dcajet
Topic Author
Posts: 4116
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 9:31 am

Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Fri Oct 04, 2019 4:52 pm

Iberia will not deploy the A350 on the MAD-BOG route, which was scheduled for 15/10. The airline says "operational reasons" are behind the decision and has not given a new date for the deployment of the A350 on the route. The A346 will continue to serve BOG.

Instead the airline has announced A350 service to SJO and SCL, for Decemeber and January, respectively. Until then, only EZE, JFK & ORD will continue to see IB's A350s.

https://torreeldorado.co/iberia-airbus- ... id-bogota/
Last edited by dcajet on Fri Oct 04, 2019 5:13 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"Unattended children will be given espresso and a free kitten"
 
LatinAirliner
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2018 1:01 am

Re: Iberia cancels planned A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Fri Oct 04, 2019 5:08 pm

I think there is a new date, the article mentions January 1st 2020.

According to Airline Route, the A350 will be flying January 1st 2020 to BOG: https://www.routesonline.com/news/38/ai ... e-changes/
LatinAirliner - Nickpo
 
dcajet
Topic Author
Posts: 4116
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 9:31 am

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Fri Oct 04, 2019 5:15 pm

Changed the title to reflect the info you provided - although Iberia's not confirmed that, Routes Online is a very credible source.
"Unattended children will be given espresso and a free kitten"
 
Weatherwatcher1
Posts: 265
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2019 5:14 pm

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Sun Oct 06, 2019 1:36 pm

Is this due to delivery for the A350s?
 
TheF15Ace
Posts: 294
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 10:27 am

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Sun Oct 06, 2019 1:47 pm

How come the DL IB A350 can't fly LAX-SYD MAD-BOG? :duck:
 
LatinAirliner
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2018 1:01 am

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Sun Oct 06, 2019 1:55 pm

My questions are:

How is the A350 performance taking off from high altitude airports in long haul flights?
Is Iberia still making performance analysis for the BOG-MAD route in specific?
I think Lufthansa had already tested their A350 in the MEX-MUC route and they went back to the A340-600, is because of performance?
LatinAirliner - Nickpo
 
dcajet
Topic Author
Posts: 4116
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 9:31 am

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Sun Oct 06, 2019 9:24 pm

LatinAirliner wrote:
My questions are:

How is the A350 performance taking off from high altitude airports in long haul flights?
Is Iberia still making performance analysis for the BOG-MAD route in specific?
I think Lufthansa had already tested their A350 in the MEX-MUC route and they went back to the A340-600, is because of performance?


The airline only has said the delay is due to "operational reasons" so make what you'd like of it. It is only a 75-day long postponement, not sure what could change with the A350s in that period of time. I am not aware of the reasons why LH went back to the A346 on the MUC-MEX run.
"Unattended children will be given espresso and a free kitten"
 
dcajet
Topic Author
Posts: 4116
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 9:31 am

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Sun Oct 06, 2019 11:07 pm

BOG ---> 2,640 msl
MEX ---> 2,250 msl

If the A350 had issues at MEX, they won't get any better at BOG.
"Unattended children will be given espresso and a free kitten"
 
User avatar
seabosdca
Posts: 6509
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:33 am

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Sun Oct 06, 2019 11:37 pm

Failure to procure some necessary piece of equipment on time?

With that big wing, the A350 shouldn't have takeoff performance issues at BOG.
 
User avatar
BaconButty
Posts: 803
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 3:42 pm

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Sun Oct 06, 2019 11:50 pm

dcajet wrote:
BOG ---> 2,640 msl
MEX ---> 2,250 msl

If the A350 had issues at MEX, they won't get any better at BOG.


ADD is at 2,334m, they fly to PVG which is between MAD-BOG and MUC-MEX in distance. That and the fact that the route is starting a couple of months later would suggest the reasons are more mundane?
Down with that sort of thing!
 
gbsgoulart
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 10:17 pm

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Mon Oct 07, 2019 3:16 am

seabosdca wrote:
Failure to procure some necessary piece of equipment on time?

With that big wing, the A350 shouldn't have takeoff performance issues at BOG.


It is actually due to some obstacles around BOG runways. Thus, the payload restrictions hinder the use of the A350. The Colombian CAA is already working on solutions, so the January 1st schedule should work.
 
Jomar777
Posts: 390
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 8:45 am

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Mon Oct 07, 2019 9:02 am

I wonder why did IB not plan replacing the A346 on the MAD-GRU route by the A350 yet?
GIG is on a A332 which is more thna fine given the actual yields and the fact that their A332s are quite new.
But why doens't GRU gets a replacement?
 
dcajet
Topic Author
Posts: 4116
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 9:31 am

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Mon Oct 07, 2019 5:56 pm

Jomar777 wrote:
I wonder why did IB not plan replacing the A346 on the MAD-GRU route by the A350 yet?
GIG is on a A332 which is more thna fine given the actual yields and the fact that their A332s are quite new.
But why doens't GRU gets a replacement?


Because other markets in South America are more important to Iberia's bottom line than GRU. Same reason why TAP rules in Brazil, Iberia rules in Argentina, etc.
"Unattended children will be given espresso and a free kitten"
 
Jomar777
Posts: 390
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 8:45 am

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Tue Oct 08, 2019 8:36 am

dcajet wrote:
Jomar777 wrote:
I wonder why did IB not plan replacing the A346 on the MAD-GRU route by the A350 yet?
GIG is on a A332 which is more thna fine given the actual yields and the fact that their A332s are quite new.
But why doens't GRU gets a replacement?


Because other markets in South America are more important to Iberia's bottom line than GRU. Same reason why TAP rules in Brazil, Iberia rules in Argentina, etc.


Get that since, historically, IB really started in South America in EZE but surely GRU accrues more passenger yields than, let's say BOG. IB's GRU offer is the worst one between Air Europa (B789), Latam (B77W) and Air China (B789). You could mention the service as a differential but I did this line on LATAM & IB not long ago (LATAM outbound and IB inbound) and I foujnd no significant difference on the offering.
 
pipeafcr
Posts: 399
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 1:47 am

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Tue Oct 08, 2019 11:26 am

Jomar777 wrote:
dcajet wrote:
Jomar777 wrote:
I wonder why did IB not plan replacing the A346 on the MAD-GRU route by the A350 yet?
GIG is on a A332 which is more thna fine given the actual yields and the fact that their A332s are quite new.
But why doens't GRU gets a replacement?


Because other markets in South America are more important to Iberia's bottom line than GRU. Same reason why TAP rules in Brazil, Iberia rules in Argentina, etc.


Get that since, historically, IB really started in South America in EZE but surely GRU accrues more passenger yields than, let's say BOG. IB's GRU offer is the worst one between Air Europa (B789), Latam (B77W) and Air China (B789). You could mention the service as a differential but I did this line on LATAM & IB not long ago (LATAM outbound and IB inbound) and I foujnd no significant difference on the offering.


In 2018, BOG was the busiest international route (outside the EU) out of MAD
Felipe Carrillo
 
HIA350
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:51 pm

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Tue Oct 08, 2019 12:46 pm

TheF15Ace wrote:
How come the DL IB A350 can't fly LAX-SYD MAD-BOG? :duck:



mad - bog is 4338 nautical miles, even the mighty a343 can do it so get your facts straight

LAX - Syd is 6507 NM you should call delta and IB operations tell them you need information for school paper and ask them instead of using sarcasm
 
TheF15Ace
Posts: 294
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 10:27 am

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Tue Oct 08, 2019 2:04 pm

HIA350 wrote:
TheF15Ace wrote:
How come the DL IB A350 can't fly LAX-SYD MAD-BOG? :duck:



mad - bog is 4338 nautical miles, even the mighty a343 can do it so get your facts straight

LAX - Syd is 6507 NM you should call delta and IB operations tell them you need information for school paper and ask them instead of using sarcasm


Image
 
DCA350
Posts: 68
Joined: Sat May 04, 2019 7:27 pm

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Tue Oct 08, 2019 2:58 pm

pipeafcr wrote:
Jomar777 wrote:
dcajet wrote:

Because other markets in South America are more important to Iberia's bottom line than GRU. Same reason why TAP rules in Brazil, Iberia rules in Argentina, etc.


Get that since, historically, IB really started in South America in EZE but surely GRU accrues more passenger yields than, let's say BOG. IB's GRU offer is the worst one between Air Europa (B789), Latam (B77W) and Air China (B789). You could mention the service as a differential but I did this line on LATAM & IB not long ago (LATAM outbound and IB inbound) and I foujnd no significant difference on the offering.


In 2018, BOG was the busiest international route (outside the EU) out of MAD


Thanks for the info, I always thought EZE was King, but BOG is a powerhouse that's only going to continue to grow, especially with Argentina's economy tanking again.
 
dcajet
Topic Author
Posts: 4116
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 9:31 am

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Tue Oct 08, 2019 3:45 pm

DCA350 wrote:
pipeafcr wrote:
Jomar777 wrote:

Get that since, historically, IB really started in South America in EZE but surely GRU accrues more passenger yields than, let's say BOG. IB's GRU offer is the worst one between Air Europa (B789), Latam (B77W) and Air China (B789). You could mention the service as a differential but I did this line on LATAM & IB not long ago (LATAM outbound and IB inbound) and I foujnd no significant difference on the offering.


In 2018, BOG was the busiest international route (outside the EU) out of MAD


Thanks for the info, I always thought EZE was King, but BOG is a powerhouse that's only going to continue to grow, especially with Argentina's economy tanking again.


Not that fast. The only reason BOG has more passengers is AV's hub thaf funnels passengers to pretty much everywhere in the region, except far away places such as EZE or GRU. When it comes to point to point traffic, EZE (and MEX) are still streets ahead from BOG. In fact, Argentina is the country in the world where most Spanish nationals live outside of Spain.
"Unattended children will be given espresso and a free kitten"
 
DCA350
Posts: 68
Joined: Sat May 04, 2019 7:27 pm

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Tue Oct 08, 2019 6:54 pm

dcajet wrote:
DCA350 wrote:
pipeafcr wrote:

In 2018, BOG was the busiest international route (outside the EU) out of MAD


Thanks for the info, I always thought EZE was King, but BOG is a powerhouse that's only going to continue to grow, especially with Argentina's economy tanking again.


Not that fast. The only reason BOG has more passengers is AV's hub thaf funnels passengers to pretty much everywhere in the region, except far away places such as EZE or GRU. When it comes to point to point traffic, EZE (and MEX) are still streets ahead from BOG. In fact, Argentina is the country in the world where most Spanish nationals live outside of Spain.


Ok this makes sense.. As I acknowledged before I thought EZE handled more traffic and Iberia's number of flights reflect this. But Colombia is Booming.. They have flights to Madrid from MDE and CLO in addition to the up to 5 daily from Bogota.
 
danimarroquin
Posts: 252
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 4:06 am

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Wed Oct 09, 2019 1:56 am

gbsgoulart wrote:
seabosdca wrote:
Failure to procure some necessary piece of equipment on time?

With that big wing, the A350 shouldn't have takeoff performance issues at BOG.


It is actually due to some obstacles around BOG runways. Thus, the payload restrictions hinder the use of the A350. The Colombian CAA is already working on solutions, so the January 1st schedule should work.


what obstacles ??? there's 2 runways in SKBO , so i really don't see the inconvenience for a obstacle ?
 
gbsgoulart
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 10:17 pm

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:16 am

danimarroquin wrote:
gbsgoulart wrote:
seabosdca wrote:
Failure to procure some necessary piece of equipment on time?

With that big wing, the A350 shouldn't have takeoff performance issues at BOG.


It is actually due to some obstacles around BOG runways. Thus, the payload restrictions hinder the use of the A350. The Colombian CAA is already working on solutions, so the January 1st schedule should work.


what obstacles ??? there's 2 runways in SKBO , so i really don't see the inconvenience for a obstacle ?


Several actually: Trees, buildings, antennas and even a hangar inside the airport built with excessive height. You name it, and they are there... :spin: At the moment, there are still around 36 flagged obstacles inside the flights' path distributed between the 4 ends of the 2 runways. Most of them should be gone by January, but there are some which will require a legal route before being removed, which tends to be quite slow in Colombia.

It is important to note that it is safe to operate, but the A350 would suffer heavy payload restrictions due to the climb gradient required. Most widebodies headed to Europe currently suffer some penalty...
 
A388
Posts: 7891
Joined: Mon May 21, 2001 3:48 am

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Thu Oct 10, 2019 3:38 am

If these obstacles are such a heavy toll on the A350 payload, how come all those 787-9's don't have a similar issue? It's not like the A350-900 is that much bigger compared to the 787-9? Why the difference?

A388
 
tommy1808
Posts: 10872
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 3:24 pm

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Thu Oct 10, 2019 6:25 am

A388 wrote:
If these obstacles are such a heavy toll on the A350 payload, how come all those 787-9's don't have a similar issue? It's not like the A350-900 is that much bigger compared to the 787-9? Why the difference?

A388


Depends on where those -9 fly to from BOG.

Best regards
Thomas
This Singature is a safe space......
 
User avatar
seahawk
Posts: 8726
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:29 am

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Thu Oct 10, 2019 6:44 am

Operational reasons does not mean aircraft A can not fly the route, it usually means that using aircraft B on the route is better - maybe just because using aircraft B on another route would be less efficient. And like MEX with LH, it makes a lot of sense to keep the quads on the hot and high routes as long as you have them.
 
Clydenairways
Posts: 1231
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 8:27 am

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Thu Oct 10, 2019 9:53 am

Maybe the A346 can carry more cargo in addition to a full pax load, so maybe the A346 will stay on these kind of airports until eventually replaced by the A350.
 
airbazar
Posts: 9698
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:12 pm

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Thu Oct 10, 2019 11:24 am

Clydenairways wrote:
Maybe the A346 can carry more cargo in addition to a full pax load, so maybe the A346 will stay on these kind of airports until eventually replaced by the A350.

The A346 is a beast out of high altitude airports. The A346 is to the widebodies what the B752 is to the narrowbodies when it comes to take-off performance at altitude. However, like the 752 it comes at a significant cost: high fuel consumption. So what it gains in payload, it gives away in fuel sort of.
A388 wrote:
If these obstacles are such a heavy toll on the A350 payload, how come all those 787-9's don't have a similar issue? It's not like the A350-900 is that much bigger compared to the 787-9? Why the difference?

What makes you think they don't have a similar issue? Only AF operates the 789 out of BOG to Europe. Everyone else is either 788 or A346. LH is the other airline operating the A346. Coincidence? AF has neither 788's nor A346's so they have to operate the next best thing.
 
danimarroquin
Posts: 252
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 4:06 am

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Thu Oct 10, 2019 6:25 pm

gbsgoulart wrote:
danimarroquin wrote:
gbsgoulart wrote:

It is actually due to some obstacles around BOG runways. Thus, the payload restrictions hinder the use of the A350. The Colombian CAA is already working on solutions, so the January 1st schedule should work.


what obstacles ??? there's 2 runways in SKBO , so i really don't see the inconvenience for a obstacle ?


Several actually: Trees, buildings, antennas and even a hangar inside the airport built with excessive height. You name it, and they are there... :spin: At the moment, there are still around 36 flagged obstacles inside the flights' path distributed between the 4 ends of the 2 runways. Most of them should be gone by January, but there are some which will require a legal route before being removed, which tends to be quite slow in Colombia.

It is important to note that it is safe to operate, but the A350 would suffer heavy payload restrictions due to the climb gradient required. Most widebodies headed to Europe currently suffer some penalty...



Those sound like recommendations made for better performance of the airport , not a restriction for the A350 to operate .
Besides , the A350-900 and 1000 where in bogota doing touch and go s with no problem .

What hangar are we talking about ? Do you have the source for this arguments ?
 
airbazar
Posts: 9698
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:12 pm

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Thu Oct 10, 2019 7:36 pm

danimarroquin wrote:
gbsgoulart wrote:
danimarroquin wrote:

what obstacles ??? there's 2 runways in SKBO , so i really don't see the inconvenience for a obstacle ?


Several actually: Trees, buildings, antennas and even a hangar inside the airport built with excessive height. You name it, and they are there... :spin: At the moment, there are still around 36 flagged obstacles inside the flights' path distributed between the 4 ends of the 2 runways. Most of them should be gone by January, but there are some which will require a legal route before being removed, which tends to be quite slow in Colombia.

It is important to note that it is safe to operate, but the A350 would suffer heavy payload restrictions due to the climb gradient required. Most widebodies headed to Europe currently suffer some penalty...



Those sound like recommendations made for better performance of the airport , not a restriction for the A350 to operate .
Besides , the A350-900 and 1000 where in bogota doing touch and go s with no problem .

What hangar are we talking about ? Do you have the source for this arguments ?


It could be airline specific. Different airlines have different clearance requirement.
For example, when JL started flying to BOS with the 788 the cranes from the container port that were on the take-off path had to be moved. That was a JL requirement. No one else required that.
https://images.app.goo.gl/xibcAg6k34D2eQdn8
 
gbsgoulart
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 10:17 pm

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Fri Oct 11, 2019 3:08 am

danimarroquin wrote:

Those sound like recommendations made for better performance of the airport , not a restriction for the A350 to operate .
Besides , the A350-900 and 1000 where in bogota doing touch and go s with no problem .

What hangar are we talking about ? Do you have the source for this arguments ?


Yes I do. Can't quite reveal everything, but here are some pics and draws that can illustrate the issue. One of the pics belongs to the Hangar in question.

And you are right about the A350 flights in BOG... But again, the aircraft can operate, but it is not efficient, as correctly pointed out by @airbazar. Also important to notice, those obstacles were published by the CAA just a couple of months ago. When IB decided to bring the A350, they were not published yet, so that's why they had to push back the dates.

https://imgur.com/a/ExjEES6

P.D: Multiple edits, because I can't post pics :lol: .. sorry, this is my 3rd post on A.net, after many years as a lurker...
 
Summa767
Posts: 1841
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 1:30 am

Re: Iberia postpones A350 deployment on the MAD-BOG route

Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:55 pm

gbsgoulart wrote:
danimarroquin wrote:

Those sound like recommendations made for better performance of the airport , not a restriction for the A350 to operate .
Besides , the A350-900 and 1000 where in bogota doing touch and go s with no problem .

What hangar are we talking about ? Do you have the source for this arguments ?


Yes I do. Can't quite reveal everything, but here are some pics and draws that can illustrate the issue. One of the pics belongs to the Hangar in question.

And you are right about the A350 flights in BOG... But again, the aircraft can operate, but it is not efficient, as correctly pointed out by @airbazar. Also important to notice, those obstacles were published by the CAA just a couple of months ago. When IB decided to bring the A350, they were not published yet, so that's why they had to push back the dates.

https://imgur.com/a/ExjEES6

P.D: Multiple edits, because I can't post pics :lol: .. sorry, this is my 3rd post on A.net, after many years as a lurker...


Thank you very much for such illustrative contribution.
It's quite an eye opener for many of us that even a the height of a hanger to the side of the runway can have an impact on an aircraft's operations planning.

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos