Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Dominion301 wrote:Thanks for this amazing post. Took me a good 1/2 hr to read it.
My take is:
-It looks like the big winners of this update are PWM, ECP, PNS and (dare I say) ATL; and
-I think we can safely put to rest now any assumptions about EVP’s future within WN.
Jshank83 wrote:Dominion301 wrote:Thanks for this amazing post. Took me a good 1/2 hr to read it.
My take is:
-It looks like the big winners of this update are PWM, ECP, PNS and (dare I say) ATL; and
-I think we can safely put to rest now any assumptions about EVP’s future within WN.
ECP/PNS are mostly just yearly seasonal adds. I don’t think any are new except the ATL-ECP one
USAirALB wrote:It's interesting to me that WN has discontinued all LAS and PHX routes to the Northeast with the exception of BUF. ALB lost their LAS flight a couple of years ago and then they brought it back again last year, only to axe it again.
I'm guessing Canadian traffic helps the routes at BUF? IIRC MHT/BDL/PVD all had PHX and/or LAS at one point.
USAirALB wrote:
I'm guessing Canadian traffic helps the routes at BUF? IIRC MHT/BDL/PVD all had PHX and/or LAS at one point.
caflyboy wrote:MCO-OKC
AWACSooner wrote:caflyboy wrote:MCO-OKC
This is what, the 58th time they've tried this...and SATURDAY ONLY...seasonal...and a 5:00 AM DEPARTURE from OKC.
Then they'll say it didn't work...cancel the route after a short time, and we're screwed out of yet another non-stop market that should be served near-daily (F9 and G4 can somehow make it work, but WN can't).
Same old song and dance for WN at OKC...
MIflyer12 wrote:USAirALB wrote:I'm guessing Canadian traffic helps the routes at BUF? IIRC MHT/BDL/PVD all had PHX and/or LAS at one point.
That may not be a bad guess. As a domestic flight it avoids $$ U.S. and Canadian border transit fees. Whether Hamiltonians and St Catherinians will continue to support that at sufficient fares I won't predict.
USAirALB wrote:It's interesting to me that WN has discontinued all LAS and PHX routes to the Northeast with the exception of BUF. ALB lost their LAS flight a couple of years ago and then they brought it back again last year, only to axe it again.
I'm guessing Canadian traffic helps the routes at BUF? IIRC MHT/BDL/PVD all had PHX and/or LAS at one point.
WN732 wrote:USAirALB wrote:It's interesting to me that WN has discontinued all LAS and PHX routes to the Northeast with the exception of BUF. ALB lost their LAS flight a couple of years ago and then they brought it back again last year, only to axe it again.
I'm guessing Canadian traffic helps the routes at BUF? IIRC MHT/BDL/PVD all had PHX and/or LAS at one point.
My guess is and it's only a guess, is that they don't want to run full on transcons from their smaller northeast stations, which ties up an airplane for hours when they can run a shorter stage length flight to DEN, STL, MDW, and even BWI could connect you on a plane that would carry a little more O&D. With those 3 airports combined you can get to nearly every station on the west coast. This shorter stage length could also allow them to squeeze out another short-haul flight that they may have otherwise been unable to do which is a better use of resources.
The bigger players on the east coast obviously have transcons but they can also afford it with better O&D.
czbb wrote:MIflyer12 wrote:
That may not be a bad guess. As a domestic flight it avoids $$ U.S. and Canadian border transit fees. Whether Hamiltonians and St Catherinians will continue to support that at sufficient fares I won't predict.
Which makes you wonder how long it will be until WN start serving BLI/Bellingham (or South Vancouver as I call it). Unlike BUF for Toronto, there are plenty of places in Metro Vancouver that are actually closer to BLI than YVR. For me in the burbs, it's 30 min to YVR and 60 to BLI; add to that it's awesome little airport to fly in and out of.
DEN / OAK / HOU / MDW / LAX (I can understand them not wanting to compete with G4's service to LAS)
Hey @flyswa, are you listening?
Dominion301 wrote:Jshank83 wrote:Dominion301 wrote:Thanks for this amazing post. Took me a good 1/2 hr to read it.
My take is:
-It looks like the big winners of this update are PWM, ECP, PNS and (dare I say) ATL; and
-I think we can safely put to rest now any assumptions about EVP’s future within WN.
ECP/PNS are mostly just yearly seasonal adds. I don’t think any are new except the ATL-ECP one
Isn’t something like ECP-ATL a new route and not just a seasonal resumption?
USAirALB wrote:It's interesting to me that WN has discontinued all LAS and PHX routes to the Northeast with the exception of BUF. ALB lost their LAS flight a couple of years ago and then they brought it back again last year, only to axe it again.
I'm guessing Canadian traffic helps the routes at BUF? IIRC MHT/BDL/PVD all had PHX and/or LAS at one point.
caflyboy wrote:Top 20 Stations by number of stations served Non-Stop:
1. BWI/DEN (69)
3. HOU (68)
4. MDW (67)
5. DAL (61)
6. LAS (54)
7. MCO/PHX/STL (51)
10. BNA.FLL (47)
12. TPA (43)
13. ATL (41)
14. OAK (38)
15. SAN (36)
16. AUS/MCI (33)
18. LAX/SJC (32)
20. SMF (24)
LAX772LR wrote:caflyboy wrote:Top 20 Stations by number of stations served Non-Stop:
1. BWI/DEN (69)
3. HOU (68)
4. MDW (67)
5. DAL (61)
6. LAS (54)
7. MCO/PHX/STL (51)
10. BNA.FLL (47)
12. TPA (43)
13. ATL (41)
14. OAK (38)
15. SAN (36)
16. AUS/MCI (33)
18. LAX/SJC (32)
20. SMF (24)
How is SMF a bigger count by station than say, MSY, which serves 3 more destinations?