Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
tphuang wrote:It looks like Indy-Newark is the only permanently-cut market
tphuang wrote:The weird part is that they are not struggling on all of those markets. Especially DEN/MCI/MKE, not sure why they cut those down to one also. They are certainly bleeding on ATL/IND/CMH though. Maybe time for WN to retreat back to MHT.
FA9295 wrote:knope2001 wrote:Midway’s cuts are more than a few but not as broad as I thought they might be given how many have already been posted.
Here are Midway domestic markets operated in February 2018 where February 2019 has fewer weekday flights:
-1 Boston (2 left)
-1 Cleveland (4 left0
-1 Detroit (4 left)
-3 Flint (discontinued)
-1 Fort Myers (3 left)
-1 Louisville (2 left)
-1 Norfolk (1 left)
-1 Omaha (4 left)
-1 Portland PDX (1 left)
It looks like Indy-Newark is the only permanently-cut market but a number of the “seasonally-discontinued” markets had been year-round. So these are new year-over-year market drops but not permanent discontinuation:
Here are the new seasonal cuts which operated last February
ALB-DEN
BWI-SMF
BWI-SJC
MCI-SEA
IND-LAX
PHL-LAS
SAN-TPA
CMH-OAK (resumed seasonally in 2018 in mid-February)
OAK-TUS (weekend-only in 2018)
OAK-STL (weekend-only in 2018)
The perennial Southwest question with “seasonal” is how long the season will last. No way to tell that until we see future schedules.
BWI-SEA is also going seasonal.
knope2001 wrote:MKE-DAL is back and MKE-HOU (which replaced DAL last spring) remains so MKE will have two Texas nonstop on Southwest.
malev2012 wrote:I don't understand how WN will manage 195 flights a day at DAL with only 18 gates. Since they operate 10 out of gate 15, that means 17 gates must handle 185 gates or 10.88 flights per day. Any kind of problem will lead to rolling delays, and especially with the larger birds turn times take longer on 143-175 seat planes.
compensateme wrote:DTW-PHX is reduced to Saturday-only service, DTW-ATL drops from 3x to 2x and DTW-MDW remains at 4x (been that way for awhile, but was at 5x last year).
knope2001 wrote:Jshank83 wrote:knope2001 wrote:OAK-STL (weekend-only in 2018)
STL-OAK didn't run at all in February last year except Valentines day. It ran every day except Saturday in January (but it was back-filled later after originally being cut in January).
Southwest did fly four STL-OAK flights in February 2018 which is normally the mark of 1x/week but in fact it wasn't. They ran STL-OAK on February 1, 2, 4 and 14. So it wasn't a weekend flight in February. It looks like the daily-except-Saturday flights which operated in January 2018 didn't end after 1/31 but after 2/4, hence the few trailing frequencies in February numbers.
aviationjunky wrote:malev2012 wrote:I don't understand how WN will manage 195 flights a day at DAL with only 18 gates. Since they operate 10 out of gate 15, that means 17 gates must handle 185 gates or 10.88 flights per day. Any kind of problem will lead to rolling delays, and especially with the larger birds turn times take longer on 143-175 seat planes.
It actually wouldn't be that difficult. Assuming they are running a 15-17 hour flight day (5am-10pm), with 18 gates, and 195 flights, that means that each gate is running about 7-9 hours a day with 10-11 flights per gate. Since SW promises a 30 minute turn around, which we all know never really happens, it allows for more flights per gate, per day, without much back up. Also, since DAL is a hub for SW, it is assumed they have open tarmac space for stand-by aircraft for any potential long term flight delays.
AirFiero wrote:I have a Detroit question...didn’t WN serve DET at one point? Where was the passenger terminal?
Roots1 wrote:BWI-ROC is reduced from 3 to 2x daily.
malev2012 wrote:I don't understand how WN will manage 195 flights a day at DAL with only 18 gates. Since they operate 10 out of gate 15, that means 17 gates must handle 185 gates or 10.88 flights per day. Any kind of problem will lead to rolling delays, and especially with the larger birds turn times take longer on 143-175 seat planes.
Dominion301 wrote:malev2012 wrote:I don't understand how WN will manage 195 flights a day at DAL with only 18 gates. Since they operate 10 out of gate 15, that means 17 gates must handle 185 gates or 10.88 flights per day. Any kind of problem will lead to rolling delays, and especially with the larger birds turn times take longer on 143-175 seat planes.
It’s actually 200 as they also need to accommodate DL’s 5 flights. However if as was said, departures are staggered from 0500-2200, heck even 2230, it should be doable.
As for DET, operations were from the terminal building, which has been vacant for a long time.
msycajun wrote:Dominion301 wrote:malev2012 wrote:I don't understand how WN will manage 195 flights a day at DAL with only 18 gates. Since they operate 10 out of gate 15, that means 17 gates must handle 185 gates or 10.88 flights per day. Any kind of problem will lead to rolling delays, and especially with the larger birds turn times take longer on 143-175 seat planes.
It’s actually 200 as they also need to accommodate DL’s 5 flights. However if as was said, departures are staggered from 0500-2200, heck even 2230, it should be doable.
As for DET, operations were from the terminal building, which has been vacant for a long time.
I find it interesting that they feel that adding flights to DAL, even when cutting a lot of things across the network is a good strategy. Looking at the stats, DAL had an ontime arrival rate of 78% and ontime departure of 73% for the year ending in April, down from the previous year. That to me suggests that airport congestion is delaying things. It will only get worse with more flights and bigger planes.
MIflyer12 wrote:msycajun wrote:Dominion301 wrote:
It’s actually 200 as they also need to accommodate DL’s 5 flights. However if as was said, departures are staggered from 0500-2200, heck even 2230, it should be doable.
As for DET, operations were from the terminal building, which has been vacant for a long time.
I find it interesting that they feel that adding flights to DAL, even when cutting a lot of things across the network is a good strategy. Looking at the stats, DAL had an ontime arrival rate of 78% and ontime departure of 73% for the year ending in April, down from the previous year. That to me suggests that airport congestion is delaying things. It will only get worse with more flights and bigger planes.
Those stats really aren't any different from 2013 or 2014. DAL had 7,017 air carrier ops in 2013, and 11,790 in 2017.
http://www.dallas-lovefield.com/resourc ... rrent.html
WNflyer1523 wrote:Looks like BDL-LAS is ending
flyrocoak wrote:Roots1 wrote:BWI-ROC is reduced from 3 to 2x daily.
This is disappointing. I just checked the load factors the other day and WN has an annual average of 85.43% in ROC. Not horrible.
holeham wrote:The loss of SAN-TPA even if it is just seasonal has to be a blow to the folks at TPA.
maximairways wrote:3x Saturdays only BUF-RSW seems like an increase from years past, I wonder if it's an attack on F9.
knope2001 wrote:tphuang wrote:The weird part is that they are not struggling on all of those markets. Especially DEN/MCI/MKE, not sure why they cut those down to one also. They are certainly bleeding on ATL/IND/CMH though. Maybe time for WN to retreat back to MHT.
I get that some of the mostly point-to-point routes are 1x in the dead of winter...CMH, IND, MCI, MKE were all 1x last winter already. But to me to cut down to 2x to MDW and 1x to DEN really speaks to things not improving in Boston. To drop from 6x in summer to 2x in winter to their biggest hub MDW does not speak well of them penetrating the meat of the market. Southwest has had remarkable success winning their share...and often more than their share...in business travel markets all sorts of places but the Northeast sure doesn't seem to be an easy nut to crack. This is the dead of winter schedule, of course, but 2x BOS-MDW is a blow.
jetmatt777 wrote:OKC-BNA remains Sunday only.
OKC-MCO (sun) dropped
OKC-MDW dropped
OKC-DCA changed to a midday flight (was perfect for OKC O&D with a morning departure and evening return)
AWACSooner wrote:jetmatt777 wrote:OKC-BNA remains Sunday only.
OKC-MCO (sun) dropped
OKC-MDW dropped
OKC-DCA changed to a midday flight (was perfect for OKC O&D with a morning departure and evening return)
Screwed...Screwed...Screwed...SCREWED!!!
msycajun wrote:Dominion301 wrote:malev2012 wrote:I don't understand how WN will manage 195 flights a day at DAL with only 18 gates. Since they operate 10 out of gate 15, that means 17 gates must handle 185 gates or 10.88 flights per day. Any kind of problem will lead to rolling delays, and especially with the larger birds turn times take longer on 143-175 seat planes.
It’s actually 200 as they also need to accommodate DL’s 5 flights. However if as was said, departures are staggered from 0500-2200, heck even 2230, it should be doable.
As for DET, operations were from the terminal building, which has been vacant for a long time.
I find it interesting that they feel that adding flights to DAL, even when cutting a lot of things across the network is a good strategy. Looking at the stats, DAL had an ontime arrival rate of 78% and ontime departure of 73% for the year ending in April, down from the previous year. That to me suggests that airport congestion is delaying things. It will only get worse with more flights and bigger planes.
WNCrew wrote:Maybe I missed it, but did we announce any of our additional routes with the acquisition of those slots at DCA and LGA?
Jshank83 wrote:WNCrew wrote:Maybe I missed it, but did we announce any of our additional routes with the acquisition of those slots at DCA and LGA?
I am pretty sure they have all been announced now, as of the previous update. I can't remember all of them
I think BNA got a DCA and MCI got an LGA. STL got a DCA early so it wasn't announced with the others. They might have some leased out also. Someone on here I am sure can remember.
knope2001 wrote:tphuang wrote:The weird part is that they are not struggling on all of those markets. Especially DEN/MCI/MKE, not sure why they cut those down to one also. They are certainly bleeding on ATL/IND/CMH though. Maybe time for WN to retreat back to MHT.
I get that some of the mostly point-to-point routes are 1x in the dead of winter...CMH, IND, MCI, MKE were all 1x last winter already. But to me to cut down to 2x to MDW and 1x to DEN really speaks to things not improving in Boston. To drop from 6x in summer to 2x in winter to their biggest hub MDW does not speak well of them penetrating the meat of the market. Southwest has had remarkable success winning their share...and often more than their share...in business travel markets all sorts of places but the Northeast sure doesn't seem to be an easy nut to crack. This is the dead of winter schedule, of course, but 2x BOS-MDW is a blow.
Mboyle1988 wrote:I’m gutted. Someone in my company flies PHX to SDF at least weekly. Once again wn screws Phoenix. No DTW, no SDF, no LIT, no DSM, no CVG. So many cuts.
cvgComair wrote:Mboyle1988 wrote:I’m gutted. Someone in my company flies PHX to SDF at least weekly. Once again wn screws Phoenix. No DTW, no SDF, no LIT, no DSM, no CVG. So many cuts.
It seems like everyone is dropping CVG-PHX: F9 just cut it, G4 hasn't moved beyond 2/3x week, and WN will only operate it in April plus a few Saturdays in Dec. Pretty crazy that there will only be 1 daily flight most of the year between the two cities, when comparable cities like IND see at least 4x/day on the route. Luckily we still have Delta on the route, but it seems kind of ridiculous that no other carrier can operate CVG-PHX daily/year-round.
cvgComair wrote:Mboyle1988 wrote:I’m gutted. Someone in my company flies PHX to SDF at least weekly. Once again wn screws Phoenix. No DTW, no SDF, no LIT, no DSM, no CVG. So many cuts.
It seems like everyone is dropping CVG-PHX: F9 just cut it, G4 hasn't moved beyond 2/3x week, and WN will only operate it in April plus a few Saturdays in Dec. Pretty crazy that there will only be 1 daily flight most of the year between the two cities, when comparable cities like IND see at least 4x/day on the route. Luckily we still have Delta on the route, but it seems kind of ridiculous that no other carrier can operate CVG-PHX daily/year-round.
cledaybuck wrote:cvgComair wrote:Mboyle1988 wrote:I’m gutted. Someone in my company flies PHX to SDF at least weekly. Once again wn screws Phoenix. No DTW, no SDF, no LIT, no DSM, no CVG. So many cuts.
It seems like everyone is dropping CVG-PHX: F9 just cut it, G4 hasn't moved beyond 2/3x week, and WN will only operate it in April plus a few Saturdays in Dec. Pretty crazy that there will only be 1 daily flight most of the year between the two cities, when comparable cities like IND see at least 4x/day on the route. Luckily we still have Delta on the route, but it seems kind of ridiculous that no other carrier can operate CVG-PHX daily/year-round.
Evan DL appears to have cut back to 5x weekly next spring.
KMCOFlyer wrote:cledaybuck wrote:cvgComair wrote:It seems like everyone is dropping CVG-PHX: F9 just cut it, G4 hasn't moved beyond 2/3x week, and WN will only operate it in April plus a few Saturdays in Dec. Pretty crazy that there will only be 1 daily flight most of the year between the two cities, when comparable cities like IND see at least 4x/day on the route. Luckily we still have Delta on the route, but it seems kind of ridiculous that no other carrier can operate CVG-PHX daily/year-round.
Evan DL appears to have cut back to 5x weekly next spring.
DL timing is terrible for connections. I don't see how DL can operate CVG-PHX without any connections to support it. If the flight time was moved back to around 9-10 am from CVG, it could work.
Mboyle1988 wrote:I’m gutted. Someone in my company flies PHX to SDF at least weekly. Once again wn screws Phoenix. No DTW, no SDF, no LIT, no DSM, no CVG. So many cuts.
Mboyle1988 wrote:I’m gutted. Someone in my company flies PHX to SDF at least weekly. Once again wn screws Phoenix. No DTW, no SDF, no LIT, no DSM, no CVG. So many cuts.
smflyer wrote:I didn't know what forum to post this in, but I was listening to a radio interview with SMF's marketing manager and he noted that we should expect WN to announce Hawaii route by August. I already posted this in the SMF thread, so here it is:
In a news interview with the airports marketing manager, he said WN will be announcing Hawaii flights out of SMF to "come by August". You can hear the interview with the link posted and he mentions the WN Hawaii details at around 4:00mins in.
https://kfbk.iheart.com/featured/the-af ... p-flights/
Haneke also discusses possible future non-stop service that he would like to see and mentions Kauai, Philadelphia, Nashville, and Fort Lauderdale
AirFiero wrote:I was at the gym, and saw a story on the TV showing the news that WN was adding 33 new destinations from OAK? Is this new or just old news?
jplatts wrote:AirFiero wrote:I was at the gym, and saw a story on the TV showing the news that WN was adding 33 new destinations from OAK? Is this new or just old news?
While I do not see WN adding nonstop service to 33 additional destinations from OAK anytime soon, I could see WN possibly adding nonstop service to 20 additional destinations in the Midwest, Southeast, and Northeast out of OAK, but WN will not be adding all 20 of these nonstop routes prior to 2020. WN already plans on serving HNL, LIH, OGG, and KOA, and I do expect WN to be adding nonstop service to these Hawaiian destinations nonstop from OAK. WN also had said that ANC is one of the top destinations in the U.S. without WN service, and WN had also already stated that it is considering expansion into Alaska.
The top destinations in the contiguous U.S. traveled to from the San Francisco Bay Area that aren't currently served nonstop from the San Francisco Bay Area include ALB, BUF, RSW, GRR, JAX, SDF, ORF, and RIC. WN could possibly add nonstop service to OAK from some of these destinations if UA doesn't add nonstop service to SFO from these destinations.
ucdtim17 wrote:AirFiero wrote:jplatts wrote:
While I do not see WN adding nonstop service to 33 additional destinations from OAK anytime soon, I could see WN possibly adding nonstop service to 20 additional destinations in the Midwest, Southeast, and Northeast out of OAK, but WN will not be adding all 20 of these nonstop routes prior to 2020. WN already plans on serving HNL, LIH, OGG, and KOA, and I do expect WN to be adding nonstop service to these Hawaiian destinations nonstop from OAK. WN also had said that ANC is one of the top destinations in the U.S. without WN service, and WN had also already stated that it is considering expansion into Alaska.
The top destinations in the contiguous U.S. traveled to from the San Francisco Bay Area that aren't currently served nonstop from the San Francisco Bay Area include ALB, BUF, RSW, GRR, JAX, SDF, ORF, and RIC. WN could possibly add nonstop service to OAK from some of these destinations if UA doesn't add nonstop service to SFO from these destinations.
It didn’t seem plausible to me. Maybe 33 new flights, but even then, where do the planes come from? Unless they make major cuts elsewhere.
It's an error. The stat is 33 total destinations for WN at OAK this year. So no, they are not adding 33 more. They barely have room for the current number and have expanded into 3 gates in Terminal 1.
AirFiero wrote:jplatts wrote:AirFiero wrote:I was at the gym, and saw a story on the TV showing the news that WN was adding 33 new destinations from OAK? Is this new or just old news?
While I do not see WN adding nonstop service to 33 additional destinations from OAK anytime soon, I could see WN possibly adding nonstop service to 20 additional destinations in the Midwest, Southeast, and Northeast out of OAK, but WN will not be adding all 20 of these nonstop routes prior to 2020. WN already plans on serving HNL, LIH, OGG, and KOA, and I do expect WN to be adding nonstop service to these Hawaiian destinations nonstop from OAK. WN also had said that ANC is one of the top destinations in the U.S. without WN service, and WN had also already stated that it is considering expansion into Alaska.
The top destinations in the contiguous U.S. traveled to from the San Francisco Bay Area that aren't currently served nonstop from the San Francisco Bay Area include ALB, BUF, RSW, GRR, JAX, SDF, ORF, and RIC. WN could possibly add nonstop service to OAK from some of these destinations if UA doesn't add nonstop service to SFO from these destinations.
It didn’t seem plausible to me. Maybe 33 new flights, but even then, where do the planes come from? Unless they make major cuts elsewhere.
ucdtim17 wrote:AirFiero wrote:jplatts wrote:
While I do not see WN adding nonstop service to 33 additional destinations from OAK anytime soon, I could see WN possibly adding nonstop service to 20 additional destinations in the Midwest, Southeast, and Northeast out of OAK, but WN will not be adding all 20 of these nonstop routes prior to 2020. WN already plans on serving HNL, LIH, OGG, and KOA, and I do expect WN to be adding nonstop service to these Hawaiian destinations nonstop from OAK. WN also had said that ANC is one of the top destinations in the U.S. without WN service, and WN had also already stated that it is considering expansion into Alaska.
The top destinations in the contiguous U.S. traveled to from the San Francisco Bay Area that aren't currently served nonstop from the San Francisco Bay Area include ALB, BUF, RSW, GRR, JAX, SDF, ORF, and RIC. WN could possibly add nonstop service to OAK from some of these destinations if UA doesn't add nonstop service to SFO from these destinations.
It didn’t seem plausible to me. Maybe 33 new flights, but even then, where do the planes come from? Unless they make major cuts elsewhere.
It's an error. The stat is 33 total destinations for WN at OAK this year. So no, they are not adding 33 more. They barely have room for the current number and have expanded into 3 gates in Terminal 1.