Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
WeatherPilot wrote:So they had to park ~5% of their fleet, dealt with numerous cancellations and only lost $15 Million in net profit.
WeatherPilot wrote:So they had to park ~5% of their fleet, dealt with numerous cancellations and only lost $15 Million in net profit.
musman9853 wrote:the max grounding is gonna screw over a bunch of investors, me thinks.
WeatherPilot wrote:So they had to park ~5% of their fleet, dealt with numerous cancellations and only lost $15 Million in net profit.
MIflyer12 wrote:WeatherPilot wrote:So they had to park ~5% of their fleet, dealt with numerous cancellations and only lost $15 Million in net profit.
$15 million? Net income was down $76 million, and the MAX grounding started March 13.
VetteDude wrote:musman9853 wrote:the max grounding is gonna screw over a bunch of investors, me thinks.
Probably not, it's already pretty priced in (which is why Southwest has lagged the other airlines slightly lately). Even Boeing's stock hasn't been beaten down too badly. As long as they come back into service, the market will look the other way for an extraordinary circumstance like this.
STT757 wrote:They’re getting my money today, I’m in ATL right now making a connection because they cut they’re EWR-Florida flying. At least bring back EWR-MCO, or add EWR-ATL. ATL is busy for WN, but there are a few adds like EWR they can make.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
airliner371 wrote:STT757 wrote:They’re getting my money today, I’m in ATL right now making a connection because they cut they’re EWR-Florida flying. At least bring back EWR-MCO, or add EWR-ATL. ATL is busy for WN, but there are a few adds like EWR they can make.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They opted for the much shorter EWR-BWI route but I agree - 2 daily EWR-ATL would be a no brainer.