User avatar
CLTRampRat
Topic Author
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:42 am

Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 2:35 am

Mods, there are quite a few open threads regarding the 737MAX issues and fallout, if this should be in one of those threads I apologize in advance. If this has already been discussed I’m sorry, like I said there are a few open threads going on at the same time.

That being said:

The Justice Department has issued official notices to Boeing to hand over documents and info relating to their FAA certification and pilot training practices.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/justi ... ar-BBV1TOn
 
JAAlbert
Posts: 1937
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 12:43 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 2:42 am

The Justice Department should be investigating the FAA as well.
 
User avatar
CLTRampRat
Topic Author
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:42 am

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 2:44 am

JAAlbert wrote:
The Justice Department should be investigating the FAA as well.


I would have to agree.
 
 
User avatar
CLTRampRat
Topic Author
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:42 am

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 2:52 am

 
ikramerica
Posts: 14874
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 9:33 am

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 2:56 am

JAAlbert wrote:
The Justice Department should be investigating the FAA as well.

I think thats the IG not DOJ who would do that. Or Congress?
Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
 
JAAlbert
Posts: 1937
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 12:43 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 6:24 am

ikramerica wrote:
JAAlbert wrote:
The Justice Department should be investigating the FAA as well.

I think thats the IG not DOJ who would do that. Or Congress?


Well whatever or whoever -- it just seems to me that you can't give away your authority and then claim surprise when someone else uses it to their advantage.
 
AntonioMartin
Posts: 527
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2017 11:58 am

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 9:29 am

I thought I'd read something long the lines of JPATS looking to add some Boeing 737s....but I guess its pouring at Boeing these days...
 
chiad
Posts: 1193
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 4:24 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 10:07 am

CLTRampRat wrote:


Yeah. Like I've said before I wonder when and if the MAX is allowed to fly passengers again and how far this ball will roll.
And now, depending on what is found and the law suits to follow from Airlines, passengers and countries, what will be the state of Boeing and FAA when the dust settles.
 
User avatar
TPX101
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:26 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 10:44 am

JAAlbert wrote:
The Justice Department should be investigating the FAA as well.

Agreed.
 
oldannyboy
Posts: 2316
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:28 am

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 10:48 am

JAAlbert wrote:
The Justice Department should be investigating the FAA as well.



Yep. Fully agree. :yes:
 
Blerg
Posts: 2053
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:42 am

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 10:52 am

If they find Boeing and the FAA guilty then could airlines sue either one of the two? Also don't national aviation authorities also need to approve new aircraft?
 
IWMBH
Posts: 301
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2018 5:01 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 11:06 am

Blerg wrote:
If they find Boeing and the FAA guilty then could airlines sue either one of the two? Also don't national aviation authorities also need to approve new aircraft?


I don't know about airlines, maybe they could cancel their contracts if they want to?
I'm almost certain that relatives of the one deceased can sue Boeing if they get convicted.
 
Blerg
Posts: 2053
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:42 am

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 11:56 am

IWMBH wrote:
Blerg wrote:
If they find Boeing and the FAA guilty then could airlines sue either one of the two? Also don't national aviation authorities also need to approve new aircraft?


I don't know about airlines, maybe they could cancel their contracts if they want to?
I'm almost certain that relatives of the one deceased can sue Boeing if they get convicted.


True, they could always claim MAX isn't what they were promised to be, not to mention that the model is unsafe.
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 20961
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 12:03 pm

ikramerica wrote:
JAAlbert wrote:
The Justice Department should be investigating the FAA as well.

I think thats the IG not DOJ who would do that. Or Congress?

DoT's IG to be specific, according to the article:

Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao on Tuesday asked the agency's inspector general to investigate the Max certification.

The article also addresses one of my questions:

It's not yet clear what possible criminal laws could be at issue in the probe. Among the things the investigators are looking into is the process by which Boeing itself certified the plane as safe, and the data it presented the FAA about that self-certification, the sources said.

The FBI Seattle office and Justice Department's criminal division in Washington are leading the investigation.

What crimes could be committed in this space?

Seattle Times suggested FAA inspectors felt pressured by their bosses to deliver results more quickly. Guess what: most of us get such pressure every day.

ST suggested that FAA technical people felt that FAA managers delegated too much certification scope to Boeing yet also said it was management's prerogative to do so.

ST suggested that Boeing made changes to the way MCAS worked after the certification was done and did not update them on that. If proven true, is that a criminal offense?

ST suggested as always that FAA favors the advancement of aviation (i.e. commercial interests) over aviation interests. Seems to be more an issue for Congress than DoJ, IMHO.

To me that mainly leaves the issue of ordinary crimes such as fraud or corruption, but I've seen no allegations of that anywhere.

In the end it might be a lot of looking and not a lot of finding, IMHO.
Last edited by Revelation on Thu Mar 21, 2019 12:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Wake up to find out that you are the eyes of the world
The heart has its beaches, its homeland and thoughts of its own
Wake now, discover that you are the song that the morning brings
The heart has its seasons, its evenings and songs of its own
 
texl1649
Posts: 1000
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:38 am

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 12:04 pm

A criminal case (such as racketeering, reckless endangerment, conspiracy to defraud the government etc) the FBI could handle here without any conflict needing an outside or independent counsel.

Any airline suits or claims (such as for fraudulent misrepresentation or breach of contract/duty) could take note of facts made public in any DOJ/FBI case that is tried.
 
KingOrGod
Posts: 126
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:19 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 12:06 pm

Blerg wrote:
IWMBH wrote:
Blerg wrote:
If they find Boeing and the FAA guilty then could airlines sue either one of the two? Also don't national aviation authorities also need to approve new aircraft?


I don't know about airlines, maybe they could cancel their contracts if they want to?
I'm almost certain that relatives of the one deceased can sue Boeing if they get convicted.


True, they could always claim MAX isn't what they were promised to be, not to mention that the model is unsafe.


I think according to the Boeing press releases, the MAX is safe, not safer. The upgrades would make a safe aircraft safer... :scratchchin: :tapedshut:
 
User avatar
GEUltraFan9XGTF
Posts: 267
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2018 3:31 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 12:48 pm

Where does it stink the most? I want names. Who is responsible for MCAS? Systems integration? Testing and certification? Who besides Dennis Muilenburg? Eric Linblad?
© 2019. All statements are my own. The use of my statements, including by journalists, YouTube vloggers like "DJ's Aviation", etc. without my written consent is strictly prohibited.
 
2175301
Posts: 1439
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 11:19 am

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 12:51 pm

I personally believe that this is going nowhere. They have to look; but, I think they will find that there were no criminal activities involved.

Have a great day,
 
Blerg
Posts: 2053
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:42 am

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 5:00 pm

Very, very interesting read. Seems like buying planes from Boeing is like buying a ticket on an LCC.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/21/busi ... harge.html

From the article:

Neither feature was mandated by the Federal Aviation Administration. All 737 Max jets have been grounded.

“They’re critical, and cost almost nothing for the airlines to install,” said Bjorn Fehrm, an analyst at the aviation consultancy Leeham. “Boeing charges for them because it can. But they’re vital for safety.”
 
nycbjr
Posts: 179
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 6:45 am

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 5:19 pm

Blerg wrote:
Very, very interesting read. Seems like buying planes from Boeing is like buying a ticket on an LCC.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/21/busi ... harge.html

From the article:

Neither feature was mandated by the Federal Aviation Administration. All 737 Max jets have been grounded.

“They’re critical, and cost almost nothing for the airlines to install,” said Bjorn Fehrm, an analyst at the aviation consultancy Leeham. “Boeing charges for them because it can. But they’re vital for safety.”


Holy hell, this stuff should be standard equipment! I've always been a Boeing fan but more and more I'm left shaking my head.. I hope the company learns from this and comes out a better organization, but I fear any would be short lived.

As to the FBI/DOJ looking into, very smart thing to do, not sure much will come of it.
 
HaulSudson
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2019 6:02 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 8:07 pm

[code][/code]
GEUltraFan9XGTF wrote:
Where does it stink the most? I want names. Who is responsible for MCAS? Systems integration? Testing and certification? Who besides Dennis Muilenburg? Eric Linblad?


Hamilton.

He's now in charge of the lion air and Ethiopian crash team.
He knows first hand which evidence has to be shredded ASAP.

Boeing is taking no chances.

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/artic ... sh-456777/

You couldn't make it up, I know.
 
User avatar
GEUltraFan9XGTF
Posts: 267
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2018 3:31 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 8:36 pm

HaulSudson wrote:
[code][/code]
GEUltraFan9XGTF wrote:
Where does it stink the most? I want names. Who is responsible for MCAS? Systems integration? Testing and certification? Who besides Dennis Muilenburg? Eric Linblad?


Hamilton.

He's now in charge of the lion air and Ethiopian crash team.
He knows first hand which evidence has to be shredded ASAP.

Boeing is taking no chances.

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/artic ... sh-456777/

You couldn't make it up, I know.


They know they are facing jail time if they take out the shredders.
© 2019. All statements are my own. The use of my statements, including by journalists, YouTube vloggers like "DJ's Aviation", etc. without my written consent is strictly prohibited.
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 20961
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 9:11 pm

2175301 wrote:
I personally believe that this is going nowhere. They have to look; but, I think they will find that there were no criminal activities involved.

It's funny how few seem to be allowing for this kind of outcome.

In another thread we have posters saying blame should be assigned before the facts are known.

Seems due process is a concept lost on them.

GEUltraFan9XGTF wrote:
They know they are facing jail time if they take out the shredders.

You don't want to mess around when US prosecutors have dropped subpoenas on you.

Ref: Deiselgate.
Wake up to find out that you are the eyes of the world
The heart has its beaches, its homeland and thoughts of its own
Wake now, discover that you are the song that the morning brings
The heart has its seasons, its evenings and songs of its own
 
oschkosch
Posts: 202
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2018 3:41 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 10:10 pm

Clearly for Boeing the question is not if they are in the shit, but how deep. It gets worse every day...

Gesendet von meinem SM-G950F mit Tapatalk
 
User avatar
PW100
Posts: 3720
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 9:17 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 10:11 pm

Revelation wrote:
Seattle Times suggested FAA inspectors felt pressured by their bosses to deliver results more quickly. Guess what: most of us get such pressure every day.

ST suggested that FAA technical people felt that FAA managers delegated too much certification scope to Boeing yet also said it was management's prerogative to do so.

ST suggested that Boeing made changes to the way MCAS worked after the certification was done and did not update them on that. If proven true, is that a criminal offense?

ST suggested as always that FAA favors the advancement of aviation (i.e. commercial interests) over aviation interests. Seems to be more an issue for Congress than DoJ, IMHO.

To me that mainly leaves the issue of ordinary crimes such as fraud or corruption, but I've seen no allegations of that anywhere.

In the end it might be a lot of looking and not a lot of finding, IMHO.


Good summary and I agree with your conclusion.

The one thing I do fear, is that these type of folks won't stop investigating digging until they found something they think is not right and should be prosecuted, without fully understanding the underlying context.
Immigration officer: "What's the purpose of your visit to the USA?" Spotter: "Shooting airliners with my Canon!"
 
grbauc
Posts: 1376
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 9:05 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Thu Mar 21, 2019 10:28 pm

JAAlbert wrote:
ikramerica wrote:
JAAlbert wrote:
The Justice Department should be investigating the FAA as well.

I think thats the IG not DOJ who would do that. Or Congress?


Well whatever or whoever -- it just seems to me that you can't give away your authority and then claim surprise when someone else uses it to their advantage.


Proof? please these are complicated procedures that aren't simply a matter of "giving away authority"
 
JFK31R
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 8:47 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 5:00 am

This isn't the first time this has happened. Lauda 405 was also due to a critical design flaw that was improperly tested by Boeing and approved by the FAA.

As long as regulatory bodies allow manufactures to determine on their own what's safe, this things are gonna happen. Sadly, the FAA has been known as the "Tombstone Agency" for years.
 
ELBOB
Posts: 295
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2015 6:56 am

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 11:58 am

nycbjr wrote:
Holy hell, this stuff should be standard equipment! I've always been a Boeing fan but more and more I'm left shaking my head.. I hope the company learns from this and comes out a better organization, but I fear any would be short lived.


Short lived? Boeing have often had engineering issues with new types. Some examples from the jet era:

- Lack of rudder boost on the 707 which led to dozens of deaths in training accidents due to lack of control authority with an outer engine failed. Forced to make the change by the UK regulator so as to sell to BOAC;
- Four 727 approach crashes at night within six months of entering service in 1965, killing over 280. Whilst the root cause was identified, most perished because of fires started when broken generator leads ignited the severed centre-section aluminium fuel lines. Those were replaced in 300 in-service aircraft with stronger, flexible tubes in an emergency fix program;
- 737 Classic rudder actuator, often discussed here;
- 747 tail control runs inadequately separated, leading to loss of control when rear pressure bulkhead failed. 505 died due to this.
- 767 thrust reverser issues already mentioned

In fact the 757 and 777 are the only two which come to mind which didn't suffer from significant engineering oversights or shortcuts.
 
User avatar
jfklganyc
Posts: 5401
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 2:31 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 12:13 pm

ELBOB wrote:
nycbjr wrote:
Holy hell, this stuff should be standard equipment! I've always been a Boeing fan but more and more I'm left shaking my head.. I hope the company learns from this and comes out a better organization, but I fear any would be short lived.


Short lived? Boeing have often had engineering issues with new types. Some examples from the jet era:

- Lack of rudder boost on the 707 which led to dozens of deaths in training accidents due to lack of control authority with an outer engine failed. Forced to make the change by the UK regulator so as to sell to BOAC;
- Four 727 approach crashes at night within six months of entering service in 1965, killing over 280. Whilst the root cause was identified, most perished because of fires started when broken generator leads ignited the severed centre-section aluminium fuel lines. Those were replaced in 300 in-service aircraft with stronger, flexible tubes in an emergency fix program;
- 737 Classic rudder actuator, often discussed here;
- 747 tail control runs inadequately separated, leading to loss of control when rear pressure bulkhead failed. 505 died due to this.
- 767 thrust reverser issues already mentioned

In fact the 757 and 777 are the only two which come to mind which didn't suffer from significant engineering oversights or shortcuts.




Different times now. Even the 777 was 30 years ago.

It is 2019.

New Planes falling out of the sky are unacceptable


Heck, new space shuttles falling out of the sky are unacceptable.
 
musman9853
Posts: 742
Joined: Mon May 14, 2018 12:30 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 12:17 pm

nycbjr wrote:
Blerg wrote:
Very, very interesting read. Seems like buying planes from Boeing is like buying a ticket on an LCC.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/21/busi ... harge.html

From the article:

Neither feature was mandated by the Federal Aviation Administration. All 737 Max jets have been grounded.

“They’re critical, and cost almost nothing for the airlines to install,” said Bjorn Fehrm, an analyst at the aviation consultancy Leeham. “Boeing charges for them because it can. But they’re vital for safety.”


Holy hell, this stuff should be standard equipment! I've always been a Boeing fan but more and more I'm left shaking my head.. I hope the company learns from this and comes out a better organization, but I fear any would be short lived.

As to the FBI/DOJ looking into, very smart thing to do, not sure much will come of it.



I mean thousands of people die every year in auto accidents that probably could be avoided with modern safety tech, if their cars had them. No one blames ford is someone dies in a crash that could have been avoided if they bought forward collision assist. It's not really different
Welcome to the City Beautiful.
 
yuomi
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:57 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 12:51 pm

If, as it seems thus far, a potentially critical safety component was made a costed 'optional extra' (at great profit to Boeing) they are going to have to dig VERY deep into their pockets here.
 
User avatar
DL717
Posts: 1564
Joined: Wed May 23, 2018 10:53 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 12:54 pm

JAAlbert wrote:
The Justice Department should be investigating the FAA as well.


And EASA.
Welcome to Nothingburgers. May I take your order?
 
yuomi
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:57 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 1:06 pm

DL717 wrote:
JAAlbert wrote:
The Justice Department should be investigating the FAA as well.


And EASA.



Erm...why?
 
nycbjr
Posts: 179
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 6:45 am

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 1:23 pm

ELBOB wrote:
nycbjr wrote:
Holy hell, this stuff should be standard equipment! I've always been a Boeing fan but more and more I'm left shaking my head.. I hope the company learns from this and comes out a better organization, but I fear any would be short lived.


Short lived? Boeing have often had engineering issues with new types. Some examples from the jet era:

- Lack of rudder boost on the 707 which led to dozens of deaths in training accidents due to lack of control authority with an outer engine failed. Forced to make the change by the UK regulator so as to sell to BOAC;
- Four 727 approach crashes at night within six months of entering service in 1965, killing over 280. Whilst the root cause was identified, most perished because of fires started when broken generator leads ignited the severed centre-section aluminium fuel lines. Those were replaced in 300 in-service aircraft with stronger, flexible tubes in an emergency fix program;
- 737 Classic rudder actuator, often discussed here;
- 747 tail control runs inadequately separated, leading to loss of control when rear pressure bulkhead failed. 505 died due to this.
- 767 thrust reverser issues already mentioned

In fact the 757 and 777 are the only two which come to mind which didn't suffer from significant engineering oversights or shortcuts.


Sorry I meant as an organization, engineering wise I'm sure this will have a lasting impact.

Nice summary!
 
User avatar
DL717
Posts: 1564
Joined: Wed May 23, 2018 10:53 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 1:26 pm

yuomi wrote:
DL717 wrote:
JAAlbert wrote:
The Justice Department should be investigating the FAA as well.


And EASA.



Erm...why?


You think the FAA is the only agency that certified the MAX? Europe and Canada’s FBI equivalents should get busy.
Welcome to Nothingburgers. May I take your order?
 
CWizard
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 4:50 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 1:37 pm

Why is anyone surprised?
Over the last thirty years or so the multi-national corporations, banks, etc. and their lobbyist have perverted the system to the point the U.S. is as corrupt as any third world banana republic. Especially the Justice Department, where anti-trust has become a complete joke.
 
mjoelnir
Posts: 8364
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:06 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 1:41 pm

DL717 wrote:
yuomi wrote:
DL717 wrote:

And EASA.



Erm...why?


You think the FAA is the only agency that certified the MAX? Europe and Canada’s FBI equivalents should get busy.


But the USA justice department has no jurisdiction over EASA. At least not in this case, a frame manufactured and certified in the USA. If we would be looking at a European manufactured frame, it could be a different case.
 
User avatar
Polot
Posts: 9378
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 3:01 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 1:54 pm

mjoelnir wrote:
DL717 wrote:
yuomi wrote:


Erm...why?


You think the FAA is the only agency that certified the MAX? Europe and Canada’s FBI equivalents should get busy.


But the USA justice department has no jurisdiction over EASA. At least not in this case, a frame manufactured and certified in the USA. If we would be looking at a European manufactured frame, it could be a different case.

Even if it was a European manufactured plane the FBI has no jurisdiction or grounds to investigate the EASA, they would have to investigate why the FAA certified the aircraft. It is up to the Europeans to decide if they want to investigate why EASA did not put up a bigger fight.
 
art
Posts: 2913
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:46 am

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 2:02 pm

I mean thousands of people die every year in auto accidents that probably could be avoided with modern safety tech, if their cars had them. No one blames ford is someone dies in a crash that could have been avoided if they bought forward collision assist. It's not really different


If it were not really different, Ford would be marketing a car with a design weakness eg incorrect front/lrear weight distribution where the weight over the front wheels was excessive. To counteract the problem a computer-based system is added to limit brake pressure to the rear wheels to prevent lock up but if the system failed it would lprevent any pressure being applied to the rear brakes with attendant problems (increased braking distance / front wheel skids).

After a few people had been killed after losing control on a corner/driving into the back of a truck, I think the model concerned would be grounded until the anti-skid system was fixed. I also think Ford 's letter box would be full of correspondence from lawyers representing the families of the deceased.



.
 
PixelPilot
Posts: 252
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:19 am

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 2:20 pm

art wrote:
I mean thousands of people die every year in auto accidents that probably could be avoided with modern safety tech, if their cars had them. No one blames ford is someone dies in a crash that could have been avoided if they bought forward collision assist. It's not really different


If it were not really different, Ford would be marketing a car with a design weakness eg incorrect front/lrear weight distribution where the weight over the front wheels was excessive. To counteract the problem a computer-based system is added to limit brake pressure to the rear wheels to prevent lock up but if the system failed it would lprevent any pressure being applied to the rear brakes with attendant problems (increased braking distance / front wheel skids).

After a few people had been killed after losing control on a corner/driving into the back of a truck, I think the model concerned would be grounded until the anti-skid system was fixed. I also think Ford 's letter box would be full of correspondence from lawyers representing the families of the deceased.

.


Pretty much every extra safety feature that gets standardized in a car is due to previous accidents.
Like rear cameras for example. A lot of those were optional but due to constant "backing up and hitting someone/something" type of accidents, rear cameras are mandatory on new cars in US.
Still, it won't make shit drivers awareness better but combined with aural warning it will save lives.
I just hope boeing didn't knowingly ignore certain safety aspects. It will suck to have a monopoly. It slows everything down.
 
User avatar
spinotter
Posts: 519
Joined: Wed May 27, 2015 1:37 am

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 2:45 pm

CWizard wrote:
Why is anyone surprised?
Over the last thirty years or so the multi-national corporations, banks, etc. and their lobbyist have perverted the system to the point the U.S. is as corrupt as any third world banana republic. Especially the Justice Department, where anti-trust has become a complete joke.


I agree completely. Lobbying is simply legalized bribery. Free speech includes dirty money - one of the main reasons why the American people do not trust government any more. I will be interested to see what consequences the 737 MAX 8 saga will have for Boeing, the FAA, etc. I don't think we can expect too much, however. No criminal prosecutions when the government is just as much to blame as the manufacturer.
 
mjoelnir
Posts: 8364
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:06 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 2:47 pm

Polot wrote:
mjoelnir wrote:
DL717 wrote:

You think the FAA is the only agency that certified the MAX? Europe and Canada’s FBI equivalents should get busy.


But the USA justice department has no jurisdiction over EASA. At least not in this case, a frame manufactured and certified in the USA. If we would be looking at a European manufactured frame, it could be a different case.

Even if it was a European manufactured plane the FBI has no jurisdiction or grounds to investigate the EASA, they would have to investigate why the FAA certified the aircraft. It is up to the Europeans to decide if they want to investigate why EASA did not put up a bigger fight.


I think the FBI would ask EASA directly, if it would be a European manufactured frame. If EASA would decline to answer, EASA employees should be careful and stop traveling to the USA.
It is just that in this case the primary certification agency is the FAA, the worst EASA could be accused of is rubber stamping a decision by an USA agency and I assume the FBI will keep going straight to the source.
 
kalvado
Posts: 1820
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 4:29 am

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 2:59 pm

mjoelnir wrote:
Polot wrote:
mjoelnir wrote:

But the USA justice department has no jurisdiction over EASA. At least not in this case, a frame manufactured and certified in the USA. If we would be looking at a European manufactured frame, it could be a different case.

Even if it was a European manufactured plane the FBI has no jurisdiction or grounds to investigate the EASA, they would have to investigate why the FAA certified the aircraft. It is up to the Europeans to decide if they want to investigate why EASA did not put up a bigger fight.


I think the FBI would ask EASA directly, if it would be a European manufactured frame. If EASA would decline to answer, EASA employees should be careful and stop traveling to the USA.
It is just that in this case the primary certification agency is the FAA, the worst EASA could be accused of is rubber stamping a decision by an USA agency and I assume the FBI will keep going straight to the source.


There is a treaty between EU and USA regarding these certifications. Basically, it says "if our friends at FAA thinks it is good enough, it is good for EASA as well. We may check a few things, as our requirements are a touch different - but overall we trust them"
So EASA is a victim here as well.
 
User avatar
scbriml
Posts: 17279
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 10:37 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 3:06 pm

kalvado wrote:
There is a treaty between EU and USA regarding these certifications. Basically, it says "if our friends at FAA thinks it is good enough, it is good for EASA as well. We may check a few things, as our requirements are a touch different - but overall we trust them"
So EASA is a victim here as well.


But maybe a "willing" victim?

It is suggested that EASA was unhappy about MCAS and pushed back, but eventually relented to the FAA's viewpoint. I don't know how true that is or how hard they pushed back, but it has been mentioned several times in the various MAX threads.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana!
There are 10 types of people in the World - those that understand binary and those that don't.
 
Blerg
Posts: 2053
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:42 am

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 3:08 pm

So if they find a legal breach, what could be the consequences?
 
mxaxai
Posts: 1068
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 7:29 am

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 3:24 pm

Blerg wrote:
So if they find a legal breach, what could be the consequences?

Depends on what exactly they find but mostly the usual stuff.

Strictly legally:
- Fines for the company + Compensation for the victims
- Loss of certification for the 737max
- A criminal record for minor players
- Jail time for key persons, especially managers and technical approvers

Beyond that:
- Dismissal of involved employees
- "voluntary" resignation of top level management positions
- Changed procedures
- Loss of trust and stock value

Volkswagen's diesel manipulations or Airbus' corruption probes are some recent, comparable examples that led to some or all of the above.
 
mxaxai
Posts: 1068
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 7:29 am

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 3:43 pm

PW100 wrote:
The one thing I do fear, is that these type of folks won't stop investigating digging until they found something they think is not right and should be prosecuted, without fully understanding the underlying context.

The way I see it, there are two ways Boeing could potentially be found guilty.
The first would be their failure to adhere to standard processes and industry best practices. Most procedures how an aircraft shall be designed and certified are written down, and often in a very clear and unambiguous manner. If some documents do not exist or are clearly unsatisfactory for their purpose, the person(s) responsible for those documents would be in serious trouble. Since such documents are usually signed, this should be easy to trace.

The second would be if they falsified data, dismissed valid concerns or modified the aircraft without including that modification in the certification. It's been suggested that the trim rate provided to the FAA is much lower than what the system actually does. The difficulty here is to prove that this was not accidental. You'd need to look into the system source code, different versions of the system documentation, mails & minutes of meetings, etc.

Unless Boeing can shred & delete enough documentation quickly, it should be in their best interest to fully cooperate with this investigation.
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 20961
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 3:49 pm

mxaxai wrote:
Volkswagen's diesel manipulations or Airbus' corruption probes are some recent, comparable examples that led to some or all of the above.

Facts don't support taking the analogy as far as you did when mentioning loss of certification.

VW was found intentionally installing a "defeat device" i.e. intentionally detecting it was being tested and reducing its emissions so it can pass tests it won't pass using the default driving configuration. A VW executive signed the paperwork submitted to EPA saying no such "defeat device" would be used, which according to statute was a criminal act, and paid the price via jail time.

We have no evidence that deliberate cheating is going on in the current situation. If DoJ finds proof of such, then things obviously change. Even still, we should keep in mind that at the end of the day, we can still go to our local VW dealer and buy a VW. VW took a big hit, but not a fatal blow.
Wake up to find out that you are the eyes of the world
The heart has its beaches, its homeland and thoughts of its own
Wake now, discover that you are the song that the morning brings
The heart has its seasons, its evenings and songs of its own
 
ILNFlyer
Posts: 370
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:34 pm

Re: Justice Department looks into Boeing

Fri Mar 22, 2019 3:49 pm

JAAlbert wrote:
The Justice Department should be investigating the FAA as well.


Then they should also investigate EASA as well, as they also certified the aircraft.

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos