Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Vistara W19 Singapore aircraft changes
Vistara from late-November 2019 is adjusting operational aircraft for Singapore service, currently operated by Boeing 737-800 aircraft. Planned changes as follow.
Delhi – Singapore eff 30NOV19 A320 replaces 737-800, 1 daily
UK115 DEL2345 – 0810+1SIN 320 D
UK116 SIN0930 – 1315DEL 320 D
Mumbai – Singapore eff 30NOV19 A320 replaces 737-800, 1 daily
UK105 BOM2355 – 0810+1SIN 320 D
UK106 SIN1030 – 1415BOM 320 D
Air India W19 Mumbai – London aircraft changes
Air India in the last few days filed operational aircraft changes for Mumbai – London Heathrow route, where Boeing 777-300ER aircraft will continue to operate on/after 27OCT19. The Star Alliance carrier previously filed Boeing 787-8 aircraft for this daily service in winter season.
AI131 BOM0700 – 1130LHR 77W D
AI130 LHR1330 – 0400+1BOM 77W D
unnayan wrote:If AI had slack in fleet, they should have atleast made Sydney daily, with all the Indian diaspora there
unnayan wrote:Vistara 787 out of the paint shop...ex Hainan bird
https://www.bangaloreaviation.com/2019/ ... ected.html
unnayan wrote:Vistara 787 out of the paint shop...ex Hainan bird
https://www.bangaloreaviation.com/2019/ ... ected.html
unnayan wrote:Vistara 787 out of the paint shop...ex Hainan bird
https://www.bangaloreaviation.com/2019/ ... ected.html
acechip wrote:unnayan wrote:Vistara 787 out of the paint shop...ex Hainan bird
https://www.bangaloreaviation.com/2019/ ... ected.html
Just for the record, based on the link, it isnt an "ex-Hainan" bird per se, but a Not Taken Up bird by Hainan for delivery.
Its a great moment. I really hope Indian carriers get out of this 'narrow body' mindset and aim for bigger, better.
Blerg wrote:Do we know what routes Vistara will use the 787 on?
Looks really nice I must say.
edealinfo wrote:Blerg wrote:Do we know what routes Vistara will use the 787 on?
Looks really nice I must say.
Vistara was supposed to get its first aircraft in Feb 2020. I guess this means it will get its first 787 a lot sooner. The first flight is either Mumbai or Delhi to London ( have they secured the slots)???
edealinfo wrote:Blerg wrote:Do we know what routes Vistara will use the 787 on?
Looks really nice I must say.
Vistara was supposed to get its first aircraft in Feb 2020. I guess this means it will get its first 787 a lot sooner. The first flight is either Mumbai or Delhi to London ( have they secured the slots)???
binayak wrote:My thoughts on future routes :
If Vistara tries to launch EWR - BOM / DEL with UA partnership with those 787-9s , I'm pretty sure that will mark the end of AI operating that route. Even the most loyal AI pax will shift happily to Vistara. After all let the so called national carrier get a taste of international competition and let them realize that the Gujarati crowd of NJ won't fly them forever.
binayak wrote:edealinfo wrote:Blerg wrote:Do we know what routes Vistara will use the 787 on?
Looks really nice I must say.
Vistara was supposed to get its first aircraft in Feb 2020. I guess this means it will get its first 787 a lot sooner. The first flight is either Mumbai or Delhi to London ( have they secured the slots)???
Vistara earlier hinted the first flight to be Tokyo with JAL partnership.
My thoughts on future routes :
If Vistara tries to launch EWR - BOM/ DEL with UA partnership with those 787-9s , I'm pretty sure that will mark the end of AI operating that route. Even the most loyal AI pax will shift happily to Vistara. After all let the so called national carrier get a taste of international competition and let them realize that the Gujarati crowd of NJ won't fly them forever.
SQ22 wrote:May I kindly remind you to post links to your sources when posting information like the start of new routes etc.? If not these posts will be removed for violating forum rules. Thanks.
unnayan wrote:They probably requested Flightradar24 to hide the flight.President Xi Jinping arrived in Chennai on B-2479 (Air China B747-8) however unable to track it on flightradar24.com. Any idea if such Presidential flights are not trackable on Flight radar? Just curious....
edealinfo wrote:SQ22 wrote:May I kindly remind you to post links to your sources when posting information like the start of new routes etc.? If not these posts will be removed for violating forum rules. Thanks.
Here is the link (Pune to Singapore)
https://www.google.com/amp/s/indianexpr ... 3814/lite/
voxkel wrote:UK needs to launch flights to Africa, like BOM-JNB/DUR (789) or BOM-NBO. 321N can make NBO-BOM nonstop right?
Honestly UK needs to hub long haul in BOM because with the loss of 9W BOM is not the hub of any true international carrier (DEL has Air India). Flights from BOM-LHR/CDG would be good additions imo.
unnayan wrote:voxkel wrote:UK needs to launch flights to Africa, like BOM-JNB/DUR (789) or BOM-NBO. 321N can make NBO-BOM nonstop right?
Honestly UK needs to hub long haul in BOM because with the loss of 9W BOM is not the hub of any true international carrier (DEL has Air India). Flights from BOM-LHR/CDG would be good additions imo.
But these will be such a waste of 787-9 capabilities....not saying they should not..but...they don't need such a capable frame for those routes
edealinfo wrote:unnayan wrote:voxkel wrote:UK needs to launch flights to Africa, like BOM-JNB/DUR (789) or BOM-NBO. 321N can make NBO-BOM nonstop right?
Honestly UK needs to hub long haul in BOM because with the loss of 9W BOM is not the hub of any true international carrier (DEL has Air India). Flights from BOM-LHR/CDG would be good additions imo.
But these will be such a waste of 787-9 capabilities....not saying they should not..but...they don't need such a capable frame for those routes
So, is it more capable for flying to Europe/Japan or the US/Canada?obviously, it cannot be both since the distances greatly vary,
unnayan wrote:More bad news for AI.. more than hundred A320 first officers resign...
https://www.news18.com/amp/news/india/o ... 41623.html
unnayan wrote:edealinfo wrote:unnayan wrote:
But these will be such a waste of 787-9 capabilities....not saying they should not..but...they don't need such a capable frame for those routes
So, is it more capable for flying to Europe/Japan or the US/Canada?obviously, it cannot be both since the distances greatly vary,
For comparison.. Qantas flies them on Per to LHR.. so obviously these are best for ULR routes to US and Canada..India to LHR can be done by others too
voxkel wrote:UK needs to launch flights to Africa, like BOM-JNB/DUR (789) or BOM-NBO. 321N can make NBO-BOM nonstop right?
Honestly UK needs to hub long haul in BOM because with the loss of 9W BOM is not the hub of any true international carrier (DEL has Air India). Flights from BOM-LHR/CDG would be good additions imo.
edealinfo wrote:Turkey demand's more bilateral rights to India.
Given that they raised the Kash issue at the United Nations in September there is a zero chance that they would be approved.
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/need-mo ... es-2114276
However, if they start and Amritsar to Istanbul route maybe they will have a moonshot chance. After all, Air India is starting an Amritsar to London Stanstead route which seemed unbelievable.
Amristar as a source point for travel can help the unrealistic become realistic.
https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/ne ... 47586.html