Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR

 
x1234
Topic Author
Posts: 876
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 3:50 pm

SQ cancelled plans for BRU, are loads that bad on EU flights?

Thu Jul 30, 2020 10:57 pm

SQ cancelled plans for BRU, are loads that bad on EU flights? I have always said that BRU and MAD are the most important destinations missing in SQ's EU network. Since they fly to IST where TK flies to every major European airport (including CIS/Central Asia) would they code-share with TK? Or is the EU business mainly with Lufthansa in FRA/MUC?
 
User avatar
LAXintl
Posts: 24628
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 12:12 pm

Re: SQ cancelled plans for BRU, are loads that bad on EU flights?

Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:08 pm

SQ just posted a record loss, with enplanements down 99.5% for the group!
At the moment Singapore is essentially closed to foreigners, and those let in are issued a 14-day self-quarantine notice, so yes loads must be atrocious in the few markets they operate to.

SQ already codeshares with TK to European markets.
https://bit.ly/3jVplJF
From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
 
User avatar
MrBrightSide
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:48 am

Re: SQ cancelled plans for BRU, are loads that bad on EU flights?

Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:32 pm

Singapore does not allow international transit, so even if you're on a flight BKK-SIN or KUL-SIN or JKT-SIN (the bread and butter connections), you're not allowed to take a connection, even though you'd stay airside all the time. That cut off significant revenue potential and gave traffic to QR, EK and others.
There's no better way to travel than fly (shameless rip of LH's slogan ;-)
 
toga998
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon May 25, 2020 8:09 pm

Re: SQ cancelled plans for BRU, are loads that bad on EU flights?

Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:38 am

Considering that we are suffering from a global health crisis affecting every corner of the world I would not say this is surprising...
 
User avatar
smithbs
Posts: 488
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:09 pm

Re: SQ cancelled plans for BRU, are loads that bad on EU flights?

Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:51 am

MrBrightSide wrote:
Singapore does not allow international transit, so even if you're on a flight BKK-SIN or KUL-SIN or JKT-SIN (the bread and butter connections), you're not allowed to take a connection, even though you'd stay airside all the time. That cut off significant revenue potential and gave traffic to QR, EK and others.


That's interesting. Does that apply to connecting with different carriers, or even same carriers? How long has that rule been in effect? Or is it just for COVID?
 
eamondzhang
Posts: 1803
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 8:23 am

Re: SQ cancelled plans for BRU, are loads that bad on EU flights?

Fri Jul 31, 2020 1:06 am

smithbs wrote:
MrBrightSide wrote:
Singapore does not allow international transit, so even if you're on a flight BKK-SIN or KUL-SIN or JKT-SIN (the bread and butter connections), you're not allowed to take a connection, even though you'd stay airside all the time. That cut off significant revenue potential and gave traffic to QR, EK and others.


That's interesting. Does that apply to connecting with different carriers, or even same carriers? How long has that rule been in effect? Or is it just for COVID?

IIRC Singapore is actually allowing international transits now but with strict restrictions.

Pax must be travelling from and to specific allowed countries (believe Aus/NZ are two), must have boarding pass and baggage taged to their destination and must be transiting only once and that is via SIN.

Which essentially means you can't go MEL-SIN on SQ and SIN-KUL on AK or LHR-IST-SIN-TYO for example.

I'm personally not surprised on SQ's exit from BRU - in fact I will be very surprised if not more carriers are abandoning their new long-haul routes like SQ does to BRU.

Michael
 
787SIN
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2017 6:00 am

Re: SQ cancelled plans for BRU, are loads that bad on EU flights?

Fri Jul 31, 2020 1:46 am

As michael said, transiting at Changi is restricted. Believe only those travelling on SQ group airlines can at the moment.

Transit has been allowed on certain flights since beginning of June, and has been expanded slightly. But still limited. As its fairly fluid the best info is both on the Changi Airport website which and idea of what to expect when transiting the airport and SQs which details the routes transit is available on.
 
AngMoh
Posts: 1052
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 5:03 am

Re: SQ cancelled plans for BRU, are loads that bad on EU flights?

Fri Jul 31, 2020 4:27 am

787SIN wrote:
As michael said, transiting at Changi is restricted. Believe only those travelling on SQ group airlines can at the moment.

Transit has been allowed on certain flights since beginning of June, and has been expanded slightly. But still limited. As its fairly fluid the best info is both on the Changi Airport website which and idea of what to expect when transiting the airport and SQs which details the routes transit is available on.


My daughter flew back SIN-AMS to return to university last Tuesday. There were totally 2 business class passengers, 5 premium economy (which was 1 family flying together), and around 30-40 economy passengers. Only 4 passengers flew SIN-AMS, all economy. I believe all were students returning to university. The rest were transit passengers originating from Australia and New Zealand. The bulk were dutch students returning from exchange programs in Australia.

Arrangements were very strict. First transit passengers were completely separated with no interaction at any point in time. Holding areas in airport for transit passengers were separate. First boarding was economy transit passengers and they were seated in the back (after toilet). Then Singapore originating passengers were boarded in the forward section of economy (between premium economy and toilets). Then premium economy. Don't know the arrangements for business. I read before that there are separate toilets in the plane for Singapore originating passengers and transit passengers, but not sure if that was the case. On arrival, there was separate disembarkation for the various groups and no mixing anytime till passing immigration. Once passed immigration and Dutch jurisdiction, there was no control whatsoever. Health declarations were not checked. The required self isolation was not emphasised. The only instruction were by SQ crew.

Singapore is paranoid about being excused of exporting corona. We have high numbers, but if this was anywhere in Europe our numbers would be way lower due to our unique circumstances. Last week there was a passenger arriving from New Zealand via Singapore found positive of covid in South Korea. The first excuse was transit in Singapore, but that was impossible because of arrangements and the fact that maximum transfer time is 4 hours. It is impossible to be infected in Singapore and a swab 10 hours later in Korea to be positive. Now New Zealand and South Korea are trying to figure out what happened.
727 732 733 734 735 73G 738 739/ER 742 743 744/M 752 753 762 772 77E 773 77W 788 A300 A310 A319 A320 A321 A332 A333 A343 A345 A346 A359 A35K A388 DC-9 DC-10 MD11 MD81 MD82 MD87 F70 ERJ145 E170 E175 E190 E195 ATR72 Q400 CRJ200 CRJ700 CRJ900 BAE146 RJ85
 
itisi
Posts: 309
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2016 12:37 pm

Re: SQ cancelled plans for BRU, are loads that bad on EU flights?

Fri Jul 31, 2020 11:32 am

Are loads bad :rotfl: .... Why would anyone be flying!
737-300/400/500 ... are NOT classics :)
 
SpoonNZ
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2013 10:22 am

Re: SQ cancelled plans for BRU, are loads that bad on EU flights?

Fri Jul 31, 2020 11:36 am

AngMoh wrote:
The first excuse was transit in Singapore, but that was impossible because of arrangements and the fact that maximum transfer time is 4 hours. It is impossible to be infected in Singapore and a swab 10 hours later in Korea to be positive. Now New Zealand and South Korea are trying to figure out what happened.

According to https://i.stuff.co.nz/national/health/c ... queenstown he was in the transit lounge for 14 hours.

Seems most likely to be its a persistent asymptomatic case from a long time ago - as you say, catching it at SIN and testing positive even 20 hours later seems infeasible.
 
brilondon
Posts: 3159
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 6:56 am

Re: SQ cancelled plans for BRU, are loads that bad on EU flights?

Fri Jul 31, 2020 11:47 am

itisi wrote:
Are loads bad :rotfl: .... Why would anyone be flying!

That's my question. Why would anyone want to fly. Even after a vaccine is found, it will not eliminate the virus, only eventually reduce the risk. A risk, I am not going to take.
Rush forever Closer To My Heart
 
airbazar
Posts: 10168
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:12 pm

Re: SQ cancelled plans for BRU, are loads that bad on EU flights?

Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:27 pm

brilondon wrote:
itisi wrote:
Are loads bad :rotfl: .... Why would anyone be flying!

That's my question. Why would anyone want to fly. Even after a vaccine is found, it will not eliminate the virus, only eventually reduce the risk. A risk, I am not going to take.

Not everyone is that paranoid. This is still a very rare virus to catch, albeit a dangerous one so precautions need to be taken but by no means does it mean one need to curl up into a ball and hide under the stairs for a year or two. Earlier in July my family and I went on vacation, by plane *gasp*, and we are debating a possible second trip later in August.
 
CriticalPoint
Posts: 1062
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 5:01 pm

Re: SQ cancelled plans for BRU, are loads that bad on EU flights?

Fri Jul 31, 2020 1:03 pm

brilondon wrote:
itisi wrote:
Are loads bad :rotfl: .... Why would anyone be flying!

That's my question. Why would anyone want to fly. Even after a vaccine is found, it will not eliminate the virus, only eventually reduce the risk. A risk, I am not going to take.


You ever stopped to wonder why FAs and Pilots aren’t dropping dead in droves?

Maybe because it’s safer than you think.......GASP.

The industry isn’t lying to you when they tell you how good the HEPA filters are and all the lengths the airlines go through (especially United Airlines) to clean the aircraft and keep people safe.
 
User avatar
LH748
Posts: 454
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:44 am

Re: SQ cancelled plans for BRU, are loads that bad on EU flights?

Fri Jul 31, 2020 1:06 pm

You might have missed it but we're right in the middle of a pandamic
There's little to no passenger demand
306 310 318 319 320 321 333 343 388 ATR72 733 737 738 739 743 744 748 752 753 763 764 772 77W 788 CRJ7 CRJ9 E170 F100 MD11 RJ1H
AA AB AC AF AK AZ BA DE DL EW FD FR HF HG IB IR MF KU LH LT LX OD TG TK TP UA VJ VN WN W6 YP YW
 
Prost
Posts: 2575
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:23 pm

Re: SQ cancelled plans for BRU, are loads that bad on EU flights?

Fri Jul 31, 2020 1:12 pm

CriticalPoint wrote:
brilondon wrote:
itisi wrote:
Are loads bad :rotfl: .... Why would anyone be flying!

That's my question. Why would anyone want to fly. Even after a vaccine is found, it will not eliminate the virus, only eventually reduce the risk. A risk, I am not going to take.


You ever stopped to wonder why FAs and Pilots aren’t dropping dead in droves?

Maybe because it’s safer than you think.......GASP.

The industry isn’t lying to you when they tell you how good the HEPA filters are and all the lengths the airlines go through (especially United Airlines) to clean the aircraft and keep people safe.


There have been a number of my fellow employees who have caught it and even died.
 
CriticalPoint
Posts: 1062
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 5:01 pm

Re: SQ cancelled plans for BRU, are loads that bad on EU flights?

Fri Jul 31, 2020 1:14 pm

Prost wrote:
CriticalPoint wrote:
brilondon wrote:
That's my question. Why would anyone want to fly. Even after a vaccine is found, it will not eliminate the virus, only eventually reduce the risk. A risk, I am not going to take.


You ever stopped to wonder why FAs and Pilots aren’t dropping dead in droves?

Maybe because it’s safer than you think.......GASP.

The industry isn’t lying to you when they tell you how good the HEPA filters are and all the lengths the airlines go through (especially United Airlines) to clean the aircraft and keep people safe.


There have been a number of my fellow employees who have caught it and even died.


Of course. My point is if it was this highly infected tube people seem to think it is then all aircrew would be dead and gone by now.
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 24396
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: SQ cancelled plans for BRU, are loads that bad on EU flights?

Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:54 pm

787SIN wrote:
As michael said, transiting at Changi is restricted. Believe only those travelling on SQ group airlines can at the moment.

Transit has been allowed on certain flights since beginning of June, and has been expanded slightly. But still limited. As its fairly fluid the best info is both on the Changi Airport website which and idea of what to expect when transiting the airport and SQs which details the routes transit is available on.

The uncertainty can't be prevented but it is yet another thing suppressing demand. Who wants to find themselves stuck in an unexpected way half way through a journey? Best to stay home till it's all sorted out.

CriticalPoint wrote:
My point is if it was this highly infected tube people seem to think it is then all aircrew would be dead and gone by now.

I don't think such exaggerations are helpful. It's just common sense that the more places you go and the more people you interact with, the greater your odds are of catching and spreading this highly contagious virus, so non-essential travel should be avoided.
Wake up to find out that you are the eyes of the world
The heart has its beaches, its homeland and thoughts of its own
Wake now, discover that you are the song that the morning brings
The heart has its seasons, its evenings and songs of its own
 
CriticalPoint
Posts: 1062
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 5:01 pm

Re: SQ cancelled plans for BRU, are loads that bad on EU flights?

Fri Jul 31, 2020 3:04 pm

Revelation wrote:
787SIN wrote:
As michael said, transiting at Changi is restricted. Believe only those travelling on SQ group airlines can at the moment.

Transit has been allowed on certain flights since beginning of June, and has been expanded slightly. But still limited. As its fairly fluid the best info is both on the Changi Airport website which and idea of what to expect when transiting the airport and SQs which details the routes transit is available on.

The uncertainty can't be prevented but it is yet another thing suppressing demand. Who wants to find themselves stuck in an unexpected way half way through a journey? Best to stay home till it's all sorted out.

CriticalPoint wrote:
My point is if it was this highly infected tube people seem to think it is then all aircrew would be dead and gone by now.

I don't think such exaggerations are helpful. It's just common sense that the more places you go and the more people you interact with, the greater your odds are of catching and spreading this highly contagious virus, so non-essential travel should be avoided.


All I’m saying is that simple statistics prove that being on an airplane is not going to get you sick. Iv been flying constantly since March.......commuting, Deadheading on some flights that are packed. Walking through terminals getting on busses and staying in Hotels. All aircrews have and we aren’t getting sick and those that do aren’t dying

Wouldn’t aircrews be the proverbial canaries in a coal mine?
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 24396
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

Re: SQ cancelled plans for BRU, are loads that bad on EU flights?

Fri Jul 31, 2020 3:17 pm

Revelation wrote:
CriticalPoint wrote:
My point is if it was this highly infected tube people seem to think it is then all aircrew would be dead and gone by now.

I don't think such exaggerations are helpful. It's just common sense that the more places you go and the more people you interact with, the greater your odds are of catching and spreading this highly contagious virus, so non-essential travel should be avoided.

I think we're in agreement the airlines and the airports are doing a very good job and the results reflect that. If I had to travel due to some sort of emergency situation I would. Since I do not have to travel, I don't. I have lost one friend to CV19, know of a few fatalities that may have been CV19 related (there's now a stigma around admitting it so it is often going unsaid) and know of several people who survived infection but it really pushed them to the edge. It makes no sense to put one's self at additional risk if it can be avoided.
Wake up to find out that you are the eyes of the world
The heart has its beaches, its homeland and thoughts of its own
Wake now, discover that you are the song that the morning brings
The heart has its seasons, its evenings and songs of its own
 
brilondon
Posts: 3159
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 6:56 am

Re: SQ cancelled plans for BRU, are loads that bad on EU flights?

Fri Jul 31, 2020 3:18 pm

CriticalPoint wrote:
brilondon wrote:
itisi wrote:
Are loads bad :rotfl: .... Why would anyone be flying!

That's my question. Why would anyone want to fly. Even after a vaccine is found, it will not eliminate the virus, only eventually reduce the risk. A risk, I am not going to take.


You ever stopped to wonder why FAs and Pilots aren’t dropping dead in droves?

Maybe because it’s safer than you think.......GASP.

The industry isn’t lying to you when they tell you how good the HEPA filters are and all the lengths the airlines go through (especially United Airlines) to clean the aircraft and keep people safe.
Prost wrote:
CriticalPoint wrote:
brilondon wrote:
That's my question. Why would anyone want to fly. Even after a vaccine is found, it will not eliminate the virus, only eventually reduce the risk. A risk, I am not going to take.


You ever stopped to wonder why FAs and Pilots aren’t dropping dead in droves?

Maybe because it’s safer than you think.......GASP.

The industry isn’t lying to you when they tell you how good the HEPA filters are and all the lengths the airlines go through (especially United Airlines) to clean the aircraft and keep people safe.

If you think this is a joke, by all means keep up the work you're doing. There is enough evidence to show that this is going to be two to three years before they can control this. It's not just the flu. Drinking bleach or injecting yourself with snake oil will not stop the virus from getting to you.

There have been a number of my fellow employees who have caught it and even died.
Rush forever Closer To My Heart
 
airbazar
Posts: 10168
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:12 pm

Re: SQ cancelled plans for BRU, are loads that bad on EU flights?

Fri Jul 31, 2020 4:49 pm

CriticalPoint wrote:
All I’m saying is that simple statistics prove that being on an airplane is not going to get you sick. Iv been flying constantly since March.......commuting, Deadheading on some flights that are packed. Walking through terminals getting on busses and staying in Hotels. All aircrews have and we aren’t getting sick and those that do aren’t dying

Wouldn’t aircrews be the proverbial canaries in a coal mine?

1000% agree. And we're now having the same exact hysterics around kids returning to school when data from other countries that did open schools back in May and June shows that is can be done safely and more importantly, young kinds are more likely to catch the virus at home from their parents than at school from their peers. But science seems to have taken a backseat to politics these days.
There have been countless studies over decades about airborn contagious diseases on airplanes. Manufacturers have taken those studies seriously when designing airplanes. Those are facts. Tuberculosis kills 3,000 people per day and it's been an epidemic for decades and no one ever stopped flying because of it. Chances are most of us have been inside a plane with someone carrying TB.
Long story short, I feel 10x safer now inside a plane than I do sitting in a restaurant in my city. Some will argue I shouldn't be doing either :)

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos