Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR

 
LAXBUR
Posts: 412
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2018 1:05 pm

Re: Alaska Airlines Network Thread 2020

Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:10 pm

USAirALB wrote:
LAXBUR wrote:
WN still isn’t very strong in the Northwest so operating out of another airport in Seattle doesn’t make much sense.

WN is actually very strong in the PNW from a brand recognition standpoint.

From a market perspective, they used to be incredibly strong, however retreated after suspending their intra-PNW routes.

They used to do:
GEG-PDX/SEA/SLC
SLC-BOI/RNO/SEA/PDX
PDX-BOI/RNO
BOI-SEA/RNO
RNO-SEA

Recall that they originally had planned to serve PAE with flights to both OAK and LAS. I wouldn't be surprised if they eventually serve PAE one day.


Cancelling a ton of routes isn’t really an indication they’re “strong” in the Northwest. Really confused by this rebuttal.

And WN gave up slots at PAE. Again, not sure what you’re getting at here.
 
wedgetail737
Posts: 5249
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 8:44 am

Re: Alaska Airlines Network Thread 2020

Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:38 pm

SANFan wrote:
Back to the PAE situation. Hold on a second here. First, there is NO service on AS from PAE to anywhere (including PHX) right now; PHX & LAS begin Aug 1 yet no other routes return.

The article linked above was written in mid-May, at the height of the COVID effects on AS and other cx. There was no mention of the airport construction coming up which would close the terminal and temporarily drop all service to Paine Field. The article made it sound like AS was perhaps just going to give up on PAE service.

I don't know what network planning in SEA is planning for PAE but I really can't foresee them cancelling all but 2 routes from PAE.

Now all of a sudden people here are trying to figure out which airlines are going to swoop in and replace AS (and UA?) ! I think we need to take a step back, take a deep breath and chill for a few weeks. I really doubt that AS is going anywhere and will bring their service at PAE back as soon as (a) the airport apron work is finished, and (b) the traffic at the airport reaches levels that support that service. (I assume UA will do the same.) The COVID recovery is really just starting and PAE is, after all, a pretty small airport near a very big airport!

The question I asked up-thread was why only a single flight to PHX and to LAS on August 1 by AS. (And again I say, PHX? In August?) Maybe AS is "trying the new apron out" at PAE with just a couple of flights? They can't even operate a single flight to SAN or LA or SJC? (I believe these markets all saw 2 daily flights pre-COVID.) Can all the CA markets have failed miserably from PAE for AAG?

bb


https://www.heraldnet.com/business/pain ... p-repairs/

Here is the article about PAE construction.
 
wedgetail737
Posts: 5249
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 8:44 am

Re: Alaska Airlines Network Thread 2020

Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:41 pm

LAXBUR wrote:
cledaybuck wrote:
wnflyguy wrote:

Well PAE also stated they have a business to run. The covid impact will force them to take back all unused slots from United and AlaskaAir. And seek out other airlines to service the airport.
They need the revenue to pay the bills and can't gamble on United or AlaskaAir maybe coming back some day.

Spirit, Frontier ,Southwest and JetBlue are all in prime position to jump in and gain marketshare.

AlaskaAir I think is going to be forced into defending it's turf in this pandemic should a strong player takes PAE up on getting slots.

Flyguy
This is some pretty fanciful thinking. These slots weren't a hot commodity before COVID.


Yeah, I don’t see how in the best of times when few were interested equates to more interest during the worst of times.

PAE will likely stay a small niche airport for AS frequent flyers at most. WN still isn’t very strong in the Northwest so operating out of another airport in Seattle doesn’t make much sense. JetBlue is likely mostly serving folks originating in the Northeast who won’t be familiar with “Everett”. I agree. This is “fanciful thinking”.


With only a handful of "slots" (something like 23, I can't remember), there's not that many opportunities. UA was already cutting SFO-PAE, but I had heard their DEN-PAE route was doing well. But overall, it was/is Alaska's airport.
 
User avatar
gunsontheroof
Posts: 3641
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 8:30 am

Re: Alaska Airlines Network Thread 2020

Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:58 pm

USAirALB wrote:
LAXBUR wrote:
WN still isn’t very strong in the Northwest so operating out of another airport in Seattle doesn’t make much sense.

WN is actually very strong in the PNW from a brand recognition standpoint.

From a market perspective, they used to be incredibly strong, however retreated after suspending their intra-PNW routes.

They used to do:
GEG-PDX/SEA/SLC
SLC-BOI/RNO/SEA/PDX
PDX-BOI/RNO
BOI-SEA/RNO
RNO-SEA

Recall that they originally had planned to serve PAE with flights to both OAK and LAS. I wouldn't be surprised if they eventually serve PAE one day.


As LAXBUR said, not really sure how highlighting a bunch of cancelled routes demonstrates the strength of WN in the Northwest. They gradually backed off SEA when they didn't get their way at BFI years ago and pulled the plug on PAE before the terminal opened up. They pulled their regional flights (GEG, BOI) years ago and also downsized at PDX. They certainly have brand recognition here (some of that can be credited to California transplants), but not on the level of AS or even DL.
Picked a hell of a week to quit sniffing glue.
 
ericm2031
Posts: 1398
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 8:46 am

Re: Alaska Airlines Network Thread 2020

Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:11 pm

AS just extended their schedule through the end of August, so anything beyond that is not a true schedule of what will be flown.
 
USAirALB
Posts: 2303
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 4:46 am

Re: Alaska Airlines Network Thread 2020

Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:50 am

LAXBUR wrote:
USAirALB wrote:
LAXBUR wrote:
WN still isn’t very strong in the Northwest so operating out of another airport in Seattle doesn’t make much sense.

WN is actually very strong in the PNW from a brand recognition standpoint.

From a market perspective, they used to be incredibly strong, however retreated after suspending their intra-PNW routes.

They used to do:
GEG-PDX/SEA/SLC
SLC-BOI/RNO/SEA/PDX
PDX-BOI/RNO
BOI-SEA/RNO
RNO-SEA

Recall that they originally had planned to serve PAE with flights to both OAK and LAS. I wouldn't be surprised if they eventually serve PAE one day.


Cancelling a ton of routes isn’t really an indication they’re “strong” in the Northwest. Really confused by this rebuttal.

And WN gave up slots at PAE. Again, not sure what you’re getting at here.

You said "still isn't" (implying that they are new to the market) and I was highlighting how they once were strong and still have said brand recognition...
Hence:
gunsontheroof wrote:
They certainly have brand recognition here
RJ85, F70, E135, E140, E145, E70, E75, E90, CR2, CR7, CR9, 717, 732, 733, 734, 735, 73G, 738, 739, 744ER, 752, 753, 762, 772, 77E, 77W, 789, 319, 320, 321, 332, 333, 343, 359, 388
 
User avatar
gunsontheroof
Posts: 3641
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 8:30 am

Re: Alaska Airlines Network Thread 2020

Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:30 am

USAirALB wrote:
LAXBUR wrote:
USAirALB wrote:
WN is actually very strong in the PNW from a brand recognition standpoint.

From a market perspective, they used to be incredibly strong, however retreated after suspending their intra-PNW routes.

They used to do:
GEG-PDX/SEA/SLC
SLC-BOI/RNO/SEA/PDX
PDX-BOI/RNO
BOI-SEA/RNO
RNO-SEA

Recall that they originally had planned to serve PAE with flights to both OAK and LAS. I wouldn't be surprised if they eventually serve PAE one day.


Cancelling a ton of routes isn’t really an indication they’re “strong” in the Northwest. Really confused by this rebuttal.

And WN gave up slots at PAE. Again, not sure what you’re getting at here.

You said "still isn't" (implying that they are new to the market) and I was highlighting how they once were strong and still have said brand recognition...
Hence:
gunsontheroof wrote:
They certainly have brand recognition here


Well, that was LAXBUR that (correctly) said that, not me. Brand-familiarity doesn't always translate into market share...Southwest has tried to make inroads to the PNW market for decades and has never really been able to gain a foothold. Of course, a lot of that can be attributed to Alaska, who enjoy an unusually high level of customer loyalty for an airline and have retained their market share for several years amidst a buildup by a powerful rival.
Picked a hell of a week to quit sniffing glue.
 
jplatts
Posts: 3613
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 6:42 pm

Re: Alaska Airlines Network Thread 2020

Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:40 am

gunsontheroof wrote:
Well, that was LAXBUR that (correctly) said that, not me. Brand-familiarity doesn't always translate into market share...Southwest has tried to make inroads to the PNW market for decades and has never really been able to gain a foothold. Of course, a lot of that can be attributed to Alaska, who enjoy an unusually high level of customer loyalty for an airline and have retained their market share for several years amidst a buildup by a powerful rival.


PDX was the largest WN station in the Pacific Northwest in 2019, and WN carried more passengers out of PDX than it did out of SEA in 2019. WN also had 17.75% market share at PDX compared to only 6.44% market share at SEA, but AS's SEA hub is much bigger than its PDX hub and DL has a hub at SEA.
 
LAXBUR
Posts: 412
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2018 1:05 pm

Re: Alaska Airlines Network Thread 2020

Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:22 pm

USAirALB wrote:
LAXBUR wrote:
USAirALB wrote:
WN is actually very strong in the PNW from a brand recognition standpoint.

From a market perspective, they used to be incredibly strong, however retreated after suspending their intra-PNW routes.

They used to do:
GEG-PDX/SEA/SLC
SLC-BOI/RNO/SEA/PDX
PDX-BOI/RNO
BOI-SEA/RNO
RNO-SEA

Recall that they originally had planned to serve PAE with flights to both OAK and LAS. I wouldn't be surprised if they eventually serve PAE one day.


Cancelling a ton of routes isn’t really an indication they’re “strong” in the Northwest. Really confused by this rebuttal.

And WN gave up slots at PAE. Again, not sure what you’re getting at here.

You said "still isn't" (implying that they are new to the market) and I was highlighting how they once were strong and still have said brand recognition...
Hence:
gunsontheroof wrote:
They certainly have brand recognition here


I’m not going to argue about your comprehension of “still isn’t”. And not sure what your argument is.

Anyways, as others have noted Southwest hasn’t done well in time in the Northwest; however you want to present it. Most of those routes you mentioned were from the Morris Air buyout anyways. It isn’t a knock against WN. Alaska’s FF program, schedule, and customer service keeps people in the Northwest engaged. WN adding a handful of flights to PAE won’t change that and that’s why they likely won’t do that. Again, they dropped out before they even started. WN can better take on Alaska in places like California. PAE would be a waste of time and money for WN.
 
tphuang
Posts: 5206
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:04 pm

Re: Alaska Airlines Network Thread 2020

Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:38 pm

This is an interesting article showing that AS cut back 20% of schedule close-in.
https://crankyflier.com/2020/06/30/alas ... k-in-july/

I assume that part of this is due to certain market not being open while other markets are showing declining demand due to recent COVID surges.
 
User avatar
SANFan
Posts: 5410
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 10:10 am

Re: Alaska Airlines Network Thread 2020

Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:39 pm

tphuang wrote:
This is an interesting article showing that AS cut back 20% of schedule close-in.
https://crankyflier.com/2020/06/30/alas ... k-in-july/
I assume that part of this is due to certain market not being open while other markets are showing declining demand due to recent COVID surges.

This is common practice these days around the industry is it not and AS is certainly no exception. For example, AS's Aug 1 schedule that is now out is perfectly viable the way it is. Using SAN as an example, since I just finished a turn sked for it, almost every flight of the 34-flight sked is listed as daily (two exceptions are PVR which is 3X weekly and a SEA flight operating 4X weekly to use that aircraft on the alternate days.) I expect as August approaches, some of the flights could be reduced to less than daily as the carrier studies booking data. Perhaps even a flight could be eliminated if necessary. This is what has happened over the last few months and IMO is to be expected.

Also, AS had many HI flights scheduled for July (as they do for August) and they removed most of the July ones as HI remained 'closed'. Apparently a new policy has been developed for August travel to and from Hawaii so I expect the flights WILL operate on AS. (Frequencies could be reduced from daily of course if necessary.)

bb
 
Chugach
Posts: 1329
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 10:18 am

AS responds to B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 12:27 pm

New routes are LAX-RSW/TPA/LIH/KOA/BZN/MFR/EUG, PDX-FLL, SAN-FLL, and SEA-RSW.

Discuss.

https://investor.alaskaair.com/news-rel ... s-2020-lax
 
User avatar
Midwestindy
Posts: 5276
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 3:56 am

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 12:29 pm

Doesn't seem to be much overlap with B6, this is good for AA though
Status for 2019/2020: AAdvantage Platinum, Delta Gold, Southwest A-List
 
catiii
Posts: 3584
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 1:18 am

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 12:35 pm

Meanwhile no one will pay attention to this given the AA/B6 news.
 
phatfarmlines
Posts: 1534
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2001 12:06 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 12:41 pm

More like AS clapping back at DL......

Open season on DL especially with the AA/B6 news.
 
MIflyer12
Posts: 8051
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:58 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 12:41 pm

Props to AS for trying something at LAX. They need to grow - not just up and down the West Coast - to stay relevant to LAX travelers.
 
catiii
Posts: 3584
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 1:18 am

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 12:44 pm

MIflyer12 wrote:
Props to AS for trying something at LAX. They need to grow - not just up and down the West Coast - to stay relevant to LAX travelers.


Until they address their inferior hard product they’re going to remain irrelevant.
 
cschleic
Posts: 1806
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 10:47 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 1:26 pm

Could some of this be replacing Eagle flights to LAX?
 
JAMBOJET
Posts: 293
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 6:23 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 1:38 pm

catiii wrote:
MIflyer12 wrote:
Props to AS for trying something at LAX. They need to grow - not just up and down the West Coast - to stay relevant to LAX travelers.


Until they address their inferior hard product they’re going to remain irrelevant.


What's the matter with Alaska's hard product? They have more legroom in every cabin than American, Delta, and United and an in-flight entertainment system equivalent to narrow body product on AA, United, Southwest, Delta on the 717 product, Hawaiian etc. PTVs aren't everything.
 
jplatts
Posts: 3613
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 6:42 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 1:43 pm

Chugach wrote:
New routes are LAX-RSW/TPA/LIH/KOA/BZN/MFR/EUG, PDX-FLL, SAN-FLL, and SEA-RSW.


There are some adds that WN could make in response to the announced AS adds out of LAX and SAN, including the return of LAX-TPA nonstop service, the addition of LAX-KOA nonstop service, and the addition of SAN-FLL nonstop service.
 
jplatts
Posts: 3613
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 6:42 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 1:46 pm

AS adding PDX-TPA nonstop service might be a possibility with the lack of PDX-TPA nonstop service is one of the biggest holes in both the PDX and TPA markets. There are also other adds that could be made by AS out of PDX such as PDX-ATL/IND/BNA/RDU/SAT.

AS adding SFO-TPA nonstop service is also a possibility with UA currently being the only airline serving TPA nonstop from the San Francisco Bay Area.
 
USAirALB
Posts: 2303
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 4:46 am

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 1:50 pm

The Florida routes are interesting.

AA attempted LAX-TPA a couple years back and it didn't quite work out. I think DL has been on the route for years now. The RSW adds are quite perplexing to me; I don't think anyone has attempted RSW-West Coast service. I never really thought RSW was popular for West Coast travelers as it seems much more a Midwestern market. I can't really see RSW working out in the long run.
RJ85, F70, E135, E140, E145, E70, E75, E90, CR2, CR7, CR9, 717, 732, 733, 734, 735, 73G, 738, 739, 744ER, 752, 753, 762, 772, 77E, 77W, 789, 319, 320, 321, 332, 333, 343, 359, 388
 
MIflyer12
Posts: 8051
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:58 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 1:52 pm

catiii wrote:
MIflyer12 wrote:
Props to AS for trying something at LAX. They need to grow - not just up and down the West Coast - to stay relevant to LAX travelers.


Until they address their inferior hard product they’re going to remain irrelevant.


That's a very NYC-LAX centric view of the industry. AS F on LAX-RSW/TPA/LIH/KOA/BZN/MFR/EUG, PDX-FLL, SAN-FLL, and SEA-RSW will be fully competitive. You don't see AA sending lie-flats on LAX-KOA.
 
tphuang
Posts: 5206
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:04 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 2:05 pm

Aside from the two FLL routes, I don't see how this is a clap back at B6. In fact with the AA/B6 deal, I see more cooperation between AS and B6 down the road.
 
bretonrlong
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:52 am

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 2:33 pm

Nice to see the RSW adds! Has Alaska ever flown to RSW before?
 
drdisque
Posts: 1320
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 9:57 am

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 2:37 pm

Protecting their turf in the PNW by adding flights to LAX makes sense. Flinging several 737's a day from the west coast to Florida does not.
 
usflyer msp
Posts: 3794
Joined: Tue May 23, 2000 11:50 am

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 2:44 pm

USAirALB wrote:
The Florida routes are interesting.

AA attempted LAX-TPA a couple years back and it didn't quite work out. I think DL has been on the route for years now. The RSW adds are quite perplexing to me; I don't think anyone has attempted RSW-West Coast service. I never really thought RSW was popular for West Coast travelers as it seems much more a Midwestern market. I can't really see RSW working out in the long run.


I agree on RSW. RSW is where midwesterners go to golf, fish, and die. I don't see any market from the west coast. RSW must have some strong incentives.
 
slcdeltarumd11
Posts: 4756
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 7:30 am

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 2:45 pm

LAX is gonna be really interesting. Someone who's short on cash is gonna cut flights . Hard to see who that is right now. Someone is gonna need to conserve cash here in 2021. Some of the legacies might have the least reasons to fight for lax. AA has PHX, dl has sea for it's future Pacific flights, and UA has SFO. Have to see how cash goes here in 2021 I think we see the legacies hurting the most.

The routes dont seem like they are afraid of b6 more that they want more lax and realize maybe a legacy will be hurting for cash and they can expand?
 
ATCtower
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 1:46 am

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 2:51 pm

Never mind the context of this post, have we really sunk to the level where “claps back” is an acceptable title in a thread? My how we have degraded....

On that note, it was only a matter of time before AS made this move. I don’t know that it has a lot to do with B6 moves but more to do with AS seeing a spot to capitalize on an underserved situation.

This also seemingly opens the door to a wide range of Asia connections via Seattle vs having to transit NYC/Cal.
By reading the above post you waive all rights to be offended. If you do not like what you read, forget it.
 
jplatts
Posts: 3613
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 6:42 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 3:21 pm

USAirALB wrote:
The Florida routes are interesting.

AA attempted LAX-TPA a couple years back and it didn't quite work out. I think DL has been on the route for years now. The RSW adds are quite perplexing to me; I don't think anyone has attempted RSW-West Coast service. I never really thought RSW was popular for West Coast travelers as it seems much more a Midwestern market. I can't really see RSW working out in the long run.


AS might be able to make LAX-RSW nonstop service work as the PDEW of RSW-LAX/BUR/LGB/SNA/ONT was 113 passengers per day in the January 2019 - September 2019 time period.

While the PDEW of SEA-RSW was only 54 passengers per day in the January 2019 - September 2019 time period, AS might be able to make SEA-RSW nonstop service work due to
(a) AS having connecting feed from Alaska, Hawaii, British Columbia, Washington State, and Oregon in addition to O&D traffic on SEA-RSW nonstop service,
(b) AS being able to significantly stimulate additional demand from SEA to other markets that were added by AS in the last 3 years such as CMH, IND, and PIT, and
(c) AS already serving FLL, MCO, and TPA in Florida nonstop from SEA.

While AS doesn't currently serve JAX, AS adding SEA-JAX nonstop service is a possibility as the PDEW of SEA-JAX was 100 passengers per day in the January 2019 - September 2019 time period, which is almost double the PDEW of SEA-RSW in the January 2019 - September 2019 time period.

While F9 has less-than-daily seasonal nonstop service to CLE from SEA, AS adding SEA-CLE nonstop service is a possibility with the lack of SEA-CLE nonstop service on a non-ULCC being a huge hole with the PDEW of SEA-CLE being 218 passengers per day in Q3 2019 and with over 66% of the passengers traveling between SEA and CLE connecting on airlines other than F9 in Q3 2019.

I had also previously mentioned AS adding SEA-BDL and SEA-ORF nonstop service as possibilities with BDL and ORF being two of the top destinations that do not currently have any nonstop service out of SEA.
 
32andBelow
Posts: 4969
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 2:54 am

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 3:31 pm

That’s a lot of transcons. Will they have the frames for this once their west coast routes are back up the full steam?
 
MIAFLLPBIFlyer
Posts: 493
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2017 8:25 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 3:42 pm

tphuang wrote:
Aside from the two FLL routes, I don't see how this is a clap back at B6. In fact with the AA/B6 deal, I see more cooperation between AS and B6 down the road.


Something interesting here is the primary competitor for AA out of MIA on west coast routes is B6 and AS out of FLL. While AA is cozying up with both carriers, they're now battling at FLL and potentially impacting AA's loads out of MIA. Or perhaps more importantly strategically long-term it blocks WN/UA/DL from ever having a presence in these markets, which is to AA's advantage in the bigger scheme of things. I am think out loud on this one but it is quite interesting because it does potentially block any new entrant from South Florida-West Coast unless they want to role the dice on PBI which is probably never happening.
 
wnflyguy
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 7:58 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 4:00 pm

With AA scaling down the Eagle flying from LAX along with LAWA putting Terminal 9 on hold.
Maybe AS can take over the Eagles nest to increase E175 flying from LAX.

Flyguy
My Wings are clipped just another Retired Airline person. The Ultimate Armchair out of the loop airline industry geek. Aloha Mr Hand!
 
CobaltScar
Posts: 723
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 2:30 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 4:10 pm

There is no comparison between hard/soft product on a AS and B6 flight, especially on transon.
 
User avatar
SANFan
Posts: 5410
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 10:10 am

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 4:15 pm

In a slightly different view from most of the posts so far, very nice to see AS taking a direct stab at Blue with SAN-FLL! (I wonder if this might also have a slight hint toward AS's "buddies" over at AA to be careful with what they are apparently cooking up with B6 today...? I refer to AA's SAN-MIA service.)

This addition (SAN-Lauderdale) comes as a very pleasant surprise. I think most of us were expecting to see PDX-FLL announced since AS has been hinting at it for a couple of weeks now. I had wondered if AS might take a swipe at Blue for adding SAN-EWR and SAN-FLL sure seemed like a good fit for such a swipe so it's all good I say!

Next I'd love to see AS jump into SAN-TPA -- keeping the Florida theme and all -- since that's a route that I believe the carrier has been looking at for a while now; I'm not sure what WN's plans are for the route. Let's remember that AS has already scheduled daily-double flights between SAN and MCO for the winter so that's more toward the Florida theme...

Thank you Alaska for giving us here in SAN something to chew on as part of this big and important announcement!

bb
 
User avatar
klm617
Posts: 5016
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 8:57 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 4:48 pm

This would be a great time for AS to add DTW-LAX. They seem to be doing pretty well with DTW-SEA
the truth does matter, guys. too bad it's often quite subjective. the truth is beyond the mere facts and figures. it's beyond good and bad, right and wrong...
 
maverick4002
Posts: 264
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2015 2:14 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 4:50 pm

ATCtower wrote:
Never mind the context of this post, have we really sunk to the level where “claps back” is an acceptable title in a thread? My how we have degraded....

On that note, it was only a matter of time before AS made this move. I don’t know that it has a lot to do with B6 moves but more to do with AS seeing a spot to capitalize on an underserved situation.

This also seemingly opens the door to a wide range of Asia connections via Seattle vs having to transit NYC/Cal.



Lol @ your annoyance at clap back. it is not that serious at all
 
User avatar
klm617
Posts: 5016
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 8:57 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 4:51 pm

jplatts wrote:
USAirALB wrote:
The Florida routes are interesting.

AA attempted LAX-TPA a couple years back and it didn't quite work out. I think DL has been on the route for years now. The RSW adds are quite perplexing to me; I don't think anyone has attempted RSW-West Coast service. I never really thought RSW was popular for West Coast travelers as it seems much more a Midwestern market. I can't really see RSW working out in the long run.


AS might be able to make LAX-RSW nonstop service work as the PDEW of RSW-LAX/BUR/LGB/SNA/ONT was 113 passengers per day in the January 2019 - September 2019 time period.

While the PDEW of SEA-RSW was only 54 passengers per day in the January 2019 - September 2019 time period, AS might be able to make SEA-RSW nonstop service work due to
(a) AS having connecting feed from Alaska, Hawaii, British Columbia, Washington State, and Oregon in addition to O&D traffic on SEA-RSW nonstop service,
(b) AS being able to significantly stimulate additional demand from SEA to other markets that were added by AS in the last 3 years such as CMH, IND, and PIT, and
(c) AS already serving FLL, MCO, and TPA in Florida nonstop from SEA.

While AS doesn't currently serve JAX, AS adding SEA-JAX nonstop service is a possibility as the PDEW of SEA-JAX was 100 passengers per day in the January 2019 - September 2019 time period, which is almost double the PDEW of SEA-RSW in the January 2019 - September 2019 time period.

While F9 has less-than-daily seasonal nonstop service to CLE from SEA, AS adding SEA-CLE nonstop service is a possibility with the lack of SEA-CLE nonstop service on a non-ULCC being a huge hole with the PDEW of SEA-CLE being 218 passengers per day in Q3 2019 and with over 66% of the passengers traveling between SEA and CLE connecting on airlines other than F9 in Q3 2019.

I had also previously mentioned AS adding SEA-BDL and SEA-ORF nonstop service as possibilities with BDL and ORF being two of the top destinations that do not currently have any nonstop service out of SEA.


What everybody forgets though is once you add a nonstop link O/D numbers increase. How many people are flying to TPA and MCO instead of RSW because of better fares and schedules.
the truth does matter, guys. too bad it's often quite subjective. the truth is beyond the mere facts and figures. it's beyond good and bad, right and wrong...
 
MAH4546
Posts: 26220
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2001 1:44 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 4:53 pm

So much for the greatly exaggerated death of Alaska’s LAX hub. Great to see this.
a.
 
737-990
Posts: 341
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2000 3:41 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 5:06 pm

ATCtower wrote:
Never mind the context of this post, have we really sunk to the level where “claps back” is an acceptable title in a thread? My how we have degraded....

On that note, it was only a matter of time before AS made this move. I don’t know that it has a lot to do with B6 moves but more to do with AS seeing a spot to capitalize on an underserved situation.

This also seemingly opens the door to a wide range of Asia connections via Seattle vs having to transit NYC/Cal.


Agreed. Poorly worded worded title thread. A more appropriate title would have been AS announces California and Florida expansion. Very few of these routes have anything to do with JetBlue. Certainly TPA and RSW have nothing to do with B6.
Happiest is a man who has his vocation as a hobby
 
nine4nine
Posts: 619
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 3:44 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 5:09 pm

JAMBOJET wrote:
catiii wrote:
MIflyer12 wrote:
Props to AS for trying something at LAX. They need to grow - not just up and down the West Coast - to stay relevant to LAX travelers.


Until they address their inferior hard product they’re going to remain irrelevant.


What's the matter with Alaska's hard product? They have more legroom in every cabin than American, Delta, and United and an in-flight entertainment system equivalent to narrow body product on AA, United, Southwest, Delta on the 717 product, Hawaiian etc. PTVs aren't everything.



When the WiFi and seatback power port actually works. I’ve been on some AS, WN, and UA flights where the network was down the entire flight or the power wasn’t there or INOP. At least in the old days before IFE at least you had a big cushy seat with the option to sleep the flight away. Now sitting on a park bench which is pretty impossible to even sleep with nothing to stare at other than a plastic seat back is misery.

And AS first class is bottom of the barrel in the US. I would never book it outside of the the small upgrade fee at the gate.
717, 727-100, 727-200, 732, 733, 734, 735, 73G, 738, 739, 742, 748, 752, 753, 762, 763, 772, 77W, 787-10, DC9, MD80/88/90, DC10, 319, 220-300, 320, 321, 321n, 332, 333, CS100, CRJ200, Q400, E175, E190, ERJ145, EMB120
 
SocalApproach
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:08 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 5:14 pm

Claps Back? With that title I was expecting FLL-JFK but not surprised to just see a bunch of regional flying added.


phatfarmlines wrote:
More like AS clapping back at DL......

Open season on DL especially with the AA/B6 news.

:checkmark:
 
User avatar
SANFan
Posts: 5410
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 10:10 am

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 5:48 pm

737-990 wrote:
ATCtower wrote:
... it was only a matter of time before AS made this move. I don’t know that it has a lot to do with B6 moves but more to do with AS seeing a spot to capitalize on an underserved situation.

Agreed. Poorly worded worded title thread. A more appropriate title would have been AS announces California and Florida expansion. Very few of these routes have anything to do with JetBlue. Certainly TPA and RSW have nothing to do with B6.

SAN & PDX-FLL are certainly 'clap backs" aimed pointblank at B6. And the other adds from LAX may not be route-specific but AS is greatly expanding at LA in view of the news very recently by Blue of their intentions at LA.

bb
 
tphuang
Posts: 5206
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:04 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 6:25 pm

SANFan wrote:
737-990 wrote:
ATCtower wrote:
... it was only a matter of time before AS made this move. I don’t know that it has a lot to do with B6 moves but more to do with AS seeing a spot to capitalize on an underserved situation.

Agreed. Poorly worded worded title thread. A more appropriate title would have been AS announces California and Florida expansion. Very few of these routes have anything to do with JetBlue. Certainly TPA and RSW have nothing to do with B6.

SAN & PDX-FLL are certainly 'clap backs" aimed pointblank at B6. And the other adds from LAX may not be route-specific but AS is greatly expanding at LA in view of the news very recently by Blue of their intentions at LA.

bb


You are trying too hard here. Those lax adds look like normal network building adds given their relationship with aa.

Only the fll adds look like retaliation. Frankly, I am not sure b6 will even start pdx given the coronavirus surge.
 
User avatar
lesfalls
Posts: 3366
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 11:58 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 6:46 pm

Midwestindy wrote:
Doesn't seem to be much overlap with B6, this is good for AA though


Other then SAN-FLL where else do they overlap?
Lufthansa: Einfach ein bisschen besser.
 
TonyClifton
Posts: 221
Joined: Thu May 14, 2020 3:19 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 6:59 pm

Does every move have to be a “strike” at another airline, or is it just one carrier fleshing out their network?

Good adds for AS.
 
LAXBUR
Posts: 412
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2018 1:05 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 7:11 pm

nine4nine wrote:
JAMBOJET wrote:
catiii wrote:

Until they address their inferior hard product they’re going to remain irrelevant.


What's the matter with Alaska's hard product? They have more legroom in every cabin than American, Delta, and United and an in-flight entertainment system equivalent to narrow body product on AA, United, Southwest, Delta on the 717 product, Hawaiian etc. PTVs aren't everything.



When the WiFi and seatback power port actually works. I’ve been on some AS, WN, and UA flights where the network was down the entire flight or the power wasn’t there or INOP. At least in the old days before IFE at least you had a big cushy seat with the option to sleep the flight away. Now sitting on a park bench which is pretty impossible to even sleep with nothing to stare at other than a plastic seat back is misery.

And AS first class is bottom of the barrel in the US. I would never book it outside of the the small upgrade fee at the gate.


This person obviously has an axe to grind. More legroom, quality food on 3.5hr flights. That’s more than I’ve gotten on AA or even DL. DL does have nice IFE. But to say bottom of the barrel especially against AA and UA really makes you look foolish.
 
winginit
Posts: 2879
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 9:23 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 7:41 pm

I'm really struggling to see how these route adds will reduce cash burn.
 
User avatar
madpropsyo
Posts: 88
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2018 2:02 am

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 7:55 pm

CobaltScar wrote:
There is no comparison between hard/soft product on a AS and B6 flight, especially on transon.


On the handful of flights where B6 operates Mint, yes, of course.

On every single other aircraft and the airport experience though? First Class, Upgrades, Lounges, etc. AS beats B6 hands down.
 
CobaltScar
Posts: 723
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 2:30 pm

Re: AS claps back at B6, announces LAX and FLL expansion

Thu Jul 16, 2020 7:58 pm

madpropsyo wrote:
CobaltScar wrote:
There is no comparison between hard/soft product on a AS and B6 flight, especially on transon.


On the handful of flights where B6 operates Mint, yes, of course.

On every single other aircraft and the airport experience though? First Class, Upgrades, Lounges, etc. AS beats B6 hands down.


So you'd rather fly transcon in a Alaska economy cabin or a Jetblue one? (since you already agreed jetBlue business >> alaskas)

One has large TVs, more legroom, free wifi, more snacks/drinks, lower density seating

the other does not.

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos