Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
SpectralK wrote:I suppose these will replace their 763s which are probably done at this point with one going to 5Y and another in indefinite storage since March. Though it is quite a bigger plane, the fuel efficiency and increased range should make up for that. I suppose Neos has some ability to control their demand as a leisure operator too, so they can find ways to fill those extra seats.
mooseofspruce wrote:SpectralK wrote:I suppose these will replace their 763s which are probably done at this point with one going to 5Y and another in indefinite storage since March. Though it is quite a bigger plane, the fuel efficiency and increased range should make up for that. I suppose Neos has some ability to control their demand as a leisure operator too, so they can find ways to fill those extra seats.
AirwaysMag reports the 763s were returned to lessors so yes. (https://airwaysmag.com/airlines/neos-ai ... egian-air/)
Also reports LN-LNX (Carl von Linné tailfin) and LN-LNT (UNICEF tailfin) are the 789s in question.
Someone83 wrote:mooseofspruce wrote:SpectralK wrote:I suppose these will replace their 763s which are probably done at this point with one going to 5Y and another in indefinite storage since March. Though it is quite a bigger plane, the fuel efficiency and increased range should make up for that. I suppose Neos has some ability to control their demand as a leisure operator too, so they can find ways to fill those extra seats.
AirwaysMag reports the 763s were returned to lessors so yes. (https://airwaysmag.com/airlines/neos-ai ... egian-air/)
Also reports LN-LNX (Carl von Linné tailfin) and LN-LNT (UNICEF tailfin) are the 789s in question.
Both leased from AerCap.....Norwegian's largest owner
Phosphorus wrote:Yes, this will become an important note in any transaction, involving Norwegian. Leasing company ABCD, through its partly-owned subsidiary Norwegian, has performed an XYZ transaction. Just so that the folks keep in mind, what forces are in play.
Someone83 wrote:Phosphorus wrote:Yes, this will become an important note in any transaction, involving Norwegian. Leasing company ABCD, through its partly-owned subsidiary Norwegian, has performed an XYZ transaction. Just so that the folks keep in mind, what forces are in play.
The ownership shouldn't be large enough to be defined as partly owned? Probably just falls under the "financial investment" category
Polot wrote:Someone83 wrote:Phosphorus wrote:Yes, this will become an important note in any transaction, involving Norwegian. Leasing company ABCD, through its partly-owned subsidiary Norwegian, has performed an XYZ transaction. Just so that the folks keep in mind, what forces are in play.
The ownership shouldn't be large enough to be defined as partly owned? Probably just falls under the "financial investment" category
Aercap has a ~16% stake in DY and is their largest shareholder.
BawliBooch wrote:Engine problems with Norwegian 787's resolved?
Why would Neos take on an aircraft with known issues?
bennett123 wrote:Given that the B767 being replaced first flew in 1995/1996 are they candidates for cargo conversion?.