Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
qf789 wrote:Qantas marks 4 months serving PER-LHR
Some fast facts
244 flights
57,000 passengers
170,000 meals
26,000 Tim Tams
3,539,512 km's travelled
https://twitter.com/Qantas/status/1025184898485760000
george77300 wrote:qf789 wrote:Qantas marks 4 months serving PER-LHR
Some fast facts
244 flights
57,000 passengers
170,000 meals
26,000 Tim Tams
3,539,512 km's travelled
https://twitter.com/Qantas/status/1025184898485760000
Well the passenger numbers I’m skeptical. That makes an average LF of 234/236 or 99% which seems very high.
It’s more likely they did 244 and multiplyed by capacity giving 57,584 and rounded. I guess they don’t want to reveal Load Factors. Makes sense I suppose....
george77300 wrote:Well the passenger numbers I’m skeptical. That makes an average LF of 234/236 or 99% which seems very high.
qf789 wrote:george77300 wrote:qf789 wrote:Qantas marks 4 months serving PER-LHR
Some fast facts
244 flights
57,000 passengers
170,000 meals
26,000 Tim Tams
3,539,512 km's travelled
https://twitter.com/Qantas/status/1025184898485760000
Well the passenger numbers I’m skeptical. That makes an average LF of 234/236 or 99% which seems very high.
It’s more likely they did 244 and multiplyed by capacity giving 57,584 and rounded. I guess they don’t want to reveal Load Factors. Makes sense I suppose....
what are you expecting the LF to be
Eyad89 wrote:qf789 wrote:george77300 wrote:
Well the passenger numbers I’m skeptical. That makes an average LF of 234/236 or 99% which seems very high.
It’s more likely they did 244 and multiplyed by capacity giving 57,584 and rounded. I guess they don’t want to reveal Load Factors. Makes sense I suppose....
what are you expecting the LF to be
Definitely not 100%, it does seem like a figure of the maximum capacity during the reported period.
If it were a 100% load factor, they should definately increase their prices.
george77300 wrote:Eyad89 wrote:qf789 wrote:
what are you expecting the LF to be
Definitely not 100%, it does seem like a figure of the maximum capacity during the reported period.
If it were a 100% load factor, they should definately increase their prices.
They said over 50,000 in the video. They are just reporting maximum capacity not true pax numbers. Not a chance every flight has been full in all classes.
uta999 wrote:Anyone know what the problem is with BA 788 G-ZBJE ? She has now been on the ground at LHR since 7th March 2018, arriving from Chennai (MAA).
It can't just be RR engine issues. Did she suffer some ramp rash?
DATE FROM TO FLIGHT FLIGHT TIME STD ATD STA STATUS
07 Mar 2018 London (LHR) - (G) - - - -
Unknown
07 Mar 2018 Chennai (MAA) London (LHR) BA36 10:22 7:30 AM 7:50 AM 1:15 PM
Landed 12:42 PM
06 Mar 2018 London (LHR) Chennai (MAA) BA35 9:16 2:20 PM 2:56 PM 5:35 AM
Landed 5:41 AM
05 Mar 2018 New Orleans (MSY) London (LHR) BA224 8:45 8:10 PM 8:22 PM 11:00 AM
Landed 11:07 AM
05 Mar 2018 London (LHR) New Orleans (MSY) BA225 8:45 1:55 PM 2:28 PM 4:39 PM
Landed 5:13 PM
04 Mar 2018 Montreal (YUL) London (LHR) BA94 6:06 8:55 PM 9:35 PM 8:30 AM
Landed 8:40 AM
FLIGHTRADAR24
uta999 wrote:So RR can't supply BA with 2 new engines five months later!
There are also 2 new 789's on the ground for two months, (G-ZBKK & G-ZBKN)
There's also a LA 788 on the ground since late last year.
Momo1435 wrote:uta999 wrote:So RR can't supply BA with 2 new engines five months later!
There are also 2 new 789's on the ground for two months, (G-ZBKK & G-ZBKN)
There's also a LA 788 on the ground since late last year.
It's probably cheaper to ground one or a couple for a longer period and keep other frames flying. The frames that keep on flying will have their faulty engines swapped 1 on 1 with the refurbished engines that came from the frames that are in long term storage. And the next refurbished engines will go to the next frame, and so on and on until all are fixed. The last refurbished engines can then go to the frames that were stored first.
RR just said that the situation will stay dynamic for another 12 to 18 months. So a 5 month grounding is not that long, the issues are very serious.
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/artic ... ro-450871/
qf789 wrote:Air India is only utilising only 21 of 27 788's due to crew shortages and spare parts
https://www.deccanchronicle.com/busines ... tions.html
qf789 wrote:Air India is only utilising only 21 of 27 788's due to crew shortages and spare parts
https://www.deccanchronicle.com/busines ... tions.html
qf789 wrote:Air India is only utilising only 21 of 27 788's due to crew shortages and spare parts
https://www.deccanchronicle.com/busines ... tions.html
hayzel777 wrote:How in the world can an airline of their size and magnitude have a spare parts shortage?
qf789 wrote:Air India is only utilising only 21 of 27 788's due to crew shortages and spare parts
https://www.deccanchronicle.com/busines ... tions.html