Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
NTLDaz wrote:Morrison just announced NZ type isolation for international arrivals.
zkncj wrote:NTLDaz wrote:Morrison just announced NZ type isolation for international arrivals.
How long till VA becomes an domestic airline?
NTLDaz wrote:zkncj wrote:NTLDaz wrote:Morrison just announced NZ type isolation for international arrivals.
How long till VA becomes an domestic airline?
The best thing they have going for them in this situation is their international footprint is so small. Having said that domestic travel is going to take a hit as well.
NTLDaz wrote:Morrison just announced NZ type isolation for international arrivals.
Milesdependent wrote:Anyone got any predictions what further reductions we will see announced from QF in next 24-72 hours? Given todays announcement re self-isolating.
myki wrote:NTLDaz wrote:Morrison just announced NZ type isolation for international arrivals.
Silver lining: more domestic tourism, possibly where needed in the bushfire-hit regions
Milesdependent wrote:Anyone got any predictions what further reductions we will see announced from QF in next 24-72 hours? Given todays announcement re self-isolating.
SYDSpotter wrote:This is pretty unprecedented for the sector, with SARS and 9/11 people were reluctant to travel. With these Covid19 measures, people are not only reluctant to travel but there impediments to travel. Yes it's aimed at international arrivals and to a lesser extent departures, but the domestic sector is also not immune with many businesses prohibiting domestic travel. Will be there be a bump in domestic tourism, sure but not enough to offset the loss of corporate domestic travel and many will put off travel in general.
VA are obviously very vulnerable, but QF/JQ aren't out of the woods if this continues for a prolonged period. Let's hope we get through this pretty quickly, because this is impacting pretty much everyone in society.
RyanairGuru wrote:It would however be difficult to explain why they would rescue QF bit not VA.
SYDSpotter wrote:RyanairGuru wrote:It would however be difficult to explain why they would rescue QF bit not VA.
It would actually be an easy one, 90% of VA is owned by foreign airlines/companies whereas QF is still majority Australian owned.
An airline bailout would cause a lot of controversy be it QF or VA, bailing out an airline owned by foreign airlines would be politically toxic.
eta unknown wrote:The XJ info would have much more weight if it came from someone senior in Commercial Dept.
NTLDaz wrote:
Disagree. There are going to be bailouts galore if this pans out as expected, ie months not weeks.
It's not a difficult sell IMO. Thousands of jobs saved and the tourism industry will be further hampered from recovering if there's only Qantas. When Ansett went under there weren't only 2 airlines.
SYDSpotter wrote:It would actually be an easy one, 90% of VA is owned by foreign airlines/companies whereas QF is still majority Australian owned.
myki wrote:NTLDaz wrote:Morrison just announced NZ type isolation for international arrivals.
Silver lining: more domestic tourism, possibly where needed in the bushfire-hit regions
SYDSpotter wrote:It would actually be an easy one, 90% of VA is owned by foreign airlines/companies whereas QF is still majority Australian owned..
moa999 wrote:SYDSpotter wrote:It would actually be an easy one, 90% of VA is owned by foreign airlines/companies whereas QF is still majority Australian owned..
Any bailout should effectively wipe out equity (much like NZ Govts bailout of AirNZ) so foreign ownership won't be an issue
downdata wrote:myki wrote:NTLDaz wrote:Morrison just announced NZ type isolation for international arrivals.
Silver lining: more domestic tourism, possibly where needed in the bushfire-hit regions
Highly doubtful. Unless you believe there is currently a lot of domestic tourism being done in places like Italy or China...etc.
Even sources of inelastic demand like domestic business trips are being cancelled or postponed. Also look at ANA drastically cutting domestic capacity in Japan post lockdown.
Bush fire regions are likely taking a double hit from less international demand AND less domestic demand, if indeed there are any at all.
downdata wrote:myki wrote:NTLDaz wrote:Morrison just announced NZ type isolation for international arrivals.
Silver lining: more domestic tourism, possibly where needed in the bushfire-hit regions
Highly doubtful. Unless you believe there is currently a lot of domestic tourism being done in places like Italy or China...etc.
Even sources of inelastic demand like domestic business trips are being cancelled or postponed. Also look at ANA drastically cutting domestic capacity in Japan post lockdown.
Bush fire regions are likely taking a double hit from less international demand AND less domestic demand, if indeed there are any at all.
Thai77w wrote:eta unknown wrote:The XJ info would have much more weight if it came from someone senior in Commercial Dept.
You can believe what you want. What he said is exactly what senior management had passed on to staff. I've got no reason to doubt him.
As for their expectations only they could tell you what the expectations were, all I know is they stated they were happy with the performance.
melpax wrote:downdata wrote:myki wrote:Silver lining: more domestic tourism, possibly where needed in the bushfire-hit regions
Highly doubtful. Unless you believe there is currently a lot of domestic tourism being done in places like Italy or China...etc.
Even sources of inelastic demand like domestic business trips are being cancelled or postponed. Also look at ANA drastically cutting domestic capacity in Japan post lockdown.
Bush fire regions are likely taking a double hit from less international demand AND less domestic demand, if indeed there are any at all.
If anything, I can see holiday towns within easy driving distance of the major cities being busy over the Easter break, barring any worsening of the situation such as lockdowns.
melpax wrote:downdata wrote:myki wrote:Silver lining: more domestic tourism, possibly where needed in the bushfire-hit regions
Highly doubtful. Unless you believe there is currently a lot of domestic tourism being done in places like Italy or China...etc.
Even sources of inelastic demand like domestic business trips are being cancelled or postponed. Also look at ANA drastically cutting domestic capacity in Japan post lockdown.
Bush fire regions are likely taking a double hit from less international demand AND less domestic demand, if indeed there are any at all.
If anything, I can see holiday towns within easy driving distance of the major cities being busy over the Easter break, barring any worsening of the situation such as lockdowns.
NTLDaz wrote:Morrison just announced NZ type isolation for international arrivals.
soyuz wrote:The ME3 have been quiet as church mice so far, still flying A380s galore between their hubs and Australia and I can't recall reading anything about reductions/cancellations as yet! Is it a tripartite Mexican standoff to see who blinks first? Surely all thee must be haemorrhaging money right now.
eta unknown wrote:I guess they actually fly them or park them and EK has already parked a few. Maybe we'll see some frequency reductions to SYD/MEL.
soyuz wrote:The ME3 have been quiet as church mice so far, still flying A380s galore between their hubs and Australia and I can't recall reading anything about reductions/cancellations as yet! Is it a tripartite Mexican standoff to see who blinks first? Surely all thee must be haemorrhaging money right now.
SYDSpotter wrote:moa999 wrote:SYDSpotter wrote:It would actually be an easy one, 90% of VA is owned by foreign airlines/companies whereas QF is still majority Australian owned..
Any bailout should effectively wipe out equity (much like NZ Govts bailout of AirNZ) so foreign ownership won't be an issue
If the bailout is in the form of the Government taking an ownership stake then yes agree, not an issue. But if it is a bailout in the form of any cash handout/support, then it becomes problematic.
Then again, the Government did provide subsidies to Ford/Holden for quite some time which were 'critical' industries, so maybe I am being too pessimistic.
qf789 wrote:soyuz wrote:The ME3 have been quiet as church mice so far, still flying A380s galore between their hubs and Australia and I can't recall reading anything about reductions/cancellations as yet! Is it a tripartite Mexican standoff to see who blinks first? Surely all thee must be haemorrhaging money right now.
While I cant speak for the east coast out of PER both EK and QR loads have been quite good, actually I would say they have been the best performers, looking at the Asian carriers that’s a different story
qf789 wrote:Qantas offering customers flexibility regarding purchased tickets due to Coronavirus
https://www.qantasnewsroom.com.au/media ... ronavirus/
metalinyoni wrote:qf789 wrote:Qantas offering customers flexibility regarding purchased tickets due to Coronavirus
https://www.qantasnewsroom.com.au/media ... ronavirus/
I have got a flight to Perth booked next weekend. The Cancellation terms state That the voucher “To be used for travel within 12 months of the date that the original ticket was issued. We will waive the change fee once you’re ready to rebook.”
Does the voucher have to be used in 12 months or does the travel have to be within 12 Months. I bought the ticket Aug 2019. Do I have to fly by Aug this year or do have rebook by Aug?
qf002 wrote:I’d put money on QF and VA grounding their widebody fleets within days, with the exception of some QF 789s to maintain a skeleton network from SYD to LHR, SIN, HKG, HND and LAX (the latter until the inevitable US travel ban comes into effect). 789s are also their most effective cargo shifters.