oddly enough, FR24 says it's continuing to DFW
That would make more sense but its at FL150 headed towards PIT. perhaps emergency low on fuel?
Runway28L wrote:Now that I think of it, they are more than likely stopping at PIT for fuel then continuing to DFW to try and get the pax reaccomadated.
Irehdna wrote:Runway28L wrote:Now that I think of it, they are more than likely stopping at PIT for fuel then continuing to DFW to try and get the pax reaccomadated.
That's an odd move IMO. Why DFW? Couldn't they divert to YYZ or IAD?
PennPal wrote:FedEx 3018 FLL-EWR diverted to IND of all places...circled over Trenton, then made two attempts at Newark.
https://www.flightradar24.com/FDX3018/10075ac2
pgh234 wrote:Flaps wrote:Skywatcher wrote:Just checked FlightAware. AZ610 and BA33K diverted to YUL at 20:00. I guess YYZ/DTW/IAD etc. are getting overloaded. Most airports are maxed out at the best of times-these diversions must really stress everybody out.
Every suitable diversion point is or is close to being maxed out. Stressed out is an understatement. Its chaos. In many cases even if a flight can get in somewhere and get a place to park there is no one available to handle/process the flights once they are in.
PIT has space for probably 100 more widebody diverstions (not to mention CLE, CMH, etc). We have gotten hardly anything today.
I am sure you know more than me...but how can no one at PIT be unable to unload an A-380? I swear EK has diverted here before with the 380. 747's show up with some sort of regularity (Cargo, AF1, diversions). Hell G-20 probably had a few hundered of these widebodies here. Plus, wouldn't the pallet unloaders for Condor 767's and DL 767's and FedEx/UPS A-300s and MD-11's be able to unload a A-380? What "can't they handle?" tow-bars? Unloading? Pushback? Stairs? Gates?
Flaps wrote:They could do a gas and go to DFW at PIT. That would make sense. Fueling would not be an issue. Thats what they did last year.
qf789 wrote:QF11 has left DTW, FR24 says it’s heading for JFK however it looks like it’s goong back to LAX
Flaps wrote:Prior A380 diversions have been gas and go. No offloading. With the equipment available on the field (all operators) realistically a 747/77W is the largest that can be handled without advance arrangements. Equipment was brought in specifically for the G20. AF1 carries its own handling equipment. Without a towbar it would have to be remote parked and deplaned via stairs. No busses available to bus to terminal from remote parking. Todays diversions (B6 in particular) have sucked up most every bus available for hire. The airport has none. With some lead time possibly some parking shuttle busses could be commandeered but again there is lead time needed even for that. With everything stretched as thin as it is with the existing diversions there arent enough resources to go around.
Irehdna wrote:Runway28L wrote:Now that I think of it, they are more than likely stopping at PIT for fuel then continuing to DFW to try and get the pax reaccomadated.
That's an odd move IMO. Why DFW? Couldn't they divert to YYZ or IAD?