Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR

 
asuflyer
Topic Author
Posts: 553
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 12:48 pm

AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Sun Mar 01, 2020 7:46 pm

An AC Express CR9 registered C-FNJZ operating AC8839 was evacuated at SFO this morning due to smoke in the cabin after takeoff. The aircraft returned to SFO where all pax evacuated safely.

Image

Evacuation video:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1234191499186728960
 
bennett123
Posts: 9726
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 12:49 am

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Sun Mar 01, 2020 7:52 pm

Nice to see that they remembered to take their bags with them.
 
barney captain
Posts: 2350
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2001 5:47 pm

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Sun Mar 01, 2020 8:29 pm

bennett123 wrote:
Nice to see that they remembered to take their bags with them.


No kidding.

I didn't see any indication of smoke, but they performed an emergency evac as opposed to a controlled evac utilizing just the airstairs.
Southeast Of Disorder
 
User avatar
longhauler
Posts: 6488
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:00 am

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 12:18 am

barney captain wrote:
I didn't see any indication of smoke, but they performed an emergency evac as opposed to a controlled evac utilizing just the airstairs.


They could smell smoke in the cockpit and both lav smoke alarms (fore and aft) were activated. After taking off of 01R they landed on 28R, 6 minutes later. Impressive.

Without actually being in the cabin, I’d have to agree with the sentiment to get everyone off as quickly as possible. If I were sitting in the back of that pencil, when only using one main exit, I could imagine panic ensuing.
Just because I stopped arguing, doesn't mean I think you are right. It just means I gave up!
 
theasianguy
Posts: 174
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 10:31 am

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 12:32 am

Air Canada just can't stay out of trouble in SFO, eh?
 
WNCrew
Posts: 992
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 11:22 pm

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 12:33 am

barney captain wrote:
bennett123 wrote:
Nice to see that they remembered to take their bags with them.


No kidding.

I didn't see any indication of smoke, but they performed an emergency evac as opposed to a controlled evac utilizing just the airstairs.


Reminds me of WN 2123 in SNA that evacuated due to an APU fire... no smoke in cabin, no smell, nothing... yet the Pilots initiated an EVAC.
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
 
outbackair
Posts: 155
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 6:01 pm

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 12:55 am

bennett123 wrote:
Nice to see that they remembered to take their bags with them.


Aviation authorities (eg FAA) need to set up fines of $1000 (or more) per bag bigger than a wallet taken off during evacuation, or find some law where they can be charged for endangering lives. No shortage of evidence as every evacuation is filmed these days.
 
User avatar
T18
Posts: 534
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 12:28 am

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 1:05 am

Technically this was a Jazz flight. Also odd that I just now see a Ground Stop for all JZA a/c.
ATCSCC 003 DCC 03/02/2020 JZA GROUND STOP
MESSAGE:
EVENT TIME: 02/0045 - 02/0130
FACILITIES INCLUDED: ALL
REASON: AIRLINE REQUEST
REMARKS: DUE TO AIRLINE REQUEST PLEASE GROUND STOP ALL JZA AIRCRAFT.

EFFECTIVE TIME: 020048 - 020200
SIGNATURE: 20/03/02 00:48

Looks like a fun day to be in operations for Jazz Air.
“Racing's important to men who do it well. When you're racing, it's life. Anything that happens before or after is just waiting.” ― Steve McQueen (Le Mans) 1971
 
User avatar
767333ER
Posts: 1170
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 5:14 am

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 2:30 am

theasianguy wrote:
Air Canada just can't stay out of trouble in SFO, eh?

The joke doesn’t work sadly because it’s Jazz, not Air Canada.
Been on: 732 733 734 73G 738 752 763 A319 A320 A321 CRJ CR7 CRA/CR9 E145 E175 E190 F28 MD-82 MD-83 C172R C172S P2006T PA-28-180

2 ears for spatial hearing, 2 eyes for depth perception, 2 ears for balance... How did Boeing think 1 sensor was good enough?!
 
Speedalive
Posts: 165
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 7:09 pm

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 3:00 am

767333ER wrote:
theasianguy wrote:
Air Canada just can't stay out of trouble in SFO, eh?

The joke doesn’t work sadly because it’s Jazz, not Air Canada.

A couple Jazz pilots I know put "Air Canada Express pilot" in their instagram bios. Can't have it both ways ;) :stirthepot:
 
IPFreely
Posts: 2604
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 8:26 am

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 5:06 am

767333ER wrote:
The joke doesn’t work sadly because it’s Jazz, not Air Canada.


If there was an award for most ridiculous statement of the day, you would win.
 
1989worstyear
Posts: 887
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2016 6:53 pm

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 5:13 am

Does Bombardier use kapton in the CRJ-900?
Stuck at age 15 thanks to the certification date of the A320-200 and my parents' decision to postpone having a kid by 3 years. At least there's Dignitas...
 
Whiteguy
Posts: 1537
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2003 6:11 am

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 5:22 am

IPFreely wrote:
767333ER wrote:
The joke doesn’t work sadly because it’s Jazz, not Air Canada.


If there was an award for most ridiculous statement of the day, you would win.


I was going to say them same for the origin comment...
 
ACDC8
Posts: 7874
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 6:56 pm

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 9:47 am

767333ER wrote:
theasianguy wrote:
Air Canada just can't stay out of trouble in SFO, eh?

The joke doesn’t work sadly because it’s Jazz, not Air Canada.

Flying on behalf of Air Canada, so yes, the joke does work :sarcastic:
A Grumpy German Is A Sauerkraut
 
User avatar
longhauler
Posts: 6488
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:00 am

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 12:50 pm

While some may think it’s “a joke”, I think this reflects very well on the quality of the Jazz operation and their pilots. To get the boat back on the ground in 6 minutes safely is not easy! Not to mention, ATC deserves accolades, as it is not easy for them to coordinate such a manoeuvre at such a busy airport.

I can think of a couple smoke/fire issues on take off in the past that had far worse results.

But ..... by your convoluted extension, you feel Air Canada too deserves praise as “it’s all Air Canada”, right? To me, that seems like taking away credit from Jazz.
Just because I stopped arguing, doesn't mean I think you are right. It just means I gave up!
 
asdf
Posts: 696
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:03 am

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 12:58 pm

6 minutes is kinda kewl ....

what did they do
negativ-G rolls ....?
 
Airontario
Posts: 690
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2001 12:04 am

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 1:07 pm

barney captain wrote:
bennett123 wrote:
Nice to see that they remembered to take their bags with them.


No kidding.

I didn't see any indication of smoke, but they performed an emergency evac as opposed to a controlled evac utilizing just the airstairs.


Hard to say until the final report is out. Captain could've called for a delanement using the main door, but maybe someone at the emergency exit misheard or felt unsafe and they opened up one of the over wing exits. Once one is open, others follow and it turns into a full blown evac.

The reason I think this is the case is because the forward service door isn't opened. The forward 2 doors would be the responsibility of the FA, and if they didn't open that service door, I'm thinking a full evac wasn't called by the flight deck.
 
oldannyboy
Posts: 2571
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:28 am

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 1:54 pm

longhauler wrote:
While some may think it’s “a joke”, I think this reflects very well on the quality of the Jazz operation and their pilots. To get the boat back on the ground in 6 minutes safely is not easy! Not to mention, ATC deserves accolades, as it is not easy for them to coordinate such a manoeuvre at such a busy airport.

I can think of a couple smoke/fire issues on take off in the past that had far worse results.

But ..... by your convoluted extension, you feel Air Canada too deserves praise as “it’s all Air Canada”, right? To me, that seems like taking away credit from Jazz.


As always, thanks for your insight, and your excellent, knowledgeable, balanced comments Longhauler. It's great to have people like you on this forum. You really do make a difference. People like you make it worthwhile being on here!

I agree: kudos to the great professionals for getting that heavy and slick CR9 down in 6 minutes. Must have been tight and sporty maneuvering!

One question: looking at the video, the aircraft is sitting still with nothing happening for the best part of 32 seconds before the evacuation actually begins....why so long? Any clue?

Thanks

danny
 
Ziyulu
Posts: 895
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 10:35 am

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 2:15 pm

oldannyboy wrote:
longhauler wrote:

One question: looking at the video, the aircraft is sitting still with nothing happening for the best part of 32 seconds before the evacuation actually begins....why so long? Any clue?

Thanks

danny


It's probably because folks were grabbing their bags.
 
User avatar
767333ER
Posts: 1170
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 5:14 am

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 4:19 pm

ACDC8 wrote:
767333ER wrote:
theasianguy wrote:
Air Canada just can't stay out of trouble in SFO, eh?

The joke doesn’t work sadly because it’s Jazz, not Air Canada.

Flying on behalf of Air Canada, so yes, the joke does work :sarcastic:

Only these things are Air Canada: the crew uniforms, the food, the coffee, the paint on the aircraft, the destinations, and the capacity purchased by Air Canada in the cabin. It’s no more Air Canada than SkyWest is United.
Been on: 732 733 734 73G 738 752 763 A319 A320 A321 CRJ CR7 CRA/CR9 E145 E175 E190 F28 MD-82 MD-83 C172R C172S P2006T PA-28-180

2 ears for spatial hearing, 2 eyes for depth perception, 2 ears for balance... How did Boeing think 1 sensor was good enough?!
 
User avatar
longhauler
Posts: 6488
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:00 am

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 4:30 pm

oldannyboy wrote:
One question: looking at the video, the aircraft is sitting still with nothing happening for the best part of 32 seconds before the evacuation actually begins....why so long? Any clue?

I am not familiar with the CRJ-900, but what I fly, an evacuation is performed by a checklist, which can take 20-30 seconds.

That checklist is started after the need to evacuate is confirmed. That confirmation is made using inside information (the FAs) and outside information (ATC and emergency response vehicles). Sometimes it can take a few seconds.

But if at any point, the Captain is not comfortable, he will call for the emergency evacuation checklist, get the folks off the plane, answer questions later. On what I fly, one can almost guarantee some injuries during evacuation ..... it’s not an easy decision.
Just because I stopped arguing, doesn't mean I think you are right. It just means I gave up!
 
cschleic
Posts: 1806
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 10:47 pm

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 4:43 pm

WNCrew wrote:
barney captain wrote:
bennett123 wrote:
Nice to see that they remembered to take their bags with them.


No kidding.

I didn't see any indication of smoke, but they performed an emergency evac as opposed to a controlled evac utilizing just the airstairs.


Reminds me of WN 2123 in SNA that evacuated due to an APU fire... no smoke in cabin, no smell, nothing... yet the Pilots initiated an EVAC.


Not 100% certain if your comment is being critical of the SNA situation but I would think a fire anywhere in the aircraft warrants getting out as quickly as possible. Fires can spread. I recall reading once that fire is one of the things that concerns pilots the most because of limited ability to do anything about it.
 
as739x
Posts: 5219
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 7:23 am

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 5:08 pm

767333ER wrote:
ACDC8 wrote:
767333ER wrote:
The joke doesn’t work sadly because it’s Jazz, not Air Canada.

Flying on behalf of Air Canada, so yes, the joke does work :sarcastic:

Only these things are Air Canada: the crew uniforms, the food, the coffee, the paint on the aircraft, the destinations, and the capacity purchased by Air Canada in the cabin. It’s no more Air Canada than SkyWest is United.


It's an unfortunate side effect of slapping that Maple Leaf on the tail, wether fair or not! Just part of the industry. They still bought their ticket on the AC website.

United has been run under the bus forever now over the Dr. Dao incident, yet it was a Republic plane and Chicago PD and an incident that dominoes from a decision made by Republic.

I flew for a regional before that operated for 2 major airlines and I'll be damned if you made a mistake that looked bad on one of them, you heard about it from the head of your department.
"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
 
barney captain
Posts: 2350
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2001 5:47 pm

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 5:31 pm

cschleic wrote:
WNCrew wrote:
barney captain wrote:

No kidding.

I didn't see any indication of smoke, but they performed an emergency evac as opposed to a controlled evac utilizing just the airstairs.


Reminds me of WN 2123 in SNA that evacuated due to an APU fire... no smoke in cabin, no smell, nothing... yet the Pilots initiated an EVAC.


Not 100% certain if your comment is being critical of the SNA situation but I would think a fire anywhere in the aircraft warrants getting out as quickly as possible. Fires can spread. I recall reading once that fire is one of the things that concerns pilots the most because of limited ability to do anything about it.


Thanks for the benefit of the doubt as I was certainly not being critical - none of us were there. It was strictly an observation and as another pointed out, R1 was never opened and it appeared to start as a controlled evac, until one over-wing exit then the other opened.
Southeast Of Disorder
 
jetblueguy22
Posts: 3478
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 12:26 am

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 8:31 pm

outbackair wrote:
bennett123 wrote:
Nice to see that they remembered to take their bags with them.


Aviation authorities (eg FAA) need to set up fines of $1000 (or more) per bag bigger than a wallet taken off during evacuation, or find some law where they can be charged for endangering lives. No shortage of evidence as every evacuation is filmed these days.

Every time I see something like this I roll my eyes. Yes, I completely agree that people should leave their luggage onboard, but a fine isn’t stopping anything. You’re evacuating an aircraft that is potentially on fire. You aren’t thinking rationally at that point, you’re thinking about survival.

People are by nature selfish, it isn’t going to change a thing besides making regulators look like monsters for fining “victims”
Look at sweatpants guy. This is a 90 million dollar aircraft, not a Tallahassee strip club
 
User avatar
AirKevin
Posts: 619
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2017 2:18 am

Re: AC 8839 evacuated at SFO

Mon Mar 02, 2020 10:58 pm

Airontario wrote:
barney captain wrote:
bennett123 wrote:
Nice to see that they remembered to take their bags with them.
No kidding.

I didn't see any indication of smoke, but they performed an emergency evac as opposed to a controlled evac utilizing just the airstairs.
Hard to say until the final report is out. Captain could've called for a delanement using the main door, but maybe someone at the emergency exit misheard or felt unsafe and they opened up one of the over wing exits. Once one is open, others follow and it turns into a full blown evac.

The reason I think this is the case is because the forward service door isn't opened. The forward 2 doors would be the responsibility of the FA, and if they didn't open that service door, I'm thinking a full evac wasn't called by the flight deck.

There was an incident back in 2005 in which a passenger started an evacuation on board a Delta 757 when a tail pip fire occurred on the right engine. Several people were injured in the evacuation, some of which were blown by the jet blast of the engines, which were still running.

https://www.tampabay.com/archive/2004/0 ... -airlines/
Captain Kevin

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos