Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
WPvsMW wrote:Need HNL nonstop.
cporcelli78 wrote:need ISP
WPvsMW wrote:Need HNL nonstop.
JetBlueCLT wrote:*Key thing to note* AA should be acquiring 7 gates on concourse A sometime in early 2020. Which will finally give them some breathing room! Growth will be pretty stale on the AA side until they get those gates imo. Which is why most of predictions are intended for a 2020 start.
Boof02671 wrote:Once again CLT to GRU was tried and failed.
Boof02671 wrote:WPvsMW wrote:Need HNL nonstop.
Already tried that. Flight was a money loser and a lot of times the 762 had to make a fuel stop.
Cubsrule wrote:Boof02671 wrote:WPvsMW wrote:Need HNL nonstop.
Already tried that. Flight was a money loser and a lot of times the 762 had to make a fuel stop.
True, although AA now has scads of widebodies with the range (every widebody in the fleet, in fact). The trouble is that they are all larger than the 762, and CLT is not in a great location for Hawaii given the very limited O&D.
WPvsMW wrote:Cubsrule wrote:Boof02671 wrote:Already tried that. Flight was a money loser and a lot of times the 762 had to make a fuel stop.
True, although AA now has scads of widebodies with the range (every widebody in the fleet, in fact). The trouble is that they are all larger than the 762, and CLT is not in a great location for Hawaii given the very limited O&D.
A CLT/HNL nonstop would depend almost entirely on connections... just like every other long haul nonstop serving CLT.
Perfect for a B788. CLT is much more networked than during the B762 effort.
FlyingJhawk wrote:This is not meant to derail the thread but just last week was my first time to CLT in quite a while. I was there to get a connection to GCM and while the making the connection itself was great (our inbound and outbound flights were next to each other) I found the taxing seemed to take a relatively long time and ramp traffic seemed awfully congested for mid day movements. Is this normal?
Cubsrule wrote:Here's the problem: the southeast isn't a huge market to Hawaii to start with, and CLT-HNL could only at best capture a segment of it. If I want to fly RDU-OGG or BNA-KOA, does it make sense for a hypothetical CLT-HNL to be part of that itinerary? I'd suggest not.
WPvsMW wrote:Re: CLT/HNL. Check out the LFs on DL's ATL/HNL nonstops, and the fares for lie-flat, B764 or B772 daily, 2x daily in summer. I think CLT has the feed for 1x daily B788. Start 3x weekly and build if needed. Where are the ex-ATL pax connecting from? The Atlantic seaboard. Moreover, a new B788 is going to divert DL pax who prefer the Dreamliner to the B764. AA can market "better air" and wifi among other attributes, though I think AA has to upgauge their streaming video catalog.
adamanbermuda wrote:CLT - HNL would have to rely almost entirely on connecting passengers, and there isn’t enough traffic from the Southeast to HNL to justify CLT - HNL. I don’t think AA is losing any passengers by making customers from destinations only served from CLT connect in CLT and then DFW/PHX/LAX. They have the data, if there was enough traffic from AVL/ILM/MLB/MYR/EWN to HNL im sure AA would have already considered bringing it back. All the cities just mentioned are very small markets, anything bigger than those in the south east already has a direct to DFW.
CLTRampRat wrote:I’ll throw my two sense in.
-Southwest adds at least one new route. I know PHX/LAS/DEN are all being considered.
-Spirit announces service. “We are talking. It’s close.” We shall see.
Janj wrote:Boof02671 wrote:Once again CLT to GRU was tried and failed.
It didn't necessarily fail, it was just moved (along with GIG) to Miami after the merger with AA. Now with Open Skies, maybe there's a chance of it coming back.
However, I think CLT-northern South America will probably come before deep SA.
OneAA wrote:Janj wrote:Boof02671 wrote:Once again CLT to GRU was tried and failed.
It didn't necessarily fail, it was just moved (along with GIG) to Miami after the merger with AA. Now with Open Skies, maybe there's a chance of it coming back.
However, I think CLT-northern South America will probably come before deep SA.
Why would AA need any Charlotte to South America flights? Miami has South America completely covered for AA and the mega hub in DFW has most major cities in South America covered. Between those two, fail to see a need for CLT to South America flights.
dfwjim1 wrote:The fact is that CLT is a small metro area that has very little tourist appeal both for folks living in the United States and those visiting from overseas.
OneAA wrote:Janj wrote:Boof02671 wrote:Once again CLT to GRU was tried and failed.
It didn't necessarily fail, it was just moved (along with GIG) to Miami after the merger with AA. Now with Open Skies, maybe there's a chance of it coming back.
However, I think CLT-northern South America will probably come before deep SA.
Why would AA need any Charlotte to South America flights? Miami has South America completely covered for AA and the mega hub in DFW has most major cities in South America covered. Between those two, fail to see a need for CLT to South America flights.
nomorerjs wrote:You're the one goimg around and starting it, you're the problem.CLT, please don’t become the next DTW!
Boof02671 wrote:WPvsMW wrote:Need HNL nonstop.
Already tried that. Flight was a money loser and a lot of times the 762 had to make a fuel stop.
sargester wrote:Boof02671 wrote:WPvsMW wrote:Need HNL nonstop.
Already tried that. Flight was a money loser and a lot of times the 762 had to make a fuel stop.
if they use the 332 I would guarantee this route would do just as well as ATL-HNL, US used the wrong equipment at the wrong time
sargester wrote:Boof02671 wrote:WPvsMW wrote:Need HNL nonstop.
Already tried that. Flight was a money loser and a lot of times the 762 had to make a fuel stop.
if they use the 332 I would guarantee this route would do just as well as ATL-HNL, US used the wrong equipment at the wrong time
dfwjim1 wrote:OneAA wrote:Janj wrote:It didn't necessarily fail, it was just moved (along with GIG) to Miami after the merger with AA. Now with Open Skies, maybe there's a chance of it coming back.
However, I think CLT-northern South America will probably come before deep SA.
Why would AA need any Charlotte to South America flights? Miami has South America completely covered for AA and the mega hub in DFW has most major cities in South America covered. Between those two, fail to see a need for CLT to South America flights.
You are absolutely right. And the same thing goes for flights from CLT to the Hawaiian Islands...connections can be easily made in LAX, PHX and DFW as those AA stations are basically on the way to the Islands. The fanboys in CLT really need to be thankful for what they have now and what they might be gain this year. The fact is that CLT is a small metro area that has very little tourist appeal both for folks living in the United States and those visiting from overseas.
OneAA wrote:My predictions for CLT in 2019:
- AA grows their flights to 1,000 plus daily.
- UA opens a Southeast hub in CLT
- DL moves the Atlanta hub to CLT
- Emirates, Qatar and Ethihad all start service.
- CLT becomes connected via nonstops to every continent on earth.
- Elon Musk and Richard Branson work together to make CLT the hub of a hyperloop / spaceport connection.
- CLT opens 10 additional runways to handle the 4000 plus daily flights that AA, UA and DL bring by having their world hubs there.
- CLT gets hourly flights to Heathrow.
JetBlueCLT wrote:dfwjim1 wrote:OneAA wrote:
Why would AA need any Charlotte to South America flights? Miami has South America completely covered for AA and the mega hub in DFW has most major cities in South America covered. Between those two, fail to see a need for CLT to South America flights.
You are absolutely right. And the same thing goes for flights from CLT to the Hawaiian Islands...connections can be easily made in LAX, PHX and DFW as those AA stations are basically on the way to the Islands. The fanboys in CLT really need to be thankful for what they have now and what they might be gain this year. The fact is that CLT is a small metro area that has very little tourist appeal both for folks living in the United States and those visiting from overseas.
"The fanboys in CLT really need to be thankful for what they have now and what they might be gain this year." I love these asinine comments on anet. AA should be thankful to have a hub in such a great geographic location for a hub. Regardless of its 2.5 metro population. Funny, every time I listen or read any quarterly results. I always seem to hear that CLT is the 1st or 2nd most profitable hub. Why should people be scolded or harrased on here for suggesting new routes out of here. The amount of toxic users with hate for CLT on here is mind boggling.....and funny, honestly. Thats not all directed to you btw. Reason why I try to stay off this site.
No hate here for CLT as I have been through CLT several times transferring on U.S. Airways and AA and I like the airport. However suggesting that flights to South America and/or Honolulu on AA is totally unrealistic as long as AA has hubs in MIA, DFW, LAX, PHX and ORD.
Whatever, *majority* of the routes that get added seem to be very successful from Charlotte.
cheapgreek wrote:sargester wrote:Boof02671 wrote:Already tried that. Flight was a money loser and a lot of times the 762 had to make a fuel stop.
if they use the 332 I would guarantee this route would do just as well as ATL-HNL, US used the wrong equipment at the wrong time
US had a very small widebody fleet and I don't remember if they had the A332 at that time but only 9 A333's which were not good on long distance flights. They were always weight restricted from FCO. The 767-200's made up the rest of the small widebody fleet,and these could not do the ATH-PHL flights without weight restrictions, I was stuck in Athens for two days trying to get out.
Boof02671 wrote:Dec 2019?
adamanbermuda wrote:CLT needs SFO on UA
JetBlueCLT wrote:-UA: CLT-SFO, 2 daily A319(1 flight on Saturday)