Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
aemoreira1981 wrote:With the collapse of Montenegro Airlines in Europe, they had three E195s, all leased from GECAS. Two of the 3 are less than 12 years old. I have to wonder if Bamboo Airways could strike a quick agreement to lease those two frames (most recently 4O-AOB/C, msn 19000283/19000358). They could then return the two Great Dane airframes and train their own crews on the E195. In addition, I have to wonder if Bamboo Airways could reach a deal with JetBlue to acquire some of their stored E190s, as their BCS3 replacements are coming in and they have E190s less than 12 years old. The JetBlue E190s are exactly 100 seat planes and could be CAH and VKG compliant (the only drawback might be how many cyles JetBlue has put on its E190s, as pre-pandemic, their frames tended to be the highest-time relative to airframe age in the world.
Each would also provide healthy competition in the domestic market to keep Vietnam Airlines (VASCO) honest on pricing. Out of curiosity, would the E275 or E290 be acceptable at CAH or VKG, or would they be too heavy? A fleet of 6 E190s (purchased secondhand) and 2-3 E195s (GECAS leased) might work here.
cpthuy wrote:
Antaras wrote:aemoreira1981 wrote:With the collapse of Montenegro Airlines in Europe, they had three E195s, all leased from GECAS. Two of the 3 are less than 12 years old. I have to wonder if Bamboo Airways could strike a quick agreement to lease those two frames (most recently 4O-AOB/C, msn 19000283/19000358). They could then return the two Great Dane airframes and train their own crews on the E195. In addition, I have to wonder if Bamboo Airways could reach a deal with JetBlue to acquire some of their stored E190s, as their BCS3 replacements are coming in and they have E190s less than 12 years old. The JetBlue E190s are exactly 100 seat planes and could be CAH and VKG compliant (the only drawback might be how many cyles JetBlue has put on its E190s, as pre-pandemic, their frames tended to be the highest-time relative to airframe age in the world.
Each would also provide healthy competition in the domestic market to keep Vietnam Airlines (VASCO) honest on pricing. Out of curiosity, would the E275 or E290 be acceptable at CAH or VKG, or would they be too heavy? A fleet of 6 E190s (purchased secondhand) and 2-3 E195s (GECAS leased) might work here.
1. Vietnam limits the airframe age to 10 years old, however, QH can always negotiate with the CAA Vietnam to register old airframes (just like how did VN re-register a 12-year-old A321 from Cambodia Angkor). Plenty of options for QH, E190/195 from Royal Air Maroc, jetBlue, Azul (?), and Montenegro. Not thinking about jetBlue as QH wants a true 2-class config (on LOT and GDE airframe, it block the aisle seat on the extra-legroom seat and calls them "business seats"). And in that way, QH cannot have a 100-seat airframe on the B6's E190s, except it reconfig it to the E190-E2 standard config. It may also want an E195 or something config with a true C-seat.
2. CAH can only hold E175, while others such as VCS, VKG, or DIN can hold 100-seat E190/195.
aemoreira1981 wrote:Speaking of the E175, there are seven ex-Flybe E175s currently up for lease, presumably by the owners of Flybe (likely Stobart Air, which owns the frames that Bamboo is wet-leasing from Great Dane), that are around 8 years old. How is Bamboo not all over those frames, since it's unlikely that Flybe can re-launch in any form? Those are 88-seat frames.
Antaras wrote:QH officially submit to CAAV for an Embraer-type license in Vietnam:
Shared by my friend
Antaras wrote:aemoreira1981 wrote:Speaking of the E175, there are seven ex-Flybe E175s currently up for lease, presumably by the owners of Flybe (likely Stobart Air, which owns the frames that Bamboo is wet-leasing from Great Dane), that are around 8 years old. How is Bamboo not all over those frames, since it's unlikely that Flybe can re-launch in any form? Those are 88-seat frames.
QH didn't get the formal license for Embraer-type operation from the authorities, so everything it can do now is wet-leasing airframes.
I posted the license request on the previous posts:Antaras wrote:QH officially submit to CAAV for an Embraer-type license in Vietnam:
Shared by my friend
And yes, a few ex-BE E175 is have extremely high chance to be a part of QH fleet.
oldJoe wrote:Antaras wrote:aemoreira1981 wrote:Speaking of the E175, there are seven ex-Flybe E175s currently up for lease, presumably by the owners of Flybe (likely Stobart Air, which owns the frames that Bamboo is wet-leasing from Great Dane), that are around 8 years old. How is Bamboo not all over those frames, since it's unlikely that Flybe can re-launch in any form? Those are 88-seat frames.
QH didn't get the formal license for Embraer-type operation from the authorities, so everything it can do now is wet-leasing airframes.
I posted the license request on the previous posts:Antaras wrote:QH officially submit to CAAV for an Embraer-type license in Vietnam:
Shared by my friend
And yes, a few ex-BE E175 is have extremely high chance to be a part of QH fleet.
How I can understand this ? "QH didn't get the formal license for Embraer-type operation from the authorities" and than "And yes, a few ex-BE E175 is have extremely high chance to be a part of QH fleet" Do you really expect a European crew on wet lease to fly under local contracts ? Never ever !
oldJoe wrote:Antaras wrote:aemoreira1981 wrote:Speaking of the E175, there are seven ex-Flybe E175s currently up for lease, presumably by the owners of Flybe (likely Stobart Air, which owns the frames that Bamboo is wet-leasing from Great Dane), that are around 8 years old. How is Bamboo not all over those frames, since it's unlikely that Flybe can re-launch in any form? Those are 88-seat frames.
QH didn't get the formal license for Embraer-type operation from the authorities, so everything it can do now is wet-leasing airframes.
I posted the license request on the previous posts:Antaras wrote:QH officially submit to CAAV for an Embraer-type license in Vietnam:
Shared by my friend
And yes, a few ex-BE E175 is have extremely high chance to be a part of QH fleet.
How I can understand this ? "QH didn't get the formal license for Embraer-type operation from the authorities" and than "And yes, a few ex-BE E175 is have extremely high chance to be a part of QH fleet" Do you really expect a European crew on wet lease to fly under local contracts ? Never ever !
Antaras wrote:According to the 6-month wet-lease agreements, all of the Bamboo-colored E195s being operated by Great Dane and LOT will be returned back to its operator before July 2021.
VSMUT wrote:Antaras wrote:According to the 6-month wet-lease agreements, all of the Bamboo-colored E195s being operated by Great Dane and LOT will be returned back to its operator before July 2021.
Any idea if these will be extended?
cpthuy wrote:Another Embraer joined the fleet with a VN-A reg, VN-A266. According to planespotters.net, this one is ex-China Southern B-3210.
VSMUT wrote:Antaras wrote:ghost77 wrote:Many Embraer 190s out there are ready to be leased ex Air Canada, American, JetBlue, RAM and many more airlines getting rid of them! Good for Bamboo that will give home to 4 frames.
g77
In fact as Vietnamese carriers cannot register airframes which are older than 10 y/o, and most AC/AA/Jetblue frames are too old, I don't think that QH would take any from these carriers.
However, RAM's airframes are just more than 5 years old, and RAM are discarding exactly 4 airframes, so it makes perfect sense that Bamboo had a call with Nordic Aviation for a nice lease contract for those airframes (Emb Serial 19000680, *681, *682 and *684)
The article does say 110-120 seats, which suggests an E195, not E190. There is a fair bunch of young E190s and E195s available within short notice, not least those from Azul but also Helvetica who are replacing then with E2s.
VSMUT wrote:Antaras wrote:One more rumor, as GDE's E195 can only bring around 100 pax to VCS (as QH said due to the payload and the runway limitation, especially on the 2-hour route HAN-VCS), this time QH may choose the smaller E190 for cheaper costs and better performance.
Indeed, it does specify E190.
I wonder what they will do for business class on the E-jet. Same style seating as the Great Dane E195, or perhaps a Royal Jordanian 1+2 config?
Antaras wrote:VSMUT wrote:Antaras wrote:One more rumor, as GDE's E195 can only bring around 100 pax to VCS (as QH said due to the payload and the runway limitation, especially on the 2-hour route HAN-VCS), this time QH may choose the smaller E190 for cheaper costs and better performance.
Indeed, it does specify E190.
I wonder what they will do for business class on the E-jet. Same style seating as the Great Dane E195, or perhaps a Royal Jordanian 1+2 config?
If QH decides to keep the config from CZ, it would be 1-2
(c) SeatGuru
VSMUT wrote:So this is the first of their own E190s?
VSMUT wrote:What do those 1+2 business class seats look like? A google search turned up empty-handed.