RyanairGuru wrote:waoz1 wrote:qf2220 wrote:
Could.ypu be better served however if the airport could let you or other users fly direct to say CDG and FRA? So your experience is not as good as it could be?
Well this is the thing, if we are talking QF not like they have really looked after Perth intentionally over the years. For a while there we had no services at all. I think most in the West would have the feeling if they added CDG and FRA for a while then they could use an aircraft that could go SYD direct... Perth would be dropped in a second. So I could see why PAPL would be reluctant to fork out on something that in all probability wouldnt last.
But QF aren't asking PAPL to "fork out on something", they want to use their existing facilities.
T3 is owned by the airport, the state government stumped up $14 million with QF/PAPL or just PAPL the rest (that wasnt made clear at the time). So expanding services out of T3 will need some additional works at some stage if they want to add services.