Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
dtw2hyd wrote:edealinfo wrote:...With Subramanium Swanmee breathing down their necks..
I think he already ruined Tata's chance. Any Tata-owned airline will have a tough time getting the US Department of Treasury clearance to start or continue US ops. Of course, GoI may pull out all the stops. Do some offline research, google "Delhi HC orders ED pgurus". On the surface Swamy made it look like an Air Asia issue, so PMO doesn't interfere, but he was setting the stage to screw the crown jewel of aviation.
airboss787 wrote:
But none of those codeshares go beyond LHR, as of today. So unless they enhance that, there's very little advantage to being at LHR.
VTORD wrote:In fact I would go so far as to argue that NRT wouldn't be such a bad idea for Vistara:
dtw2hyd wrote:edealinfo wrote:...With Subramanium Swanmee breathing down their necks..
I think he already ruined Tata's chance. Any Tata-owned airline will have a tough time getting the US Department of Treasury clearance to start or continue US ops. Of course, GoI may pull out all the stops. Do some offline research, google "Delhi HC orders ED pgurus". On the surface Swamy made it look like an Air Asia issue, so PMO doesn't interfere, but he was setting the stage to screw the crown jewel of aviation.
edealinfo wrote:
This makes no sense to me for the following reasons:
1. Narita is in to boondocks so to speak and is TWICE the distance from the Tokyo City center as Haneda. Unless you are implying that business passengers enjoy the views of a longer ride.
edealinfo wrote:3. This market (Delhi- Japan) is all about O & D (connections to N. America is an afterthought). The choice of the airport for O & D MATTERS.
edealinfo wrote:4. JAL and Vistara will only have a codeshare not a joint venture on this route. This means that its in each individual carrier's interest to get as many higher paying passengers on its metal than the other.
edealinfo wrote:5. Vistara is already starting with a disadvantage even in economy. 9 passengers abreast versus JAL's 8 and JAL's economy received best economy class ranking from Syktrax. Further, Japenese passengers, by a huge margin prefer flying their own carrier (for language, space, food, familiarity, etc.)
edealinfo wrote:6. If JAL is asking Vistara to use Narita despite a free platinum slot at Hanenda, that's, as an analogy like British Airways telling Vistara - hey, I heard you can get a $35 million intrinsic value slot at LHR for free but why don't you instead fly to Stanstead airport since we already have LHR nicely covered. Wouldn't it be great for passengers to have a choice of also flying to Stanstead, rather than LHR, which we nicely cover anyway. And, guess what, we will codeshare on this flight of yours to Stanstead and also on our flights to LHR. Do we have a deal, now? Which flights do you thing the premium paying passengers will choose? Who is the big loser here? I stand by my comment that if Vistara picks Narita they have been totally outmaneuvered, outwitted, and heck, conned (for lack of a more polished word) by JAL.
VTORD wrote:as YOU have been claiming without providing a published verifiable source[/u]
edealinfo wrote:Narita is a downright bad choice when compared to the free coveted daytime slot pair at Haneda, available to Vistara on a titanium platter. This opportunity hasn’t been around for the last 4 decades and won’t be available At least for the next 6 decades. And, airlines can’t buy a Haneda slot like they can at LHR. Additionally, the costs to operate to Haneda or Narita are roughly the same so the revenue potential is the differentiator.
The intrinsic value of the slot is in using it to generate premium revenue. If Vistara can’t make Haneda work, there is zero chance Narita ever will.
fiestyemus wrote:Vistara's 787 interiors revealed- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYhfG0k5fh0
sibibom wrote:fiestyemus wrote:Vistara's 787 interiors revealed- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYhfG0k5fh0
The Business Class is the same as SQ's regional business class on B787-10
edealinfo wrote:It's not that bad of a seat. Flew TK IST-IAD and it was decent. Not as great in terms of privacy like Qsuites. Personally I'd take these over reverse herringbone.sibibom wrote:fiestyemus wrote:Vistara's 787 interiors revealed- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYhfG0k5fh0
The Business Class is the same as SQ's regional business class on B787-10
1. If it’s the same as SQ’s “regional” business class, does this mean a huge downgrade, “relatively” when compared to other airlines flying on routes 8 to 10 hours?
2. And is this layout Vistara’s so called “ big” announcement for March 2 for which they had released several promotional videos and engaged in a Twitter and Facebook promotional campaign?
dtw2hyd wrote:
I think he already ruined Tata's chance. Any Tata-owned airline will have a tough time getting the US Department of Treasury clearance to start or continue US ops. Of course, GoI may pull out all the stops. Do some offline research, google "Delhi HC orders ED pgurus". On the surface Swamy made it look like an Air Asia issue, so PMO doesn't interfere, but he was setting the stage to screw the crown jewel of aviation.
edealinfo wrote:VTORD wrote:as YOU have been claiming without providing a published verifiable source[/u]
https://livefromalounge.boardingarea.co ... don-tokyo/
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1429637&p=21954289#p21954289
edealinfo wrote:VTORD wrote:RE NAG:
Yeah that's an interesting route. But what is more interesting is that the minister in question has been out of power for 6 years now and the route still exists. Unless QR is trying to appease the philosophical alma mater of Narendra Modi who are HQ'd in Nagpur.
.
The QR route to Nagpur succeeds for the following reasons:
1. QR is blocked from further expansion in India. While traffic between India and Doha, and India and the rest of the world, has grown substantially, and with EK, QR and EY blocked, people use existing routes to the fullest.
2. QR is the only carrier that offers NAGpur residents an outlet to the world. (Air Arabia is nothing, "in comparison").
sand26391 wrote:American Airlines opens booking for BLR-SEA flight wef 25OCT.
edealinfo wrote:per Live Mint
Vistara is exploring flights to Moscow, Frankfurt, London, and Paris.
CaliguyNYC wrote:I still think it is sad that SFO-BLR hasn’t happened. Maybe UA will now launch it.
dtw2hyd wrote:edealinfo wrote:...With Subramanium Swanmee breathing down their necks..
I think he already ruined Tata's chance. Any Tata-owned airline will have a tough time getting the US Department of Treasury clearance to start or continue US ops. Of course, GoI may pull out all the stops. Do some offline research, google "Delhi HC orders ED pgurus". On the surface Swamy made it look like an Air Asia issue, so PMO doesn't interfere, but he was setting the stage to screw the crown jewel of aviation.
CaliguyNYC wrote:dtw2hyd wrote:edealinfo wrote:...With Subramanium Swanmee breathing down their necks..
I think he already ruined Tata's chance. Any Tata-owned airline will have a tough time getting the US Department of Treasury clearance to start or continue US ops. Of course, GoI may pull out all the stops. Do some offline research, google "Delhi HC orders ED pgurus". On the surface Swamy made it look like an Air Asia issue, so PMO doesn't interfere, but he was setting the stage to screw the crown jewel of aviation.
Sorry not understanding why would a TATA owned airline not get to fly to the US? Running an airline in INdia is super messy. I’d take Tatas running AI over the GOI any day.
CaliguyNYC wrote:dtw2hyd wrote:edealinfo wrote:...With Subramanium Swanmee breathing down their necks..
I think he already ruined Tata's chance. Any Tata-owned airline will have a tough time getting the US Department of Treasury clearance to start or continue US ops. Of course, GoI may pull out all the stops. Do some offline research, google "Delhi HC orders ED pgurus". On the surface Swamy made it look like an Air Asia issue, so PMO doesn't interfere, but he was setting the stage to screw the crown jewel of aviation.
Sorry not understanding why would a TATA owned airline not get to fly to the US? Running an airline in INdia is super messy. I’d take Tatas running AI over the GOI any day.
dtw2hyd wrote:
Google the highlighted portion and follow the Reference link from December 2, 2016. AFAIK, the US Treasury doesn't allow airlines/owners who have dealings with sanctioned entities. I could be wrong in my opinion.
SeanM1997 wrote:Air India will maintain 10x weekly flights between Mumbai and London Heathrow in Summer 2020. Daily flights on B777 and additional flights on Tuesdays, Thursdays & Saturdays on B787
Air India will have 31 weekly departures/arrivals at London Heathrow in Summer 2020:
Delhi - 14 (7x B777/7x B787)
Mumbai - 10 (7x B777/3x B787)
Ahmedabad - 4 (B787)
Bengaluru - 3 (B787)
VTORD wrote:I did. Exactly this: "Delhi HC orders ED pgurus". If you google some key terms from the main article, you will stumble upon some news stories from 2018 stating that NCLT has cleared the involvement in alleged terror links/funding. The Bloomberg Quint story is actually very detailed.
...
If Vistara was to be docked for having dealings with sanctioned entities, Boeing would probably not have been able to sell them the 789s either.
edealinfo wrote:From Business Standard - Vistara refuses to pay for LHR slots and instead will leave its fate to LHR’s worse chances than being struck by lightening lottery system
“Unavailability of slots at Heathrow has forced Vistara to plan its London flight into Gatwick Airport- the city’s secondary airport which isn’t popular among full service airlines. “Anyone who operates to London ideally wants Heathrow Airport. We tried a lot but finding a slot in Heathrow is quite impossible at this point of time. No one wants to give up. We may start with Gatwick and shift to Heathrow whenever slots are available,” a Vistara executive said.
edealinfo wrote:JOYA380B747 wrote:hohd wrote:At NAG, QR has no competition, but with PNQ, BOM itself is competition.
PNQ can sustain multiple international flights on its own without being any competition at all to slot constrained BOM until Navi Mumbai comes online.
PNQ is a slot constrained as well. International carriers need to get a slot of airport’s choice as opposed to the airlines own choice, which means it ain’t great for financial viability.
airboss787 wrote:edealinfo wrote:VTORD wrote:as YOU have been claiming without providing a published verifiable source[/u]
https://livefromalounge.boardingarea.co ... don-tokyo/
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1429637&p=21954289#p21954289
Never trust blogs. Blogs are not verifiable or reliable as sources. They are mostly just opinions, including the linked article.
avier wrote:
-- snipped --
Speaking of covid-19, Garuda Indonesia is considering adding such temporary flights to India (Mumbai/Delhi) from Bali. This is from spare capacity they have due to large scale flight reductions in their network because of covid-19.
https://coconuts.co/bali/news/garuda-in ... -outbreak/
pune wrote:airboss787 wrote:edealinfo wrote:
Never trust blogs. Blogs are not verifiable or reliable as sources. They are mostly just opinions, including the linked article.
The blog is run by a travel journalist who has been known to share/break stories over number of years. I haven't yet seen though how many of his predictions have come right . At the same time, their is always the famous saying ' There's many a slip 'twixt the cup and the lip' . There have been many times even announcements of something happening and then not happening or things not working out, so we have yet to see what happens.
pune wrote:
The blog is run by a travel journalist who has been known to share/break stories over number of years. I haven't yet seen though how many of his predictions have come right . At the same time, their is always the famous saying ' There's many a slip 'twixt the cup and the lip' . There have been many times even announcements of something happening and then not happening or things not working out, so we have yet to see what happens.
pune wrote:I have talked to numerous drivers who just do the PNQ - BOM and vice-versa and most of them have said that 80% of the time it's the westerners who frequent this trip.
oceanvikram wrote:
At the end of the day India is a third world country and using first world logic does not work … it gets airlines bankrupt. If anything, Ethiopian has figured the perfect balance of providing a good enough service and being profitable.
edealinfo wrote:Of the 2 new American Airlines long haul routes from Seattle- to BLR and London. Delta fights back by adding a non stop of its own to LHR. Will BLR be next?
https://simpleflying.com/delta-takes-ai ... ouncement/
pune wrote:edealinfo wrote:JOYA380B747 wrote:
PNQ can sustain multiple international flights on its own without being any competition at all to slot constrained BOM until Navi Mumbai comes online.
PNQ is a slot constrained as well. International carriers need to get a slot of airport’s choice as opposed to the airlines own choice, which means it ain’t great for financial viability.
This is true as well as the fact that was mentioned in last month's thread as well. The fact is both PNQ and BOM are slot-constrained with PNQ being more. I have talked to numerous drivers who just do the PNQ - BOM and vice-versa and most of them have said that 80% of the time it's the westerners who frequent this trip. While this is welcome being a Puneite, I am non-plussed why is it so ? Apart from Osho, Iyengar Yoga school and perhaps a somewhat milder climate than Mumbai has, don't really see the difference. Because as convention centers go, we are in no way a match to BOM to the number of convention centers there as well as modes of funding for conferences etc.
pune wrote:edealinfo wrote:This is true as well as the fact that was mentioned in last month's thread as well. The fact is both PNQ and BOM are slot-constrained with PNQ being more. I have talked to numerous drivers who just do the PNQ - BOM and vice-versa and most of them have said that 80% of the time it's the westerners who frequent this trip..