Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
ojjunior wrote:Sad news. I've seen this movie in Brazil with VP, TR, RG and many others.
TAM just survived due it's selling (or JV, whatever) with the former LanChile.
Now this.
Hope they find a way out of this. Brazilian market need AV to keep rates/services in a reasonable level due competition.
raylee67 wrote:I thought AV Brasil is a major part of the strategy and growth plan of Avianca? Without Brazil, Avianca cannot rival LATAM. Would Avianca Holdings pump capital to save AV Brasil?
pipeafcr wrote:I wonder how this could effect the merger between AV Holdings and AV Brasil, I had also heard of AV Brasil joining the United/AV JV so that could either be really good or really bad for the Brazilian airline
asuflyer wrote:The following aircraft have been stored, in an attempt that a deal can be reached and that they don't get repossessed.
PR-AVJ 318
PR-OBB 320
PR-OBQ A20
PR-OBR A20
PR-OCP 320
PR-ONR 318
PR-ONZ 320
dcajet wrote:The 318s have been out of service and stored for a good while now, IIRC, @ BSB. PR-ONZ is at Sao Jose dos Campos awaiting delivery to Avianca Argentina. It has not flown for a while.
aemoreira1981 wrote:ojjunior wrote:Sad news. I've seen this movie in Brazil with VP, TR, RG and many others.
TAM just survived due it's selling (or JV, whatever) with the former LanChile.
Now this.
Hope they find a way out of this. Brazilian market need AV to keep rates/services in a reasonable level due competition.
In a country where the domestic market is largely LATAM, Azul, and Gol, Avianca Brasil is a distant fourth: LATAM has the large international market.
Thibault973 wrote:Domestic fares in Brasil are ridiculousely high.
winGl3t wrote:Thibault973 wrote:Domestic fares in Brasil are ridiculousely high.
They aren't. G3 average fare for 2017 was lower than 80 USD.
winGl3t wrote:Thibault973 wrote:Domestic fares in Brasil are ridiculousely high.
They aren't. G3 average fare for 2017 was lower than 80 USD.
Thibault973 wrote:Brazilian sites are reporting that United Continental Holdings agreed to lend 456 millions USD to the Synergy Group, who owns 100% of Avianca Brasil and 60% of the Avianca Holding.
https://www.aeroflap.com.br/united-forn ... ca-brasil/
Thibault973 wrote:
They might be a "distant fourth" due to their absence in some major markets (they only recently launched flight to Belem) but where they do operate they offer a vastly superior product with competitive prices. Domestic fares in Brasil are ridiculousely high. G3 and AD are nowhere near the LCLF that they pretend to be.
incitatus wrote:Thibault973 wrote:
They might be a "distant fourth" due to their absence in some major markets (they only recently launched flight to Belem) but where they do operate they offer a vastly superior product with competitive prices. Domestic fares in Brasil are ridiculousely high. G3 and AD are nowhere near the LCLF that they pretend to be.
I understand you are looking at Avianca as a passenger, one concerned with some product attributes and price. But step back and look at the situation of the company: If they are in dire financial straights, the price/service proposition they have had in the market is not sustainable. They were careless to expand at a fast pace with price points that were below what they needed to be viable.
Thibault973 wrote:Domestic fares in Brasil are ridiculousely high. G3 and AD are nowhere near the LCLF that they pretend to be.
VTCIE wrote:There goes another A318 operator. All there is left now are AF, BA (BA1/2), AV and TAROM.
pipeafcr wrote:Because of the name confusion, AVH stocks plummeted both in Wall Street and Bogota
Etheereal wrote:pipeafcr wrote:Because of the name confusion, AVH stocks plummeted both in Wall Street and Bogota
Im sure thats no confusion at all.
pipeafcr wrote:Because of the name confusion, AVH stocks plummeted both in Wall Street and Bogota
juliuswong wrote:Lessors are now taking back their fleet aggressively. Nearly all their fleet are leased.
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/artic ... io-454278/
Someone83 wrote:juliuswong wrote:Lessors are now taking back their fleet aggressively. Nearly all their fleet are leased.
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/artic ... io-454278/
That article is from before they filed for bankruptcy protection.
When they are in bankruptcy it is much harder for creditors to get their assets, so it is not that easy for the leasing companies to just taking back their aircraft, without a court approval
juliuswong wrote:Someone83 wrote:juliuswong wrote:Lessors are now taking back their fleet aggressively. Nearly all their fleet are leased.
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/artic ... io-454278/
That article is from before they filed for bankruptcy protection.
When they are in bankruptcy it is much harder for creditors to get their assets, so it is not that easy for the leasing companies to just taking back their aircraft, without a court approval
Thanks for the insight. Indeed, many of the lessors do not want the same KF bankruptcy situation to happen again to them.
Azul Linhas Aereas has taken delivery of both the above A320neo.
A320-251N 7918 PR-YYA Azul Linhas Aereas for delivery feb19 ex AMA (+ 8086 PR-YYB ex 2-ROBR) ex 2-ROBQ
Source: https://www.skyliner-aviation.de/regdb. ... av4&page=1
xiaotung wrote:I heard that Azul were considering the possibility of joining the AV-UA joint venture. Are they preparing for the worst?
dcajet wrote:3 A320NEOs (PR-OBL/M/O) flew from GIG to MVD today for what I'd imagine is a return to the lessor/s.
Avianca Brazil's fleet is down to 6 NEOs.
dcajet wrote:3 A320NEOs (PR-OBL/M/O) flew from GIG to MVD today for what I'd imagine is a return to the lessor/s.
Avianca Brazil's fleet is down to 6 NEOs.