Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
N292UX wrote:If there’s some routes out of EWR, I could see adds like EWR-SVQ/BLQ/OSL being some possibilities.
rjbesikof wrote:2) ORD-MXP (MXP would now be served from the middle of the country)..
fun2fly wrote:789 Polaris Mod N29961 looks to exit XMN Oct 16.
Boiler905 wrote:Based on clues observed and discussed...
LAX-ARN
LAX-LGW
rjbesikof wrote:N292UX wrote:If there’s some routes out of EWR, I could see adds like EWR-SVQ/BLQ/OSL being some possibilities.
AA failed with BLQ. Would UA do any better?
capitalflyer wrote:Sweden, Porto, Nice
Boiler905 wrote:Based on clues observed and discussed...
IAH-ACC/LAD (tag)
IAD-VIE
airbazar wrote:Boiler905 wrote:Based on clues observed and discussed...
IAH-ACC/LAD (tag)
IAD-VIE
ACC/LAD would make more sense from IAD or EWR.
IAD-VIE doesn't make sense. Route is served by OS which is owned by LH with whom UA has a JV.
United787 wrote:I really am hoping for:
ORD-BOG or LIM
ORD-BCN
ORD-ATH
but until the Global Terminal (T2) is built at ORD, I don't see UA having much room to add much of anything. Hopefully we will at least resume all of the pre-COVID routes.
marcogr12 wrote:United787 wrote:I really am hoping for:
ORD-BOG or LIM
ORD-BCN
ORD-ATH
but until the Global Terminal (T2) is built at ORD, I don't see UA having much room to add much of anything. Hopefully we will at least resume all of the pre-COVID routes.
ORD-ATH is an AA territory...Is there room for a 2nd player?
marcogr12 wrote:
ORD-ATH is an AA territory...Is there room for a 2nd player?
piedmontf284000 wrote:I truly believe that all the new routes will be in Europe. UA is betting on Summer 2022 being the return of transatlantic traffic, and based on what I am hearing and seeing, they will be correct.
As far as some of the guesses above, UA has already loaded all of these into the system and are available for purchase...
EWR-NCE
EWR-SNN
EWR-PRG
EWR-OPO
EWR-EDI
EWR-ARN
EWR-DBV
EWR-NAP
EWR-OSL (SAS service)
I can't remember how many are resumption of service or new service.
Irehdna wrote:marcogr12 wrote:United787 wrote:I really am hoping for:
ORD-BOG or LIM
ORD-BCN
ORD-ATH
but until the Global Terminal (T2) is built at ORD, I don't see UA having much room to add much of anything. Hopefully we will at least resume all of the pre-COVID routes.
ORD-ATH is an AA territory...Is there room for a 2nd player?
NYC-ATH has 5 daily flights. 2x DL and 1x EK/AA/UA. Obviously ORD-ATH is smaller (5x smaller?) but would not be surprised if UA could make it work especially with their hub at ORD (and dedicate EWR solely for east coast).
by738 wrote:A thistle badge presumably means something more for EDI?
rjbesikof wrote:N292UX wrote:If there’s some routes out of EWR, I could see adds like EWR-SVQ/BLQ/OSL being some possibilities.
AA failed with BLQ. Would UA do any better?
marcogr12 wrote:United787 wrote:I really am hoping for:
ORD-BOG or LIM
ORD-BCN
ORD-ATH
but until the Global Terminal (T2) is built at ORD, I don't see UA having much room to add much of anything. Hopefully we will at least resume all of the pre-COVID routes.
ORD-ATH is an AA territory...Is there room for a 2nd player?
Pi7472000 wrote:COPolynesianPub wrote:sUAisDL's post made me think of a question. Does anyone know if UA had an exception policy for stranded WN passengers for a confirmed seat or standby? Many years ago if CO did reaccommadate on WN, the CO ticket counter would issue paper checks to WN to carry displaced passengers. I have no idea if that has been done at UA.
United would be smart to accommodate to WN passengers. WN has been a mess this summer and UA can show that they are a much improved product compared to WN. Hopefully UA can attract some WN passengers to their network! DEN would be a great place to start.
Acey559 wrote:piedmontf284000 wrote:I truly believe that all the new routes will be in Europe. UA is betting on Summer 2022 being the return of transatlantic traffic, and based on what I am hearing and seeing, they will be correct.
As far as some of the guesses above, UA has already loaded all of these into the system and are available for purchase...
EWR-NCE
EWR-SNN
EWR-PRG
EWR-OPO
EWR-EDI
EWR-ARN
EWR-DBV
EWR-NAP
EWR-OSL (SAS service)
I can't remember how many are resumption of service or new service.
I believe NCE is the only new one. It was announced for summer of 2020 but never happened. I believe EWR-PMO was another route in that same boat.
JannEejit wrote:Cryptic clues ? A still I grabbed from the United teaser video.
Screenshot_20211013-134217~3 by [url=https://www.flickr.com/photos/153220517@N03/]JannEejit/url], on Flickr
jhsusman wrote:United is getting 20+ new gates in Denver early in 2022 and many are widebody / international capable - got to figure that they will make a splash. . .
CALMSP wrote:jhsusman wrote:United is getting 20+ new gates in Denver early in 2022 and many are widebody / international capable - got to figure that they will make a splash. . .
to be exact, 23 NB or 16 NB on the south side and 5 WB on the north side.
Nicknuzzii wrote:portola2727 wrote:Please god, please let it be LAX-FRA and LAX-TLV.
Agreed. LAX-TLV would be a huge market for UA and I can’t believe they haven’t jumped into it yet.
portola2727 wrote:CALMSP wrote:jhsusman wrote:United is getting 20+ new gates in Denver early in 2022 and many are widebody / international capable - got to figure that they will make a splash. . .
to be exact, 23 NB or 16 NB on the south side and 5 WB on the north side.
That logic means that LAX could also get a splurge since we got the MSC and maybe a huge expansion later down the line when T9 comes online(Which is all but certain right now). The only thing that is needed at this point is approval from the city of LA and my home airport gets an awesome expansion.
STT757 wrote:United held a media event tonight in Manhattan. There’s a lid on the reporting until tomorrow’s reveal, sounds more than just restoring seasonal routes from last Summer.
CALMSP wrote:jhsusman wrote:United is getting 20+ new gates in Denver early in 2022 and many are widebody / international capable - got to figure that they will make a splash. . .
to be exact, 23 NB or 16 NB on the south side and 5 WB on the north side.
piedmontf284000 wrote:I truly believe that all the new routes will be in Europe. UA is betting on Summer 2022 being the return of transatlantic traffic, and based on what I am hearing and seeing, they will be correct.
As far as some of the guesses above, UA has already loaded all of these into the system and are available for purchase...
EWR-NCE
EWR-SNN
EWR-PRG
EWR-OPO
EWR-EDI
EWR-ARN
EWR-DBV
EWR-NAP
EWR-OSL (SAS service)
I can't remember how many are resumption of service or new service.
FlyingElvii wrote:piedmontf284000 wrote:I truly believe that all the new routes will be in Europe. UA is betting on Summer 2022 being the return of transatlantic traffic, and based on what I am hearing and seeing, they will be correct.
As far as some of the guesses above, UA has already loaded all of these into the system and are available for purchase...
EWR-NCE
EWR-SNN
EWR-PRG
EWR-OPO
EWR-EDI
EWR-ARN
EWR-DBV
EWR-NAP
EWR-OSL (SAS service)
I can't remember how many are resumption of service or new service.
Are some of these being run on the MAX?
rjbesikof wrote:On a potential LAX-MUC/FRA, Does LAX T7 now have space to acommodate a widebody European arrival/departure since PVG and LHR (the 2 main UA intl flights that ran in the afternoon) are not operating.