Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR

  • 1
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 11
 
WaywardMemphian
Posts: 1501
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 9:05 pm

Re: No VS A340s left at LHR

Thu Mar 12, 2020 6:47 pm

Well the good news is, after the mass hysteria is over and people have had enough and start living again, the Airlines left standing may find Jet A at $1(US) a gallon. It's already over 30% down from this time last year.
 
TC957
Posts: 3843
Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 1:12 pm

Re: No VS A340s left at LHR

Thu Mar 12, 2020 6:53 pm

FLALEFTY wrote:
CarbonFibre wrote:
VNAP at LGW today going nowhere.

Image

Photo: Chris Doggett.


I'm going to miss these beautiful, elegant planes. We used to see these here in MCO on occasion as temporary substitutes for the usual B744's.

Now the coundown starts to the eventual retirement of the B744's. It has been great seeing these big, old planes coming to our town every day. Does anyone have any insight when these Y-heavy 744's will be retired for the A350-1000's?

Starting next year when the final batch of A350's come in.
 
User avatar
CarbonFibre
Posts: 725
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 4:02 pm

Re: No VS A340s left at LHR

Sat Mar 14, 2020 9:06 am

A few shots of the A346 in her various VS liveries: https://flic.kr/s/aHsmJg3n44
 
blacksoviet
Posts: 1709
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 10:50 am

Re: No VS A340s left at LHR

Sun Mar 15, 2020 10:16 am

Why did Richard Branson prefer four engine aircraft?
 
Stickpusher
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2016 6:54 pm

Re: No VS A340s left at LHR

Sun Mar 15, 2020 12:51 pm

blacksoviet wrote:
Why did Richard Branson prefer four engine aircraft?


I think because his airline was operating two types of 4-engined aircraft and he wanted people to feel safer flying on them irrespective of the improvements in engine reliability! I don't think it was a statement of principle so much as a tactic to win over public opinion in Virgin Atlantic's favour. Virgin are certainly fine with twins now even though "you're only one engine failure away from an emergency".

Personally I love 4 engines around me when I'm going somewhere. Branson didn't need to advertise to me - just as well, since he wasn't!

I only ever travelled in VS's A343 and A346 in cattle class and preferred the A343, possibly because the VS entertainment fit in the A346's seats really gave me the sense that I was being strapped into a pod and that the windows were almost optional, it was horribly claustrophobia-inducing and not a great way to spend over 11 hours. I half expected there to be a tube to stick into a vein for sedatives and nutrients, and a stimulant for waking us all up at the other end. The upside of the A33x and A34x is obviously that for couples travelling, you get the seat pair to yourselves and can become comatose in private.

We get all our impressions of an airliner's virtues from the cabin fit unless we're geeky or tribal enough to have a prejudice.

I got to have a final trip in a VS 744 in late February, BGI-LGW. Best 747 trip ever, up in the top cabin and half empty, with open seat rows in front and behind, and with 4 engines yet well away from the noise. Nice also to be close to the yaw axis, for someone very motion sensitive like me that can make all the difference. I made great efforts never to be right up at the back of an A346, getting stirred around by the autopilot!

For me, the "lookers" in the A34x series were the A343 and the A345, where the proportions just look right. I never really got along with the look of the A346, which felt like a stretch too far to me. Yet when I was a kid the DC8 was only sexy in the 70-series models.

Ah well, next time we get to fly VS it'll be all twins whether we "approve" or not!
 
User avatar
JannEejit
Posts: 1662
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 4:04 pm

Re: No VS A340s left at LHR

Sun Mar 15, 2020 3:11 pm

G-VWIN and G-VNAP transferred LGW-PIK on Saturday evening (14th) for storage.
 
User avatar
JannEejit
Posts: 1662
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 4:04 pm

Re: No VS A340s left at LHR

Sun Mar 15, 2020 7:43 pm

G-VFIT has also just arrived at PIK. As I understand it, the secondary runway will be used for temporary storage purposes.
 
69bug
Posts: 159
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 12:28 pm

Re: No VS A340s left at LHR

Mon Mar 16, 2020 2:53 am

There is always the option of buying back maintenance items.

Example if the aircraft was supposed to be returned with a serviceable APU, the operator may negotiate with the lessor to pay xxx amount in lieu.

Also some items are required to be returned with full life or half life... if full life required the operator may nego to return with half life but pay xx amount.

bug
 
crownvic
Posts: 2701
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 10:16 pm

Virgin and the 747...

Tue May 05, 2020 9:07 pm

So with the announcement today that Virgin is finished with their 747's what happens to a city like Orlando which had 5-6 747 visits a day?. I realize that it will never be the same again at least not in the forseeable future, but there was an article in the Orlando Senitnel that the Brits are still itching to come back to Orlando as soon as possible and that despite what is happening now in Great Britain some still have money saved for that Florida dream vacation...Is it possible they may reinstate them down the road?
 
User avatar
VCVSpotter
Posts: 1245
Joined: Mon May 04, 2020 6:10 am

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Tue May 05, 2020 9:13 pm

I know exactly what you mean about Orlando, during last summer I saw 5 747s come in on one day to my delight. I highly doubt they'll be brought back as the press release was clear that they would be retired, I would guess about 5 or maybe even less A330s. Leisure travel, despite all of those Brits wanting to go to Florida, will still take some time to build back up. I think that for now A330s would suffice, though I don't know what will happen later down the road in 5+ years.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... edit#gid=0

Just a normal teenager juggling AP classes and airplanes. No biggie • Love the 747 & 777-9 • Farewell KLM 747-400M
 
oldJoe
Posts: 199
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 11:04 pm

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Tue May 05, 2020 9:18 pm

crownvic wrote:
So with the announcement today that Virgin is finished with their 747's what happens to a city like Orlando which had 5-6 747 visits a day?. I realize that it will never be the same again at least not in the forseeable future, but there was an article in the Orlando Senitnel that the Brits are still itching to come back to Orlando as soon as possible and that despite what is happening now in Great Britain some still have money saved for that Florida dream vacation...Is it possible they may reinstate them down the road?


No ! Keep in mind the UK have now the highest number of COVID19 deaths in Europe !
I think a survival mode is actually more important than travel to Orlando !?
 
MIflyer12
Posts: 8270
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:58 pm

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Tue May 05, 2020 9:23 pm

I expect A333s and 787-9s will do fine. I'm not sure VS needs to spend a lot of time at the moment on a five-year fleet plan.
 
TC957
Posts: 3843
Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 1:12 pm

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Tue May 05, 2020 9:59 pm

MCO will likely get the higher-density A350's regularly once VS get them.
 
KFTG
Posts: 864
Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2019 12:08 am

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Tue May 05, 2020 10:02 pm

MCO getting the high-density A350-1000 (the 747-400 replacement) was always the plan. The plan has just been accelerated.
 
FlyerTalkUserNa
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2017 11:30 am

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Tue May 05, 2020 10:42 pm

Just hoping the GLA flight makes a return at some point.
 
User avatar
JannEejit
Posts: 1662
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 4:04 pm

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Tue May 05, 2020 11:01 pm

FlyerTalkUserNa wrote:
Just hoping the GLA flight makes a return at some point.


Well if it doesn't there's a lot of people going to need bussed to MAN. Forward bookings are strong, I gather.
 
777Mech
Posts: 995
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 10:54 pm

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Tue May 05, 2020 11:05 pm

oldJoe wrote:
crownvic wrote:
So with the announcement today that Virgin is finished with their 747's what happens to a city like Orlando which had 5-6 747 visits a day?. I realize that it will never be the same again at least not in the forseeable future, but there was an article in the Orlando Senitnel that the Brits are still itching to come back to Orlando as soon as possible and that despite what is happening now in Great Britain some still have money saved for that Florida dream vacation...Is it possible they may reinstate them down the road?


No ! Keep in mind the UK have now the highest number of COVID19 deaths in Europe !
I think a survival mode is actually more important than travel to Orlando !?


Calm down. Seriously. He asked about reinstating them later on.
 
jfk777
Posts: 7367
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:23 am

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Tue May 05, 2020 11:10 pm

A sad day at Virgin since the 747 had so much to do with their founding at Gatwick and growth at Heathrow. It was the first plane for them to LAX, JFK and Tokyo. A340 were not quite as exciting. Long may Virgin fly with or without Delta.
 
User avatar
flee
Posts: 1315
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:14 am

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Wed May 06, 2020 2:48 am

I think Virgin Atlantic has taken some positive steps to survive. Right now - and maybe for the rest of 2020 - the UK is on the US travel ban list. As such traffic from the UK to US is likely to be limited to non-existent. However, for the future, the A350-1000 will replace the B747-400 - if the route is restarted before deliveries, the A330s would probably fill the role as the fleet will not be as highly utilised as before Covid-19.
 
Boeing74741R
Posts: 1416
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 5:44 am

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Wed May 06, 2020 7:41 am

crownvic wrote:
So with the announcement today that Virgin is finished with their 747's what happens to a city like Orlando which had 5-6 747 visits a day?. I realize that it will never be the same again at least not in the forseeable future, but there was an article in the Orlando Senitnel that the Brits are still itching to come back to Orlando as soon as possible and that despite what is happening now in Great Britain some still have money saved for that Florida dream vacation...Is it possible they may reinstate them down the road?


I think the 747's are now done for good. A330's followed by A350's once the higher density versions are delivered 2021/22 is the best MCO can expect once the UK is removed from the current COVID-19 travel ban list.

As an aside, it's a pity the current predicament means there won't be an opportunity to do something special to mark the 747's departure from the VS fleet. They've been a feature since day one.
 
OMAAbound
Posts: 217
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2016 12:43 am

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Wed May 06, 2020 8:38 am

The 747’s to MCO were so low yielding, that without them going full, or 90%, they struggled to make any money. Only 14 Upper Seats are hardly going to turn much profit, when the majority of people are looking to ‘jut get there’ in economy.

I’d say going forward, Virgin won’t send any aircraft to MCO, let alone an A330 or a return of a 747.

Just my 10 cents

OMAA
 
caaardiff
Posts: 203
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 3:14 am

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Wed May 06, 2020 8:42 am

Once things return to normal how will Virgin Holidays get their customers to MCO?
If they can send 5 747s during the peak I can't imagine the Tour Operator arm filling thousands of seats on rival carriers.
 
jomur
Posts: 361
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2016 6:36 pm

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Wed May 06, 2020 8:46 am

oldJoe wrote:
crownvic wrote:
So with the announcement today that Virgin is finished with their 747's what happens to a city like Orlando which had 5-6 747 visits a day?. I realize that it will never be the same again at least not in the forseeable future, but there was an article in the Orlando Senitnel that the Brits are still itching to come back to Orlando as soon as possible and that despite what is happening now in Great Britain some still have money saved for that Florida dream vacation...Is it possible they may reinstate them down the road?


No ! Keep in mind the UK have now the highest number of COVID19 deaths in Europe !
I think a survival mode is actually more important than travel to Orlando !?

Without going off topic but its the way things are reported that make a huge difference in numbers.. the UK puts down as Covid19 any deaths that have been or suspected of having it whereas other countries put down the original ailment regardless of the person having Covid19.
 
jomur
Posts: 361
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2016 6:36 pm

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Wed May 06, 2020 8:49 am

OMAAbound wrote:
The 747’s to MCO were so low yielding, that without them going full, or 90%, they struggled to make any money. Only 14 Upper Seats are hardly going to turn much profit, when the majority of people are looking to ‘jut get there’ in economy.

I’d say going forward, Virgin won’t send any aircraft to MCO, let alone an A330 or a return of a 747.

Just my 10 cents

OMAA


If Virgin don't fly any aircraft to MCO it would go bankrupt very quickly as they can not afford to refund those who have already been cancelled let alone all the other advance bookings they have.
 
DobboDobbo
Posts: 1141
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:02 am

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Wed May 06, 2020 10:27 am

OMAAbound wrote:
I’d say going forward, Virgin won’t send any aircraft to MCO, let alone an A330 or a return of a 747.


I’d be very surprised if VS disappeared from MCO - I was anticipating they would use a leisure configured A350 from MAN and LHR.

Kudos if your prediction is correct!
 
APYu
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 10:23 pm

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Wed May 06, 2020 10:32 am

DobboDobbo wrote:
OMAAbound wrote:
I’d say going forward, Virgin won’t send any aircraft to MCO, let alone an A330 or a return of a 747.


I’d be very surprised if VS disappeared from MCO - I was anticipating they would use a leisure configured A350 from MAN and LHR.

Kudos if your prediction is correct!


When US travel restrictions end there’ll be a daily LHR MCO flight and probably a second on some days, using slots currently used for destinations with multiple frequencies which won’t be needed for a few years.

Virgin ho,idays is being trimmed by 15%, if Orlando was being canned this figure would be MUCH higher.
We'd like to welcome in particular our Executive Club members and those joining us from our Oneworld alliance partners.
 
User avatar
LTU330
Posts: 257
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 4:40 pm

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Wed May 06, 2020 10:56 am

jomur wrote:
oldJoe wrote:
crownvic wrote:
So with the announcement today that Virgin is finished with their 747's what happens to a city like Orlando which had 5-6 747 visits a day?. I realize that it will never be the same again at least not in the forseeable future, but there was an article in the Orlando Senitnel that the Brits are still itching to come back to Orlando as soon as possible and that despite what is happening now in Great Britain some still have money saved for that Florida dream vacation...Is it possible they may reinstate them down the road?


No ! Keep in mind the UK have now the highest number of COVID19 deaths in Europe !
I think a survival mode is actually more important than travel to Orlando !?

Without going off topic but its the way things are reported that make a huge difference in numbers.. the UK puts down as Covid19 any deaths that have been or suspected of having it whereas other countries put down the original ailment regardless of the person having Covid19.


I imagine that as they are pulling out of LGW completely, but keeping the Slots, then it is likely that the MCO route will be re-instated eventually. As for your comment on the reporting of Covid-19. Sorry, but that's complete BS. The UK only started including deaths outside of hospitals a week ago, and the ONS figures for the "abnormally high death rates" have not been included in any figures so far. Many Countries have always included were Covid-19 is even suspected. Anyway, let's hope Virgin pulls through this. I don't ever see them operating MCO out of LHR, and it will be very interesting to see what happens with MAN in the long term. I bet Norwegian can't believe their luck (if they also pull thorough) with BA also toying with the idea of leaving LGW.
 
jfk777
Posts: 7367
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:23 am

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Wed May 06, 2020 11:04 am

The beach fleet 744 had only 14 Upper class seats but about 50 premium economy seats. a different market than JFK or LAX but not the dog some male out to be. What airline would send 5 744 a day to a city not making $$ ?
 
TC957
Posts: 3843
Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 1:12 pm

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Wed May 06, 2020 11:19 am

OMAAbound wrote:
The 747’s to MCO were so low yielding, that without them going full, or 90%, they struggled to make any money. Only 14 Upper Seats are hardly going to turn much profit, when the majority of people are looking to ‘jut get there’ in economy.

I’d say going forward, Virgin won’t send any aircraft to MCO, let alone an A330 or a return of a 747.

Just my 10 cents

OMAA

Really ? have you seen what the fares were especially in peak summer season ? Often PE on some US routes was less than standard Y to MCO.
 
Boeing74741R
Posts: 1416
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 5:44 am

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Wed May 06, 2020 11:32 am

jfk777 wrote:
The beach fleet 744 had only 14 Upper class seats but about 50 premium economy seats. a different market than JFK or LAX but not the dog some male out to be. What airline would send 5 744 a day to a city not making $$ ?


Indeed. The config was 14 Upper, 66 PE and 375 Y. PE is a popular cabin and prices are normally double that of Y. I know this isn't reflective of all year round, however the last few times I've flown MAN-MCO they have all been outside the school holiday period and the 747's were over 90% full. On one flight, nearly every seat was occupied. I also see lots of reports of FC members travelling to MCO going via ATL etc. because they can't get any reward seats in Upper or PE on the direct flights. Clearly they wouldn't make reward seats available if VS could sell it instead to somebody paying with money and clearly they wouldn't have ordered as many A350's as they have to replace the 747's if it was low yielding and they can't profitably fill the plane - something that should theoretically be easier on an A350 anyway compared to a 747-400.

LTU330 wrote:
I don't ever see them operating MCO out of LHR, and it will be very interesting to see what happens with MAN in the long term.


I do. Last year they had up to 3 flights operating LGW-MCO. Combined with the immediate withdrawal from LGW, I would say MCO is too big of a market for both VS and Virgin Holidays to turn their backs on if their London ops are consolidated at LHR for the foreseeable future. I suspect MCO will be safe, albeit with less frequencies in the short-term. There's a few slots already available with EWR permanently cancelled and GRU launch aborted, plus I suspect they may also reduce the multiple frequencies to JFK and other places to reflect weakened demand in the short-term. It's probably one reason why they decided to withdraw from LGW as there will probably be enough slots available to serve the LGW destinations from LHR.

As for MAN, I did fear we would be back to the early-2000's when it was a solitary MCO route (anybody remember the two 747-200's VS sold to Air Atlanta and leased back specifically for this route?) or worse a total withdrawal, but after yesterday's announcement it was good to see a commitment to the MAN market. There is a Clubhouse due to open this year, one major competitor in the MAN-US market is not around anymore and I saw last week the DEL route launching in October on a seasonal basis is now going to be a year-round route, so if VS do survive they're going to have a good go at it.

What will be interesting is how long it will be before they ever return to LGW given they're holding on to the slots. I presume they will be leased out in the meantime.
 
simonriat
Posts: 170
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 8:03 pm

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Wed May 06, 2020 12:20 pm

Well that was lucky for us then. And a big thank you to all a netters, who helped my family choose.

Last Marchish, I came on here to ask for our trip to Orlando, in October (2019), which we should choose. Virgin 747 upper deck, or Tui 787. We chose the 744 upper deck. Looks like that experience will never be repeated again.

Once the UK is back flying again properly, it will be interesting to see numbers from the UK returning to the USA. I wonder how much Trumps handling / comments on the crisis, has hindered tourism?
 
jomur
Posts: 361
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2016 6:36 pm

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Wed May 06, 2020 3:09 pm

Boeing74741R wrote:
jfk777 wrote:
The beach fleet 744 had only 14 Upper class seats but about 50 premium economy seats. a different market than JFK or LAX but not the dog some male out to be. What airline would send 5 744 a day to a city not making $$ ?


Indeed. The config was 14 Upper, 66 PE and 375 Y. PE is a popular cabin and prices are normally double that of Y. I know this isn't reflective of all year round, however the last few times I've flown MAN-MCO they have all been outside the school holiday period and the 747's were over 90% full. On one flight, nearly every seat was occupied. I also see lots of reports of FC members travelling to MCO going via ATL etc. because they can't get any reward seats in Upper or PE on the direct flights. Clearly they wouldn't make reward seats available if VS could sell it instead to somebody paying with money and clearly they wouldn't have ordered as many A350's as they have to replace the 747's if it was low yielding and they can't profitably fill the plane - something that should theoretically be easier on an A350 anyway compared to a 747-400.

LTU330 wrote:
I don't ever see them operating MCO out of LHR, and it will be very interesting to see what happens with MAN in the long term.


I do. Last year they had up to 3 flights operating LGW-MCO. Combined with the immediate withdrawal from LGW, I would say MCO is too big of a market for both VS and Virgin Holidays to turn their backs on if their London ops are consolidated at LHR for the foreseeable future. I suspect MCO will be safe, albeit with less frequencies in the short-term. There's a few slots already available with EWR permanently cancelled and GRU launch aborted, plus I suspect they may also reduce the multiple frequencies to JFK and other places to reflect weakened demand in the short-term. It's probably one reason why they decided to withdraw from LGW as there will probably be enough slots available to serve the LGW destinations from LHR.

As for MAN, I did fear we would be back to the early-2000's when it was a solitary MCO route (anybody remember the two 747-200's VS sold to Air Atlanta and leased back specifically for this route?) or worse a total withdrawal, but after yesterday's announcement it was good to see a commitment to the MAN market. There is a Clubhouse due to open this year, one major competitor in the MAN-US market is not around anymore and I saw last week the DEL route launching in October on a seasonal basis is now going to be a year-round route, so if VS do survive they're going to have a good go at it.

What will be interesting is how long it will be before they ever return to LGW given they're holding on to the slots. I presume they will be leased out in the meantime.


So who would be interested in leasing slots when its highly likely they would be able to get slots free from the airport itself considering Norwegian would be in the same situation re slots as they are not due to fly again from LGW until April '21 at the earliest if the survive that long. And BA would have slots to lease out/give back as well.
 
Boeing74741R
Posts: 1416
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 5:44 am

Re: Virgin and the 747...

Wed May 06, 2020 4:00 pm

simonriat wrote:
Well that was lucky for us then. And a big thank you to all a netters, who helped my family choose.

Last Marchish, I came on here to ask for our trip to Orlando, in October (2019), which we should choose. Virgin 747 upper deck, or Tui 787. We chose the 744 upper deck. Looks like that experience will never be repeated again.

Once the UK is back flying again properly, it will be interesting to see numbers from the UK returning to the USA. I wonder how much Trumps handling / comments on the crisis, has hindered tourism?


Glad you enjoyed the 747 experience. Agreed about the upper deck, the 'bubble' is a nice cabin to travel in and on VS you were usually one of the first off before the rest of Economy downstairs thanks to the front half of the upper deck having PE seats and the stairs being by door L2 that was typically used for boarding/alighting from experience.

I suspect British folk will be keen to return to the USA once it's safe to do so. How quickly that recovers will obviously depend how long the UK remains on the travel ban list along with Ireland and other European nations. In the case of Florida, it will also depend when the parks reopen. I don't really know how Disney, Universal etc. intend to manage crowds when it comes to social distancing and I guess it won't be as simple as capping how many people are allowed in at a time.

jomur wrote:
So who would be interested in leasing slots when its highly likely they would be able to get slots free from the airport itself considering Norwegian would be in the same situation re slots as they are not due to fly again from LGW until April '21 at the earliest if the survive that long. And BA would have slots to lease out/give back as well.


I don't really know how it works and how much LGW charge if taken directly from them, but I guess it will depend how lucrative the slots are in terms of timings. I only mentioned leasing slots out as an option if some sort of "use it or lose it" rule is imposed.
 
Nicknuzzii
Posts: 1237
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2018 5:57 pm

Virgin Atlantic Plans GLA for 2021

Tue May 12, 2020 3:29 pm

Interesting move in my opinion,. They are planning GLA-JFK/MCO/ATL/LAX.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thesco ... bados/amp/
 
N292UX
Posts: 573
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2017 7:08 pm

Re: Virgin Atlantic Plans GLA for 2021

Tue May 12, 2020 3:33 pm

What an interesting time to launch some new routes...
 
Ishrion
Posts: 2941
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 6:17 am

Re: Virgin Atlantic Plans GLA for 2021

Tue May 12, 2020 3:35 pm

Virgin Atlantic's news release shows it only flying GLA-MCO next year? Not JFK, ATL, and LAX?

https://corporate.virginatlantic.com/gb ... edule.html
 
User avatar
Polot
Posts: 10717
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 3:01 pm

Re: Virgin Atlantic Plans GLA for 2021

Tue May 12, 2020 3:46 pm

Ishrion wrote:
Virgin Atlantic's news release shows it only flying GLA-MCO next year? Not JFK, ATL, and LAX?

https://corporate.virginatlantic.com/gb ... edule.html


Yes, the Sun misinterpreted the COO’s quote, which was referencing all of GLA, Belfast, and MAN.

GLA can’t support MCO, JFK, ATL, and LAX, even pre-crisis.
Last edited by Polot on Tue May 12, 2020 3:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
jomur
Posts: 361
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2016 6:36 pm

Re: Virgin Atlantic Plans GLA for 2021

Tue May 12, 2020 3:46 pm

Nicknuzzii wrote:
Interesting move in my opinion,. They are planning GLA-JFK/MCO/ATL/LAX.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thesco ... bados/amp/


The only one direct is going to be MCO. The others possibly indirect as a code share on Delta. Or maybe they have it mixed up with MAN.
 
Nicknuzzii
Posts: 1237
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2018 5:57 pm

Re: Virgin Atlantic Plans GLA for 2021

Tue May 12, 2020 3:50 pm

Polot wrote:
Ishrion wrote:
Virgin Atlantic's news release shows it only flying GLA-MCO next year? Not JFK, ATL, and LAX?

https://corporate.virginatlantic.com/gb ... edule.html


Yes, the Sun misinterpreted the COO’s quote, which was referencing all of GLA, Belfast, and MAN.

GLA can’t support MCO, JFK, ATL, and LAX, even pre-crisis.


Good catch.
 
User avatar
aemoreira1981
Posts: 3609
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 12:17 am

Re: Virgin Atlantic Plans GLA for 2021

Tue May 12, 2020 5:03 pm

The only one that would make sense is GLA-MCO on an Airbus A330-300. The others can be fed through JFK, which can be served on a B752 or A21N (even a standard A21N if with at least 1 aux tank should make it).
 
User avatar
usdcaguy
Posts: 1538
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2004 12:41 pm

Re: Virgin Atlantic Plans GLA for 2021

Tue May 12, 2020 5:13 pm

I see GLA-MCO being feasible maybe twice a week next year. Since the Brits are getting 80% of their salary if they are unemployed during the pandemic, they might be able to make up for the shortfall Disney and Universal will have next year, when millions of Americans will still be unemployed.
 
digitalcloud
Posts: 164
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2018 10:03 am

Re: Virgin Atlantic Plans GLA for 2021

Tue May 12, 2020 5:23 pm

aemoreira1981 wrote:
The only one that would make sense is GLA-MCO on an Airbus A330-300. The others can be fed through JFK, which can be served on a B752 or A21N (even a standard A21N if with at least 1 aux tank should make it).


It already is served by a 757.
 
User avatar
jfklganyc
Posts: 6005
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 2:31 pm

Re: Virgin Atlantic Plans GLA for 2021

Tue May 12, 2020 5:36 pm

They should concentrate on staying in business...
 
Bhoy
Posts: 554
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 1:50 pm

Re: Virgin Atlantic Plans GLA for 2021

Tue May 12, 2020 5:40 pm

usdcaguy wrote:
I see GLA-MCO being feasible maybe twice a week next year. Since the Brits are getting 80% of their salary if they are unemployed during the pandemic, they might be able to make up for the shortfall Disney and Universal will have next year, when millions of Americans will still be unemployed.

There are (still) 4 VS flights a week scheduled on the route this Summer (starting mid June) as it is. So dropping to 2 (and presumably going from 744 to 333) would be a big drop in capacity for something that would "make up a shortfall".
 
User avatar
JannEejit
Posts: 1662
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 4:04 pm

Re: Virgin Atlantic Plans GLA for 2021

Tue May 12, 2020 6:11 pm

jfklganyc wrote:
They should concentrate on staying in business...


Doing business seems a reasonably good way of staying in business to me, these GLA-MCO flights have traditionally been very well taken up and booked heavily in advance. I don't know the stats exactly but there may already be substantial 2021 bookings in the system, and given the demise of TCX on their rival Orlando service, they are now the only show in town. You still can't underestimate the popularity of Florida with the Scottish holidaymaker, as kids we all dreamed of one day going to see Mickey Mouse's home ! :lol:

The VS 747 service has seen it's season extend year upon year, with a summer/school holiday peak of Thurs-Mon service, tailing off towards the quiet end of season, so whilst the post Covid world is still uncertain (for everyone), demand for MCO is still clearly evident. I'd be interested to know how this service develops in the coming years and whether or not the leisure configured A350-1000 will figure at some time, as was the plan when they announced it's acquisition ?

VS themselves continue to have a good relationship with GLA, frequently using it for crew and new type training days, the new A350 spent two separate weeks there last year and other types have trained there too. There's also concurrently four aircraft in storage, 2x744, 1xA332 and 1xA333. 8-)
 
MIflyer12
Posts: 8270
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:58 pm

Re: Virgin Atlantic Plans GLA for 2021

Tue May 12, 2020 6:28 pm

JannEejit wrote:
jfklganyc wrote:
They should concentrate on staying in business...


Doing business seems a reasonably good way of staying in business to me, these GLA-MCO flights have traditionally been very well taken up and booked heavily in advance. I don't know the stats exactly...


It's all about PRASM (or TRASM). If they can't get 80% load factors at decent fares they're going to need 60% load load factors at dear fares. If Scottish 'holidaymakers' are willing to spend for that 3-4x a week, great. I don't know that MCO is ever a premium fare destination (the last DOT airfare report put MCO fares at 17% below average), and BA certainly could suppress demand with LHR connecting fares.
 
8herveg
Posts: 1488
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 2:01 am

Re: Virgin Atlantic Plans GLA for 2021

Tue May 12, 2020 6:39 pm

Would VS ever operate EDI-MCO as well as or instead of from GLA? Is there a reason GLA was chosen over EDI, given both airports operate long-haul flights?
 
digitalcloud
Posts: 164
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2018 10:03 am

Re: Virgin Atlantic Plans GLA for 2021

Tue May 12, 2020 6:43 pm

Possibly remove this thread or merge it elsewhere as the article the OP posted is complete tosh?
 
skipness1E
Posts: 4837
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:18 am

Re: Virgin Atlantic Plans GLA for 2021

Tue May 12, 2020 6:46 pm

Orlando in peak season is price gouging as Ma, Pa and the we'ans pay top dollar to go direct and avoid connecting, the annual Disney holiday is still very popular. Outside peak, some decent fares are available and the service does not operate in the winter months by and large, although the season was recently extended. It's a no brainer to stay in your core markets in summer, with the B744s gone, the A333s should do well in terms of load factor.
EVERYTHING depends on how the Chancellors furlough scheme is wound down, if today's extension into Oct is merely delaying mass unemployment by a few months, the contracting in GDP will see a bloodbath next summer of those who survived the winter at all. Everything depends on the speed of the recovery and the unknown damage to the economy. Only time will tell that. Disney holidays aren't cheap and the recently unemployed aren't usually big spenders.
United are likely going to drop GLA-EWR, the B757s are in storage "medium term" and I suspect they'll concentrate on EDI for Scotland. This should allow space for Delta to survive at GLA unless they too decide on one airport to serve the country, and that's more likely to be EDI.
 
GLANKG
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 9:19 am

Re: Virgin Atlantic Plans GLA for 2021

Tue May 12, 2020 7:58 pm

Some journalism even for Sun standard.
  • 1
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 11

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos