SonaSounds
Posts: 265
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 7:16 pm

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:34 pm

KLMatSJC wrote:
SonaSounds wrote:
Looks like ANA is adding a 2nd flight to Japan from SFO after JAL added a 2nd daily flight for this summer as well. Going to be a lot of new seats from SFO to Japan with ANA and JAL both serving NRT & HND with their own aircraft from SFO. (If I remember correctly...) SFO will go from 5x daily SFO-Japan to 7x daily this summer.

San Francisco (from 29 MAR 2020)
NH108 HND 22:55 - SFO 16:25)Tu, Fr, Su 773
NH107 SFO 01:45 - HND 05:00+1 Mo, We, Sa 773
(Daily from 25 MAY 2020)

This was announced a few weeks ago with ANA's large HND announcement.


I think the flight was leaked a few weeks ago, but ANA themselves confirmed it and the schedule in their press release on 1/23/2020

http://www.anahd.co.jp/group/en/pr/202001/20200123.html
 
User avatar
KLMatSJC
Posts: 607
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 1:16 am

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:58 pm

SonaSounds wrote:
KLMatSJC wrote:
SonaSounds wrote:
Looks like ANA is adding a 2nd flight to Japan from SFO after JAL added a 2nd daily flight for this summer as well. Going to be a lot of new seats from SFO to Japan with ANA and JAL both serving NRT & HND with their own aircraft from SFO. (If I remember correctly...) SFO will go from 5x daily SFO-Japan to 7x daily this summer.


This was announced a few weeks ago with ANA's large HND announcement.


I think the flight was leaked a few weeks ago, but ANA themselves confirmed it and the schedule in their press release on 1/23/2020

http://www.anahd.co.jp/group/en/pr/202001/20200123.html

ANA announced the flight on November 19 in a press release, but didn't have the schedule for it until last week.

https://www.anahd.co.jp/group/en/pr/201911/20191119.html
A318/19/20/21/21N A332/3 A343/5 A388 B712 B722 B732/3/4/7/8/9/9ER B744/4M B752/3 B762ER/3/3ER/4ER B77E/L/W B788 CRJ2/7/9 Q400 EMB-120 ERJ-135/140/145/145XR/175 DC-10-10 MD-82/83/88/90

Long Live the Tulip, Cactus, and Redwood
 
strfyr51
Posts: 4261
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:04 pm

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Tue Jan 28, 2020 10:13 pm

jplatts wrote:
While AA is currently the only airline serving CLT nonstop from SFO, UA adding SFO-CLT nonstop service is a possibility with
(a) banking industry ties between SFO and CLT,
(b) 18% of passengers traveling between SFO and CLT were connecting on airlines other than AA in Q2 2019,
(c) UA FF's in the San Francisco Bay Area who prefer to fly on UA over AA,
(d) carriers other than AA such as UA, WN, or AS being the airline of choice for majority of travelers in the San Francisco Bay Area,
(e) San Francisco-based Wells Fargo having a significant presence in Charlotte,
(f) CLT being the largest market in the 50 states that UA doesn't currently serve nonstop from SFO,
and
(g) UA being able to offer international connections to Asia, Australia, and New Zealand from CLT through SFO (and vice versa) on UA and Star Alliance Asia-Pacific partners if UA adds SFO-CLT nonstop service.

I have also previously mentioned UA also adding SFO-MKE nonstop service with the lack of daily nonstop service to MKE from the San Francisco Bay area being a huge hole with WN reducing SFO-MKE nonstop service to Saturday-only in Summer 2020. Posts regarding UA possibly adding SFO-MKE nonstop service can be found at https://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1411813&start=100#p21853265 and https://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1411813&start=100#p21853565.

In addition to SFO-CLT and SFO-MKE, UA could also add nonstop service to ALB, BUF, CHS, DSM, ELP, JAX, LIT, SDF, MEM, ORF, RIC, and TUL out of SFO with these destinations being top domestic destinations that UA doesn't currently serve nonstop from SFO.

I could see UA connecting all of the se cities via DEN but SFO or LAX non stops? I think it's highly unlikely. UAL would HAVE to go back into both OAK and SJC to connect non stop to those cities Unless you can say which cities they would want to drop to even serve those cities. though? with all the A319-132's coming on line? They certainly could serve those cities out of SFO Non Stop. though the gate space might be limited for service to those markets out of SFO. I think they would be excellent markets for service were they to try them from OAK, SMF, or SJC...
 
Buffalomatt1027
Posts: 428
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2017 4:02 am

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Wed Jan 29, 2020 12:51 am

https://buffalonews.com/2020/01/28/schu ... francisco/

Schumer is pushing for SF - BUF direct flights. He did get b6 direct flights from BUF- LAX. So wonder how likely this route is.
 
mict
Posts: 282
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 10:19 pm

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Wed Jan 29, 2020 12:57 am

KLMatSJC wrote:
SonaSounds wrote:
KLMatSJC wrote:
This was announced a few weeks ago with ANA's large HND announcement.


I think the flight was leaked a few weeks ago, but ANA themselves confirmed it and the schedule in their press release on 1/23/2020

http://www.anahd.co.jp/group/en/pr/202001/20200123.html

ANA announced the flight on November 19 in a press release, but didn't have the schedule for it until last week.

https://www.anahd.co.jp/group/en/pr/201911/20191119.html


And by the way, flight went on sale yesterday with amazing award availability in J and F if anyone is interested. I grabbed one for next winter hoping they will put the new cabin on the route by then.
 
SonaSounds
Posts: 265
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 7:16 pm

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Wed Jan 29, 2020 3:43 pm

KLMatSJC wrote:
SonaSounds wrote:
KLMatSJC wrote:
This was announced a few weeks ago with ANA's large HND announcement.


I think the flight was leaked a few weeks ago, but ANA themselves confirmed it and the schedule in their press release on 1/23/2020

http://www.anahd.co.jp/group/en/pr/202001/20200123.html

ANA announced the flight on November 19 in a press release, but didn't have the schedule for it until last week.

https://www.anahd.co.jp/group/en/pr/201911/20191119.html


Ah ok that makes sense :thumbsup:
 
YYZORD
Posts: 475
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 5:26 pm

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Wed Jan 29, 2020 9:06 pm

Buffalomatt1027 wrote:
https://buffalonews.com/2020/01/28/schumer-pushes-for-flights-to-san-francisco/

Schumer is pushing for SF - BUF direct flights. He did get b6 direct flights from BUF- LAX. So wonder how likely this route is.


It won't work, there are too many direct flights to SFO from YYZ with both AC/UA. LAX only works from BUF thanks to Toronto pax who are going in a tourism perspective.
 
jplatts
Posts: 3328
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 6:42 pm

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Wed Jan 29, 2020 9:27 pm

YYZORD wrote:
Buffalomatt1027 wrote:
https://buffalonews.com/2020/01/28/schumer-pushes-for-flights-to-san-francisco/

Schumer is pushing for SF - BUF direct flights. He did get b6 direct flights from BUF- LAX. So wonder how likely this route is.


It won't work, there are too many direct flights to SFO from YYZ with both AC/UA. LAX only works from BUF thanks to Toronto pax who are going in a tourism perspective.


UA might actually be able to make SFO-BUF nonstop service work as the PDEW on BUF-SFO/OAK/SJC was 142 passengers per day in Q3 2019. There is also likely enough O&D traffic between the San Francisco Bay Area and BUF for UA to be able to fill an A319, A320, 737-700, or 737-800 on the SFO-BUF route.
 
jplatts
Posts: 3328
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 6:42 pm

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Wed Jan 29, 2020 9:37 pm

Q3 2019 PDEW's of some other top domestic routes not currently served nonstop from the San Francisco Bay Area:
SFO/SJC/OAK-ELP - 122
SFO/SJC/OAK-MEM - 120
SFO/SJC/OAK-RIC - 116
SFO/SJC/OAK-JAX - 110
SFO/SJC/OAK-ORF - 107
SFO/SJC/OAK-ALB - 106
SFO/SJC/OAK-SDF - 100
SFO/SJC/OAK-DSM - 82 (within the range of E-175 regional jets)
SFO/SJC/OAK-TUL - 68 (within the range of E-175 regional jets)
SFO/SJC/OAK-LIT - 58 (within the range of E-175 regional jets)
 
User avatar
intotheair
Posts: 1845
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 12:49 pm

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Thu Jan 30, 2020 1:38 am

SFO commissioner Linda Crayton has resigned. She cited health problems in her resignation letter to the mayor. She was reportedly the target of an unsuccessful bribe from the Public Works Director and his friend to try to get contracts at the airport. There were also questions about whether or not she still lived in San Francisco, which is one of the requirements for the job.

https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/art ... 014834.php
300 319 320 321 332 333 345 346 380 717 733 734 735 73G 738 739 744 752 753 762 763 772 77W 788 789 CR2 CR7 CR9 CRK Q400 E175 DC10 MD82 MD90
AA AF AS AY AZ B6 BA BR DL F9 FI GA HA KF LH MI QX SK SN SQ UA US VY WN
 
User avatar
KLMatSJC
Posts: 607
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 1:16 am

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Thu Jan 30, 2020 1:42 am

jplatts wrote:
SFO/SJC/OAK-ELP - 122

WN flies SJC-ELP seasonally and will likely go year round once the MAX stuff is over.
A318/19/20/21/21N A332/3 A343/5 A388 B712 B722 B732/3/4/7/8/9/9ER B744/4M B752/3 B762ER/3/3ER/4ER B77E/L/W B788 CRJ2/7/9 Q400 EMB-120 ERJ-135/140/145/145XR/175 DC-10-10 MD-82/83/88/90

Long Live the Tulip, Cactus, and Redwood
 
strfyr51
Posts: 4261
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:04 pm

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Thu Jan 30, 2020 2:38 am

ucdtim17 wrote:
dfwjim1 wrote:
ucdtim17 wrote:


Tragicomic for OAK that every recent addition seems to be counterbalanced by a larger reduction. One step forward, two steps back, while SFO and SJC are taking 2, 3, 4, steps forward and 0 steps back.[/quote

Unfortunately the City of Oakland and it suburbs have always been regarded as the ugly stepchild of the Bay Area due to it's high crime rate and poverty which is probably another reason while visitors and natives shy away from using OAK.


True, but that was more the case 10, 20, 30, 40 years ago than today, but OAK is probably a smaller share of the overall Bay Area air travel market today than it ever has been. Oakland the city is booming now, building more housing than SF, and has been one of the most expensive cities in the country to live in for years now. Perhaps there's just a lag, and in 2025 or 2030 OAK will finally grow (permanently) larger than it was in 2003.

OAK has now moved into one of the most expensive places to live right up there with SFO and SJC areas. the East bay has million Dollar homes to beat the Band. Oakland could serve more people if they had the flights. I live in the North Bay and would use OAK if the flights were there. But as I'm etired from United? I'm more Inclined to use SFO.
though I live equi-distant between SFO-OAK and SMF.
 
blacksoviet
Posts: 1461
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 10:50 am

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Sun Feb 02, 2020 9:02 am

Why is there no airside connection between SFO Concourse A and Concourse G of the International Terminal?
 
User avatar
intotheair
Posts: 1845
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 12:49 pm

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Sun Feb 02, 2020 9:13 am

blacksoviet wrote:
Why is there no airside connection between SFO Concourse A and Concourse G of the International Terminal?


I don’t know why it was built that way in the first place, but one of the airport’s eventual projects is to redesign the international terminal with a consolidated security checkpoint, FIS arrival facility, and connect A and G airside.
300 319 320 321 332 333 345 346 380 717 733 734 735 73G 738 739 744 752 753 762 763 772 77W 788 789 CR2 CR7 CR9 CRK Q400 E175 DC10 MD82 MD90
AA AF AS AY AZ B6 BA BR DL F9 FI GA HA KF LH MI QX SK SN SQ UA US VY WN
 
strfyr51
Posts: 4261
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:04 pm

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Sun Feb 02, 2020 10:06 am

blacksoviet wrote:
Why is there no airside connection between SFO Concourse A and Concourse G of the International Terminal?

the A and G terminals are separated by the inbound Auto roads to the airport terminal. concourse A is on the south side of the terminal and G is on the North side, Entering the Airport terminal area, A is on your Right and ends with G on your Rights as you're leaving the Terminal area, the old international terminal now belongs to American. Right Below the Airport Tower.
 
strfyr51
Posts: 4261
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:04 pm

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Sun Feb 02, 2020 10:21 am

intotheair wrote:
blacksoviet wrote:
Why is there no airside connection between SFO Concourse A and Concourse G of the International Terminal?


I don’t know why it was built that way in the first place, but one of the airport’s eventual projects is to redesign the international terminal with a consolidated security checkpoint, FIS arrival facility, and connect A and G airside.

There's no way to connect Terminal A to G Airside Physically without $Billions in renovations and relocating the entry roads to the terminal which might include short term parking, BART and the Tramway Train to Rental car and the parking Garage on North Airport Road across from the United Facility. Heck! They did a lot of "Re-Jiggerng" to get that far. Lord only knows what they'd have to spend to do it over again. Besides? I take Bart from Pittsburg in the North east Bay Straight into the Terminal when I fly out and leave my car at the Pittsburg Bart station so I don't have to walk far to get to it when I get off the Bart Train. The Ride is a little less than an hour and it's easy as heck!
 
User avatar
KLMatSJC
Posts: 607
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 1:16 am

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Sun Feb 02, 2020 10:49 am

strfyr51 wrote:
intotheair wrote:
blacksoviet wrote:
Why is there no airside connection between SFO Concourse A and Concourse G of the International Terminal?


I don’t know why it was built that way in the first place, but one of the airport’s eventual projects is to redesign the international terminal with a consolidated security checkpoint, FIS arrival facility, and connect A and G airside.

There's no way to connect Terminal A to G Airside Physically without $Billions in renovations and relocating the entry roads to the terminal which might include short term parking, BART and the Tramway Train to Rental car and the parking Garage on North Airport Road across from the United Facility.

That's not true at all. There's a corridor behind the FIS already that will become secure. It really won't be too much. I don't know about the consolidated security, but I know that there will be one big international baggage claim instead of 2 for A and G.

There was never really a point to having a connector from A to G in the first place. The only one that was really ever needed was the F to G connector for UA connections. Even now, I don't see a real demand for connecting them, but I do like the idea of the entire airport connected behind security. On that note, the T2-T3 connector should be done within the next few months. I think that only leaves G-A-B-C left to be done.
A318/19/20/21/21N A332/3 A343/5 A388 B712 B722 B732/3/4/7/8/9/9ER B744/4M B752/3 B762ER/3/3ER/4ER B77E/L/W B788 CRJ2/7/9 Q400 EMB-120 ERJ-135/140/145/145XR/175 DC-10-10 MD-82/83/88/90

Long Live the Tulip, Cactus, and Redwood
 
blacksoviet
Posts: 1461
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 10:50 am

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Sun Feb 02, 2020 12:18 pm

KLMatSJC wrote:
strfyr51 wrote:
intotheair wrote:

I don’t know why it was built that way in the first place, but one of the airport’s eventual projects is to redesign the international terminal with a consolidated security checkpoint, FIS arrival facility, and connect A and G airside.

There's no way to connect Terminal A to G Airside Physically without $Billions in renovations and relocating the entry roads to the terminal which might include short term parking, BART and the Tramway Train to Rental car and the parking Garage on North Airport Road across from the United Facility.

That's not true at all. There's a corridor behind the FIS already that will become secure. It really won't be too much. I don't know about the consolidated security, but I know that there will be one big international baggage claim instead of 2 for A and G.

There was never really a point to having a connector from A to G in the first place. The only one that was really ever needed was the F to G connector for UA connections. Even now, I don't see a real demand for connecting them, but I do like the idea of the entire airport connected behind security. On that note, the T2-T3 connector should be done within the next few months. I think that only leaves G-A-B-C left to be done.

Is there no FIS in Terminal 3?
The upper two floors of Terminal 2 are being demolished. When were these floors built? Which airline had offices there?
 
as739x
Posts: 5173
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 7:23 am

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Sun Feb 02, 2020 4:19 pm

Is Qatar still starting SFO? Answer may be dug somewhere in the old thread, sorry
"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
 
AirFiero
Posts: 1487
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 11:43 pm

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Sun Feb 02, 2020 6:06 pm

strfyr51 wrote:
intotheair wrote:
blacksoviet wrote:
Why is there no airside connection between SFO Concourse A and Concourse G of the International Terminal?


I don’t know why it was built that way in the first place, but one of the airport’s eventual projects is to redesign the international terminal with a consolidated security checkpoint, FIS arrival facility, and connect A and G airside.

There's no way to connect Terminal A to G Airside Physically without $Billions in renovations and relocating the entry roads to the terminal which might include short term parking, BART and the Tramway Train to Rental car and the parking Garage on North Airport Road across from the United Facility. Heck! They did a lot of "Re-Jiggerng" to get that far. Lord only knows what they'd have to spend to do it over again. Besides? I take Bart from Pittsburg in the North east Bay Straight into the Terminal when I fly out and leave my car at the Pittsburg Bart station so I don't have to walk far to get to it when I get off the Bart Train. The Ride is a little less than an hour and it's easy as heck!


I’d be concerned about vandalism and theft in the BART parking lot. My car was broken into many years ago at the Fremont station while I was at an A’s game.
 
ucdtim17
Posts: 593
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 6:38 pm

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Sun Feb 02, 2020 6:17 pm

strfyr51 wrote:
I take Bart from Pittsburg in the North east Bay Straight into the Terminal when I fly out and leave my car at the Pittsburg Bart station so I don't have to walk far to get to it when I get off the Bart Train. The Ride is a little less than an hour and it's easy as heck!


BART Pittsburg to SFO is 1:25 on the schedule with variation more likely longer than shorter
 
User avatar
KLMatSJC
Posts: 607
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 1:16 am

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Sun Feb 02, 2020 7:26 pm

blacksoviet wrote:
Is there no FIS in Terminal 3?
The upper two floors of Terminal 2 are being demolished. When were these floors built? Which airline had offices there?


FIS is only in the international terminal. There's plans to make swing gates in both B and F, but the FIS itself will only be in the international terminal.

On top of T2 were the old ramp and control towers. The offices were mainly FAA in the later years. They might have been airline offices in the early days of the building though.

as739x wrote:
Is Qatar still starting SFO? Answer may be dug somewhere in the old thread, sorry

Eventually I'd assume. AAB also said that they'd start LAS, and that hasn't come to fruition yet either.
A318/19/20/21/21N A332/3 A343/5 A388 B712 B722 B732/3/4/7/8/9/9ER B744/4M B752/3 B762ER/3/3ER/4ER B77E/L/W B788 CRJ2/7/9 Q400 EMB-120 ERJ-135/140/145/145XR/175 DC-10-10 MD-82/83/88/90

Long Live the Tulip, Cactus, and Redwood
 
blacksoviet
Posts: 1461
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 10:50 am

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Sun Feb 02, 2020 7:40 pm

KLMatSJC wrote:
blacksoviet wrote:
Is there no FIS in Terminal 3?
The upper two floors of Terminal 2 are being demolished. When were these floors built? Which airline had offices there?


FIS is only in the international terminal. There's plans to make swing gates in both B and F, but the FIS itself will only be in the international terminal.

On top of T2 were the old ramp and control towers. The offices were mainly FAA in the later years. They might have been airline offices in the early days of the building though.

as739x wrote:
Is Qatar still starting SFO? Answer may be dug somewhere in the old thread, sorry

Eventually I'd assume. AAB also said that they'd start LAS, and that hasn't come to fruition yet either.

Does United still have any 747-capable gates at T3?
 
User avatar
intotheair
Posts: 1845
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 12:49 pm

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Sun Feb 02, 2020 9:05 pm

KLMatSJC wrote:
strfyr51 wrote:
intotheair wrote:

I don’t know why it was built that way in the first place, but one of the airport’s eventual projects is to redesign the international terminal with a consolidated security checkpoint, FIS arrival facility, and connect A and G airside.

There's no way to connect Terminal A to G Airside Physically without $Billions in renovations and relocating the entry roads to the terminal which might include short term parking, BART and the Tramway Train to Rental car and the parking Garage on North Airport Road across from the United Facility.

That's not true at all. There's a corridor behind the FIS already that will become secure. It really won't be too much. I don't know about the consolidated security, but I know that there will be one big international baggage claim instead of 2 for A and G.

There was never really a point to having a connector from A to G in the first place. The only one that was really ever needed was the F to G connector for UA connections. Even now, I don't see a real demand for connecting them, but I do like the idea of the entire airport connected behind security. On that note, the T2-T3 connector should be done within the next few months. I think that only leaves G-A-B-C left to be done.


It's definitely possible to connect them – the international terminal main hall is above the access road to T1/2/3, and right now, you can physically walk between the security checkpoints for A and G by walking through the check-in desks.

I'm not really sure why SFO wants to connect A and G airside, either, but they have plans to. You can see some various diagrams in the link below on how they might do it. The single security checkpoint would likely be right in the middle of the main hall where two aisles of check-in desks currently are. Looks like it would block off the landside portion of the G-to-F connector. It reminds me a little bit of how DEN is currently redoing its main hall.

http://media.flysfo.com.s3.amazonaws.co ... rtures.pdf

AirFiero wrote:
I’d be concerned about vandalism and theft in the BART parking lot. My car was broken into many years ago at the Fremont station while I was at an A’s game.


That is part of the reason why the San Bruno station is one of my favorites - the police station is literally in the garage. I usually try to avoid parking at BART, though probably more because of the tight parking spaces and a general lack of spaces.
300 319 320 321 332 333 345 346 380 717 733 734 735 73G 738 739 744 752 753 762 763 772 77W 788 789 CR2 CR7 CR9 CRK Q400 E175 DC10 MD82 MD90
AA AF AS AY AZ B6 BA BR DL F9 FI GA HA KF LH MI QX SK SN SQ UA US VY WN
 
UALifer
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:35 am

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Sun Feb 09, 2020 6:15 am

Strong north winds expected at SFO on Sunday. Could see some rare and exciting circle-to-land Rwy 1R approaches.
 
User avatar
qf789
Moderator
Posts: 9906
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 3:42 pm

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Sun Feb 09, 2020 11:13 am

The first QF59 BNE-SFO has just departed BNE
Forum Moderator
 
ricq
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2019 12:25 am

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Fri Feb 14, 2020 5:03 pm

New SkyTerrace offically open.

https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisc ... s_headline

Are large DSLR cameras with longish lenses allowed?
 
SonaSounds
Posts: 265
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 7:16 pm

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Fri Feb 14, 2020 5:28 pm

ricq wrote:
New SkyTerrace offically open.

https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisc ... s_headline

Are large DSLR cameras with longish lenses allowed?


It appears so: https://twitter.com/flySFO/status/12281 ... 20/photo/1
 
Ishrion
Posts: 1846
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 6:17 am

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Sun Feb 16, 2020 6:26 am

Question regarding the new AA/AS partnership... will AA still move out of Terminal 2 into the new Terminal 1 gates?

Was AA's original consolidation to T1 because Alaska needed all T2 gates?
 
ucdtim17
Posts: 593
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 6:38 pm

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Mon Feb 17, 2020 11:20 pm

OAK struggles covered in the Chron today. https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/ar ... 061091.php
 
SFOtoORD
Posts: 1202
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 2:26 am

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Tue Feb 18, 2020 4:20 am

Ishrion wrote:
Question regarding the new AA/AS partnership... will AA still move out of Terminal 2 into the new Terminal 1 gates?

Was AA's original consolidation to T1 because Alaska needed all T2 gates?


I assumed that ship has sailed. My understanding is that UA will likely get some of the T2 gates given how high their utilization is on their SFO gates. Not a ton of useful or unique AA to AS connections at SFO anyway.
 
tphuang
Posts: 3878
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:04 pm

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Tue Feb 18, 2020 1:44 pm

SFOtoORD wrote:
Ishrion wrote:
Question regarding the new AA/AS partnership... will AA still move out of Terminal 2 into the new Terminal 1 gates?

Was AA's original consolidation to T1 because Alaska needed all T2 gates?


I assumed that ship has sailed. My understanding is that UA will likely get some of the T2 gates given how high their utilization is on their SFO gates. Not a ton of useful or unique AA to AS connections at SFO anyway.

If that's the case, then AS may have cut too much from SFO. They probably should have run more low capacity jets to PNW to get enough utilization out of their gates. Hard for them to argue for the new of all T2 gates if UA is using their gates more aggressively.
 
blacksoviet
Posts: 1461
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 10:50 am

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Tue Feb 18, 2020 4:50 pm

The ramp tower and FAA offices on top of T2 have been demolished.
 
deltaffindfw
Posts: 1508
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 7:42 am

Re: San Francisco Bay Area Aviation Thread - 2020

Tue Feb 18, 2020 5:38 pm

SFOtoORD wrote:
Ishrion wrote:
Question regarding the new AA/AS partnership... will AA still move out of Terminal 2 into the new Terminal 1 gates?

Was AA's original consolidation to T1 because Alaska needed all T2 gates?


I assumed that ship has sailed. My understanding is that UA will likely get some of the T2 gates given how high their utilization is on their SFO gates. Not a ton of useful or unique AA to AS connections at SFO anyway.


I would think that at some point, AS would want to move into T1, since that will be the quasi-OneWorld terminal. It would be less about AA and more about the intl connections.

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos