Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Chipmunk1973 wrote:[photoid][/photoid]qf789 wrote:VH-OQB departed DRS a short time ago and on her way home to SYD
https://www.flightradar24.com/QFA6023/29c989fc
Interesting route for the flight. I’m assuming there are lots of head winds?
Cheers.
RyanairGuru wrote:Chipmunk1973 wrote:[photoid][/photoid]qf789 wrote:VH-OQB departed DRS a short time ago and on her way home to SYD
https://www.flightradar24.com/QFA6023/29c989fc
Interesting route for the flight. I’m assuming there are lots of head winds?
Cheers.
Other than passing slightly further north to avoid Kazakhstan (can’t explain why that would be?) it is basically following the great circle route.
Don’t forget that the world isn’t flat. A straight line between Europe and Australia, over the Middle East and to the south of India is NOT the most direct route. While not a huge difference, SYD-DXB-HKG is about 3.5% longer than SYD-HKG-LHR.
NZ516 wrote:Here is a really positive story about Newcastle airport which is finally receiving a lot of love from Qantas. The city has been neglected for a very long time which is unusual as it's catchment population is 1.1 million so it's fairly huge. Will they offer the city a service to Perth next I wonder?
https://simpleflying.com/qantas-flights ... -adelaide/
Sydney Airport board agrees to $23.6bn buyout deal with international consortium
The consortium, named Sydney Aviation Alliance...
Among the members of the consortium ... include IFM's Australian Infrastructure Fund and Global Infrastructure Fund as well as AustralianSuper, QSuper and Global Infrastructure Partners.
Thatcher wrote:NZ516 wrote:Here is a really positive story about Newcastle airport which is finally receiving a lot of love from Qantas. The city has been neglected for a very long time which is unusual as it's catchment population is 1.1 million so it's fairly huge. Will they offer the city a service to Perth next I wonder?
https://simpleflying.com/qantas-flights ... -adelaide/
I'm wondering whether QF's sudden / belated love of NTL might be Bonza related? Hunter Valley wineries, Port Stephens, Stockton Beach, Gloucester / Barrington Tops, Myall Lakes, and Newcastle's own attractive riverside precinct and city beaches - seems to tick some of the Bonza neglected region boxes.
The NTL runway is to be widened / strengthened too, announced in May 2021 (2023 scheduled completion), allowing it to take widebodies as large as 777.
https://infrastructuremagazine.com.au/2021/05/10/66-million-for-newcastle-airport-runway-upgrade/
Isn't the Bonza CEO / Founder from Coffs Harbour? Just up the road from Newcastle, really.
NZ516 wrote:Thatcher wrote:NZ516 wrote:Here is a really positive story about Newcastle airport which is finally receiving a lot of love from Qantas. The city has been neglected for a very long time which is unusual as it's catchment population is 1.1 million so it's fairly huge. Will they offer the city a service to Perth next I wonder?
https://simpleflying.com/qantas-flights ... -adelaide/
I'm wondering whether QF's sudden / belated love of NTL might be Bonza related? Hunter Valley wineries, Port Stephens, Stockton Beach, Gloucester / Barrington Tops, Myall Lakes, and Newcastle's own attractive riverside precinct and city beaches - seems to tick some of the Bonza neglected region boxes.
The NTL runway is to be widened / strengthened too, announced in May 2021 (2023 scheduled completion), allowing it to take widebodies as large as 777.
https://infrastructuremagazine.com.au/2021/05/10/66-million-for-newcastle-airport-runway-upgrade/
Isn't the Bonza CEO / Founder from Coffs Harbour? Just up the road from Newcastle, really.
Could well be related they would certainly have the inside knowledge of what they might launch first market reports etc.
smi0006 wrote:I also would say tourism bodies and airports are throwing a lot of money around to attract airlines and services atm - QF is lucky the 717 and E-90 are perfect for theses routes (as an A220 would be) I wouldn’t say NTL was neglected, but it was a JQ stronghold at one point.
Hopefully as we’ve seen a significant amount of migration to the regions through covid we see these services stick around for the long haul!
qf2048 wrote:If QF goes with 737 Max, E190's for their domestic fleet replacement do you think Embraer might throw in a good deal on those new Turbo props with the rear mounted engines? The Dash series will need replacing at some point.
jrfspa320 wrote:qf2048 wrote:If QF goes with 737 Max, E190's for their domestic fleet replacement do you think Embraer might throw in a good deal on those new Turbo props with the rear mounted engines? The Dash series will need replacing at some point.
It doesn't look like it will be ready until at least 2040 - the Dash will need replacing before then.
qf789 wrote:The next ex Mi 738 heading for VA is 9V-MGG is currently positioning to BNE
http://flightaware.com/live/flight/SIA8 ... /WSSS/YBBN
NZ516 wrote:jrfspa320 wrote:qf2048 wrote:If QF goes with 737 Max, E190's for their domestic fleet replacement do you think Embraer might throw in a good deal on those new Turbo props with the rear mounted engines? The Dash series will need replacing at some point.
It doesn't look like it will be ready until at least 2040 - the Dash will need replacing before then.
Wow that is a long time away to be ready 18 more years!
tristans wrote:qf789 wrote:The next ex Mi 738 heading for VA is 9V-MGG is currently positioning to BNE
http://flightaware.com/live/flight/SIA8 ... /WSSS/YBBN
Meanwhile IWQ is back in TSV, paint job not up to scratch I wonder....
BNEFlyer wrote:tristans wrote:qf789 wrote:The next ex Mi 738 heading for VA is 9V-MGG is currently positioning to BNE
http://flightaware.com/live/flight/SIA8 ... /WSSS/YBBN
Meanwhile IWQ is back in TSV, paint job not up to scratch I wonder....
Speaking of the ex-MI 737's, VA posted a TikTok this morning of either IJQ or IWQ having the new 737 MAX seats installed.
Kent350787 wrote:BNEFlyer wrote:tristans wrote:
Meanwhile IWQ is back in TSV, paint job not up to scratch I wonder....
Speaking of the ex-MI 737's, VA posted a TikTok this morning of either IJQ or IWQ having the new 737 MAX seats installed.
The comment does mention its a prototype, so perhaps it will eneter servcie with older while they're waiting?
qf789 wrote:More on VA new seats, will only be on 2 737’s for now, VA seeking feedback on new seats before considering rolling out onto other aircraft, overall it looks good
https://twitter.com/exec_traveller/stat ... 08353?s=21
qf789 wrote:Sharp says Bonza won’t take off, is that code for he doesn’t want them to take off as if Bonza is s threat to anyone it will be REX
https://twitter.com/airlinegossip/statu ... 55392?s=21
zkncj wrote:qf789 wrote:More on VA new seats, will only be on 2 737’s for now, VA seeking feedback on new seats before considering rolling out onto other aircraft, overall it looks good
https://twitter.com/exec_traveller/stat ... 08353?s=21
Just no more half wall between Y/J, even though it was an small wall. It at least made it feel an bit more exclusive from Y.
qf789 wrote:More on VA new seats, will only be on 2 737’s for now, VA seeking feedback on new seats before considering rolling out onto other aircraft, overall it looks good
https://twitter.com/exec_traveller/stat ... 08353?s=21
qf789 wrote:It is being reported that a travel bubble between Australia and South Korea and also Japan could be announced by the end of the year, could we see QF return to ICN if the bubble is confirmed?
https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/health-w ... -c-4516403
RyanairGuru wrote:
Other than passing slightly further north to avoid Kazakhstan (can’t explain why that would be?) it is basically following the great circle route.
Don’t forget that the world isn’t flat. A straight line between Europe and Australia, over the Middle East and to the south of India is NOT the most direct route. While not a huge difference, SYD-DXB-HKG is about 3.5% longer than SYD-HKG-LHR.
tristans wrote:A bit more of a '3D' look at the route:
https://twitter.com/Keg767/status/14576 ... 19106?s=20
moa999 wrote:There are a small number of global manufacturers who have base products and can tweak design, material and options for each layout.
Eg. Qantas's Business Suite on the refurbed 380s, 787s and 330s is the Thompson Aero Vantage XL, variations of which (even including sliding doors) are used on a bunch of airlines.
VAs new Business class seems to be the Collins MIQ that American also uses.
https://www.collinsaerospace.com/what-w ... -class/miq
Others include Zodiac, BE Aerospace and Cirrus
qf789 wrote:It is being reported that a travel bubble between Australia and South Korea and also Japan could be announced by the end of the year, could we see QF return to ICN if the bubble is confirmed?
https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/health-w ... -c-4516403
anstar wrote:qf789 wrote:It is being reported that a travel bubble between Australia and South Korea and also Japan could be announced by the end of the year, could we see QF return to ICN if the bubble is confirmed?
https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/health-w ... -c-4516403
More likely to see JQ reinstate their OOL-ICN service?
Chipmunk1973 wrote:RyanairGuru wrote:
Other than passing slightly further north to avoid Kazakhstan (can’t explain why that would be?) it is basically following the great circle route.
Don’t forget that the world isn’t flat. A straight line between Europe and Australia, over the Middle East and to the south of India is NOT the most direct route. While not a huge difference, SYD-DXB-HKG is about 3.5% longer than SYD-HKG-LHR.tristans wrote:A bit more of a '3D' look at the route:
https://twitter.com/Keg767/status/14576 ... 19106?s=20
Thank you both for sharing that, it explains a lot. It’s not always easy, for me at least, to see a line on a map and try and think of that in a spherical sense.
Much appreciated and cheers.
PS. I don’t believe in a flat world either
RyanairGuru wrote:anstar wrote:qf789 wrote:It is being reported that a travel bubble between Australia and South Korea and also Japan could be announced by the end of the year, could we see QF return to ICN if the bubble is confirmed?
https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/health-w ... -c-4516403
More likely to see JQ reinstate their OOL-ICN service?
How much inbound tourism are we likely to see on the short term? I suspect not much for the first six months or so, due to lingering uncertainty etc. I suspect that the biggest beneficiary of a ‘travel bubble’ will be VFR initially, and then international students a bit later. I therefore suspect that the only initial focus will be SYD followed by BNE/MEL (can someone please remind me, does Brisbane have a larger Korean population than Melbourne?)
kriskim wrote:RyanairGuru wrote:anstar wrote:
More likely to see JQ reinstate their OOL-ICN service?
How much inbound tourism are we likely to see on the short term? I suspect not much for the first six months or so, due to lingering uncertainty etc. I suspect that the biggest beneficiary of a ‘travel bubble’ will be VFR initially, and then international students a bit later. I therefore suspect that the only initial focus will be SYD followed by BNE/MEL (can someone please remind me, does Brisbane have a larger Korean population than Melbourne?)
Brisbane has a larger Korean diaspora population than Melbourne. But Melbourne had quite a sizeable student population pre-covid.
BNE would probably come back with KE at some point where it had a year round service, MEL only had a seasonal summer service with OZ which just kicked off. There was quite a few repatriation flights with both OZ and KE out of MEL in 2020, I’m not sure if the same can be said from BNE.
With OZ merging with KE, will be interesting to see if QF will take this chance to launch SYD-ICN. Not sure if KE would be keen to relaunch MEL, a route it dropped in 2013, I would have thought JQ would have jumped at the chance but instead choose OOL instead.
IndianicWorld wrote:
It’s going to be very interesting to see what routes return and any ew routes commence. It’s a hard one to read at the moment, but one thing is for sure, most of the focus has tended to be on SYD. It’s a throwback to decades ago before MEL and BNE continued to strengthen their positions.
IndianicWorld wrote:
Really not sure exactly why JQ went with OOL for the ICN route, but it likely had a focus on the inbound market that they were looking to tap into.
smi0006 wrote:zkncj wrote:qf789 wrote:More on VA new seats, will only be on 2 737’s for now, VA seeking feedback on new seats before considering rolling out onto other aircraft, overall it looks good
https://twitter.com/exec_traveller/stat ... 08353?s=21
Just no more half wall between Y/J, even though it was an small wall. It at least made it feel an bit more exclusive from Y.
New J seat looks great, don’t mind the hard shell back especially if it gives the impression of more space and storage, leg rest is a nice feature. But I think for J and transcon, in seat entertainment would be expected. And as UA have said, pax may not use the IFE but simply having it in the seat raised customer experience scores across all areas.
I agree - I like a proper cabin divider between cabins, regardless of where I’m sitting. I think VA rope currently is naff, and stupid a full curtain just looks more sensible!
SenFinn wrote:Have been checking business class return fares SYD to LA in December and the prices are interesting:
United $9k
Delta $11k
Qantas $16k
I’m thinking QF has underestimated demand or they’re just making hay.
FL420FT wrote:With the projected flight schedule, it's underestimated demand.
RyanairGuru wrote:Delta and United have clearly found a market moving cargo through the pandemic, so it isn’t an appeals-to-apples comparison, but when United are flying double daily 77Ws while Qantas are three-weekly 787s, Qantas have really screwed themselves with their lethargic return to service. There’s no excuse for not having 10 787s ready to go, and all the A330s should be free as well as they are doing bugger all Perth flying.
EK413 wrote:RyanairGuru wrote:Delta and United have clearly found a market moving cargo through the pandemic, so it isn’t an appeals-to-apples comparison, but when United are flying double daily 77Ws while Qantas are three-weekly 787s, Qantas have really screwed themselves with their lethargic return to service. There’s no excuse for not having 10 787s ready to go, and all the A330s should be free as well as they are doing bugger all Perth flying.
Haven’t QF brought forward or attempting to bring forward the delivery of the 3 x B789’s parked at VCV?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk