Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
heyjoojoo wrote:There's audio of the incident. The engine noises you expect to hear in a grave yard spiral loss of control. He was in IMC. I suspect that's where the investigation goes. I suspect all those reports of pieces falling off were the shit scattering
https://youtu.be/RSmttRBQ4x0?t=8
Karlsands wrote:I’d bet on a weigh and balance issue, may they all rest well. And may the survived recover mentally and physically
d8s wrote:Here is the WX at the time of the accident: KFUL 032153Z 23006KT 10SM SCT022 BKN041 OVC050 15/11 A2988 RMK AO2 RAE2057 SLP118 P0000 T01500106
AAlaxfan wrote:d8s wrote:Here is the WX at the time of the accident: KFUL 032153Z 23006KT 10SM SCT022 BKN041 OVC050 15/11 A2988 RMK AO2 RAE2057 SLP118 P0000 T01500106
Translation please.
Luke1994 wrote:AAlaxfan wrote:d8s wrote:Here is the WX at the time of the accident: KFUL 032153Z 23006KT 10SM SCT022 BKN041 OVC050 15/11 A2988 RMK AO2 RAE2057 SLP118 P0000 T01500106
jworks158 wrote:Aircraft was N414RS a Cessna 414. I determined this yesterday while looking at live footage from over the crash scene. The NTSB spokesperson on site said that in a video he saw, it appeared that the aircraft broke apart mid flight. https://abc7.com/yorba-linda-5-killed-a ... s/5119211/
GalaxyFlyer wrote:The weather at FUL says little about the inflight conditions, if it’s an LOC in IMC accident.
GF
skyharborshome wrote:GalaxyFlyer wrote:The weather at FUL says little about the inflight conditions, if it’s an LOC in IMC accident.
GF
Must have been a massive G-force to break a wing mid flight. Looks like both sheared off however for sure once of them broke in-flight. Possible LOC due to one engine out with IMC being a factor ot like you it was said previous he become disoriented. Either way that was was quite the turn and a tragic end to have people on the ground killed.
747Whale wrote:Karlsands wrote:I’d bet on a weigh and balance issue, may they all rest well. And may the survived recover mentally and physically
That's ridiculous. Wild speculation with no facts in evidence. Sheer guess work. Irresponsible.
An aircraft crashed. That's all that's known. Stick to facts, instead of fantasy.
milemaster wrote:747Whale wrote:That's ridiculous. Wild speculation with no facts in evidence. Sheer guess work. Irresponsible.
An aircraft crashed. That's all that's known. Stick to facts, instead of fantasy.
Easy there partner.
trnswrld wrote:^^^ sorry but he’s right.....how can anyone come on here literally right after a crash and be like “oh sounds like a weight and balance issue” Lol wtf. How does that person have ANY idea whatsoever to make that statement?
LTCM wrote:Time to seriously restrict this kind of aviation. If you cannot maintain a plane and pilot skills then you don't fly, period
milemaster wrote:trnswrld wrote:^^^ sorry but he’s right.....how can anyone come on here literally right after a crash and be like “oh sounds like a weight and balance issue” Lol wtf. How does that person have ANY idea whatsoever to make that statement?
Because this is an internet message board that consists of public topics that anyone can speculate on? Do you think speculating on airliners.net is the equivalent to an NTSB ruling?
Adipocere wrote:Absolutely tragic for the folks on the ground - just going about your business, living your life and it all just ends. Absolutely no control or agency. It’s been a while since I’ve heard about Yorba Linda either - wasn’t this Richard Nixon’s hangout?
DTWLAX wrote:What is up with these small plane crashes in Orange County. In a similar incident in August last year, another small plane crashed down in a parking lot next to South Coast Plaza killing all passengers.
jworks158 wrote:Aircraft was N414RS a Cessna 414. I determined this yesterday while looking at live footage from over the crash scene. The NTSB spokesperson on site said that in a video he saw, it appeared that the aircraft broke apart mid flight. https://abc7.com/yorba-linda-5-killed-a ... s/5119211/
d8s wrote:skyharborshome wrote:GalaxyFlyer wrote:The weather at FUL says little about the inflight conditions, if it’s an LOC in IMC accident.
GF
Must have been a massive G-force to break a wing mid flight. Looks like both sheared off however for sure once of them broke in-flight. Possible LOC due to one engine out with IMC being a factor ot like you it was said previous he become disoriented. Either way that was was quite the turn and a tragic end to have people on the ground killed.
Here is a link to video of the accident: https://www.onenewspage.com/video/20190 ... ashcam.htm
LTCM wrote:Time to seriously restrict this kind of aviation. If you cannot maintain a plane and pilot skills then you don't fly, period
LTCM wrote:Time to seriously restrict this kind of aviation. If you cannot maintain a plane and pilot skills then you don't fly, period
skyharborshome wrote:GalaxyFlyer wrote:The weather at FUL says little about the inflight conditions, if it’s an LOC in IMC accident.
GF
Must have been a massive G-force to break a wing mid flight. Looks like both sheared off however for sure once of them broke in-flight. Possible LOC due to one engine out with IMC being a factor ot like you it was said previous he become disoriented. Either way that was was quite the turn and a tragic end to have people on the ground killed.
heyjoojoo wrote:There's audio of the incident. The engine noises you expect to hear in a grave yard spiral loss of control. He was in IMC. I suspect that's where the investigation goes. I suspect all those reports of pieces falling off were the shit scattering
https://youtu.be/RSmttRBQ4x0?t=8
crownvic wrote:jworks158 wrote:Aircraft was N414RS a Cessna 414. I determined this yesterday while looking at live footage from over the crash scene. The NTSB spokesperson on site said that in a video he saw, it appeared that the aircraft broke apart mid flight. https://abc7.com/yorba-linda-5-killed-a ... s/5119211/
You determined this yesterday while looking at live footage...strange what a coincidence, I determined the same results looking at the same pics showing registration on the fuselage plastered all over the internet yesterday too.
milemaster wrote:trnswrld wrote:^^^ sorry but he’s right.....how can anyone come on here literally right after a crash and be like “oh sounds like a weight and balance issue” Lol wtf. How does that person have ANY idea whatsoever to make that statement?
Because this is an internet message board that consists of public topics that anyone can speculate on? Do you think speculating on airliners.net is the equivalent to an NTSB ruling?
LTCM wrote:Time to seriously restrict this kind of aviation. If you cannot maintain a plane and pilot skills then you don't fly, period
747Whale wrote:milemaster wrote:trnswrld wrote:^^^ sorry but he’s right.....how can anyone come on here literally right after a crash and be like “oh sounds like a weight and balance issue” Lol wtf. How does that person have ANY idea whatsoever to make that statement?
Because this is an internet message board that consists of public topics that anyone can speculate on? Do you think speculating on airliners.net is the equivalent to an NTSB ruling?
The NTSB doesn't rule on mishaps. The NTSB investigates them, thoroughly, and professionally.
No, speculating on the internet about a mishap is not the equivalent to an NTSB investigation.
Speculating on the internet is mindless drivel. No comparison whatsoever with an NTSB investigation.LTCM wrote:Time to seriously restrict this kind of aviation. If you cannot maintain a plane and pilot skills then you don't fly, period
Restrict which kind of aviation?
Most pilots can't maintain an airplane.
You have no idea if this mishap involved pilot skills, or maintenance. It may have been any number of things, as no details are forthcoming yet. That's the purpose of an investigation, rather than mindless speculation.
Adipocere wrote:Absolutely tragic for the folks on the ground - just going about your business, living your life and it all just ends. Absolutely no control or agency. It’s been a while since I’ve heard about Yorba Linda either - wasn’t this Richard Nixon’s hangout?
WayexTDI wrote:Absolutely correct.
However, a lot of people on here (especially you) have enough knowledge to weed out through the numerous possibilities of such a crash to select a few most likely reasons.
All remains hypothetical of course until the official report is released.
26point2 wrote:The story has taken a strange twist. It was initially reported that the pilot was a retired Chicago policeman but his Police ID is fake and there is no record of him working for the Chicago Police.
http://abc7.com/oc-plane-crash-pilots-f ... p/5121959/
747Whale wrote:WayexTDI wrote:Absolutely correct.
However, a lot of people on here (especially you) have enough knowledge to weed out through the numerous possibilities of such a crash to select a few most likely reasons.
All remains hypothetical of course until the official report is released.
I have enough technical knowledge and working knowledge to refrain from speculation in the absence of fact.
I've flown the 414 privately and under Part 135, and have instructed in it and been a check airman in it, so have some experience in the type. It doesn't give me any insight into what happened, however, in absence of fact.