Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
WIederling wrote:DBCoop3r wrote:She's taxing now, wingtips still up
seem to be down now.
chopper is "sitting there" waiting.
suddenly turned overexposed. the sun?
ikolkyo wrote:Apparently they are waiting for winds to get under 10 knots.
ikolkyo wrote:Apparently they are waiting for winds to get under 10 knots.
PHLspecial wrote:ikolkyo wrote:Apparently they are waiting for winds to get under 10 knots.
Are they flying with the wind because they don't want to south into Sea traffic?
ikramerica wrote:Truly a disappointing livery. What once was cutting edge is now tired. An omen for the X itself?
SurlyBonds wrote:Why does this 777-9 appear to have an extra door in the rear? Is this for testing purposes?
cschleic wrote:Latest METAR shows wind 180 at 16, gusting 23, 6SM RA BR BKN014 OVC019
ikramerica wrote:Truly a disappointing livery. What once was cutting edge is now tired. An omen for the X itself?
ifly4free wrote:Either those Seattle folk are really used to rain or umbrellas are forbidden. I have not seen an umbrella yet.
x1234 wrote:Is it because this plane is experimental that they have to wait for the winds to die down?
ikramerica wrote:Truly a disappointing livery. What once was cutting edge is now tired. An omen for the X itself?
ikolkyo wrote:Apparently they are waiting for winds to get under 10 knots.
ojjunior wrote:I'm sorry but AFAIK in Roman numerals X means 10, this is the 777-9 so why is it called 777X???
MrBretz wrote:Stupid question time: why not take off in the opposite direction?