• 1
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 10
 
User avatar
qf789
Moderator
Posts: 8275
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 3:42 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Thu Apr 18, 2019 9:02 am

777-9 N779XW testing on 17th April at 9pm includes FQIS calibration, refuel and surge pressure testing

Image

https://twitter.com/mattcawby/status/11 ... 60704?s=20

Another photo of N779XW at the fuel dock

Image

https://twitter.com/mattcawby/status/11 ... 15616?s=20
Forum Moderator
 
User avatar
FrenchPotatoEye
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2017 1:20 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Thu Apr 18, 2019 9:49 am

When is the 8 due out?
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 26204
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Thu Apr 18, 2019 5:27 pm

FrenchPotatoEye wrote:
When is the 8 due out?


EIS is 2021 last I heard, so late 2020?
 
Spetsnaz55
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2019 2:38 am

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Fri Apr 19, 2019 1:02 am

qf789 wrote:
Second 779 has rolled out of final assembly

Image

Image

https://twitter.com/mattcawby/status/11 ... 37952?s=20



That is flight test 3. 2 is still inside finishing up testing
 
User avatar
qf789
Moderator
Posts: 8275
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 3:42 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Sun Apr 21, 2019 8:43 am

779 N779XW has undergone initial fueling

Image

https://twitter.com/mattcawby/status/11 ... 99233?s=20
Forum Moderator
 
Sooner787
Posts: 2440
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 1:44 am

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Sun Apr 21, 2019 5:00 pm

Stitch wrote:
FrenchPotatoEye wrote:
When is the 8 due out?


EIS is 2021 last I heard, so late 2020?


The 777-8 , with the shorter fuselage paired with those massive wings and engines,
will really look amazing. Can't wait to see that jet as well :)
 
many321
Posts: 279
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2017 6:15 am

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Sun Apr 21, 2019 5:25 pm

Sooner787 wrote:
Stitch wrote:
FrenchPotatoEye wrote:
When is the 8 due out?


EIS is 2021 last I heard, so late 2020?


The 777-8 , with the shorter fuselage paired with those massive wings and engines,
will really look amazing. Can't wait to see that jet as well :)


That's the one I'm most looking forward to.
 
User avatar
ikolkyo
Posts: 2556
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Sun Apr 21, 2019 5:25 pm

Can't wait for the 777X to fly, I think its going to beat many expectations.
 
Tokyo777
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:29 am

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Sun Apr 21, 2019 6:20 pm

Stitch wrote:
FrenchPotatoEye wrote:
When is the 8 due out?


EIS is 2021 last I heard, so late 2020?


777-8X EIS is 2022 (and always has been).
 
User avatar
RobK
Posts: 3556
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 1:43 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Thu Apr 25, 2019 8:23 am

The first production frame for Emirates is in sub assembly right now. (Disregard if already posted up thread, I've not been following this one too closely).
 
Sooner787
Posts: 2440
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 1:44 am

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Thu Apr 25, 2019 10:00 pm

So I heard / read few weeks back first flight was set for around April 26th?

Haven't seen any hints on social media about it yet, so anyone have the inside

info on the target date ?
 
travaz
Posts: 825
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2001 1:03 am

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Fri Apr 26, 2019 12:38 am

Cathay Pacific CEO Rupert Hogg said he is impressed with the airplane after visiting Boeing. He also said he might order more of the 777X. Article behind a paywall.
The CEO of Cathay Pacific says Boeing's new 777X is the logical choice for the Hong Kong airline as it modernizes its long-haul fleet. CEO Rupert Hogg suggested to The Business Journal the carrier might buy more than the first batch of 21 it ordered in 2013, when 777X was launched.
Cathay Pacific CEO Rupert Hogg had an upfront look at 777X - Puget ...
http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/.../ ... -hogg.html
 
Dave05
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2018 2:09 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Fri Apr 26, 2019 1:34 pm

keesje wrote:
OldAeroGuy wrote:
MileHFL400 wrote:

The 200LR is the real cage fighter!!


Maybe the 777-200LR/F is like a sumo wrestler.


The 777-9 is at serious ballerina, she gained 30k lb empty weight over the 77W.

77W OEW: 370,000 lb / 167,829 kg
777X OEW 400,000 lb / 181,400 kg

Apparently the lower wing loading of the 777X provides better control power at low speeds, during V1+ engine continue take-off.

That said, I can see the GE9X gaining thrust a bit again, even before type certification, to improve safety margins.


The 777w engine's record breaking full thrust was just a demonstration right? That much thrust was never used on any commercial flights. In the demonstration they run the engine untill it blew up to achieve the maximum thrust numbers.
 
pabloeing
Posts: 571
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2014 3:00 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Fri Apr 26, 2019 1:46 pm

travaz wrote:
Cathay Pacific CEO Rupert Hogg said he is impressed with the airplane after visiting Boeing. He also said he might order more of the 777X. Article behind a paywall.
The CEO of Cathay Pacific says Boeing's new 777X is the logical choice for the Hong Kong airline as it modernizes its long-haul fleet. CEO Rupert Hogg suggested to The Business Journal the carrier might buy more than the first batch of 21 it ordered in 2013, when 777X was launched.
Cathay Pacific CEO Rupert Hogg had an upfront look at 777X - Puget ...
http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/.../ ... -hogg.html

QF visit for B777X too in PAE?
 
OldAeroGuy
Posts: 3836
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:50 am

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Fri Apr 26, 2019 2:18 pm

Dave05 wrote:
keesje wrote:
OldAeroGuy wrote:

Maybe the 777-200LR/F is like a sumo wrestler.


The 777-9 is at serious ballerina, she gained 30k lb empty weight over the 77W.

77W OEW: 370,000 lb / 167,829 kg
777X OEW 400,000 lb / 181,400 kg

Apparently the lower wing loading of the 777X provides better control power at low speeds, during V1+ engine continue take-off.

That said, I can see the GE9X gaining thrust a bit again, even before type certification, to improve safety margins.


The 777w engine's record breaking full thrust was just a demonstration right? That much thrust was never used on any commercial flights. In the demonstration they run the engine untill it blew up to achieve the maximum thrust numbers.


The GE90-115B did run at 127,900 lbs thrust during ground testing but it was not kept at this level until it blew up.

777-300ER's routinely operate their GE90-115B's up to their rated thrust of 115,300 lbs as required for takeoff performance.
Airplane design is easy, the difficulty is getting them to fly - Barnes Wallis
 
User avatar
lightsaber
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:55 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Fri Apr 26, 2019 7:55 pm

OldAeroGuy wrote:
Dave05 wrote:
keesje wrote:

The 777-9 is at serious ballerina, she gained 30k lb empty weight over the 77W.

77W OEW: 370,000 lb / 167,829 kg
777X OEW 400,000 lb / 181,400 kg

Apparently the lower wing loading of the 777X provides better control power at low speeds, during V1+ engine continue take-off.

That said, I can see the GE9X gaining thrust a bit again, even before type certification, to improve safety margins.


The 777w engine's record breaking full thrust was just a demonstration right? That much thrust was never used on any commercial flights. In the demonstration they run the engine untill it blew up to achieve the maximum thrust numbers.


The GE90-115B did run at 127,900 lbs thrust during ground testing but it was not kept at this level until it blew up.

777-300ER's routinely operate their GE90-115B's up to their rated thrust of 115,300 lbs as required for takeoff performance.

Engines must be run to 103% of rpm during testing. Or, the engine controls must keep the maximum engine rpm below 97.08% of the maximum tested. So testing must always produce more thrust than ever used in service. 103% rpm is about 110% thrust, so all engines are tested to excessive thrust. This is an old FAA requirement to ensure all engines have safety margin. RPM was selected as it is a data point that isn't likely to be off enough to matter and is easy to measure.

GE-90s did undergo blade out testing which is spectacular. Due to oil venting, the GE-90 created quite a fireball, which is normal for this test. A Pratt team witnessed and released the photos. Since then GE has paid Pratt to perform the testing to ensure, as per test contract, the photos are never released. As Pratt's test site is miles from anywhere and in the middle of a swampy forest, no one off site can take photos. Due to the same test stand testing classified engines, no nearby flights are allowed.
You know nothing John Snow.
 
OldAeroGuy
Posts: 3836
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:50 am

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Fri Apr 26, 2019 9:47 pm

No issue just so long as it's clear that the destruction was the blade out test, not the triple point testing.
Airplane design is easy, the difficulty is getting them to fly - Barnes Wallis
 
nikeherc
Posts: 642
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:40 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Fri May 03, 2019 12:08 am

Has anyone heard anything new on testing and first flight?
DC6 to 777 and most things in between
 
UAEflyer
Posts: 1203
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:29 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Fri May 03, 2019 6:18 am

Is there any 77XBBJ on order ? Which government will be the first to fly it .
 
migair54
Posts: 2396
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 4:24 am

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Fri May 03, 2019 7:07 am

keesje wrote:
OldAeroGuy wrote:
MileHFL400 wrote:

The 200LR is the real cage fighter!!


Maybe the 777-200LR/F is like a sumo wrestler.


The 777-9 is at serious ballerina, she gained 30k lb empty weight over the 77W.

77W OEW: 370,000 lb / 167,829 kg
777X OEW 400,000 lb / 181,400 kg

Apparently the lower wing loading of the 777X provides better control power at low speeds, during V1+ engine continue take-off.

That said, I can see the GE9X gaining thrust a bit again, even before type certification, to improve safety margins.



How is that possible?? I was under the impression that the plane will be lighter due to the new technologies and materials. does this mean that the payload will be lower?? do we have any hint on the MLW and MZFW?

OldAeroGuy wrote:
But at the start of a jump ie takeoff, she weights just the same. 775,000 lb / 351,538 kg

That's for the ULR models, the normal B77W is around 340.2T. So I am not sure if the B779 will have both options or it will be only at 351T.
 
RJMAZ
Posts: 1386
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 2:54 am

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Fri May 03, 2019 8:08 am

migair54 wrote:
How is that possible?? I was under the impression that the plane will be lighter due to the new technologies and materials.

It would have been lighter if the wing was kept the same size and the fuselage was the same length. The 777X wing is significantly bigger which offsets any weight saving from conposites.

The big wing improves lift to drag ratio. So if both the 777W and 777X took off at the same 351T MTOW then the 777X would require less engine thrust to climb and cruise.

Extra weight used to increase wingspan is weight well spent when it comes to long range fuel burn. Aircraft empty weight is mainly important when it comes to short haul aircraft.
 
migair54
Posts: 2396
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 4:24 am

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Fri May 03, 2019 9:55 am

RJMAZ wrote:
migair54 wrote:
How is that possible?? I was under the impression that the plane will be lighter due to the new technologies and materials.

It would have been lighter if the wing was kept the same size and the fuselage was the same length. The 777X wing is significantly bigger which offsets any weight saving from conposites.

The big wing improves lift to drag ratio. So if both the 777W and 777X took off at the same 351T MTOW then the 777X would require less engine thrust to climb and cruise.

Extra weight used to increase wingspan is weight well spent when it comes to long range fuel burn. Aircraft empty weight is mainly important when it comes to short haul aircraft.


I got it, so the plane will be heavier, but for the same mission will have less fuel burn, and more capacity, so the benefit is less fuel and more payload.

I guess EK will start using them mainly in the ULR missions where the reduce uplift of fuel plus the reduce fuel burn and the extra space will make the plane an excellent choice, much better than in shorter routes. It will be interesting to see how does the B779 perform in the hot summer weather with 10.000 less lbs of thrust, but I guess it will be compensated by the wing design and the extra long wing.

SEPilot wrote:
Climb performance is determined by how much excess thrust is available over what is required to maintain level flight and by the weight. Being as the weight is the same it is how much extra thrust is available that will determine climb performance. But wing efficiency will also play a small role, and I believe the thrust margin is probably about the same. So my expectation is that the 779 will climb at least as well as the 77W and maybe slightly better.


I really hope it climbs better, because the B77W at very heavy weight it's not climbing very well, be happy if you can reach 30.000 for the first 2-3 hours. The B77L and the B77F are much better climbing.
 
User avatar
qf789
Moderator
Posts: 8275
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 3:42 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Sat May 04, 2019 8:56 am

Forum Moderator
 
User avatar
LAX772LR
Posts: 12099
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 11:06 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Sat May 04, 2019 9:07 am

Stitch wrote:
The MAX theme is now the official Boeing House Theme so all their planes use it.

Meh. Seems like every time they roll out a significant new variant, the "House Theme" colors change..... 77W, 77L, 748, 787s, 7Mx, etc.
I myself, suspect a more prosaic motive... ~Thranduil
 
User avatar
RRUltrafan
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2016 1:52 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Sun May 05, 2019 9:35 am

Does anyone know why there seems to be a sort of ridge towards the rear of the GE9X's nacelle? At the trailing edge of the nacelle, it comes down straight, but at around the halfway point the nacelle extends further back.
"Everything has an end, but, only the sausage has two" - Albert Einstein
 
User avatar
vhtje
Posts: 940
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:40 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Sun May 05, 2019 2:09 pm

LAX772LR wrote:
Meh. Seems like every time they roll out a significant new variant, the "House Theme" colors change..... 77W, 77L, 748, 787s, 7Mx, etc.


I'm struggling to see your problem with Boeing updating its in-house livery. Its not like Boeing is releasing a new model every week...?
I only turn left when boarding aircraft. Well, mostly. All right, sometimes. OH OKAY - rarely.
 
User avatar
VirginFlyer
Posts: 5170
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2000 12:27 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Sun May 05, 2019 5:23 pm

RRUltrafan wrote:
Does anyone know why there seems to be a sort of ridge towards the rear of the GE9X's nacelle? At the trailing edge of the nacelle, it comes down straight, but at around the halfway point the nacelle extends further back.

Are you talking about the fairing on back half of the bottom of the nacelle as visible in this photo?

Image

It is where the thrust reverser mechanism is I believe.

V/F
It is not for him to pride himself who loveth his own country, but rather for him who loveth the whole world. The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens. —Bahá'u'lláh
 
User avatar
LAX772LR
Posts: 12099
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 11:06 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Sun May 05, 2019 8:40 pm

migair54 wrote:
That's for the ULR models, the normal B77W is around 340.2T. So I am not sure if the B779 will have both options or it will be only at 351T.

There are no "both options" with either variant.

The choice is far more than binary:
there are plenty of weight options an airline can select, and they don't have to be static at all times, even for the same aircraft.



vhtje wrote:
LAX772LR wrote:
Meh. Seems like every time they roll out a significant new variant, the "House Theme" colors change..... 77W, 77L, 748, 787s, 7Mx, etc.

I'm struggling to see your problem with Boeing updating its in-house livery. Its not like Boeing is releasing a new model every week...?

I'm struggling with why you're assuming that I have "a problem" with any of the aforementioned. :confused:

I simply noted that it changes all the time, so there's nothing all that significant about the current appearance on a given model being official at this point. Consistent history of the last two decades shows that it's likely to change with whatever comes out next.


RRUltrafan wrote:
Does anyone know why there seems to be a sort of ridge towards the rear of the GE9X's nacelle? At the trailing edge of the nacelle, it comes down straight, but at around the halfway point the nacelle extends further back.

I'm wondering why it's become more pronounced on recent bigger engines. It's very noticeable on the A32x-NEOs
I myself, suspect a more prosaic motive... ~Thranduil
 
User avatar
bikerthai
Posts: 2842
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:45 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Mon May 06, 2019 3:42 am

VirginFlyer wrote:
It is where the thrust reverser mechanism is I believe.


If this is a translating sleeve TR, then the actuators 6 per nacelles are further up. What you are seeing may be the faring for the track on which the translating sleeve will slide. Just a guess....

One can verify this by the absence of these bumps on the pivoting doors TRs on the Airbus models.

bt
Intelligent seeks knowledge. Enlightened seeks wisdom.
 
User avatar
zululima
Posts: 454
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:21 am

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Mon May 06, 2019 4:43 am

bikerthai wrote:
VirginFlyer wrote:
It is where the thrust reverser mechanism is I believe.


If this is a translating sleeve TR, then the actuators 6 per nacelles are further up. What you are seeing may be the faring for the track on which the translating sleeve will slide. Just a guess....

One can verify this by the absence of these bumps on the pivoting doors TRs on the Airbus models.

bt


It's obvious he doesn't mean the top and bottom TR fairings, which everyone sees. He's talking about the trailing edge of the TR; it's not straight vertical, but has a kink.
I didn't get a 'Harumph' outta that guy!
 
User avatar
RRUltrafan
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2016 1:52 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Mon May 06, 2019 6:12 am

zululima yes thats what I was referring to
"Everything has an end, but, only the sausage has two" - Albert Einstein
 
User avatar
SEPilot
Posts: 5391
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 10:21 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Mon May 06, 2019 8:00 am

So any further word on when first flight will be?
The problem with making things foolproof is that fools are so doggone ingenious...Dan Keebler
 
User avatar
777Jet
Posts: 6969
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2014 7:29 am

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Mon May 06, 2019 9:27 am

July 7?
DC10-10/30,MD82/88/90, 717,727,732/3/4/5/7/8/9ER,742/4,752/3,763/ER,772/E/L/3/W,788/9, 306,320,321,332/3,346,359,388
 
Noshow
Posts: 897
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 3:20 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Mon May 06, 2019 11:26 am

What is she doing now? Engine runs?
 
majano
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2018 10:45 am

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Mon May 06, 2019 11:47 am

777Jet wrote:
July 7?

I see what you did there.... :highfive:
 
Noshow
Posts: 897
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 3:20 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Mon May 06, 2019 12:33 pm

Let's not wait until 2077 please.
 
User avatar
bikerthai
Posts: 2842
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:45 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Mon May 06, 2019 1:36 pm

zululima wrote:
It's obvious he doesn't mean the top and bottom TR fairings, which everyone sees. He's talking about the trailing edge of the TR; it's not straight vertical, but has a kink.


I see what you guys are talking about. If that is the case, then it has nothing to do with the TR mechanism. The shape of the trailing edge of the TR duct is to provide the proper pressure differentials as the expanding air exit the by-pass duct. Looking at the end view of the engine, there is no obvious geometry that would force you to have this kink. The one end view of the engine seems to show that the upper duct may be narrower than the lower portion thus forcing a shifting in the trailing edge to provide the right delta P. But then the difference in duct shape it may just be an illusion.

bt
Intelligent seeks knowledge. Enlightened seeks wisdom.
 
strfyr51
Posts: 3688
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:04 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Mon May 06, 2019 7:08 pm

Miquel787 wrote:
The beast has engines..Holy smokes, they are huge..awesome fanblades with those curves.

This is gonna be a hell of an airplane..The 777 was and is Boeing.s masterpiece but this machine will be their finest hour.Sorry for all the Airbus fans but this is a real airliner..

Just joking..I.m a huge triple 7 fan and can.t wait to see it lift off for it.s first flight.

the fan Blades are Huge and the number is reduced from earlier models. The question is? Would GE ever allow a retrofit of earlier GE models with the new Fan Model?
 
morrisond
Posts: 1108
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 12:22 am

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Mon May 06, 2019 7:36 pm

strfyr51 wrote:
Miquel787 wrote:
The beast has engines..Holy smokes, they are huge..awesome fanblades with those curves.

This is gonna be a hell of an airplane..The 777 was and is Boeing.s masterpiece but this machine will be their finest hour.Sorry for all the Airbus fans but this is a real airliner..

Just joking..I.m a huge triple 7 fan and can.t wait to see it lift off for it.s first flight.

the fan Blades are Huge and the number is reduced from earlier models. The question is? Would GE ever allow a retrofit of earlier GE models with the new Fan Model?


The engine core is entirely different - it would never work.
 
User avatar
lightsaber
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:55 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Mon May 06, 2019 8:03 pm

morrisond wrote:
strfyr51 wrote:
Miquel787 wrote:
The beast has engines..Holy smokes, they are huge..awesome fanblades with those curves.

This is gonna be a hell of an airplane..The 777 was and is Boeing.s masterpiece but this machine will be their finest hour.Sorry for all the Airbus fans but this is a real airliner..

Just joking..I.m a huge triple 7 fan and can.t wait to see it lift off for it.s first flight.

the fan Blades are Huge and the number is reduced from earlier models. The question is? Would GE ever allow a retrofit of earlier GE models with the new Fan Model?


The engine core is entirely different - it would never work.

Let me rephrase the question and answer. Would GE ever update the GE-90 fan to a fan with fewer blades.

My thoughts, an expensive certification that would only be done if 400+ new GE-90 could be sold. Since there is no chance of that, you will not see the upgrade.

The upgrade would save, at most 0.2% of fuel. Most if the benefit is for a low spool designed for a higher blade tip Mach number. This allows a more efficient low compressor and low turbine as they need high blade Mach #s for efficiency (why there are GTFs).

Since this requires a whole new engine optimization, it will not happen as we are talking a new low turbine that needs a new casing. See PW1100G low turbine PIP.

Lightsaber
You know nothing John Snow.
 
User avatar
747classic
Posts: 2537
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:13 am

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Sat May 11, 2019 12:39 pm

L/N 1587 C/N 65800 B777-9 N779XZ BOEING COMPANY (WH004), Everett factory, May 10th 2019

Image

777-9 fatigue test airplane WY987 on the 40-51 apron, Paine Field, May 10th 2019

Image

WY987 will be moved to the west parking lot Saturday morning May 11th, then down Perimeter Road to the 40-41 fatigue test structure.

Fatigue Test structure, awaiting test frame WY987.

Image

Image

All pictures Original uploaded by Matt Cawby at twitter, see : https://twitter.com/mattcawby/status/11 ... 5995669504 and : https://twitter.com/mattcawby/status/11 ... 0245475328
Operating a twin over the ocean, you're always one engine failure from a total emergency.
 
User avatar
777222LR
Posts: 294
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 2:19 am

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Sat May 11, 2019 12:42 pm

Man, I really want to see those wingtips unfolded already!
 
TropicalSky
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri May 05, 2017 1:37 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Sat May 11, 2019 1:04 pm

Will the fatigue test be conducted outside?
 
Spetsnaz55
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2019 2:38 am

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Sat May 11, 2019 4:13 pm

TropicalSky wrote:
Will the fatigue test be conducted outside?



Cam you not see that the fatigue test frame is sitting permanently outside?
 
User avatar
7BOEING7
Posts: 2994
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:28 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Sat May 11, 2019 4:56 pm

Most if not all of the fatigue tests are/ were conducted outside. The static test is always inside.
 
User avatar
AirCal737
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 9:17 am

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Tue May 14, 2019 4:39 am

Any idea on when these wingtips will be lowered for the first time?
 
User avatar
747classic
Posts: 2537
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:13 am

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Tue May 14, 2019 7:50 am

777-9 Test frame WY987 has arrived at the 40-41 Fatigue Test facility, KPAE, May 13th 2019

Image

Image

Original uploaded by Matt Cawby at twitter, see : https://twitter.com/mattcawby/status/11 ... 0130899973
Operating a twin over the ocean, you're always one engine failure from a total emergency.
 
zanl188
Posts: 3696
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 9:05 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Tue May 14, 2019 12:00 pm

Does Boeing build a new fatigue test rig for every new aircraft? Or is it reconfigured and reused?
Legal considerations provided by: Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe
 
musman9853
Posts: 661
Joined: Mon May 14, 2018 12:30 pm

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Tue May 14, 2019 2:13 pm

getting 154 flashbacks
Welcome to the City Beautiful.
 
User avatar
747classic
Posts: 2537
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:13 am

Re: Boeing 777X Testing Thread - 2019

Tue May 14, 2019 2:59 pm

zanl188 wrote:
Does Boeing build a new fatigue test rig for every new aircraft? Or is it reconfigured and reused?


The last fatigue test rig was used 10 years ago for the 787. AFAIK the 777-X rig structure is a new built, see below.
The hydraulic actuators and control system could be (partly) re-used.

787 fatigue testing in 2009, KPAE

Image

Original uploaded by Matt Cawby at twitter, see : https://twitter.com/mattcawby/status/11 ... 9895434241
Operating a twin over the ocean, you're always one engine failure from a total emergency.
  • 1
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 10

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos