SurlyBonds
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 10:24 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:40 pm

PixelPilot wrote:

Or MAYBE with their MAX experience they simply believe the bird is safe to fly?


WN is not the only airline with 737-MAXes. The FAA is not the only national regulator with experience with 737-MAXes.

Airlines outside of North America, and quite a few national regulators, have grounded the fleet.

What privileges the view of WN and the FAA above their counterparts elsewhere? Texan heritage?
 
vfw614
Posts: 3785
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 12:34 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:40 pm

FR24 shows some Oman Air MAXs airborne , weren't they one of the first to ground? E.g. DEL-MCT, MCT-DME
 
User avatar
Mortyman
Posts: 5687
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 8:26 pm

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:40 pm

Several of Norwegian's Boeing 737 Max 8 has had to turn in mid air over Europe ...
 
vfw614
Posts: 3785
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 12:34 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:40 pm

Just wondering - if an airline grounds without being forced to by the authorities, does it make a difference regaring EC261/04 compensation owed as a result of cancelled flights (no force majeure in that case)?
Last edited by vfw614 on Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
KlimaBXsst
Posts: 340
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 4:14 pm

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:42 pm

Should airline regulators consider grounding the MAX.

I think another good question would be are there any airlines that might be grounded into insolvency by the MAX groundings of airline regulators.

Joining the grounding chorus might not be in the best interest of your favorite financially unfit airline. Which airlines are these I wonder.
Aesthetically the A 340 got it right!
 
bob75013
Posts: 862
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2015 5:05 pm

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:43 pm

SurlyBonds wrote:
PixelPilot wrote:

Or MAYBE with their MAX experience they simply believe the bird is safe to fly?


WN is not the only airline with 737-MAXes. The FAA is not the only national regulator with experience with 737-MAXes.

Airlines outside of North America, and quite a few national regulators, have grounded the fleet.

What privileges the view of WN and the FAA above their counterparts elsewhere? Texan heritage?



How about actual data from over 41,000 WN MAX flights - more than any other airline in the world?
 
EvanWSFO
Posts: 1134
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2018 9:22 pm

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:43 pm

Given the UK and many nations are grounding the MAX, I think it's just a matter of time before the FAA follows suit. Personally, I would board one right now, but I think the tipping point is near to put them all on the ground pending investigation.
I have been on this site 15 years. A unrecoverable email account led me to starting over. Those of you who call me a rookie, you may stop ok?
 
EvanWSFO
Posts: 1134
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2018 9:22 pm

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:44 pm

Duplicate post
Last edited by EvanWSFO on Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I have been on this site 15 years. A unrecoverable email account led me to starting over. Those of you who call me a rookie, you may stop ok?
 
eternity000
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:42 pm

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:44 pm

Air Canada's 737 to FDF (Martinique) AC954 landed on schedule and AC955 is flying out later today. Does the French ruling apply to it's Caribean regions too?

I know AC has cancelled it's 737Max flights to London today.
 
777Mech
Posts: 767
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 10:54 pm

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:47 pm

KlimaBXsst wrote:
Should airline regulators consider grounding the MAX.

I think another good question would be are there any airlines that might be grounded into insolvency by the MAX groundings of airline regulators.

Joining the grounding chorus might not be in the best interest of your favorite financially unfit airline. Which airlines are these I wonder.


If a financially unfit airline is buying new maxes, then that's their own problem.

I personally don't care if it causes a hardship on any airline, I care about the safety of the general public.
 
User avatar
keesje
Posts: 13111
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2001 2:08 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:47 pm

CrimsonNL wrote:
Jetty wrote:
The Netherlands closed it's airspace for the 737MAX as well: https://www.trouw.nl/home/ook-nederland ... ~aa670d62/ (Dutch).


Interestingly enough, TUI Netherlands' TFN and TFO are currently enroute from HRG/BJL to AMS. I wonder where they'll end up

Martijn


Netherlands authorities are fully aligned with EASA. This seems a kind of pre-warning to FAA, giving them some time.
"Never mistake motion for action." Ernest Hemingway
 
gpa526
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:45 pm

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:49 pm

LOT polish airlines has just announced grounding of their 5 MAX planes.
(https://www.pasazer.com/news/40890/lot, ... 7,max.html)
 
robbo2k
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2017 10:21 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:49 pm

Poland close airspace for MAX. LOT cancelled flight with MAX.
Last edited by robbo2k on Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
ytz
Posts: 3529
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 12:31 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:49 pm

Faro wrote:
747megatop wrote:
Faro wrote:
I think this highlights in a ridiculously manifest way a new risk for civil air transport...media risk, including social media risk

When after AA191 the DC-10 was grounded it was because it was abundantly clear what had caused the accident and the potential flaw in the design. We are nowhere there at the moment with the ET crash...and yet...the media furor is forcing airlines to cave in and prematurely ground the MAX before anything concrete has been arrived at by the authorities...

This has really gotten out of hand.


Faro

Not really. After the Southwest incidents where there was a hole in the ceiling and the incident where an exploding engine killed a woman ...granted there was a lot of media coverage...but no one was calling for avoiding SW or grounding SW or grounding the 737 fleet. I think there are enough similarities between Lion Air and Ethiopian - brand new MAX 8s falling out of the sky with suspected flight control problems to warrant an immediate precautionary measure while the root cause is investigated (regulators in UK, Singapore, Australia, China are agreeing). Let's not forget the 300+ lives lost...even 1 life lost is 1 too many. We are talking about mass casualty events here (with potential for loss of lives on the ground as well). When people don't see logic they automatically turn to "media furor" or "media bias".

In some incidents (like this) you will have to react and can't wait for conclusive evidence that either links OR does not link the 2 incidents and trace it back to a problem with aircraft and/or training + human error since the risks are too high.



I quite understand the rationale behind a precautionary grounding yes...but we are lacking so much information at this stage that the link between JT and ET is extremely tenuous for the moment...not to talk of walking back the damage to the MAX brand if ET should prove to have no MCAS link...I think there’s a fair chance it could be terminal...


Faro


Tenuous? Same type. VMC. Similar problems reported. That's not tenuous.

As for concern to Boeing's brand, any regulator who puts that above their duty to the public deserves to join the unemployment line.
 
User avatar
PW100
Posts: 3766
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 9:17 pm

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:50 pm

BoeingGuy wrote:
PW100 wrote:
BoeingGuy wrote:

Correct. I was specifically replying to the poster’s comment. Sounds like you didn’t get that.


OK. But still I don't get it: subject poster was not making any claims whether flaps were retracted or not, so why would you bring it up in your post then?


Oh brother. Because he made a reference that implied MCAS could be a problem at only 1000 feet deck height. I stated that was unlikely. It really wasn’t a big deal.


Well, based on my initial message (which you OK'ed) it still could be a problem, despite the "at only 1000 ft deck height" claim.
Let's leave it here, as it's not a big deal . . .
Immigration officer: "What's the purpose of your visit to the USA?" Spotter: "Shooting airliners with my Canon!"
 
SurlyBonds
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 10:24 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:50 pm

bob75013 wrote:
SurlyBonds wrote:

What privileges the view of WN and the FAA above their counterparts elsewhere? Texan heritage?


How about actual data from over 41,000 WN MAX flights - more than any other airline in the world?


So how's about sharing some of that data, instead of cheerleading ("making an already safe plane even safer")?
 
na
Posts: 9695
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 1999 3:52 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:51 pm

Mortyman wrote:
Several of Norwegian's Boeing 737 Max 8 has had to turn in mid air over Europe ...

Grounding ok, but at least they should have let planes in the air finish their flight. What difference does 2 or 3 hours later make?
Politics...
 
User avatar
keesje
Posts: 13111
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2001 2:08 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:53 pm

GRJGeorge wrote:
ACCS300 wrote:
Short of grounding, the UK ban is now affecting AC and WS MAX flights from Canada to LHR, so it's beginning to affect our airlines regardless of Canada's failure to ground the MAX.

Strange indeed, especially even since AC had the most reported technical incidents on MAX recorded over the last 3 months alone.


They found a solution, to come back on the earlier "keep flying" announcement they need to select "new information". Probably in the coming hours.

na wrote:
Mortyman wrote:
Several of Norwegian's Boeing 737 Max 8 has had to turn in mid air over Europe ...

Grounding ok, but at least they should have let planes in the air finish their flight. What difference does 2 or 3 hours later make?
Politics...


You need your aircraft at the home base for e.g. mods. Not far away, grounded, trying to ferry them back.
Last edited by keesje on Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Never mistake motion for action." Ernest Hemingway
 
JamesCousins
Posts: 430
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 1:19 pm

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:53 pm

na wrote:
Mortyman wrote:
Several of Norwegian's Boeing 737 Max 8 has had to turn in mid air over Europe ...

Grounding ok, but at least they should have let planes in the air finish their flight. What difference does 2 or 3 hours later make?
Politics...


Likely taking them to places where they can perform any maintence or store the frames easily/affordably. Not ideal to have A/C stranded all across Europe. Not saying it's right on the passengers, but that's the reasoning...
Q400, A320-200, A321-200, 737-500, 737-800, 747-400, 757-200, 787-9 // FCA, TOM, TUI, MON, MT, BA, VS, DL, BE, X9, OLY
 
FCAFLYBOY
Posts: 641
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:03 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:53 pm

na wrote:
Mortyman wrote:
Several of Norwegian's Boeing 737 Max 8 has had to turn in mid air over Europe ...

Grounding ok, but at least they should have let planes in the air finish their flight. What difference does 2 or 3 hours later make?
Politics...


Not really politics, IMO, but protocol and procedure. You can't issue a blanket ban, and then say, "Oh, ok, we'll let you pop in and turnaround and head back home".
 
bob75013
Posts: 862
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2015 5:05 pm

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:55 pm

SurlyBonds wrote:
bob75013 wrote:
SurlyBonds wrote:

What privileges the view of WN and the FAA above their counterparts elsewhere? Texan heritage?


How about actual data from over 41,000 WN MAX flights - more than any other airline in the world?


So how's about sharing some of that data, instead of cheerleading ("making an already safe plane even safer")?


I'm sure they have shared amongst themselves and the FAA. Maybe that's why neither have grounded the plane.
 
MKIAZ
Posts: 244
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 5:24 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:55 pm

747megatop wrote:
Not really. After the Southwest incidents where there was a hole in the ceiling and the incident where an exploding engine killed a woman ...granted there was a lot of media coverage...but no one was calling for avoiding SW or grounding SW or grounding the 737 fleet.


Yea but WN actually experienced a meaningful decline in sales that affected their financial results due to people avoiding the airline out of fear.
 
ytz
Posts: 3529
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 12:31 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:55 pm

Bobloblaw wrote:
ytz wrote:
bob75013 wrote:


Didn't you know that everyone here has a PhD in aeronautical engineering with 25+ years work experience?


Nobody gets a say on flight safety apparently unless they have a PhD in Aero Eng and 25+ years experience?

I have two masters (aero and astro) from an American service academy and two decades in the air force with several tours as an engineering officer. Guess I don't meet the cutoff.....

While your background is impressive and I’m sure Airbus or Boeing would hire you, you probably wouldn’t on day one be the guy who convinces everyone to scrap the 737 for a replacement program.


I've not said scrap the program. But there's lots of folks here who seem to think calls like mine for a precautionary grounding aren't warranted. I've seen a base commander ground a fleet of 30 aircraft to find a single oil rag. That's a safety culture. Given the contextual similarities, I can't understand those who'd argue a temporary grounding isn't warranted. And you shouldn't need decades of experience and graduate degrees in engineering to make that call.
 
chimborazo
Posts: 235
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:51 pm

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:56 pm

na wrote:
Mortyman wrote:
Several of Norwegian's Boeing 737 Max 8 has had to turn in mid air over Europe ...

Grounding ok, but at least they should have let planes in the air finish their flight. What difference does 2 or 3 hours later make?
Politics...


Just move everyone out of their way and clear them to land on a 20 mile final with no one ahead, into wind, so there is the smallest chance that they hve to do a go-around.

Sarcasm but valid about the go around.
 
Lewton
Posts: 91
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 12:46 pm

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:56 pm

To be honest, making the planes go back halfway through is too much.
Just let them finish the current flight and at maximum one more to get back to their base if they were in an outbound flight.
 
robbo2k
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2017 10:21 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:57 pm

In 1hour all Europe airspace is close for MAX say ULC from Poland
 
EvanWSFO
Posts: 1134
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2018 9:22 pm

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:05 pm

Given that the UK, Germany and other European nations have banned the MAX, I think the FAA will follow suit. I have no qualms about getting on one, but it seems inevitable.
I have been on this site 15 years. A unrecoverable email account led me to starting over. Those of you who call me a rookie, you may stop ok?
 
TheRacingElf
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 11:49 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:08 pm

According to Dutch RTL Nieuws the decision to ban the MAX from Dutch airspace is based on new advice from EASA.
 
bralo20
Posts: 494
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 9:05 pm

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:10 pm

Belgium airspace is also closed for 737MAX planes.
 
vfw614
Posts: 3785
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 12:34 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:11 pm

So the only larger European country that has yet to ban the MAX8 is apparently Spain. Except for Scandinavia and South-East Europe, that's it for the time being for the MAX8.
 
User avatar
JetBuddy
Posts: 2191
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2013 1:04 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:11 pm

I think the best thing to do for FAA and North American operators are to ground the type as well.

One more incident with this type, no matter how small or unrelated it is - would be the nail in the coffin for the 737 MAX as a program.
Last edited by JetBuddy on Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
konrad
Posts: 560
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 3:54 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:12 pm

Poland's airspace is also closed for 737MAX planes.
 
Aither
Posts: 1206
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:43 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:17 pm

I think it is the first time in the history of aviation that an airplane is being grounded by social media.
Never trust the obvious
 
User avatar
flee
Posts: 979
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:14 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:18 pm

With most parts of the world closed to the Max, should there be a third Max crash, it will almost certainly be in the US.

No wonder the US politicians are getting a bit nervous!
 
IWMBH
Posts: 324
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2018 5:01 pm

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:19 pm

Aither wrote:
I think it is the first time in the history of aviation that an airplane is being grounded by social media.


I think it’s also the first time that 2 brand new aircraft crash in such a short timeframe.
 
bralo20
Posts: 494
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 9:05 pm

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:21 pm

Aither wrote:
I think it is the first time in the history of aviation that an airplane is being grounded by social media.


It could be very well that there is information out there, only known to officials, that triggered this. The first big authority that issued a ban was the British CAA and nobody was truly asking for it (except maybe here).
 
BoeingGuy
Posts: 6311
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:01 pm

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:21 pm

PW100 wrote:
BoeingGuy wrote:
PW100 wrote:

OK. But still I don't get it: subject poster was not making any claims whether flaps were retracted or not, so why would you bring it up in your post then?


Oh brother. Because he made a reference that implied MCAS could be a problem at only 1000 feet deck height. I stated that was unlikely. It really wasn’t a big deal.


Well, based on my initial message (which you OK'ed) it still could be a problem, despite the "at only 1000 ft deck height" claim.
Let's leave it here, as it's not a big deal . . .


Right. This thread is getting old. Nothing we debate is going to amount to a hill of beans. I’ll be interested to learn what the experts determine caused the ET accident.

I think I’ll switch over to a more cheerful topic like the new service at PAE. I saw one of the AS E175s lining up on 16R for takeoff this morning.
 
User avatar
hongkongflyer
Posts: 687
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2014 8:23 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:22 pm

konrad wrote:
As a general comment, is this the first time when the Chinese aviation regulatory authority sets the trend for the rest of the world? Interesting times.


Reasons :
1)They have the most MAX except USA
2) High-level gov meetings are being held in Beijing.
The entire country is at full alert and the government at all levels don't want anything bad happens during the period
3) They care about the safety more then profits
4) Trade War and Huiwa bargaining power
 
akb88
Posts: 139
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2019 2:44 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:24 pm

I'm astounded that people are upset about them grounding the planes! This is about safety, there have been doubts casts on the safety of the aircraft and people are going out of their way to avoid them. Isn't modern aviation built around safety?
 
SurlyBonds
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 10:24 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:24 pm

bob75013 wrote:
I'm sure they have shared amongst themselves and the FAA. Maybe that's why neither have grounded the plane.


You'll forgive me if I don't take your word for it; regulatory capture is A Thing. And not to put a fine point on it, but China has quite a bit of experience with the MAX as well as WN; it was the first country to ground the plane.

Idiotic drivel about "making an already safe plane already safer" doesn't help. Plainly, something wasn't safe on Sunday. Yes, I agree that this response is going to be fodder for future business school case studies about how not to do damage control. In fact, I see it as virtually a textbook case of what NOT to do.
Last edited by SurlyBonds on Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:29 pm, edited 2 times in total.
 
jreuschl
Posts: 408
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 3:04 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:25 pm

Is there any data sharing that goes on with the black box information? Or is it just held in one country?

It seems we would want multiple authorities to look at the data from both crashes, since we really just have speculation at this point in both of these crashes.

Also, it seems the airspeed indicators are prone to failure/be erratic. That seems to be a more simple problem at start.

I do think WN, AA, AC, WS will have to stop flying them just for PR. They're the remaining airlines, right?
Last edited by jreuschl on Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:29 pm, edited 2 times in total.
 
akb88
Posts: 139
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2019 2:44 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:25 pm

Also something must have come out of some of the investigations if authorities in the UK for instance took inititive and banned them from their airspace.
 
747megatop
Posts: 1702
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 8:22 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:28 pm

ytz wrote:
Faro wrote:
747megatop wrote:
Not really. After the Southwest incidents where there was a hole in the ceiling and the incident where an exploding engine killed a woman ...granted there was a lot of media coverage...but no one was calling for avoiding SW or grounding SW or grounding the 737 fleet. I think there are enough similarities between Lion Air and Ethiopian - brand new MAX 8s falling out of the sky with suspected flight control problems to warrant an immediate precautionary measure while the root cause is investigated (regulators in UK, Singapore, Australia, China are agreeing). Let's not forget the 300+ lives lost...even 1 life lost is 1 too many. We are talking about mass casualty events here (with potential for loss of lives on the ground as well). When people don't see logic they automatically turn to "media furor" or "media bias".

In some incidents (like this) you will have to react and can't wait for conclusive evidence that either links OR does not link the 2 incidents and trace it back to a problem with aircraft and/or training + human error since the risks are too high.



I quite understand the rationale behind a precautionary grounding yes...but we are lacking so much information at this stage that the link between JT and ET is extremely tenuous for the moment...not to talk of walking back the damage to the MAX brand if ET should prove to have no MCAS link...I think there’s a fair chance it could be terminal...


Faro


Tenuous? Same type. VMC. Similar problems reported. That's not tenuous.

As for concern to Boeing's brand, any regulator who puts that above their duty to the public deserves to join the unemployment line.


Agreed.

Frankly i am quite amazed at many of the posts i have seen on a.net over the past couple of days since the ET crash. After the back to back Lion Air and ET incidents; the theory should now be PROVE BEYOND a doubt that MAX is 100% safe to fly..till then that type is grounded [the regulators in UK, Australia, Singapore etc. are rightly following this approach).

But, quite a few on a.net (& perhaps Boeing and FAA) seem to be on the thought process of let's PROVE THAT IT IS UNSAFE to fly and till then we will let the type keep flying (we don't have the facts to link the 2..might be training issue..etc. etc.). Too much at stake IMHO and not the right approach. I think there is enough circumstancial evidence [2 brand new MAXs; flight control problems within mins of takeoff followed by a crash] with 300+ lives lost to say, let's take a step back, pause things...understand what is going on and prove+certify beyond a doubt that it is 100% safe to fly after necessary fixes (if any) are done.
 
1ffb2002
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:28 pm

HaulSudson wrote:
1ffb2002 wrote:
This thread is getting ridiculous. Posting that officials are influenced by money over safety is completely unsupported by fact. FAA grounds on fact not hysteria. There are no facts showing that the MAX is dangerous. There indeed have been two serious crashes with large loss of life, but there are no facts yet from the second crash. Let's get some preliminary data prior to condemning government authorities, leaders, corporations, etc. If this is a configuration error on takeoff made by a very junior FO, this grounding and hysteria are moot.


And if not?


Can we wait for some facts and data?
 
max999
Posts: 1113
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 11:05 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:29 pm

Aither wrote:
I think it is the first time in the history of aviation that an airplane is being grounded by social media.


Let's have a serious discussion instead of using excuses to divert the conversation away from any fault in the design of the 737 MAX. In this thread, I've seen the following diversions being used: poor piloting, poor safety culture in '3rd world' (not my terminology) countries, bad maintenance practices, terrorism, cargo fire, millennials, and now the new one...social media. What's the next diversion? Act of God?
Last edited by max999 on Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
All the things I really like to do are either immoral, illegal, or fattening.
 
aden23
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu May 03, 2018 11:12 pm

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:29 pm

Aither wrote:
I think it is the first time in the history of aviation that an airplane is being grounded by social media.



People concerned with their own safety, imagine that.
 
Aither
Posts: 1206
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:43 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:31 pm

akb88 wrote:
I'm astounded that people are upset about them grounding the planes! This is about safety, there have been doubts casts on the safety of the aircraft and people are going out of their way to avoid them. Isn't modern aviation built around safety?


Maybe I'm naive here but we have no reason not to trust the FAA.
For me it's not about safety (only), it's about general public perception after the absolute sh*t communication of both Boeing & the FAA.
As I said yesterday, if one major airline grounds the aircraft, direct competitors will follow to protect their image...and so we will see a geographic contamination happening.

This is exactly what happened
It really started in China. For some good reasons they are totally risk adverse on this.
Then if we could draw a map, it "contaminated" Asian airlines, then Oceania and Middle East, then Europe and by the end of today it will be the Americas.
Last edited by Aither on Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Never trust the obvious
 
Amiga500
Posts: 2293
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2015 8:22 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:32 pm

max999 wrote:
Aither wrote:
I think it is the first time in the history of aviation that an airplane is being grounded by social media.


Let's have a serious discussion instead of using excuses to divert the conversation away from any fault in the design of the 737 MAX. In this thread, I've seen the following diversions being used: poor piloting, poor safety culture in '3rd world' (not my terminology) countries, bad maintenance practices, terrorism, cargo fire, millennials, and now the new one...social media. What's the next diversion? Act of God?


If only Boeing had not designed the altitude measurement system on the basis of this radical "round earth" theory that is running amok.
 
MSPNWA
Posts: 3339
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 2:48 am

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:33 pm

IWMBH wrote:
I think it’s also the first time that 2 brand new aircraft crash in such a short timeframe.


Depends on what it considered "short timeframe". Statistically the A320 had a rougher start. Two were lost before even 100 were in service. Three before 300. A fourth by around 400 in service. It's not just how quickly two crashes happen that determines relative safety.
 
cschleic
Posts: 1675
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 10:47 pm

Re: Should airline regulators consider grounding B737 MAX series

Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:33 pm

Aither wrote:
I think it is the first time in the history of aviation that an airplane is being grounded by social media.


Lots of world events have been influenced or caused by social media lately and some could have more far ranging impact than the 737 MAX.

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos