Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
waoz1 wrote:I know its a bit of a first world problem.
However was thinking of using my VA points to Europe in business as I have a few.
Used to get a heap of FFlyers with SQ in both directions any time of the year, now nothing at all any time of the year.
Interesting tho I can book say Perth-Singapore, Singapore-London separate sectors using a heap more points and only ones that come up are EY via BNE,SYD,MEL (30+ hours)
Are VA points becoming worthless? or do people just use them for Domestic travel?
I have found QF to be a bit easier to use.
VHZNE wrote:ZNH has been delivered and is on the way to MEL. ETA is around 2300L tonight. I’m not aware of the name yet.
Qantas16 wrote:Any updates on the new VA lounge at BNE International? Wasn't it meant to be open soon?
eta unknown wrote:Doesn't matter now- they already bagged the airport award lol
NTLDaz wrote:eta unknown wrote:Doesn't matter now- they already bagged the airport award lol
Unfortunately there are some very serious bushfires happening near the airport.
Apparently the inbound flight suffered a lightning strike as well.
There have been pretty severe winds up here and Sydney which brought a pretty nasty dust storm as well.
NTLDaz wrote:eta unknown wrote:Doesn't matter now- they already bagged the airport award lol
Unfortunately there are some very serious bushfires happening near the airport.
Apparently the inbound flight suffered a lightning strike as well.
There have been pretty severe winds up here and Sydney which brought a pretty nasty dust storm as well.
MooLor wrote:NTLDaz wrote:eta unknown wrote:Doesn't matter now- they already bagged the airport award lol
Unfortunately there are some very serious bushfires happening near the airport.
Apparently the inbound flight suffered a lightning strike as well.
There have been pretty severe winds up here and Sydney which brought a pretty nasty dust storm as well.
Local media are reporting SYD is down to one runway due to the strong winds, with significant delays.
I've just watched QF12 / A380 on FR24 land on the east/west runway. That runway is 2530m according to the SYD website, compared to the main north/south runway's 3960m. Quite a few lined up for the runway too, should be an interesting day.
NTLDaz wrote:MooLor wrote:NTLDaz wrote:
Unfortunately there are some very serious bushfires happening near the airport.
Apparently the inbound flight suffered a lightning strike as well.
There have been pretty severe winds up here and Sydney which brought a pretty nasty dust storm as well.
Local media are reporting SYD is down to one runway due to the strong winds, with significant delays.
I've just watched QF12 / A380 on FR24 land on the east/west runway. That runway is 2530m according to the SYD website, compared to the main north/south runway's 3960m. Quite a few lined up for the runway too, should be an interesting day.
MEL as well I believe. Going to be a chaotic day across the network.
NTL have advised people to leave early to get to the Airport due to traffic chaos due to the bushfires.
Big day for NTL yesterday- Renee Lawrence coming home into a media scrum, people arriving for the car races and first international flight in decades. Combine that with the crazy winds and bushfires would have led to a busy day.
DeltaB717 wrote:NTLDaz wrote:eta unknown wrote:Doesn't matter now- they already bagged the airport award lol
Unfortunately there are some very serious bushfires happening near the airport.
Apparently the inbound flight suffered a lightning strike as well.
There have been pretty severe winds up here and Sydney which brought a pretty nasty dust storm as well.
Yep, and a whole range of other disruptions around the network as well (most of which probably had little to no direct impact on the NTL-AKL flight, to be fair). Yesterday was a horrible day for airline ops. I think it's fair to say the delay to this particular flight was out of the airline's control and probably shouldn't be held against them, or cause for people to laugh at them. Fair play!
NTLDaz wrote:MooLor wrote:NTLDaz wrote:
Unfortunately there are some very serious bushfires happening near the airport.
Apparently the inbound flight suffered a lightning strike as well.
There have been pretty severe winds up here and Sydney which brought a pretty nasty dust storm as well.
Local media are reporting SYD is down to one runway due to the strong winds, with significant delays.
I've just watched QF12 / A380 on FR24 land on the east/west runway. That runway is 2530m according to the SYD website, compared to the main north/south runway's 3960m. Quite a few lined up for the runway too, should be an interesting day.
MEL as well I believe. Going to be a chaotic day across the network.
NTL have advised people to leave early to get to the Airport due to traffic chaos due to the bushfires.
Big day for NTL yesterday- Renee Lawrence coming home into a media scrum, people arriving for the car races and first international flight in decades. Combine that with the crazy winds and bushfires would have led to a busy day.
qf789 wrote:NTLDaz wrote:MooLor wrote:
Local media are reporting SYD is down to one runway due to the strong winds, with significant delays.
I've just watched QF12 / A380 on FR24 land on the east/west runway. That runway is 2530m according to the SYD website, compared to the main north/south runway's 3960m. Quite a few lined up for the runway too, should be an interesting day.
MEL as well I believe. Going to be a chaotic day across the network.
NTL have advised people to leave early to get to the Airport due to traffic chaos due to the bushfires.
Big day for NTL yesterday- Renee Lawrence coming home into a media scrum, people arriving for the car races and first international flight in decades. Combine that with the crazy winds and bushfires would have led to a busy day.
Due to the one runway ops departure/arrival slots have been reduced resulting in many flight cancellations. VA has also cancelled this morning's MEL-PER-MEL flight so the A332 can be used on MEL-SYD-MEL instead
MooLor wrote:The terminal looked a lot bigger than I imagined NTL to be, if it was NTL.
Velocity7 wrote:MooLor wrote:The terminal looked a lot bigger than I imagined NTL to be, if it was NTL.
Possibly BNE? There was footage both from BNE and NTL of her arrival
tullamarine wrote:qf789 wrote:NTLDaz wrote:
MEL as well I believe. Going to be a chaotic day across the network.
NTL have advised people to leave early to get to the Airport due to traffic chaos due to the bushfires.
Big day for NTL yesterday- Renee Lawrence coming home into a media scrum, people arriving for the car races and first international flight in decades. Combine that with the crazy winds and bushfires would have led to a busy day.
Due to the one runway ops departure/arrival slots have been reduced resulting in many flight cancellations. VA has also cancelled this morning's MEL-PER-MEL flight so the A332 can be used on MEL-SYD-MEL instead
I imagine last night's and today's weather has meant fleets and crews of both QF and VA are misplaced meaning delays are likely to continue throughout today and only resolved over the weekend when the greater downtime allows for repositioning or reallocating fleet from previously planned flights.
Australia's relatively benign weather means this is a fairly rare event. These types of delays are more common in US for example where winter snow in NE and low pressure systems in the south often mean delays in hubs which fan out throughout the major airlines' networks.
a320fan wrote:QF9 is really not that great of an offer for MEL based PAX,
Had to purchase a one way MEL-LHR for April. QF9, $1609
Went with Royal Brunei for $562, and the overall travel time is 40 minutes less than the QF option.
I'd expect better service offering on QF, but not over a $1000 better.
qf789 wrote:QF25 SYD-HND has diverted to BNE, looks like it may have been planned
Qantas16 wrote:qf789 wrote:QF25 SYD-HND has diverted to BNE, looks like it may have been planned
From a QLD spotters group on Facebook... story goes that there were 202 passengers onboard from SYD and an extra 156 joined in BNE who were initially meant to connect in SYD... So presumably those from MEL/CBR/PER etc that were initially going to fly to SYD and then HND got rerouted to BNE instead yesterday due to the delays in SYD. If that is true, its very smart planning from QF Operations.
Flyerqf wrote:QF15 is being operated by a 744 today, looks like the onward JFK leg will be operated by a 787 originating from MEL which strangely has had its A380 subbed to a 787 on QF93 today.
tullamarine wrote:Flyerqf wrote:QF15 is being operated by a 744 today, looks like the onward JFK leg will be operated by a 787 originating from MEL which strangely has had its A380 subbed to a 787 on QF93 today.
Sounds like the delays experienced in MEL and SYD knocked onto the LAX flights. QF94 is being operated by 789 tonight. Aircraft operating QF94 usually operates QF35 to SIN after it arrives in MEL and QF93 is operated by the plane that arrived as QF36 from SIN. QF35 is still shown as a A380 tomorrow as is QF93 meaning another A380 somehow has to get into MEL.
I note OQD is currently returning from DXB after repaint and due to arrive into SYD tomorrow morning. Maybe it will be redirected to MEL to be the missing A380.
qf789 wrote:It is unrelated to the weather events over the past day or so. The inbound QF16 arriving in BNE was a 744 and by the looks of it, it came at the expense of a QF55/56 rotation. The 789 that became available operated a QF94/93 rotation. A388's VH-OQB has been on the ground at LAX since Thursday, so perhaps either a maintenance issue or loads are a bit low atm, tonights QF94 arrival in MEL tomorrow morning is A388 not 789 equipment.
TasFlyer wrote:An exciting day for HBA with QF744 OEJ landing in HBA tonight after the Antarctica scenic flight. The flight arrives on the NN ewly constructed wide-body bay. Unfortunately the aircraft could not take-off from HBA as originally planned as the runway failed QF's engineering inspection. Instead, passengers were first transported to MEL on 2 X 737s.
VapourTrails wrote:TasFlyer wrote:An exciting day for HBA with QF744 OEJ landing in HBA tonight after the Antarctica scenic flight. The flight arrives on the NN ewly constructed wide-body bay. Unfortunately the aircraft could not take-off from HBA as originally planned as the runway failed QF's engineering inspection. Instead, passengers were first transported to MEL on 2 X 737s.
An amazing experience! What a way to farewell my second and very likely last flight on a 747, The Queen of the Skies, with Wunala. Quite an emotional aside to the main feature, the vast ice and mountainous continent which also put on beautiful clear weather, quite the contrast to the cloudy and rainy HBA and cloudy MEL. Trip report planned 2019. My question is, was this the only ZZF Charter QF Antarctica Flight for HBA, given the original plan had to be altered, by flying via MEL?
QF41 wrote:VapourTrails wrote:TasFlyer wrote:An exciting day for HBA with QF744 OEJ landing in HBA tonight after the Antarctica scenic flight. The flight arrives on the NN ewly constructed wide-body bay. Unfortunately the aircraft could not take-off from HBA as originally planned as the runway failed QF's engineering inspection. Instead, passengers were first transported to MEL on 2 X 737s.
An amazing experience! What a way to farewell my second and very likely last flight on a 747, The Queen of the Skies, with Wunala. Quite an emotional aside to the main feature, the vast ice and mountainous continent which also put on beautiful clear weather, quite the contrast to the cloudy and rainy HBA and cloudy MEL. Trip report planned 2019. My question is, was this the only ZZF Charter QF Antarctica Flight for HBA, given the original plan had to be altered, by flying via MEL?
I look forward to the trip report. As an ex hobartian, i wish i was at the airport to see the 747 tower over the terminal.
qf789 wrote:Last night’s QF9 has been delayed by 25 hours due to bad weather in London, crew timed out hence the delay, I have read elsewhere that they were going to off load 40 passengers to take on extra fuel, can anyone confirm this?
The delayed QF10 will depart LHR tomorrow at 8am for an 830am arrival into PER on Thursday
tullamarine wrote:qf789 wrote:Last night’s QF9 has been delayed by 25 hours due to bad weather in London, crew timed out hence the delay, I have read elsewhere that they were going to off load 40 passengers to take on extra fuel, can anyone confirm this?
The delayed QF10 will depart LHR tomorrow at 8am for an 830am arrival into PER on Thursday
Was QF9 delayed or the returning QF10? I could understand how the return crew could time out as they were sitting around at the airport but, unless the plane was held on the ground in PER due to LHR weather, which seems weird, the crew on QF9 would've timed out and the options would've been landing with time exceeded or diverting to AMS when iit became obvious that they were going to break cap.
qf789 wrote:Qantas is planning on returning to Fiji for NS19, up to 4 weekly
http://australianaviation.com.au/2018/1 ... n-to-fiji/
angusjt wrote:qf789 wrote:Qantas is planning on returning to Fiji for NS19, up to 4 weekly
http://australianaviation.com.au/2018/1 ... n-to-fiji/
SYD-NAN I imagine, though they'll be competing with the FJ A330.
QF742 wrote:angusjt wrote:qf789 wrote:Qantas is planning on returning to Fiji for NS19, up to 4 weekly
http://australianaviation.com.au/2018/1 ... n-to-fiji/
SYD-NAN I imagine, though they'll be competing with the FJ A330.
I am somewhat surprised by this route. QF own a significant portion of FJ (46%) so I would wonder why they would bother flying their own metal. Is FJ’s fleet fully utilised?
qf789 wrote:tullamarine wrote:qf789 wrote:Last night’s QF9 has been delayed by 25 hours due to bad weather in London, crew timed out hence the delay, I have read elsewhere that they were going to off load 40 passengers to take on extra fuel, can anyone confirm this?
The delayed QF10 will depart LHR tomorrow at 8am for an 830am arrival into PER on Thursday
Was QF9 delayed or the returning QF10? I could understand how the return crew could time out as they were sitting around at the airport but, unless the plane was held on the ground in PER due to LHR weather, which seems weird, the crew on QF9 would've timed out and the options would've been landing with time exceeded or diverting to AMS when iit became obvious that they were going to break cap.
Both, QF9 has not departed PER, VH-ZNB has been sitting in PER for the past 22 hours which has caused a knock on effect to the departing QF10