Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
qf2220 wrote:ClassicLover wrote:Hey people,
You might remember back in June I posted on the Australian Aviation June thread that I was doing my Master's thesis at Cranfield University for my Air Transport Management degree. I was asking for people who flew in Australia for business purposes to do a survey.
The purpose of the survey was to find out the attitudes of business travellers towards new entrants in the Australian domestic market. Anyway, I've now successfully completed my MSc, and I have the results for you if you want to see them.
They're published here - https://travelupdate.boardingarea.com/australian-business-new-airline/
If you have any additional questions on it, feel free to ask and I'll answer them here. Clearly it's not all the information from the survey, but it should give you a good flavour anyway.
Thanks to everyone who took a few minutes out of their day to do it, I really appreciate it!
Trent.
Thanks for the follow up. These results are not unexpected, which is good in that it gives your research some validity. What might be interesting is to do some discrete choice modelling to see what people are actually willing to pay for these attributes. There would be some of this quantified in the existing literature I am sure, but some more up to date information would be a worthy addition to the field.
All the best post MSc!
aerokiwi wrote:Congrats on the Masters!
And some interesting results. I've always been a little perplexed re lounge access. I have it by default but use ot for maybe 1 in 8 trips, and even then, just for 15 minutes to grab a quick coffee or snack. I'm usually in such a huge rush and trying to cram in as many appointments as possible that I'm mostly just concerned about missing my flight.
So I'm curious, for those that actually travel for work, how many actually have the time to loll about in longes admiring the view? Leisure travel, sure, great to have. But for work... really? If I you get to the airport early enough to make the most of a lounge, wouldn't you rather try and get an earlier flight?
ClassicLover wrote:Hey people,
You might remember back in June I posted on the Australian Aviation June thread that I was doing my Master's thesis at Cranfield University for my Air Transport Management degree. I was asking for people who flew in Australia for business purposes to do a survey.
The purpose of the survey was to find out the attitudes of business travellers towards new entrants in the Australian domestic market. Anyway, I've now successfully completed my MSc, and I have the results for you if you want to see them.
They're published here - https://travelupdate.boardingarea.com/australian-business-new-airline/
If you have any additional questions on it, feel free to ask and I'll answer them here. Clearly it's not all the information from the survey, but it should give you a good flavour anyway.
Thanks to everyone who took a few minutes out of their day to do it, I really appreciate it!
Trent.
getluv wrote:Well done for completing your Masters. I remember finishing mine and feeling relieved after the hard slog.
Re survey results, no surprise. However, I remember having concerns when you first approached the forum and I didn't complete the survey. In a survey like this, enthusiasts would be poor respondents as there is usually have an inherent bias and can lack objectivity.
Furthermore, most business travellers don't pay for their own flight, their company does and usually with corporate discounts. Also when I read the comment about "cosy duopoly" in your commentary on your blog, it demonstrated to me that the people you were targetting were not ideal. Nevertheless, it was your survey and approach and you can only report on what you have
CraigAnderson wrote:Virgin Australia reckons its got a good half-year ahead, expecting underlying profit before tax "to grow in excess of 20 per cent" to "at least $100 million” for the first half of the current financial year despite a near $90 million increase in fuel costs.
http://australianaviation.com.au/2018/1 ... it-growth/
zkncj wrote:CraigAnderson wrote:Virgin Australia reckons its got a good half-year ahead, expecting underlying profit before tax "to grow in excess of 20 per cent" to "at least $100 million” for the first half of the current financial year despite a near $90 million increase in fuel costs.
http://australianaviation.com.au/2018/1 ... it-growth/
Wonder how much of that would atruibe to the removal of the majority of domestic A330 services? Vs is China really starting to pay off for VA?
CraigAnderson wrote:Qantas moving from Manila T1 to T3 end of this month, also QF19/20 becoming daily
https://www.ausbt.com.au/qantas-moves-t ... ource=hero
log0008 wrote:zkncj wrote:CraigAnderson wrote:Virgin Australia reckons its got a good half-year ahead, expecting underlying profit before tax "to grow in excess of 20 per cent" to "at least $100 million” for the first half of the current financial year despite a near $90 million increase in fuel costs.
http://australianaviation.com.au/2018/1 ... it-growth/
Wonder how much of that would atruibe to the removal of the majority of domestic A330 services? Vs is China really starting to pay off for VA?
Mostly of the back of the domestic market i'd guess - the domestic market is posting monthly load factor record almost every month, mining traffic has also picked up.
TasFlyer wrote:log0008 wrote:zkncj wrote:
Wonder how much of that would atruibe to the removal of the majority of domestic A330 services? Vs is China really starting to pay off for VA?
Mostly of the back of the domestic market i'd guess - the domestic market is posting monthly load factor record almost every month, mining traffic has also picked up.
Speaking of the domestic market performance, the August results were released on Friday and are available at: https://bitre.gov.au/publications/ongoing/domestic_airline_activity-monthly_publications.aspx
aerokiwi wrote:ClassicLover wrote:Hey people,
You might remember back in June I posted on the Australian Aviation June thread that I was doing my Master's thesis at Cranfield University for my Air Transport Management degree. I was asking for people who flew in Australia for business purposes to do a survey.
The purpose of the survey was to find out the attitudes of business travellers towards new entrants in the Australian domestic market. Anyway, I've now successfully completed my MSc, and I have the results for you if you want to see them.
They're published here - https://travelupdate.boardingarea.com/australian-business-new-airline/
If you have any additional questions on it, feel free to ask and I'll answer them here. Clearly it's not all the information from the survey, but it should give you a good flavour anyway.
Thanks to everyone who took a few minutes out of their day to do it, I really appreciate it!
Trent.
And on VA shareholding, I'd reject 17.5 cents as well. Not sure why you'd sell a duopoly carrier at a masive discount with positive cashflows, "underlying" profit and a booming domestic market with a robust economy. The negative impact on MAX orders? Wishful thinking - sadly - by the usual VA deathwatchers. The NZ relationship? NZ's 3rd attempt in Australia (BNE hub, Ansett debacle, VA) and its 3rd failure... maybe something about NZ's approach... just maybe? Velocity changes - interesting, don't know all the angles to that one but a private equity owner juicing it for sale is a familiar story - I'd hope the market had learnt by now to see through PE behaviour (hello Dick Smith!).
zkncj wrote:CraigAnderson wrote:Virgin Australia reckons its got a good half-year ahead, expecting underlying profit before tax "to grow in excess of 20 per cent" to "at least $100 million” for the first half of the current financial year despite a near $90 million increase in fuel costs.
http://australianaviation.com.au/2018/1 ... it-growth/
Wonder how much of that would atruibe to the removal of the majority of domestic A330 services? Vs is China really starting to pay off for VA?
Zkpilot wrote:aerokiwi wrote:ClassicLover wrote:Hey people,
You might remember back in June I posted on the Australian Aviation June thread that I was doing my Master's thesis at Cranfield University for my Air Transport Management degree. I was asking for people who flew in Australia for business purposes to do a survey.
The purpose of the survey was to find out the attitudes of business travellers towards new entrants in the Australian domestic market. Anyway, I've now successfully completed my MSc, and I have the results for you if you want to see them.
They're published here - https://travelupdate.boardingarea.com/australian-business-new-airline/
If you have any additional questions on it, feel free to ask and I'll answer them here. Clearly it's not all the information from the survey, but it should give you a good flavour anyway.
Thanks to everyone who took a few minutes out of their day to do it, I really appreciate it!
Trent.
And on VA shareholding, I'd reject 17.5 cents as well. Not sure why you'd sell a duopoly carrier at a masive discount with positive cashflows, "underlying" profit and a booming domestic market with a robust economy. The negative impact on MAX orders? Wishful thinking - sadly - by the usual VA deathwatchers. The NZ relationship? NZ's 3rd attempt in Australia (BNE hub, Ansett debacle, VA) and its 3rd failure... maybe something about NZ's approach... just maybe? Velocity changes - interesting, don't know all the angles to that one but a private equity owner juicing it for sale is a familiar story - I'd hope the market had learnt by now to see through PE behaviour (hello Dick Smith!).
BNE hub? That was never really a thing. Back then it was about traffic to/from New Zealand and Asia not about trying to move in on QF turf.
AN was a disaster set up before NZ was involved and they were just along for the ride.
VA - NZ took a stake to help them work together better and presumably to keep VA from the New Zealand market. I don’t think NZ had any intentions of a takeover and certainly not with the other airlines involved. As it is VA hasn’t improved with NZ leaving despite the other airlines being on board. NZ shouldn’t have increased its stake beyond the initial purchase in hindsight.
Remember that QF has also tried to hub AKL before.
qf789 wrote:Qantas 738 VH-XZJ has been used to carry the rules to Fiji today
TasFlyer wrote:Light plane crashes west of Launceston, pilot suffers severe burns:
https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2018-10-21/plane-crash-at-hagley-in-northern-tasmania/10401826?pfmredir=sm
tullamarine wrote:TasFlyer wrote:log0008 wrote:
Mostly of the back of the domestic market i'd guess - the domestic market is posting monthly load factor record almost every month, mining traffic has also picked up.
Speaking of the domestic market performance, the August results were released on Friday and are available at: https://bitre.gov.au/publications/ongoing/domestic_airline_activity-monthly_publications.aspx
It's no wonder both airline groups are now extremely profitable on their domestic businesses. When you see LFs of over 85%, as is the case with the many routes in the Top 30, this means just about all the peak time flights on these routes are going out full. Fuel will be a big factor in limiting profit growth in 2018/19 particularly as older hedge contracts expire but whilst load factors hold up and capacity growth is constrained the bull run for domestic profits should continue.
qf789 wrote:The Shark, E190-E2 demonstrator is on its way to DRW to start its Australian Tour
https://twitter.com/AirportWebcams/stat ... 0335569920
qf789 wrote:Qantas to open new first lounge in SIN and existing business lounge will be expanded, overall capacity will increase 60% to offer seating for around 800 customers
https://www.qantasnewsroom.com.au/media ... at-changi/
planemanofnz wrote:qf789 wrote:Qantas to open new first lounge in SIN and existing business lounge will be expanded, overall capacity will increase 60% to offer seating for around 800 customers
https://www.qantasnewsroom.com.au/media ... at-changi/
Pardon my ignorance, but why does QF need to invest in an F lounge with capacity for 240 people, when i) it currently only caters for maybe 2 or 3 flights a day with F through SIN, and ii) Australia - LHR F passengers will likely be moved from the flights through SIN to non-stop flights with Project Sunrise, in ~5 years? Is it because they're expecting a lot of premium FFP members, eligible for F lounge access, to use the lounge too? F seems like such a niche these days! Kind of fascinated to see it continue to be a part of QF's strategy!
Cheers,
C.
Zkpilot wrote:Remember that QF has also tried to hub AKL before.
qf789 wrote:Air India has agreed to explore the business case of flying to PER
AsiaTravel wrote:Lots of Platinum FF is one thing but also Oneworld Emeralds flying on AY, BA and JL. I suspect that Emirates might redirect its First and Platinum customers to the F lounge too, at least that is what I would do as a customer.
What's happened to i) MU's proposed PVG - PER flight, and ii) VN's proposed SGN - PHE flight? No update?
Cheers,
C.
planemanofnz wrote:AsiaTravel wrote:Lots of Platinum FF is one thing but also Oneworld Emeralds flying on AY, BA and JL. I suspect that Emirates might redirect its First and Platinum customers to the F lounge too, at least that is what I would do as a customer.
Valid points re the oneworld partners, but on EK - is that partnership even going to be around in the next 5-10 years (the period future-proofing/forecasting for this lounge would have to take account of)? BA does have their own Concorde Bar for F only at SIN too, I think?
Cheers,
C.
planemanofnz wrote:qf789 wrote:Qantas to open new first lounge in SIN and existing business lounge will be expanded, overall capacity will increase 60% to offer seating for around 800 customers
https://www.qantasnewsroom.com.au/media ... at-changi/
Pardon my ignorance, but why does QF need to invest in an F lounge with capacity for 240 people, when i) it currently only caters for maybe 2 or 3 flights a day with F through SIN, and ii) Australia - LHR F passengers will likely be moved from the flights through SIN to non-stop flights with Project Sunrise, in ~5 years? Is it because they're expecting a lot of premium FFP members, eligible for F lounge access, to use the lounge too? F seems like such a niche these days! Kind of fascinated to see it continue to be a part of QF's strategy!
Cheers,
C.
planemanofnz wrote:Pardon my ignorance, but why does QF need to invest in an F lounge with capacity for 240 people, when i) it currently only caters for maybe 2 or 3 flights a day with F through SIN, and ii) Australia - LHR F passengers will likely be moved from the flights through SIN to non-stop flights with Project Sunrise, in ~5 years? Is it because they're expecting a lot of premium FFP members, eligible for F lounge access, to use the lounge too? F seems like such a niche these days! Kind of fascinated to see it continue to be a part of QF's strategy!
planemanofnz wrote:qf789 wrote:Qantas to open new first lounge in SIN and existing business lounge will be expanded, overall capacity will increase 60% to offer seating for around 800 customers
https://www.qantasnewsroom.com.au/media ... at-changi/
Pardon my ignorance, but why does QF need to invest in an F lounge with capacity for 240 people, when i) it currently only caters for maybe 2 or 3 flights a day with F through SIN, and ii) Australia - LHR F passengers will likely be moved from the flights through SIN to non-stop flights with Project Sunrise, in ~5 years? Is it because they're expecting a lot of premium FFP members, eligible for F lounge access, to use the lounge too? F seems like such a niche these days! Kind of fascinated to see it continue to be a part of QF's strategy!
Cheers,
C.
qf789 wrote:3U has applied for 2 weekly URQ-CKG-SYD starting December using A330/350 equipment
https://blueswandaily.com/sichuan-airli ... y-service/
qf789 wrote:REX passenger numbers in September increase by 4%, load factors up to 66%
https://blueswandaily.com/rex-pax-up-4- ... ves-to-66/
qf002 wrote:qf789 wrote:3U has applied for 2 weekly URQ-CKG-SYD starting December using A330/350 equipment
https://blueswandaily.com/sichuan-airli ... y-service/
They already operate CKG-SYD twice weekly with A330s so this is just an extension to URC, seems a bit random to me. Or do they also need to submit an application to switch equipment to the A350?